2,926
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How clear and organized classroom instruction and deep approaches to learning affect growth in critical thinking and need for cognition

, , &

References

  • American College Testing Program. 1991. CAAP Technical Handbook. Iowa City, IA: Author.
  • Arum, R., and J. Roksa. 2011. Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Astin, A. 1993. What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Biggs, J. 1979. “Individual Differences in Study Process and the Quality of Learning Outcomes.” Higher Education 8 (4): 381–94. doi: 10.1007/BF01680526
  • Biggs, J. 1987. Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Hawthorn, VIC: Australia Council for Educational Research.
  • Biggs, J. 1993. “What Do Inventories of Students' Learning Processes Really Measure? A Theoretical Review and Clarification.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 63 (1): 3–19. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01038.x
  • Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Braskamp, L., and J. Ory. 1994. Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  • Bray, G., E. Pascarella, and C. Pierson. 2004. “Postsecondary Education and Some Dimensions of Literacy Development: An Exploration of Longitudinal Evidence.” Reading Research Quarterly 39 (3): 306–30. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.3.3
  • Cacioppo, J., R. Petty, J. Feinstein, and W. Jarvis. 1996. “Dispositional Differences in Cognitive Motivation: The Life of Individuals Differing in Need for Cognition.” Psychological Bulletin 119 (2): 197–253. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
  • Cashin, W. 1988. Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of the Research. IDEA Paper No. 20. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
  • Centra, J. 1989. “Faculty Evaluation and Faculty Development in Higher Education.’ In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. 5, edited by J. Smart, 155–79. New York: Agathon.
  • Chapman, B. 2001. “Emphasizing Concepts and Reasoning Skills in Introductory College Molecular Biology.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (11): 1157–76. doi: 10.1080/09500690110038594
  • Cohen, P. 1981. “Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Met-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies.” Review of Educational Research 51 (3): 281–309. doi: 10.3102/00346543051003281
  • Cohen, P. 1987. “A Critical Analysis and Reanalysis of the Multisection Validity Meta-analysis.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 20–24. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 283 876.
  • Crawford, K., S. Gordon, J. Nicholas, and M. Prosser. 1998. “Qualitatively Different Experiences of Learning Mathematics at University.” Learning and Instruction 8 (5): 455–68. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00005-X
  • d'Apollonia, S., and P. Abrami. 1997. “Navigating Student Ratings of Instruction.” American Psychologist 52 (11): 1198–208. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1198
  • Edison, M., S. Doyle, and E. Pascarella. 1998. “Dimensions of Teaching Effectiveness and their Impact on Student Cognitive Development.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Miami, November 5–8.
  • Eley, M. 1992. “Differential Adoption of Study Approaches Within Individual Students.” Higher Education 23 (3): 231–54. doi: 10.1007/BF00145015
  • Elias, S., and R. Loomis. 2002. “Utilizing Need for Cognition and Perceived Self-efficacy to Predict Academic Performance.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32 (8): 217–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02770.x
  • Entwistle, N., and H. Tait. 1990. “Approaches to Learning, Evaluations of Teaching, and Preferences for Contrasting Academic Environments.” Higher Education 19 (2): 169–94. doi: 10.1007/BF00137106
  • Feldman, K. 1989. “The Association Between Student Ratings of Specific Instructional Dimensions and Student Achievement: Refining and Extending the Synthesis of Data from Multisection Validity Studies.” Research in Higher Education 30 (6): 583–45. doi: 10.1007/BF00992392
  • Feldman, K. 1994. “Identifying Exemplary Teaching: Evidence from Course and Teacher Evaluations.” Paper commissioned by the National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment. Stony Brook, NY: Stare University of New York at Stony Brook.
  • Feldman, K. 1997. “Identifying Exemplary Teachers and Teaching: Evidence from Student Ratings.’ In Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice, edited by R. Perry and J. Smart, 368–95. New York: Agathon.
  • Greenwald, A., and G. Gillmore. 1997. “Grading Leniency is a Removable Contaminant of Student Ratings.” American Psychologist 52 (11): 1209–217. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1209
  • Hines, C., D. Cruickshank, and J. Kennedy. 1985. “Teacher Clarity and Its Relationship to Student Achievement and Satisfaction.” American Educational Research Journal 22 (1): 87–99. doi: 10.3102/00028312022001087
  • Kember, D., and D. Leung. 1998. “Influences upon Students’ Perceptions of Workload.” Educational Psychology 18 (3): 293–307. doi: 10.1080/0144341980180303
  • King, P. M., and K. S. Kitchener. 1994. Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lizzio, A., K. Wilson, and R. Simons. 2002. “University Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Academic Outcomes: Implications for Theory and Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 27 (1): 27–52. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099359
  • Marsh, H. 1987. “Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research.” International Journal of Educational Research 11 (3): 253–388. doi: 10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
  • Marsh, H., and M. Dunkin. 1997. “Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: A Multidimentional Perspective.” In Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice, edited by R. Perry and J. Smart, 241–320. New York: Agathon.
  • Marton, F., and R. Saljo. 1976. “On Qualitative Differences in Learning I: Outcome and Process.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1): 4–11. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
  • McKeachie, W. 1997. “Student Ratings: The Validity of Use.” American Psychologist 52 (11): 1218–25. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.11.1218
  • Meyer, J., and P. Parsons. 1989. “Approaches to Studying and Course Perceptions using the Lancaster Inventory: A Comparative Study.” Studies in Higher Education 14 (2): 137–63. doi: 10.1080/03075078912331377456
  • Nelson Laird, T., A. Garver, A. Niskode-Dossett, and J. Banks. 2008. “The Predictive Validity of a Measure of Deep Approaches to Learning.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, November 5–8.
  • Nelson Laird, T. F., T. A. Seifert, E. T. Pascarella, M. J. Mayhew, and C. F. Blaich. 2014. “Deeply Affecting First-Year Students' Thinking: Deep Approaches to Learning and Three Dimensions of Cognitive Development.” Journal of Higher Education 85 (3): 402–32.
  • Nelson Laird, T., R. Shroup, and G. Kuh. 2006. “Measuring Deep Approaches to Learning Using the National Survey of Student Engagement.” Paper presented at the annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, May 14–18.
  • Nelson Laird, T., R. Shroup, G. Kuh, and M. Schwartz. 2008. “The Effects of Discipline on Deep Approaches to Student Learning and College Outcomes.” Research in Higher Education 49 (6): 469–94. doi: 10.1007/s11162-008-9088-5
  • Pascarella, E. 1985. “College Environmental Influences on Learning and Cognitive Development: A Critical Review and Synthesis.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. 1, edited by J. Smart, 1–61. New York: Agathon.
  • Pascarella, E., C. Blaich, G. Martin, and J. Hanson. 2011. “How Robust are the Findings of Academically Adrift?” Change, May/June, 20–24. doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.568898
  • Pascarella, E., L. Bohr, A. Nora, and P. Terenzini. 1995. “Cognitive Effects of 2-year and 4-year Colleges: New Evidence.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17 (1): 83–96. doi: 10.3102/01623737017001083
  • Pascarella, E., T. Cruce, G. Wolniak, and C. Blaich. 2004. “Do Liberal Arts Colleges Really Foster Good Practices in Undergraduate Education?” Journal of College Student Development 45 (1): 57–74. doi: 10.1353/csd.2004.0013
  • Pascarella, E., M. Edison, A. Nora, L. Hagedorn, and J. Braxton. 1996. “Effects of Teacher Organization/preparation and Teacher Skill/clarity on General Cognitive Skills in College.” Journal of College Student Development 37 (1): 7–19.
  • Pascarella, E., M. Salisbury, and C. Blaich. 2011. “Exposure to Effective Instruction and College Student Persistence: A Multi-institutional Replication and Extension.” Journal of College Student Development 52 (1): 4–19. doi: 10.1353/csd.2011.0005
  • Pascarella, E., and P. Terenzini. 1991. How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. Vol. 1. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pascarella, E., and P. Terenzini. 2005. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Vol. 2. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Pascarella, E., G. Wolniak, T. Seifert, T. Cruce, and C. Blaich. 2005. Liberal Arts Colleges and Liberal Arts Education: New Evidence on Impacts. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Perry, R. 1991. “Perceived Control in College Students: Implications for Instruction in Higher Education.’ In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. 7, edited by J. Smart, 1–56. New York: Agathon.
  • Rabinowitz, M., and R. Glaser. 1985. “Cognitive Structure and Process in Highly Competent Performance.’ In The Gifted and Talented: Developmental Perspectives, edited by F. Horowitz and M. O'Brien, 75–89. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ramsden, P. 1988. “Context and Strategy: Situational Influences on Learning.’ In Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, edited by R. Schmeck, 159–84. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Ramsden, P., and N. Entwistle. 1981. “Effects of Academic Departments on Students’ Approaches to Studying.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 51 (3): 368–83. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1981.tb02493.x
  • Raudenbush, S. W., and A. S. Bryk. 2001. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Reason, R., B. Cox, K. McIntosh, and P. Terrenzini. 2010. “Deep Learning as an Individual, Conditional, and Contextual Influence on First Year Outcomes.” Paper presented at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, May 29–June 2.
  • Schonwetter, D., V. Menec, and R. Perry. 1995. “An Empirical Comparison of Two Effective College Teaching Behaviors: Expressiveness and Organization.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 18–22.
  • Schonwetter, D., R. Perry, and C. Struthers. 1994. “Students’ Perceptions of Control and Success in the College Classroom: Affects and Achievement in Different Instructional Conditions.” Journal of Experimental Education 61 (3): 227–46. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1993.9943863
  • Seifert, T., E. Pascarella, K. Goodman, M. Salisbury, and C. Blaich. 2010. “Liberal Arts Colleges and Good Practices in Undergraduate Education: Additional Evidence.” Journal of College Student Development 51 (1): 1–22. doi: 10.1353/csd.0.0113
  • Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser. 1991a. “Improving the Quality of Student Learning: The Influence of Learning Context and Student Approaches to Learning on Learning Outcomes.” Higher Education 22 (3): 251–66. doi: 10.1007/BF00132290
  • Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser. 1991b. “Relating Approaches to Study and Quality of Learning Outcomes at the Course Level.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 61 (3): 265–75. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00984.x
  • Weimer, M., and L. Lenze. 1997. “Instructional Interventions: Review of the Literature on Efforts to Improve Instruction.” In Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice, edited by R. Perry and J. Smart, 154–68. New York: Agathon.
  • Whitt, E., E. Pascarella, B. Elkins Nesheim, B. Marth, and C. Pierson. 2003. “Differences between Women and Men in Objectively Measured Outcomes, and the Factors that Influence those Outcomes in the First Three Years of College.” Journal of College Student Development 44 (5): 587–610. doi: 10.1353/csd.2003.0060
  • Wood, A., and H. Murray. 1999. “Effects of Teacher Enthusiasm on Student Attention, Motivation, and Memory Encoding.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April 19–23.
  • Zeegers, P. 2004. “Student Learning in Higher Education: A Path Analysis of Academic Achievement in Science.” Higher Education Research and Development 23 (1): 35–56. doi: 10.1080/0729436032000168487
  • Zhang, L. 2000. “University Students’ Learning Approaches in Three Cultures: An Investigation of Biggs's 3P Model.” Journal of Psychology 134 (1): 37–55. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600847

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.