Benchmarking universities' efficiency indicators in the presence of internal heterogeneity

References

• Agasisti, T., M. Arnaboldi, and G. Azzone 2008. Strategic management accounting in universities: The Italian experience. Higher Education 55, no. 1: 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10734-006-9032-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agasisti, T., and A. Dal Bianco 2006. Data envelopment analysis of the Italian university system: Theoretical issues and policy implications. International Journal of Business Performance Management 8, no. 4: 344–67. doi: 10.1504/IJBPM.2006.009613
   Google Scholar
• Agasisti, T, A. Dal Bianco, P. Landoni, A. Sala, and M. Salerno 2011. Evaluating the efficiency of research in academic departments: An empirical analysis in an Italian region. Higher Education Quarterly 65, no. 3: 267–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00489.x
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, A, G. Neave, C. Musselin, and P. Maassen 2009. Bologna, universities and bureaucrats. European integration and the governance of higher education and research. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaboldi, M, and G. Azzone 2004. Benchmarking university activities: An Italian case study. Financial Accountability & Management 20, no. 2: 205–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.2004.00193.x
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, J.E. 1990. Comparing university departments. Omega International Journal of Management Science 18, no. 2: 171–83. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(90)90064-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley, J.E. 1995. Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society 46, no. 4: 441–52. doi: 10.1057/jors.1995.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, A, and C. Daraio 2007. Universities and strategic knowledge creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, D, C. Daraio, and L. Simar 2006. Advanced indicators of productivity of universities. An application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics 66, no. 2: 389–410. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0028-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, J, and T. Shan 2000. Managing quality in higher education: An international perspective on institutional assessment and change. Buckingham: OECD, SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G 2011. Introduzione: strutture di base e processi decisionali nelle università europee. Tra didattica e ricerca: quale assetto organizzativo per le Università Italiane? Le lezioni dell'analisi comparata, 9–20. Rome: Fondazione CRUI.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A, W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, no. 6: 429–44. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P, M.G. Uranga, and G. Etxebarria 1997. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organizational dimensions. Research Policy 26, 475–91. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, J.C., G. McCallion, D.G. McKillop, S. Rasaratnam, and K.S. Stringer 2006. Implications of variant efficiency measures for policy evaluations in UK higher education. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 40, no. 1: 119–42. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2004.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J, and R. Neumann 2007. Economic and non-financial performance indicators in universities. Public Management Review 9, no. 2: 231–52. doi: 10.1080/14719030701340390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnes, J 2006. Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review 25, no. 3: 273–88. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnes, G, and J. Johnes 1993. Measuring the research performance of UK Economics departments: An application of data envelopment analysis. Oxford Economic Papers 45, no. 2: 332–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnes, J, G. Johnes, and E. Thanassoulis 2008. An analysis of costs in institutions of higher education in England. Studies in Higher Education 33, no. 5: 527–49. doi: 10.1080/03075070802372901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koksal, G, and B. Nalcaci 2006. The relative efficiency of departments at a Turkish engineering college: A data envelopment analysis. Higher Education 51, no. 1: 173–289. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6380-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krücken, G 2011. A European perspective on new modes of university governance and actorhood. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.17.11, University of California, Berkeley, December 2011
   Google Scholar
• Krücken, G, and F. Meier 2006. Turning the university into an organizational actor. In Globalization and organization. ed. G.S. Drori, J.W. Meyer, and H. Hwang. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner, C, and M. Dowling 1999. The evolution of industrial districts and regional networks: The case of the biotechnology region Munich/Martinsried. Journal of Management and Governance 3, 309–38. doi: 10.1023/A:1009928810007
   Google Scholar
• Madden, G, S. Savage, and S. Kemp 1997. Measuring public sector efficiency: A study of economics departments at Australian universities. Education Economics 5, no. 2: 153–67. doi: 10.1080/09645299700000013
   Google Scholar
• Moguérou, P 2005. Doctoral and postdoctoral education in science and engineering: Europe in the internalization competition. European Journal of Education 40, no. 4: 367–92. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2005.00234.x
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, A, and R. Tadepali 2002. Assessing academic department efficiency at a public university. Managerial and Decision Economics 23, no. 7: 385–97. doi: 10.1002/mde.1075
   Google Scholar
• Organisational for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2002. Frascati manual. Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M.E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thursby, J.G. 2000. What do we say about ourselves and what does it mean? Yet another look at Economics department research. Journal of Economic Literature 38, no. 2: 383–404. doi: 10.1257/jel.38.2.383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, C, and R. Green 1988. An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financial Accountability and Management 4, no. 2: 147–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.1988.tb00066.x
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K 2002. Student mobility between and towards OECD countries in 2001: A comparative analysis. International mobility of the highly skilled, 39–67. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D 2005. Benchmarking in universities: League tables revisited. Oxford Review of Education 31, no. 3: 353–71. doi: 10.1080/03054980500221975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilalta, J 2001. University policy and coordination systems between governments and universities: The experience of the Catalan university system. Tertiary Education and Management 7, 9–22. doi: 10.1080/13583883.2001.9967036
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, R 2008. The university in the market, 23–37. London: Portland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J 2003. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar