Australian public universities: are they practising a corporate approach to governance?

References

• Aguilera, R.V., I. Filatotchev, H. Gospel, and G. Jackson (2008). Costs, contingencies, and complementarities in corporate governance models. Organization Science, 19, 3475–94. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berle, A., and G. Means (1932). The modern corporation and private property, New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, J. (2009). Academic pedagogies, quality logics and performative universities: Evaluating teaching and what students want. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 8857–72. doi: 10.1080/03075070902898664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher, J. (2010). Corporate governance – a multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 21, 683–95. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.05.002
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, T. (2005). Accounting for Enron: Shareholder value and stakeholder interests. Corporate Governance, 13, 598–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00454.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, H., and L. Goedegebuure (2010). The real academic revolution. Why we need to reconceptualise Australia's future academic workforce and eight possible strategies for how to go about this, Melbourne: LH Martin Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, H., I. Dobson, T. Friedman, L. Goedegebuure, and L. Meek (2009). The attractiveness of the Australian academic profession: A comparative analysis, Melbourne: LH Martin Institute for Higher Education Leadership and Management.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Daily, C.M., and D.R. Dalton (1994). Bankruptcy and corporate governance: The impact of board composition and structure. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1603–17. doi: 10.2307/256801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J.H., F.D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, J.S. (1988). Higher education: A policy statement, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R. (2004). The knowledge worker, the manager-academic and the contemporary UK university: New and old forms of public management. Financial Accountability and Management, 20, 2107–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00189.x
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., and J.H. Davis (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management Review, 16, 149–64. doi: 10.1177/031289629101600103
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, T., and L.E. Preston (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 165–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatotchev, I. (2008). Developing an organizational theory of corporate governance: Comments on Henry L. Tosi, Jr. (2008). Quo Vadis? Suggestions for future corporate governance research. Journal of Management Governance, 12, 171–78. doi: 10.1007/s10997-008-9055-8
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, E. (1994). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., and R. Neumann (2007). Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities: The establishment of a performance driven system for Australian higher education. Public Management Review, 9, 12231–52. doi: 10.1080/14719030701340390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A.J., A.A. Canella, and R.L. Paetzold (2000). The resource dependency role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composite in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37, 2235–55. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Internal Auditors (2002). Recommendations for improving corporate governance. IIA Professional Guidance. Internal Auditor, June: 68
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M., and W. Meckling (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–60. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marginson, S., and M. Considine (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., and A.M. Huberman (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook 2, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L. (2011). University corporatization: Driving redefinition. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 434–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.11.002
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18, 349–64. doi: 10.2307/2391668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S., J. Guthrie, and R. Neumann (2008). The case of Australian higher education: Performance, markets and government control. In C. Mazza, P. Quattrone, and A. Riccaboni (Eds.), European universities in transition: Issues, models and cases, 171–87.London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tilling, M.V. (2002). The dialectic of the university in times of revolution – echoes of the industrial revolution?. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13, 555–74. doi: 10.1006/cpac.2001.0556
   Google Scholar
• Vidovich, L., and J. Currie (2011). Governance and trust in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 36, 143–56. doi: 10.1080/03075070903469580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research, design, and methods 3, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S., and V. Thyil (2008). A holistic model of corporate governance: A new research framework. Corporate Governance, 8, 194–108. doi: 10.1108/14720700810853437
   Google Scholar