Excellence in university academic staff evaluation: a problematic reality?

References

• Ahlqvist, V., J. Andersson, C. Hahnberg, C. Kolm, L. Söderqvist, and J. Tumpane. 2013. Observations on Gender Equality in a Selection of the Swedish Research Council's Evaluation Panels. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet. Accessed October, 30, 2013. http://www.vr.se/download/18.49e6aaba13ef4cb9623a7d/1371540667559/Rapport+J%C3%A4mst%C3%A4lldhetsobservationer_130614_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L. 2011. Cruel Optimism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. R., and L. A. Rhoton. 2011. “Women Professionals Gender Strategies: Negotiating Gendered Organizational Barriers.” In Handbook of Gender Work and Organization, edited by D. Jeanes, D. Knights, and P. Yancy Martin, 245–62. Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L. 2011. On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2001. Masculine Domination. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2012. “Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs.” Organisation 19 (4): 507–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M., and S. D'Enbeau. 2009. “Stories of Caregiving: Intersections of Academic Research and Women's Everyday Experiences.” Qualitative Inquiry 15 (7): 1199–1224. doi:10.1177/1077800409338025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorn, N. H. 1991. “The ‘Alignment’ Theory: Creating Strategic Fit.” Management Decision 29 (1): 20–24. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000000066
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W. 1987. Gender and Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Currie, J., B. Thiele, and P. Harris. 2002. Gendered Universities in Globalised Economies. Oxford: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R., S. Hilliard, and M. Reed. 2008. Knowledge, Higher Education and the New Managerialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organization Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–60. doi: 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2004. Gender and Excellence in the Making. Accessed June 15, 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/bias_brochure_final_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EU. 2012. Structural Change in Research Institutions: Enhancing Excellence, Gender Equality and Efficiency in Research and Innovation. Accessed December 2, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/ structural-changes-final-report_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foschi, M. 1996. “Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (3): 237–54. doi: 10.2307/2787021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foschi, M. 2004. “Blocking the Use of Gender-Based Double Standards for Competence.” In Gender and Excellence in the Making (EU report), 51–57. Accessed June 15, 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/bias_brochure_final_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Foschi, M. 2006. “On the Application Files Design for the Study of Competence and Double Standards.” Sociological Focus 39 (2): 115–32. doi: 10.1080/00380237.2006.10571280
   Google Scholar
• Ferber, M. A. 1988. “Citations and Networking.” Gender and Society 2 (1): 82–89. doi: 10.1177/089124388002001006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazer, N. 2008. Adding Insult to Injury: Nancy Frazer Debates Her Critics. Edited by K. Olson. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• genSET. 2010. Recommendations for Action on the Gender Dimension in Science. Portia. Accessed December 10, 2013. http://www.genderinscience.org/index.php/consensus-seminars/recommendations-report.
   Google Scholar
• Grummell, B., K. Lynch, and D. Devine. 2009. “Appointing Senior Managers in Education: Homosociability, Local Logics and Authenticity in the Selection Process.” Educational Management, Administration and Leadership 37 (3): 329–49. doi: 10.1177/1741143209102783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakanson, M. 2005. “The Impact of Gender on Citations: An Analysis of College & Research Libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship and Library Quarterly.” College Research Library 66 (4): 312–23. doi: 10.5860/crl.66.4.312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, T. 2010. “The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School.” American Sociological Review 75 (1): 52–74. doi: 10.1177/0003122409357044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEA. 2013. “Performance Evaluation Framework for Higher Education.” WEB. Accessed December 28, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• HR (Human Resources). 2012. “Case Study University.” Unpublished data.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, L. 2001. “On Metaphors on the Position of Women in Academia and Science.” NORA, Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 9 (3): 172–81. doi: 10.1080/713801035
   Google Scholar
• Husu, L. 2014. “Research Funding Gap: Her Excellence Dwarfed by His Excellence.” June 11. Accessed September 3, 2014. http://euroscientist.com/2014/06/research-funding-gap-excellence-dwarfed-excellence/.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. 2009. How Professors Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S., and C. L. Cooper. 2005. Work-Life Integration: Case Studies of Organisational Change. Chicester: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lipman-Blumen, J. 1976. “Towards a Homosocial Theory of Sex Roles: An Explanation of the Sex Segregation of Social Institutions.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 3: 15–31. doi: 10.1086/493272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., B. Gummell, and D. Devine. 2012. New Managerialism in Education: Commercialisation, Carelessness and Gender. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie Davey, K. 2008. “Women's Accounts of Organisational Politics as a Gendering Process.” Gender, Work and Organisation 15 (6): 650–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maliniak, D., R. Powers, and B. F. Walter. 2013. “The Gendered Citation Gap in International Relations.” International Organisation 67 (4): 889–922. doi: 10.1017/S0020818313000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavin, S., and P. Bryans. 2002. “Academic Women in the UK: Mainstreaming Our Experiences and Networking for Action.” Gender and Education 14 (3): 235–50. doi: 10.1080/0954025022000010703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin Mitchell, S., S. Lange, and H. Brus. 2013. “Gendered Citation Patterns in International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives: Special Issue Feminism in International Relations 14 (4): 485–92. doi: 10.1111/insp.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–63. doi: 10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley, L. 1999. Organising Feminisms: The Micropolitics of the Academy. New York: St Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, G. 2013. Literacy Attainment, Data and Discourse from the Mid 19th Century to the Present Day: A Sociological Account Using Mixed Methods Research. Final Report to the ESRC. Accessed January 15, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, P. 2014a. Management and Gender in Higher Education. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, P. 2014b. “Understanding Success: A Case Study of Gendered Change in the Professoriate.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 36 (2): 212–24. doi: 10.1080/1360080X.2014.884675
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. Closing the Gender Gap: Act Now. Accessed December 19, 2012. http://www.oecd.org/gender/closingthegap.htm.
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, D. 2005. Cultural Politics and Irish Education since the 1950s: Policy, Paradigms and Power. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., and F. Santos Insead. 2013. “Inside the Hybrid Organisation: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 56 (4): 972–1001. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitzer, E. 2011. “Why Gender Should Be a Priority for Our Attention in Science.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 36 (2): 101–2. doi: 10.1179/030801811X13013181961266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prozesky, H., and N. Boshoff. 2012. “Bibliometrics as a Tool for Measuring Gender-Specific Research Performance: An Example from South African Invasion Ecology.” Scientometrics 90 (2): 383–406. doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0478-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, T. 2011. “The Gendered Construction of Scientific Excellence.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 36 (2): 133–45. doi: 10.1179/030801811X13013181961437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. 2011. Framed by Gender: How Gender Inequality Persists in the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., and J. W. Meyer. 1983. “The Organizational of Societal Sectors.” In Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, edited by J. W. Meyer and W. R. Scott, 129–54. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, M. 2013. “The Mirage of Merit.” Australian Feminist Studies 28 (76): 127–43. doi: 10.1080/08164649.2013.789584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorvaldsdottir, T. 2004. “Engendered Opinions in Placement Committee Decisions.” In Gender and Excellence in the Making (EU Report), 101–7. Accessed June 15, 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/bias_brochure_final_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tolbert, P. S., and L. G. Zucker. 1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28: 22–39. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/131/. doi: 10.2307/2392383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenneras, C. and A. Wold. 1997. “Nepotism and Sexism in Peer Review.” Nature 387 (6631): 341–43. Accessed May 22, 2011. http://sciencethatmatters.com/wp,content/uploads/2007/04/wenneras97nepotism.pdf. doi: 10.1038/387341a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton, A. 2012. The Sociology of Gender. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, J. 2005. Crimes Against Logic. London : McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 1998. “Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle.” American Sociological Review 63: 847–70. doi: 10.2307/2657505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L. 2009. “If It Can't Be Measured It Doesn't Count”: Confronting Equity, Gender and Higher Education in the 21st Century.” Paper presented at UPSI International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Kuala Lumpur, November.
   Google Scholar