Impairment effects as a career boundary: a case study of disabled academics

References

• Acker, J. 1983. Women, the other academics. Women's Studies International Forum, 6, no. 2: 191–201. doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(83)90010-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. 1992. Cryptonormativism and double gestures: The politics of post-structuralism. Cultural Critique, 21: 63–95. doi: 10.2307/1354117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L. 2008. Younger academics' constructions of ‘authenticity’, ‘success’ and professional identity. Studies in Higher Education, 33, no. 4: 385–403. doi: 10.1080/03075070802211729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur, M., and D. Rousseau eds. 1996. The boundaryless career. A new employment principle for a new organizational era, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. 2008. Our stake in struggle (or is resistance something only others do?). Management Communication Quarterly, 21, no. 3: 380–86. doi: 10.1177/0893318907310939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, M., S. Bloxham, and L. Pearce 2010. Examining the tension between academic standards and inclusion for disabled students: The impact on marking of individual academics' frameworks for assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 35, no. 2: 209–23. doi: 10.1080/03075070903062864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association of University Teachers 2001. The employment and earnings of UK academic staff with disabilities. London: AUT. http://www.ucu.org.uk/media/pdf/disabilityemployment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bagdadli, S., L. Solari, A. Usai, and A. Grandori 2003. The emergence of career boundaries in unbounded industries: Career odysseys in the Italian new economy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, no. 5: 788–808. doi: 10.1080/0958519032000080802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barley, S., and G. Kunda 2001. Bringing work back. Organization Science. 12, no. 1: 76–95.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., and G. Mercer 2005. Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment & Society, 19, no. 3: 527–45. doi: 10.1177/0950017005055669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., and D. Hall 2004a. Preface for the JVB special issue on careers in academia. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, no. 2: 237–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2002.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., and D. Hall 2004b. The academic career: A model for future careers in other sectors?. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, no. 2: 241–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2002.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begum, N. 1992. Disabled women and a feminist agenda. Feminist Review, 40: 70–84. doi: 10.1057/fr.1992.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaxter, L., C. Hughes, and M. Tight 1998. The academic career handbook, Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brill, C. 2010. Equality in higher education: Statistical report 2010, London: Equality Challenge Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Brooklyn Derr, C., and J. Briscoe 2007. The catalytic 1970s: Lessons for the 2000s. Handbook of career studies, 528–41. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. 2009. Contours of ableism. The production of disability and abledness, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, S. 1995. Ambiguous empowerment: The work narratives of women superintendents, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chell, E. 1998. Critical incident technique. In Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide, ed. G. Symon, and C. Cassell, 51–72. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chia, R. 1995. From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16, no. 4: 579–604. doi: 10.1177/017084069501600406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, C. 1991. In the way of women. Men's resistance to sex equality in organizations, London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., J. Duberley, and M. Mallon 2004. Social constructionism in the study of career: Accessing the parts that other approaches cannot reach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, no. 3: 407–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., and M. Mallon 1999. The transition from organisational employment to portfolio working: Perceptions of ‘boundarylessness’. Work, Employment & Society, 13, no. 2: 329–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corker, M. 1999a. Differences, conflations and foundations: The limit to ‘accurate’ theoretical representation of disabled people's experience?. Disability & Society, 14, no. 5: 627–42. doi: 10.1080/09687599925984
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corker, M. 1999b. New disability discourse, the principle of optimization and social change. In Disability discourse, ed. M. Corker, and S. French, 192–210. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M. 2000. The UK Disability Discrimination Act: Disabling language, justifying inequitable social participation. In Americans with disabilities: Exploring implications of the law for individuals and institutions, ed. L. Pickering Francis, and A. Silvers, 357–70. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, M., and T. Shakespeare 2002. In Disability/post modernity: Embodying disability theory, ed. M. Corker, and T. Shakespeare, London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, L. 1996. Including all of our lives: Renewing the social model of disability. In Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability, ed. J. Morris, 206–22. London: Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, K. 2001. Anatomising embodiment and organization theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, K. 2005. Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12, no. 5: 649–78. doi: 10.1177/1350508405055940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dany, F., M. Mallon, and M. Arthur 2003. The odyssey of career and the opportunity for international comparison. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, no. 5: 705–12. doi: 10.1080/0958519032000080758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, M.J. 2000. Counting steps: The phenomenology of walking with variable mobility. Disability Studies Quarterly, 20, no. 3: 271–80.
   Google Scholar
• DeFillippi, R., and M. Arthur 1996. Boundaryless contexts and careers: A competency- based perspective. In The boundaryless career. A new employment principle for a new organizational era, ed. M. Arthur, and D. Rousseau, 116–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, S., and L. Bailyn 2000. Careers as life path: Tracing work and life strategies of biotech professionals. In Career frontiers. New conceptions of working lives, ed. M. Peiperl, M. Arthur, R. Goffee, and T. Morris, 177–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. 2005. Using narrative in social research. Qualitative and quantitative approaches, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, P. 2007. Experiential knowledge challenges ‘normality’ and individualized citizenship: Towards ‘another way of being’. Disability & Society, 22, no. 3: 283–98. doi: 10.1080/09687590701259591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, D. 2007. Legal obligation or personal lottery? Employee experiences of disability and the negotiation of adjustments in the public sector workplace. Work, Employment & Society, 21, no. 1: 67–84. doi: 10.1177/0950017007073616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M. 2011. The sublime object of desire (for knowledge): Sexuality at work in business and management schools in England. British Journal of Management, 22, no. 1: 42–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00716.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, S. 1993. Disability, impairment or something in between?. In Disabling barriers – enabling environments, ed. J. Swain, V. Finklestein, S. French, and M. Oliver, 17–25. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• French, S. 2001. Disabled people and employment. A study of the working lives of visually impaired physiotherapists, Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gersick, C., J. Bartunek, and J. Dutton 2000. Learning from academia: The importance of relationships in professional life. Academy of Management Journal, 43, no. 6: 1026–44. doi: 10.2307/1556333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. 2001. Researching social life, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, G. 2003. Rediscovering place: experiences of a quadriplegic anthropologist. The Canadian Geographer, 47, no. 4: 467–479. doi: 10.1111/j.0008-3658.2003.00036.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, J. 2007. ‘Managing’ disability: Early experiences of university students with disabilities. Disability & Society, 22, no. 1: 35–48. doi: 10.1080/09687590601056204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. 2009. Narratives of disability and the movement from deficiency to difference. Cultural Sociology, 3, no. 2: 317–32. doi: 10.1177/1749975509105537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunz, H., M. Evans, and M. Jalland 2000. Career boundaries in a ‘boundaryless’ world. In Career frontiers. New conceptions of working lives, ed. M. Peiperl, M. Arthur, R. Goffee, and T. Morris, 24–53. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunz, H., M. Peiperl, and D. Tzabbar 2007. Boundaries in the study of career. In Handbook of career studies, ed. H. Gunz, and M. Peiperl, 471–94. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Harlan, S., and P. Robert 1998. The social construction of disability in organizations: Why employers resist reasonable accommodation. Work and Occupations, 25, no. 4: 397–435. doi: 10.1177/0730888498025004002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassard, J., R. Holliday, and H. Willmott 2000. Introduction: The body in organization. Body and organization, 1–14. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hassard, J., J. Morris, and L. McCann 2012. ‘My brilliant career’? New organizational forms and changing managerial careers in Japan, the UK, and US. Journal of Management Studies, 49, no. 3: 571–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01032.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heracleous, L. 2004. Boundaries in the study of organization. Human Relations, 57, no. 1: 95–103. doi: 10.1177/0018726704042716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, V. 2001. The construction of academic time: Sub/contracting academic labour in research. Journal of Education Policy, 16, no. 1: 67–84. doi: 10.1080/02680930010009831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, J., and A. Pilnick 2007. Knowing bodies at work: Embodiment and ephemeral teamwork in anaesthesia. Organization Studies, 28, no. 9: 1395–1416. doi: 10.1177/0170840607068258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N., and J. Paulson 2012. Bodies in narratives of doctoral students' learning and experience. Studies in Higher Education, 37, no. 6: 667–81. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.537320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2002. Bauman's strangers: Impairment and the invalidation of disabled people in modern and post-modern cultures. Disability & Society, 17, no. 5: 571–84. doi: 10.1080/09687590220148531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. 2007. Being disabled: Towards a critical social ontology for disability studies. Disability & Society, 22, no. 7: 673–84. doi: 10.1080/09687590701659527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkson, K., H. Gunz, S. Ganesh, and J. Roper 2012. Boundaryless careers: Bringing back boundaries. Organization Studies, 33, no. 3: 323–40. doi: 10.1177/0170840611435600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaulisch, M., and J. Enders 2005. Careers in overlapping institutional contexts: The case of academe. Career Development International, 10, no. 2: 130–44. doi: 10.1108/13620430510588329
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, A. 1992. Learning together apart. In Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden papers, ed. A. Kaye, 1–24. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• King, Z. 2001. Career self-management: A framework for guidance of employed adults. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 21, no. 1: 65–78. doi: 10.1080/03069880020019365
   Google Scholar
• King, Z., S. Burke, and J. Pemberton 2005. The ‘bounded’ career: An empirical study of human capital, career mobility and employment outcomes in a mediated labour market. Human Relations, 58, no. 8: 981–1007. doi: 10.1177/0018726705058500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinman, G., and F. Jones 2004. Working to the limit, London: Association of University Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., and V. Molnár 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 167–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley, A. 1999. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24, no. 4: 691–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsdale, S. 1990. Women and disability, London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, H. 2008. Disclosure and support issues for disabled staff in higher education. Report 2008. London: Equality Challenge Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Mankin, D. 2007. The implications for HRD strategy, policy and practice of knowledge sharing processes in academic communities. In Eighth International Conference on HRD Research and Practice across Europe, Oxford:
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, D., and J. Case 2010. Rethinking ‘disadvantage’ in higher education: a paradigmatic case study using narrative analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 35, no. 5: 491–504. doi: 10.1080/03075070903518386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N., and A. Doucet 1998. Reflections on a voice-centred relational method: Analysing maternal and domestic voices. In Feminist dilemmas in qualitative research: Public knowledge and private lives, ed. J. Ribbens, and R. Edwards, 119–46. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, J. 1996. Encounters with strangers: Feminism and disability, London: The Women's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1983. Social work with disabled people, Basingstoke: MacMillans.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1986. Social policy and disability: Some theoretical issues. Disability & Society, 1, no. 1: 5–17. doi: 10.1080/02674648666780021
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The politics of disablement, Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overboe, J. 1999. Difference in itself: Validating disabled people's lived experience. Body & Society, 5, no. 4: 17–29. doi: 10.1177/1357034X99005004002
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. 1995. Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In Life history and narrative, ed. J. Amos Hatch, and R. Wisniewski, 5–23. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, P., C. D'Abate, and A. Prasad 2007. Organizational challenges at the periphery: Career issues for the socially marginalized. In Handbook of career studies, ed. H. Gunz, and M. Peiperl, 169–87. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pringle, J., and M. Mallon 2003. Challenges for the boundaryless career odyssey. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, no. 5: 839–53. doi: 10.1080/0958519032000080839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. 1986. Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In Writing culture. The poetics and politics of ethnography, ed. J. Clifford, and G. Marcus, 234–61. Berkely: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R., and D. Guest 2010. Have careers become boundaryless?. Human Relations, 63, no. 8: 1157–75. doi: 10.1177/0018726709354344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulstone, A. 1998. Enabling technology. Disabled people, work and new technology (Disability, human rights and society), Buckinhgam: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roulstone, A., L. Gradwell, J. Price, and L. Child 2003. Thriving and surviving at work. Disabled people's employment strategies, Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, J., E.A. Draffan, and M. Wald 2010. Digital agility and digital decision-making: conceptualising digital inclusion in the context of disabled learners in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 35, no. 4: 445–461. doi: 10.1080/03075070903131628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, S. 2005. Career success of disabled high-flyers, London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S. 2006. Sharing the world: The researcher and the researched. Qualitative Research, 6, no. 2: 207–20. doi: 10.1177/1468794106062710
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability rights and wrongs, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., and J. Corbin 1998. Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strike, T., and J. Taylor 2009. The career perceptions of academic staff and human resource discourses in English higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 63, no. 2: 177–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00404.x
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. 1999. The changing nature of careers: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 25, no. 3: 457–84. doi: 10.1177/014920639902500308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tams, S., and M. Arthur 2010. New directions for boundaryless careers: Agency and interdependence in a changing world. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, no. 5: 629–46. doi: 10.1002/job.712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 1999. Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability, Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2001. Feminism and disability: The theoretical and political significance of the personal and the experiential. In Disability, politics and the struggle for change, ed. L. Barton, 48–58. London: David Fulton.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2004. Developing the social relational in the social model of disability: A theoretical agenda. In Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research, ed. C. Barnes, and G. Mercer, 32–47. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. 2007. Sociologies of disability and illness. Contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. 2001. Qualitative research interviewing, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., and S. Mavin 2012. Disability as constructed difference: A literature review and research agenda for management and organization studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, no. 2: 159–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar