Progress and paradox for women in US higher education

References

• American Bar Association. 2006. “Visible Invisibility: Women of Color in Law Firms.” Accessed September 21 2006. http://www.abanet.org.
   Google Scholar
• American Council on Education. 2012. The American College President. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ayman, R., and K. Korabik. 2010. “Leadership: Why Gender and Culture Matter.” American Psychologist 65 (3): 157–70. doi: 10.1037/a0018806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, T. L., and W. Vélez. 1996. “Access to and Opportunity in Postsecondary Education in the United States: A Review.” Sociology of Education 69: 82–101. doi:10.2307/3108457.
   Google Scholar
• Banaji, M. R., and A. G. Greenwald. 2013. The Blindspot. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Beemyn, G., and S. Rankin. 2011. The Lives of Transgender People. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beutel, A. M., and D. J. Nelson. 2005. “Gender and Race-ethnicity of Faculty in top Science and Engineering Research Departments.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 11: 389–402. doi: 10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v11.i4.50
   Google Scholar
• Beutel, A. M., and D. J. Nelson. 2006. “The Gender and Race-ethnicity of Faculty in Top Social Science Research Departments.” Social Science Journal 43: 111–25. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2005.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blau, F. D., M. C. Brinton, and D. B. Grusky, eds. 2006. The Declining Significance of Gender? New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Boxer, M. J. 2001. When Women ask the Questions: Creating Women’s Studies in America. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calas, M. B., and L. Smircich. 1992. “Re-writing Gender into Organizational Theorizing: Directions from Feminist Perspectives.” In Rethinking Organizations: New Directions in Organization Theory and Analysis, edited by M. Reed and M. Hughes, 227–53. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Catalyst. 2004. The Bottom Line: Connecting Corporate Performance and Gender Diversity. New York: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, S. J., and W. M. Williams, eds. 2007. Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Top Researchers Debate the Evidence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, J. L. 2010. “Introduction to the Special Issue on Diversity and Leadership.” American Psychologist 65 (3): 150–56. doi: 10.1037/a0018716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. L., and J. K. Swim. 1995. “The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and men: Tokenism, Self-confidence, and Expectations.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21 (9): 876–84. doi: 10.1177/0146167295219001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. E., and D. D. Stevens, eds. 2002. Tenure in the Sacred Grove: Issues and Strategies for Women and Minority Faculty. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, B. T., and R. E. Zambrana, eds. 2009. Emerging Intersections: Race, Class and Gender in Theory, Policy, and Practice. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. 2007. “Is Math a Gift? Beliefs that Put Females at Risk.” In Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Top Researchers Debate the Evidence, edited by S. J. Ceci and W. M. Williams, 47–56. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., and L. L. Carli. 2007. Through the Labyrinth: The Truth about how Women Become Leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckel, P., and M. Hartley. 2011. Presidential Leadership in an age of Transition: Dynamic Responses for Turbulent Times. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, L. 2006. Higher Education for Women in Postwar America, 1945–1965. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fain, P. 2010. “Gay and Lesbian College Presidents Go Public With Web Video. The Chronicle of Higher Education.” Accessed December 17. http://chronicle.com/article/GayLesbian-College/125741.
   Google Scholar
• Garces, L. M., and U. M. Jayakumar. 2014. “Dynamic Diversity: Toward a Contextual Understanding of Critical Mass.” Educational Researcher 43 (3): 115–24. doi: 10.3102/0013189X14529814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, M. 2007. “Seeing Through the Eyes of Difference: The Strength of Women’s Multicultural Alliances.” On Campus with Women 36 (1): 1–3. Accessed June 20 2007. http://www.aacu.org/ocww/volume35_1/.
   Google Scholar
• Ginder, S. A., J. E. Kelly-Reid, and F. B. Mann. 2015. “Enrollment and Employees in Postsecondary Institutions, Fall 2014; and Financial Statistics and Academic Libraries, Fiscal Year 2014: First Look (Provisional Data).” NCES 2016-005. U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Accessed November 28 2015. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearc.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin, C., L. F. Katz, and I. Kuziemko. 2006. “The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 20 (4): 133–56. doi: 10.1257/jep.20.4.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, K., J. C. Bennett, and J. Harris. 2011. “Analyzing Gender Differences in Black Faculty Marginalization through a Sequential Mixed-Methods Design.” New Directions for Institutional Research 2011 (151): 45–61. doi: 10.1002/ir.398
   Google Scholar
• Guinier, L., M. Fine, and J. Balin. 1997. Becoming Gentlemen: Women, Law and Institutional Change. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, S. R. 2012. “Race Without Racism: How Higher Education Researchers Minimize Racist Institutional Norms.” Review of Higher Education 36 (1): 9–30. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2012.0047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, N. 2006. “Diversification of a University Faculty: Observations on Hiring Women Faculty in the Schools of Science and Engineering at MIT.” MIT Faculty Newsletter 18 (4). Accessed March 14 2009. http://web.mit.edu/fnl/volume/184.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hune, S. 2002. “Demographics and Diversity of Asian American College Students.” In Working with Asian American College Students, edited by M. K. McEwen, C. M. Kodama, A. N. Alvarez, S. Lee, and C. T. H. Liang, 11–20 ( New Directions for Student Services, No. 97). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hune, S. 2003. “Through “Our Eyes”: Asian Pacific Islander American Women’s History.” In Asian Pacific Islander American Women, edited by S. Hune and G. M. Nomura, 1–12. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82: 965–90. doi: 10.1086/226425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, J. 2006. Gender Equity in Higher Education: 2006. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, Center for Policy Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, V., A. Konrad, and S. Erkut. 2006. Critical Mass on Corporate Boards: Why Three or More Women Enhance Governance (Report No. 781 283-2510). Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, A. 1999. “Scientific Community: Tenured Women Battle to Make It Less Lonely at the Top.” Science 286 (5443): 1272–8. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5443.1272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, B. 2001. “Forging New University Initiatives in the Twenty-First Century: Women Executives and Equity.” In The Quest for Equity in Higher Education, edited by B. Lindsay and M. J. Justiz, 229–56. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, J., and A. Fisher. 2002. Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marschke, R., S. Laursen, J. M. Nielsen, and P. Rankin. 2007. “Demographic Inertia Revisited: An Immodest Proposal to Achieve Equitable Gender Representation among Faculty in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education 78 (1): 1–26. doi: 10.1353/jhe.2007.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, P. M. 1997. Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, P. M. 2002. “Resisting Common Injustice: Tenure Politics, Department Politics, Gay and Lesbian Politics.” In Tenure in the Sacred Grove: Issues and Strategies for Women and Minority Faculty, edited by J. E. Cooper and D. D. Stevens, 122–47. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGlone, M. S., J. Aronson, and D. Kobrynowicz. 2006. “Stereotype Threat and the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 30 (4): 392–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00314.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, P. 1983. Interactive Phases of Curriculum Re-vision: A Feminist Perspective (Working Paper Series, No. 124). Wellesley, MA: Wellesley College, Center for Research on Women.
   Google Scholar
• Minnich, E. K. 2005. Transforming Knowledge. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, J., I. Kennelly, and M. Karides. 1999. “Employment Chances in the Academic Job Market in Sociology: Do Race and Gender Matter?” Sociological Perspectives 42 (2): 215–47. doi: 10.2307/1389628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. 2012. Faculty Diversity. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moses, Y. T. 1997. “Black Women in Academe: Issues and Strategies.” In Black Women in Academe: Promises and Perils, edited by L. Benjamin, 23–38. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2013a. “Total Fall Enrollment in Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions, by Level of Enrollment, Sex of Student and other Selected Characteristics: 2013.” Table 303.60.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2013b. “Doctor’s Degrees Conferred by Postsecondary Institutions, by Race/Ethnicity and Sex of Student: Selected Years, 1976–77 through 2011–12.” Table 324.20.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2013c. “Degrees Conferred to Females by Postsecondary Institutions in Selected Professional Fields, by Race/ Ethnicity and Field of Study: 2010–2011.” Table 324.70.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. 2013d. “Doctor’s Degrees Conferred to Females by Postsecondary Institutions, by Race/Ethnicity and Field of Study: Selected Years, 2010–11 and 2011–12.” Table 324.35.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation Advance Project. 2002. Advance: Assessing the Academic Work Environment for Women Scientists and Engineers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Research on Women and Gender.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation. 2013. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Special Tabulations of U.S. Department of Education, National Center For Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Data System, Completions Survey, 2002–12.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D., and D. C. Rogers. 2004. “A National Analysis of Diversity in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities.” Accessed June 15 2007. http://www.now.org/issues/diverse/diversity_report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., A. G. Greenwald, and M. R. Banaji. 2005. “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31 (2): 166–180. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2004. “Women’s Education: A Global Challenge.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29 (2): 325–55. doi: 10.1086/378571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittman, C. T. 2010. “Race and Gender Oppression in the Classroom: The Experiences of Women Faculty of Color with White Male Students.” Teaching Sociology 38 (3): 183–196. doi: 10.1177/0092055X10370120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, K. A. 2014. Women’s Colleges and Universities in A Global Context. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sagaria, M. D., ed. 2007. Women, Universities and Change. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L. 2006. Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L., ed. 2008a. Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schiebinger, L. 2008b. “Getting More Women into Science and Engineering—Knowledge Issues.” In Gendered Innovations in Science and Engineering, edited by L. Schiebinger, 1–21. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G. 2015. Diversity’s Promise for Higher Education: Making it Work. 2nd ed. Baltimore, CA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G., E. Tovar, and H. Garcia. 2012. ““Where are They?” A Multi-lens Examination of the Distribution of Full-time Faculty by Institutional Type, Race/Ethnicity, Gender and Citizenship.” In Refining the Focus on Faculty Diversity in Postsecondary Institutions, edited by Yonhong Jade Xu, 5–26 (New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 155). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G., L. E. Wolf, B. Busenberg, and Associates. 1996. Achieving Faculty Diversity: Debunking the Myths. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G., L. E. Wolf-Wendel, and D. E. Morrison. 1995. “How Women’s Colleges Facilitate the Success of their Students.” Journal of Higher Education 66: 245–66. doi: 10.2307/2943891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinpreis, R. E., K. A. Anders, and D. Ritzke. 1999. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.” Sex Roles 41 (7/8): 509–28. doi: 10.1023/A:1018839203698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm, S. 2007. “Gender Equity as Institutional Transformation.” In Transforming Science and Engineering: Advancing Academic Women, edited by A. J. Stewart, J. E. Malley, and D. La Veque-Manty, 262–79. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. D., and C. Hollenshead. 2001. “Resisting From the Margins: The Coping Strategies of Black Women and Other Women of Color Faculty Members at a Research University.” Journal of Negro Education 70 (3): 166–175. doi: 10.2307/3211208
   Google Scholar
• Tidball, M. E., D. G. Smith, C. S. Tidball, and L. E. Wolf-Wendel. 1999. Taking Women Seriously: Lessons and Legacies for Educating the Majority. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education & Oryx Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonso, K. L. 2001. “Plotting Something Dastardly: Hiding a Gender Curriculum in Engineering.” In The Hidden Curriculum in Higher Education, edited by E. Margolis, 155–74. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Trix, F., and C. Psenka. 2003. “Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty.” Discourse & Society 14 (2): 191–220. doi: 10.1177/0957926503014002277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valian, V. 2000. Why so Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valian, V. 2005. “Beyond Gender Schemas: Improving the Advancement of Women in Academia.” Hypatia 20 (3): 198–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00495.x
   Google Scholar
• West, M. E. 2000. “Faculty Women’s Struggle for Equality at the University of California.” UCLA Women’s Law Journal 10 (2): 259–319.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. 2015. “Female Astronomers: Outsiders in their Field. Chronicle of Higher Education.” Accessed November 22 2015. http://chronicle.com/article/Female-Astronomers-Outsiders/234298.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf-Wendel, L. E. 1998. “Models of Excellence: The Baccalaureate Origins of Successful European American Women, African American Women, and Latinas.” Journal of Higher Education 69: 141–86. doi: 10.2307/2649204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Wendel, L. E. 2000. “Women-friendly Campuses: What Five Institutions Are Doing Right.” Review of Higher Education 23 (3): 319–45. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2000.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Wendel, L. E. 2002. “Women’s Colleges.” In Women in Higher Education: An Encyclopedia, edited by A. M. Martinez, and K. A. Renn, 120–122. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. D. 2002. “2001 Division 35 Presidential Address: Context Matters: Understanding Tokenism Processes and their Impact on Women’s Work.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 26: 1–8. doi: 10.1111/1471-6402.00038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, J. D., and T. L. Schleicher. 1996. “Undergraduates Regard Deviation from Occupational Gender Stereotypes as Costly for Women.” Sex Roles 35: 389–400. doi: 10.1007/BF01544128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar