Improving doctoral support through group supervision: analysing face-to-face and technology-mediated strategies for nurturing and sustaining scholarship

References

• Ali, A., and F. Kohun. 2006. “Dealing with Isolation Feelings at IS Doctoral Programs.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 1: 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, A., and F. Kohun. 2007. “Dealing With Social Isolation to Minimize Doctoral Attrition: A Four Stage Framework.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 2: 33–49.
   Google Scholar
• Barnacle, R., and G. Dall'Alba. 2011. “Research Degrees as Professional Education?” Studies in Higher Education 36 (4): 459–70. doi: 10.1080/03075071003698607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and M. Tennant. 2006. “Putting Doctoral Education to Work: Challenges to Academic Practice.” Higher Education Research & Development 25 (3): 293–306. doi: 10.1080/07294360600793093
   Google Scholar
• Bourner, T., R. Bowden, and S. Laing. 2001. “Professional Doctorates in England.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (1): 65–83. doi: 10.1080/03075070124819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E., and K. Galvin. 2005. “Doctoral Preparation: Issues and Relevance for Clinical Leaders.” Journal of Research in Nursing 10 (6): 601–24. doi: 10.1177/174498710501000604
   Google Scholar
• Carr, E., K. Galvin, and L. Todres. 2010. “Facilitating Nourished Scholarship Through Cohort Supervision in a Professional Doctorate Programme.” Encyclopaideia 14 (27): 125–46.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, J. W., K. Enyedy, R. K. Goodyear, F. Arcinue, and N. Puri. 2009. “Concept Mapping of the Events Supervisees find Helpful in Group Supervision.” Training and Education in Professional Psychology 3 (1): 1–9. doi: 10.1037/a0013656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley, C., and S. Lester. 2012. “Work-based Doctorates: Professional Extension at the Highest Levels.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (3): 257–69. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.503344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cousin, G., and F. Deepwell. 2005. “Designs for Network Learning: A Communities of Practice Perspective.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (1): 57–66. doi: 10.1080/0307507052000307795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, P. 2002. “Cybervision: Virtual Peer Group Counselling Supervision – Hindrance or Help?” Counselling and Psychotherapy Research 2 (4): 223–29. doi: 10.1080/14733140212331384705
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., P. Atkinson, and O. Parry. 1997. “Critical Mass and Doctoral Research: Reflections on the Harris Report.” Studies in Higher Education 22 (3): 319–31. doi: 10.1080/03075079712331380926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delamont, S., O. Parry, and P. Atkinson. 1998. “Creating a Delicate Balance: The Doctoral Supervisor's Dilemmas.” Teaching in Higher Education 3 (2): 157–72. doi: 10.1080/1356215980030203
   Google Scholar
• Doncaster, K., and L. Thorne. 2000. “Reflection and Planning: Essential Elements of Professional Doctorates.” Reflective Practice 1(3): 391–99. doi: 10.1080/713693159
   Google Scholar
• Enyedy, K., F. Arcinue, N. Puri, J. W. Carter, R. K. Goodyear, and M. Getzelman. 2003. “Hindering Phenomena in Group Supervision: Implications for Practice.” Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34 (3): 312–17. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.34.3.312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenge, L-A. 2012. “Enhancing the Doctoral Journey: The Role of Group Supervision in Supporting Collaborative Learning and Creativity.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (4): 401–14. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2010.520697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., J. Glass, S. Fujisaki, and S. Toner. 2010. “Group Process and Learning: A Grounded Theory Model of Group Supervision.” Training and Education in Professional Psychology 4 (3): 194–203. doi: 10.1037/a0018970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, K., and E. Carr. 2003. “The Emergence of Professional Doctorates in Nursing in the UK: Where are we Now?” Nursing Times Research 8 (4): 293–307. doi: 10.1177/136140960300800407
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., C. Jones, M. Asensio, V. Hodgson, and C. Steeples. 2005. “Networked Learning in Higher Education: Students’ Expectations and Experiences.” Higher Education 50: 473–508. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6364-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, M. 1995. “Implications of the Introduction of the Doctor of Education Degree in British Universities: Can the EdD Reach Parts the PhD Cannot?” The Vocational Aspect of Education 47 (2): 177–88. doi: 10.1080/0305787950470206
   Google Scholar
• HEFCE. 2007. “PhD Research Degrees: Update: Entry and Completion.” Higher Education Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• Halse, C., and J. Malfroy. 2010. “Retheorising Doctoral Supervision as Professional Work.” Studies in Higher Education 35 (1): 79–92. doi: 10.1080/03075070902906798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaques, D., and G. Salmon. 2007. Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Face-to-Face and Online Environments. 4th ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, L. C., N. N. Bazarova, and J. T. Hancock. 2011. “The Disclosure-Intimacy Link in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Attributional Extension of the Hyperpersonal Model.” Human Communication Research 37: 58–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. “How are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–81. doi: 10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitch Review. 2006. “Prosperity for all in the Global Economy: World Class Skills.” HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, J. M., and S. M. Hedstrom. 2006. An Exploratory Qualitative Investigation of Group Processes in Group Supervision: Perceptions of Masters-level Practicum Students. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work 31 (1) 51–72. doi: 10.1080/01933920500341390
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D. 2000. Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning. 2nd ed. London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Malfroy, J. 2005. “Doctoral Supervision, Workplace Research and Changing Pedagogic Practices.” Higher Education Research & Development 24 (2): 165–78. doi: 10.1080/07294360500062961
   Google Scholar
• Samara, A. 2006. “Group Supervision in Graduate Education: A Process of Supervision Skill Development and Text Improvement.” Higher Education Research & Development 25 (2): 115–29. doi: 10.1080/07294360600610362
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., A. Brown, I. Lunt, and L. Thorne. 2004. Professional Doctorates: Integrating Professional and Academic Knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steeples, C., and C. Jones. (eds.) 2002. Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., and N. Beasley. 2005. A Handbook for Doctoral Supervisors. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, L. C., and J. B. Walther. 2002. “Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to know one Another a bit at a Time.” Human Communication Research 28 (3): 317–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00811.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UKCGE (United Kingdom Council for Graduate Education) 2002. Report on Professional Doctorates. Dudley: UKCGE.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, R. 2002. “A Diversity of Doctorates: Fitness for the Knowledge Economy?” Higher Education Research & Development 21 (2): 143–53. doi: 10.1080/07294360220144060
   Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. 1996. “Computer-Mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction.” Communication Research 23 (1): 3–43. doi: 10.1177/009365096023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warry Report. 2006. “Increasing the Economic Impact of Research Councils.” Research Council: Economic Impact Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wisker, G., G. Robinson, and M. Shacham. 2007. “Postgraduate Research Success: Communities of Practice Involving Cohorts, Guardian Supervisors and Online Communities.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44 (3): 301–20. doi: 10.1080/14703290701486720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar