E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students

References

• Alias, N., Z. Zakariah, N. Z. Ismail, and M. N. A. Aziz. 2012. “E-learning Successful Elements for Higher Learning Institution in Malaysia.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 67: 484–89. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.353
   Google Scholar
• Alsabawy, A. Y., A. Cater-Steel, and J. Soar. 2016. “Determinants of Perceived Usefulness of E-learning Systems.” Computers in Human Behavior 64: 843–58. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Samarraie, H., H. Selim, T. Teo, and F. Zaqout. 2016. “Isolation and Distinctiveness in the Design of E-learning Systems Influence User Preferences.” Interactive Learning Environments 1–15. doi:10.1080/10494820.2016.1138313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Samarraie, H., H. Selim, and F. Zaqout. 2016. “The Effect of Content Representation Design Principles on Users’ Intuitive Beliefs and Use of E-learning Systems.” Interactive Learning Environments 24 (8): 1758–77. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1057739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. 1993. What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-confirmation Model.” MIS Quarterly 25 (3): 351–70. doi: 10.2307/3250921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A., and A. Barfar. 2011. “Information Technology Continuance Research: Current State and Future Directions.” Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems 21 (2): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuasiri, W., O. Xaymoungkhoun, H. Zo, J. J. Rho, and A. P. Ciganek. 2012. “Critical Success Factors for E-learning in Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis between ICT Experts and Faculty.” Computers & Education 58 (2): 843–55. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U. 2004. “Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in Online Courses.” International Journal on E-learning 3 (1): 61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, R. N., and J. H. Drew. 1991. “A Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact of Service Changes on Customer Attitudes.” The Journal of Marketing 55 (January): 1–9. doi: 10.2307/1252199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, B., C. W. Chang, and C. H. Wu. 2011. “Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Developing Supplier Selection Criteria.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (3): 1850–58. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. M., C. S. Chiu, and H. C. Chang. 2007. “Examining the Integrated Influence of Fairness and Quality on Learners’ Satisfaction and Web-based Learning Continuance Intention.” Information Systems Journal 17 (3): 271–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. M., M. H. Hsu, S. Y. Sun, T. C. Lin, and P. C. Sun. 2005. “Usability, Quality, Value and E-learning Continuance Decisions.” Computers & Education 45 (4): 399–416. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. M., S. Y. Sun, P. C. Sun, and T. L. Ju. 2007. “An Empirical Analysis of the Antecedents of Web-based Learning Continuance.” Computers & Education 49 (4): 1224–45. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, C. M., and E. T. Wang. 2008. “Understanding Web-based Learning Continuance Intention: The Role of Subjective Task Value.” Information & Management 45 (3): 194–201. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, V., T. E. Cheng, and W. J. Lai. 2009. “The Role of Perceived User-interface Design in Continued Usage Intention of Self-paced E-learning Tools.” Computers & Education 53 (2): 216–27. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronje, J. C. 2006. “Who Killed E-learning?” Academic Libraries: Proactive Partners in Learning and Research Symposium at University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, November, 2–3. Accepted May 2, 2015. http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Johannes_Cronje/publication/228884266_Who_killed_e-learning/links/0912f5140a00411fd6000000.pdff.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly 13 (3): 319–40. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delone, W. H., and E. R. McLean. 2003. “The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-year Update.” Journal of Management Information Systems 19 (4): 9–30. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirkan, H., M. Goul, and M. Gros. 2010. “A Reference Model for Sustainable E-learning Service Systems: Experiences with the Joint University/Teradata Consortium.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 8 (1): 151–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2009.00250.x
   Google Scholar
• Gay, G. H. 2016. “An assessment of Online Instructor E-learning Readiness Before, During, and After Course Delivery.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 28 (2): 199–220. doi: 10.1007/s12528-016-9115-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemaghaei, M., and K. Hassanein. 2015. “Online Information Quality and Consumer Satisfaction: The Moderating Roles of Contextual Factors – A Meta-analysis.” Information & Management 52 (8): 965–81. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goi, C. L., and P. Y. Ng. 2009. “E-learning in Malaysia: Success Factors in Implementing E-learning Program.” International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 20 (2): 237–46.
   Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., and R. L. Thompson. 1995. “Task-technology Fit and Individual Performance.” MIS Quarterly 19 (2): 213–36. doi: 10.2307/249689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindasamy, T. 2001. “Successful Implementation of E-learning: Pedagogical Considerations.” The Internet and Higher Education 4 (3): 287–99. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00071-9
   Google Scholar
• Gu, L., and J. Wang. 2015. “A Task Technology Fit Model on E-learning.” Issues in Information Systems 16 (1): 163–69.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, C. 2010. “Sustainability Factors for E-learning Initiatives.” Research in Learning Technology 18 (2): 89–103. doi: 10.1080/09687769.2010.492848
   Google Scholar
• Ho, C. H. 2010. “Continuance Intention of E-learning Platform: Toward an Integrated Model.” International Journal of Electronic BusinessManagement 8 (3): 206–15.
   Google Scholar
• Holsapple, C. W., and A. Lee-Post. 2006. “Defining, Assessing, and Promoting E-learning Success: An Information Systems Perspective.” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education 4 (1): 67–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00102.x
   Google Scholar
• Hung, M. C., I. C. Chang, and H. G. Hwang. 2011. “Exploring Academic Teachers’ Continuance Toward the Web-based Learning System: The Role of Causal Attributions.” Computers & Education 57 (2): 1530–43. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifinedo, P. 2006. “Acceptance and Continuance Intention of Web-based Learning Technologies (WLT) Use among University Students in a Baltic Country.” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 23: 1–20. doi: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00151.x
   Google Scholar
• Islam, A. N., and N. Azad. 2015. “Satisfaction and Continuance with a Learning Management System: Comparing Perceptions of Educators and Students.” The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology 32 (2): 109–23. doi: 10.1108/IJILT-09-2014-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, N. Z., M. R. Razak, Z. Zakariah, N. Alias, and M. N. A. Aziz. 2012. “E-learning Continuance Intention Among Higher Learning Institution Students’ in Malaysia.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 67: 409–15. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.345
   Google Scholar
• Jassbi, J., F. Mohamadnejad, and H. Nasrollahzadeh. 2011. “A Fuzzy DEMATEL Framework for Modeling Cause and Effect Relationships of Strategy Map.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (5): 5967–73. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng, D. J. F., and G. H. Tzeng. 2012. “Social Influence on the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems: Revisiting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology by the fuzzy DEMATEL technique.” Computers & Industrial Engineering 62 (3): 819–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, T. J., A. M. Sørebø, and Ø. Sørebø. 2009. “The Role of Task-technology Fit as Users’ Motivation to Continue Information System Use.” Computers in Human Behavior 25 (3): 778–84. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. C. 2010. “Explaining and Predicting Users’ Continuance Intention Toward E-learning: An Extension of the Expectation–Confirmation Model.” Computers & Education 54 (2): 506–16. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C., P. Palvia, and J. L. Chen. 2009. “Information Technology Adoption Behavior life Cycle: Toward a Technology Continuance Theory (TCT).” International Journal of Information Management 29 (4): 309–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieblein, E. 2000. “Critical Factors for Successful Delivery of Online Programs.” The Internet and Higher Education 3 (3): 161–74. doi: 10.1016/S1096-7516(01)00036-7
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, S. S., H. M. Huang, and G. D. Chen. 2007. “Surveying Instructor and Learner Attitudes Toward E-learning.” Computers & Education 49 (4): 1066–80. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limayem, M., and C. M. Cheung. 2008. “Understanding Information Systems Continuance: The Case of Internet-based Learning Technologies.” Information & Management 45 (4): 227–32. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K. M. 2011. “E-Learning Continuance Intention: Moderating Effects of User E-learning Experience.” Computers & Education 56 (2): 515–26. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W. S. 2012. “Perceived Fit and Satisfaction on Web Learning Performance: Is Continuance Intention and Task-technology Fit Perspectives.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70 (7): 498–507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K. M., N. S. Chen, and K. Fang. 2011. “Understanding E-learning Continuance intention: A Negative Critical Incidents Perspective.” Behaviour & Information Technology 30 (1): 77–89. doi: 10.1080/01449291003752948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W. S., and C. H. Wang. 2012. “Antecedences to Continued Intentions of Adopting E-learning System in Blended Learning Instruction: A Contingency Framework Based on Models of Information System Success and Task-technology Fit.” Computers & Education 58 (1): 88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh, C., D. H. Wong, A. Quazi, and R. P. Kingshott. 2016. “Re-examining Students’ Perception of E-learning: An Australian Perspective.” International Journal of Educational Management 30 (1): 129–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, C. M., C. M. Chao, and B. W. Cheng. 2013. “Integrating Technology Acceptance Model and Task-technology Fit Into Blended E-learning System.” Journal of Applied Sciences 13 (5): 736–42. doi: 10.3923/jas.2013.736.742
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Caro, E., J. G. Cegarra-Navarro, and G. Cepeda-Carrión. 2015. “An Application of the Performance-evaluation Model for E-learning Quality in Higher Education.” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 26 (5–6): 632–47. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2013.867607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masrom, M., O. Zainon, and R. Rahiman. 2008. “Critical Success in E-learning: An Examination of Technological and Institutional Support Factors.” International Journal of Cyber Society and Education 1 (2): 131–42.
   Google Scholar
• McGill, T. J., and J. E. Klobas. 2009. “A Task–technology Fit View of Learning Management System Impact.” Computers & Education 52 (2): 496–508. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill, T. J., J. E. Klobas, and S. Renzi. 2014. “Critical Success Factors for the Continuation of E-learning Initiatives.” The Internet and Higher Education 22: 24–36. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., and M. Baptista Nunes. 2006. “Organisational Issues for E-learning: Critical Success Factors as Identified by HE Practitioners.” International Journal of Educational Management 20 (7): 542–58.
   Google Scholar
• Penna, M. P., V. Stara, and M. De Rose. 2009. “The Failure of E-learning: Why Should We Use a Learner Centred Design.” Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society 3 (2): 127–35.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, W. W., C. R. Graham, R. G. Bodily, and D. S. Sandberg. 2016. “A Qualitative Analysis of Institutional Drivers and Barriers to Blended Learning Adoption in Higher Education.” The Internet and Higher Education 28: 17–27. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raspopovic, M., and A. Jankulovic. 2016. “Performance Measurement of E-learning Using Student Satisfaction Analysis.” Information Systems Frontiers 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10796-016-9636-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca, J. C., C. M. Chiu, and F. J. Martínez. 2006. “Understanding E-learning Continuance Intention: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (8): 683–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romiszowski, A. J. 2004. “How’s the E-learning Baby? Factors Leading to Success or Failure of an Educational Technology Innovation.” Educational Technology 44 (1): 5–27.
   Google Scholar
• Saba, T. 2012. “Implications of E-learning Systems and Self-efficiency on Students Outcomes: A Model Approach.” Human-Centric Computing and Information Sciences 2 (1): 1–11. doi: 10.1186/2192-1962-2-6
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., and J. E. Hunter. 2014. Methods of Meta-analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sela, E., and Y. Sivan. 2009. “Enterprise E-learning Success Factors: An Analysis of Practitioners’ Perspective (with a Downturn Addendum).” Interdisciplinary Journal of E-learning and Learning Objects 5 (1): 335–43. doi: 10.28945/81
   Google Scholar
• Selim, H. M. 2007. “Critical Success Factors for E-learning Acceptance: Confirmatory Factor Models.” Computers & Education 49 (2): 396–413. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau, W. L., and P. Y. Chau. 2016. “Understanding Behavioral Intention to Use a Cloud Computing Classroom: A Multiple Model Comparison Approach.” Information & Management 53 (3): 355–65. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soong, M. B., H. C. Chan, B. C. Chua, and K. F. Loh. 2001. “Critical Success Factors for On-line Course Resources.” Computers & Education 36 (2): 101–20. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(00)00044-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørebø, Ø., H. Halvari, V. F. Gulli, and R. Kristiansen. 2009. “The Role of Self-determination Theory in Explaining Teachers’ Motivation to Continue to Use E-learning Technology.” Computers & Education 53 (4): 1177–87. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., and A. Jeyaraj. 2013. “Information Technology Adoption and Continuance: A Longitudinal Study of Individuals’ Behavioral Intentions.” Information & Management 50 (7): 457–65. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P. C., R. J. Tsai, G. Finger, Y. Y. Chen, and D. Yeh. 2008. “What Drives a Successful E-learning? An Empirical Investigation of the Critical Factors Influencing Learner Satisfaction.” Computers & Education 50 (4): 1183–1202. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, K., P. Shea, E. E. Fredericksen, A. M. Pickett, and W. E. Pelz. 2000. “Course Design Factors Influencing the Success of Online Learning.” Paper presented at the WebNet 2000 World Conference on the WWW and Internet, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., and P. Todd. 1995. “Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience.” MIS Quarterly 19: 561–70. doi: 10.2307/249633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volery, T., and D. Lord. 2000. “Critical Success Factors in Online Education.” International Journal of Educational Management 14 (5): 216–23.
   Google Scholar
• Weng, C., C. C. Tsai, and A. Weng. 2015. “Social Support as a Neglected E-learning Motivator Affecting Trainee’s Decisions of Continuous Intentions of Usage.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 31 (2): 177–92. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., and J. S. Eccles. 2000. “Expectancy–value Theory of Achievement Motivation.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 25 (1): 68–81. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. W., and Y. T. Lee. 2007. “Developing Global Managers’ Competencies Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method.” Expert Systems with Applications 32 (2): 499–507. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J. H., R. D. Tennyson, and T. L. Hsia. 2010. “A Study of Student Satisfaction in a Blended E-learning System Environment.” Computers & Education 55 (1): 155–64. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Y. Fang, K. K. Wei, and Z. Wang. 2012. “Promoting the Intention of Students to Continue their Participation in E-learning Systems: The Role of the Communication Environment.” Information Technology & People 25 (4): 356–75. doi: 10.1108/09593841211278776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar