Gender consequences of a national performance-based funding model: new pieces in an old puzzle

References

• Aagaard, K., C. Bloch, and J. W. Schneider. 2015. “Impacts of Performance-Based Research Funding Systems: The Case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator.” Research Evaluation 24 (2): 106–17. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvv003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aagard, K., C. Bloch, J. W. Schneider, D. Henriksen, T. K. Ryan, and P. S. Lauridsen. 2014. Evaluering af den Norske Publiceringsindikator [Evaluation of the Norwegian Bibliometric Research indicator]. Oslo: The Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions.
   Google Scholar
• Aagaard, K., and N. Mejlgaard. 2012. “På vej mod en ny forskningspolitik [Towards a New Research Policy].” In Dansk forskningspolitik efter årtusindskiftet [Danish Research Policy in the New Millennium], edited by K. Aagaard and N. Mejlgaard, 11–35. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abramo, G., C. A. D'Angelo, and A. Caprasecca. 2009. “The Contribution of Star Scientists to Overall Sex Differences in Research Productivity.” Scientometrics 84 (3): 821–33. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0200-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramo, Giovanni, C. A. D'Angelo, and G. Murgia. 2013. “Gender Differences in Research Collaboration.” Journal of Infometrics 7: 811–22. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender & Society 4 (2): 139–58. doi: 10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J. 2006. “ How Good is the UK Research Base? Higher Education Institute.” Accessed March 1, 2014. http://www.hepi.ac.uk/files/24HowgoodistheUKresearchbase.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Addis, E., and M. Brouns. 2004. “Synthesis Report on the Workshop.” In Gender and Excellence in the Making, edited by E. Addis and M. Brouns, 9–32. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Aksnes, D. W., K. Rorstad, F. Piro, and G. Sivertsen. 2011. “Are Female Researchers Less Cited? A Large-Scale Study of Norwegian Scientists.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (4): 628–36. doi: 10.1002/asi.21486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auranen, O., and Pölönen, I. 2012. Classification of Scientific Publication Channels – Final Report of the Publication Forum Project (2010–2012). Federation of Finnish Learned Societies.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., and E. Corley. 2004. “Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital.” Research Policy 33: 599–616. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouns, M. 2007. “The Making of Excellence: Gender Bias in Academia.” In Exzellenz in Wissenschaft und Forschung – Neue Wege in der Gleichstellungspolitik, 23–42. Köln: Hrsg. Wissenschaftsrat.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., D. C. Miller, and W. D. Schafer. 1999. “Gender differences in Risk Taking: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (3): 367–83. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, J. R., and H. Zuckerman. 1984. “The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and Change in Patterns of Publication Among Men and Women Scientists.” In Advances in Motivation and Achievement 2, edited by P. Maehr and M. W. Steinkam, 217–58. Greenwich: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deem, R. 1998. “New Managerialism and Higher Education: The Management of Performances and Cultures in Universities in the United Kingdom.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 8 (1): 47–70. doi: 10.1080/0962021980020014
   Google Scholar
• DMS (Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science). 2011. “ Denmark Achieves Barcelona Objective and Innovation on the rise, April 26.” Accessed June 10, 2015. http://ufm.dk/en/newsroom/press-releases/archive/2011/denmark-achieves-barcelona-objective-and-innovation-on-the-rise-1.
   Google Scholar
• DMS (Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science). 2015a. Brugervejledning for niveaudeling [User Guide for Classification of Publication Channels]. Accessed June 1, 2015. http://faggruppe68.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/84819886/Brugervejledning%20til%20niveauinddeling.docx.
   Google Scholar
• DMS (Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science). 2015b. Faggrupper til bibliometrisk forskningsindikator nedsat af rektorkollegiets forretningsudvalg [Committees for the Bibliometric Indicator Appointed by the Rector College's Executive Committee], April 29. Accessed July 10, 2015. http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator/organisering/faggrupperne/faggrupper-29-apr-15-8-35-56.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N., and M. Sauder. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 1–40. doi: 10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1997. Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. London: Cassell Academic.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. She figures 2012. Statistics and Indicators on Gender Equality in Science. Brussels: European Research Area report.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. 1991. “Gender, Environmental Milieu, and Productivity.” In The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, edited by H. Zuckerman, J. Cole and J. Bruer, 188–204. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, M. F. 2005. “Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists.” Social Studies of Science 35 (1): 131–50. doi: 10.1177/0306312705046630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox Keller, E. 1986. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frölich, N., E. K. Schmidt, and M. J. Rosa. 2010. “Funding Systems for Higher Education and their Impacts on Institutional Strategies and Academia: A Comparative Study Between Denmark, Norway and Portugal.” International Journal of Educational Management 24 (1): 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., and G. Laudel. 2007. “The Social Construction of Bibliometric Evaluations.” In The Changing Governance of the Sciences. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, edited by J. Gläser, and R. Whitley, 101–23. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guena, A., and B. R. Martin. 2003. “University Research Evaluation and Funding: An International Comparison.” Minerva 41 (4): 277–304. doi: 10.1023/B:MINE.0000005155.70870.bd
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. 2002. “The Troublesome Concept of Merit.” In Gender Teaching and Research in Higher Education: Challenges for the 21st Century, edited by G. Howie and A. Tauchert, 248–60. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, I. 2008. Autoritetslister – ikke noget for kvinder [Authority lists – not relevant for women]. February 15, 2008. Accessed June 10, 2015. http://professorvaelde.blogspot.dk/2008/02/autoritetslister-ikke-noget-for-kvinder.html.
   Google Scholar
• Husu, L., and S. D. Cheveigné. 2010. “Gender and Gatekeeping of Excellence in Research Funding: European Perspectives.” In Gender Change in Academia: Re-mapping the Fields of Work, Knowledge, and Politics from a Gender Perspective, edited by B. Riegraf, B. Aulenbacher, E. Kirsch-Auwärter, and U. Müller, 43–59. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B. 2011. “Making lists, Enlisting Scientists: The Bibliometric Indicator, Uncertainty and Emergent Agency.” Science Studies 24 (2): 64–84.
   Google Scholar
• Knights, D., and W. Richards. 2003. “Sex Discrimination in UK Academia.” Gender, Work & Organization 10 (2): 213–38. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.t01-1-00012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leahey, E. 2006. “Gender differences in Productivity Research Specialization as a Missing Link.” Gender & Society 20 (6): 754–80. doi: 10.1177/0891243206293030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. S. 1992. “Measures of Sex differences in Scientific Productivity.” Social Forces 71 (1): 159–78. doi: 10.2307/2579971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairesse, J., and M. Pezzoni. 2013. “ Does Gender Affect Scientific Productivity? A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence and a Panel Data Econometric Analysis for French Physicists.” Submitted to the AFSE Meeting, 26 June 2013, Aix en Provence.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., and J. Nelder. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. 2003. Power and Quality in Higher Education. Berkshire: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelder, J., and R. Wedderburn. 1972. “Generalized Linear Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 135 (3): 370–84. doi: 10.2307/2344614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. W. 2015. “Gender Inequality and Research Performance: Moving Beyond Individual-Meritocratic Explanations of Academic Advancement.” Studies in Higher Education, doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, K. R., and K. P. Hapgood. 2012. “The Academic Jungle: Ecosystem Modelling Reveals Why Women are Driven out of Research.” Oikos 121 (7): 999–1004. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20601.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opstrup, N. 2014. “ Causes and Consequences of Performance Management at Danish Universities.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Rafols, I., L. Leydesdorff, A. O'Hare, P. Nightingale, and A. Stirling. 2011. “ How Journal Rankings can Suppress Interdisciplinary Research: A Comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management.” DRUID Working Paper No. 11-05.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoten, D., and S. Pfirman. 2007. “Women in Inter-Disciplinary Science: Exploring Preferences and Consequences.” Research Policy 36: 56–75. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, L. J., L. S. Hegedorn, M. Arredondp, and F. A. Dicrisi. 2002. “Faculty Research Productivity: Exploring the Role of Gender and Family-Related Factors.” Research in Higher Education 43 (4): 423–46. doi: 10.1023/A:1015575616285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L. 1999. Has Feminism Changed Science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L., and M. Schraudner. 2011. “Interdisciplinary Approaches to Achieving Gendered Innovations in Science, Medicine, and Engineering.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 36 (2): 154–67. doi: 10.1179/030801811X13013181961518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. W. 2009. “An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway.” European Political Science 8: 364–378. doi: 10.1057/eps.2009.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, J. W., and K. Aagaard. 2012. “Stor ståhej for ingenting – den danske bibliometriske indikator [Much ado about nothing – the Danish Bibliometric Indicator].” In Dansk forskningspolitik efter årtusindskiftet[Danish Research Policy in the New Millennium], edited by K. Aagaard and N. Mejlgaard, 229–60. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sivertsen, G. 2008. “Experiences with a Bibliometric Model for Performance based Funding of Research Institutions.” In Book of Abstracts, edited by J. Goriaz, E. Schiebel. Paper presented at the 10th International Science and Technology Indicators Conference, September 17–20, 2008. Vienna: University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Staahle, B. 2014. Videnskabeligt personale på universiteterne 2013 [Scientific staff at the universities]. Copenhagen: Styrelsen for Videregående Uddannelser. Accessed February 18, 2015. http://ufm.dk/forskning-og-innovation/statistik-og-analyser/forskereved-universiteterne/videnskabeligt-personale-pa-universiteterne-2013-statistiknotat-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. W., Fender, B. F., and Burke, K. G. 2006. “Unraveling the Academic Productivity of Economists: The Opportunity Costs of Teaching and Service.” Southern Economic Journal 72 (4): 846–59. doi: 10.2307/20111856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., Fruytier, B., and Thunnissen, M. 2013. “Talent Management in Academia: Performance Systems and HRM Policies.” Human Resource Management Journal 23 (2): 180–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-8583.2012.00196.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Raan, A. 2005. “Statistical Properties of Bibliometric Indicators: Research Group Indicator Distributions and Correlations.” Scientometrics 57 (3): 408–30.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijnsoever, F. J., and Hessels, L. K. 2011. “Factors Associated with Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration.” Research Policy 40: 463–72. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingart, P. 2005. “Impact of Bibliometrics Upon the Science System: Inadvertent Consequences.” Scientometrics 62 (1): 117–31. doi: 10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, S. 2014. “Knowledge That Counts: Points Systems and the Governance of Danish Universities.” In Under New Public Management: Institutional Ethnographies of Changing Front-line Work, edited by D. Smith and A. Griffith, 294–338. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. 2005. “Generalized Linear Models in Family Studies.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67 (4): 1029–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 1998. “Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle.” American Sociological Review 63 (6): 847–70. doi: 10.2307/2657505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., and K. A. Shauman. 2003. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, xvii, 318.
   Google Scholar
• Zippel, K., and E. Smykla. 2010. “Literature Review: Gender and International Research Collaboration.” Working paper. Accessed June 24, 2014. http://nuweb.neu.edu/zippel/nsf-workshop/.
   Google Scholar
• Zuckerman, H. 1991. “The Careers of Men and Women Scientists: A Review of Current Research.” In The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, edited by H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, and T. Bruer, 27–56. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar