Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: a review of challenges and strategies

References

• ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2001. “Chapter 1– Education and Training.” In Year Book Australia 2001. Year Book No. 83. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• ABS (Australian Bureau of Statistics). 2012. “Chapter 12 – Education and Training.” In Year Book Australia 2012. Year Book No. 92. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, M. 2012. “Supervising Doctorates at a Distance: Three Trans-Tasman Stories.” Quality Assurance in Education 20 (1): 42–53. doi: 10.1108/09684881211198239
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., and S. Sieminsky. 2006. “The Challenge of a Distance Learning Professional Doctorate in Education.” Open Learning 21 (1): 59–69. doi: 10.1080/02680510500472239
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, J., and S. Sieminsky. 2009. “Enhancing Professional Self-esteem: Learners’ Journeys on a Distance Learning Doctorate in Education (EdD).” Enhancing the Learner Experience in Higher Education 1 (1): 44–54. doi: 10.14234/elehe.v1i1.7
   Google Scholar
• Crossouard, B. 2008. “Developing Alternative Models of Doctoral Supervision with Online Formative Assessment.” Studies in Continuing Education 30 (1): 51–67. doi: 10.1080/01580370701841549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 1995. “Postgraduate Research Supervision in the Emerging Open Universities.” Australian Universities Review 2 (2): 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T., and B. Green. 1995. “Dancing at a Distance? Postgraduate Studies, Supervision, and Distance Education.” Paper presented at the 25th annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Hobart, November 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. 2002. “Digital Culture and Educational Practice.” Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on “Knowledge and Discourse: Speculating on Disciplinary Futures”, Hong Kong, June 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Guri-Rosenblit, S. 2005. “Eight Paradoxes in the Implementation Process of Elearning in Higher Education.” Higher Education Policy 18 (1): 5–29. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300069
   Google Scholar
• HESA (Higher Education Statistics Agency). 2012. Students in Higher Education Institutions 2011/2012. Cheltenham, UK: Higher Education Statistics Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, G. C. 1995. “Higher Degree Research Supervision: A Question of Balance.” Australian Universities Review 2 (2): 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Njenga, J. K., and L. C. H. Fourie. 2010. “The Myths About E-learning in Higher Education.” British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (2): 199–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00910.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OU (Open University). 2010. “About the Open University.” http://www.open.ac.uk/about/documents/about-facts-figures-0910.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OU (Open University). 2012. “History of the OU.” http://www8.open.ac.uk/about/main/the-ou-explained/history-the-ou.
   Google Scholar
• Paran, A., F. Hyland, and C. Bentall. 2010. The Research Element in Masters’ Degrees in Distance Education: Literature Review and Mapping Survey. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Price, D., and A. Money. 2002. “Alternative Models for Doctoral Mentor Organisation and Research Supervision.” Mentoring and Tutoring 10 (2): 127–35. doi: 10.1080/1361126022000002446
   Google Scholar
• Raddon, A. 2006. “Absence as Opportunity: Learning Outside the Institutional Space and Time.” Journal of Further and Higher Education 30 (2): 157–67. doi: 10.1080/03098770600617596
   Google Scholar
• Raddon, A. 2007. “Timescapes of Flexibility and Insecurity: Exploring the Context of Distance Learners.” Time and Society 16 (1): 61–82. doi: 10.1177/0961463X07074102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, A. W. 2012. Learning at a Distance: Undergraduate Enrollment in Distance Education Courses and Degree Programs. NCES 2012-154. Jessup, MD: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Sussex, R. 2008. “Technological Options in Supervising Remote Research Students.” Higher Education 55 (1): 121–37. doi: 10.1007/s10734-006-9038-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin, T. 2007. “Reflections on Supervising Distance-based PhD Students.” Royal Holloway, University of London. www.gg.rhul.ac.uk/ict4d/distance-based%20PhDs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UOL (University of London). 2012. “University of London International Programmes – Key Facts.” http://www.londoninternational.ac.uk/about_us/facts.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Venter, K. 2003. “Coping with Isolation: The Role of Culture in Adult Distance Learners’ Use of Surrogates.” Open Learning 18 (3): 271–87. doi: 10.1080/0268051032000131035
   Google Scholar
• Willems, J., H. Farley, A. Ellis, D. McCormick, and D. Walker. 2011. “Supervising Higher Degree Research (HDR) Candidates at a Distance: What do Emerging Virtual World Technologies Have to Offer?” Paper presented at the Education 2011–2021 Summit, Sydney, February, 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G. 2007. “Supervising Postgraduates: Internationally, and at a Distance.” In Connections: Sharing the Learning Space, edited by P. Wilcox, H. Jones, M. Sumner and E. Berrington, 23–28. Brighton, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar