Making the familiar strange – a research pedagogy for practice

References

• Adkins, B. 2009. “PhD Pedagogy and the Changing Knowledge Landscapes of Universities.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (2): 165–77. doi: 10.1080/07294360902725041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonacopoulou, E. 2009. “Impact and Scholarship: Unlearning and Practising to Co-create Actionable Knowledge.” Management Learning 40 (4): 421–30. doi: 10.1177/1350507609336708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, A., and G. Mercer G., eds. 2001. Postgraduate Research Supervision: Transforming (R)Elations. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M. 2007. “Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Need Not Require Joint or Relevant Research: Toward a Relational Scholarship of Integration.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (6): 1323–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bjrkeng, K., S. Clegg, and T. Pitsis. 2009. “Becoming (a) Practice.” Management Learning 40 (2): 145–59. doi: 10.1177/1350507608101226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohm, D. 2013. On Dialogue. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and C. Costley. 2007. “From Project Supervision to Advising: New Conceptions of the Practice.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44 (2): 119–30. doi: 10.1080/14703290701241034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and M. Tennant. 2006. “Putting Doctoral Education to Work: Challenges to Academic Practice.” Higher Education Research and Development 25 (3): 293–306. doi: 10.1080/07294360600793093
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D., and B. Torbert. 2003. “Transforming Inquiry and Action Interweaving 27 Flavors of Action Research.” Action Research 1 (2): 133–52. doi: 10.1177/14767503030012002
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D. 2016. Inside Organizations: Exploring Organizational Experiences. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and P. Coughlan. 2010. “Notes Toward a Philosophy of Action Learning Research.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (2): 193–203. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2010.488330
   Google Scholar
• Cooperrider, D., D. D. Whitney, and J. M. Stavros. 2008. The Appreciative Inquiry Handbook: For Leaders of Change. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Corradi, G., S. Gherardi, and L. Verzelloni. 2010. “Through the Practice Lens: Where is the Bandwagon of Practice-Based Studies Heading?” Management Learning 41 (3): 265–83. doi: 10.1177/1350507609356938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley, C., and J. Stephenson. 2008. “Building Doctorates Around Individual Candidates’ Professional Experience.” In Changing Practices of Doctoral Education, edited by D. Boud and A. Lee, 171–83. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, E. 2012. Coaching Understood: A Pragmatic Inquiry into the Coaching Process. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crossouard, B. 2008. “Developing Alternative Models of Doctoral Supervision with Online Formative Assessment.” Studies in Continuing Education 30 (1): 51–67. doi: 10.1080/01580370701841549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A. L. 2002. “Reflexive Dialogical Practice in Management Learning.” Management Learning 33 (1): 35–61. doi: 10.1177/1350507602331002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, E. 2011. Relational Coaching: Journeys Towards Mastering one-to-one Learning. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus and Dreyfus. 1986. Mind over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. CA Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. 1997. Teaching Positions: Difference, Pedagogy, and the Power of Address. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evered, R., and M. R. Louis. 1981. “Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences: Inquiry from the Inside and Inquiry from the Outside.” Academy of Management Review 6 (3): 385–95. doi: 10.2307/257374
   Google Scholar
• Fillery-Travis, A. J. 2014. “The Framework of a Generic DProf Programme – A Reflection on its Design, the Relational Dimension for Candidates and Advisers and the Potential for Knowledge co-Creation.” Studies in Higher Education, 39 (4): 608–20. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.729031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillery-Travis, A., and E. Cox. 2014. “Researching Coaching.” The Complete Handbook of Coaching S: 445–59.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, D., and G. Schreyögg. 2009. “Coping with the Concept of Knowledge: Toward a Discursive Understanding of Knowledge.” Management Learning, 40 (4): 475–80. doi: 10.1177/1350507609339690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B. 2003. “Mapping the Pleasures and Risks of Supervision.” Discourse (Abingdon) 24 (2): 175.
   Google Scholar
• Kegan, R. 2009. “What” Form” Transforms. A Constructive-Developmental Approach to Transformative Learning.” In Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists in Their Own Words, edited by Teoksessa K. Illeris (toim.), 35–54. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, P. M., and K. S. Kitchener. 1994. Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. Jossey-Bass, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Communities. Harvard: Harvard Educational.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, M. S., E. F. Holton, and R. A. Swanson. 1998. The Adult Learner: The Definite Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. Houston: Gulf Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. 2014. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, D. A., and S. Corrie. 2007. The Modern Scientist-Practitioner: A Guide to Practice in Psychology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Wilkes, L., and L. Ashmore. 2014. The Reflective Practitioner in Professional Education. London: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2008. “How are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33 (3): 267–81. doi: 10.1080/03075070802049202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. 2010. “New Approaches to Doctoral Supervision: Implications for Educational Development.” Educational Developments, 11 (2): 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A., M. Brennan, and B. Green. 2009. “Re-imagining Doctoral Education: Professional Doctorates and Beyond.” Higher Education Research & Development 28 (3): 275–87. doi: 10.1080/07294360902839883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., and B. Green. 2009. “Supervision as Metaphor.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (6): 615–30. doi: 10.1080/03075070802597168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, S. 2004. “Conceptualizing the Practitioner Doctorate.” Studies in Higher Education 29 (6): 757–70. doi: 10.1080/0307507042000287249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusted, D. 1986. “Why Pedagogy?” Screen 27 (5): 2–16. doi: 10.1093/screen/27.5.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyall, C., and L. Meagher. 2012. “A Masterclass in Interdisciplinarity: Research into Practice in Training the Next Generation of Interdisciplinary Researchers.” Futures 44: 608–17. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., and J. Whitehead. 2011. All you Need to Know About Action Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 1994. “Understanding Transformation Theory.” Adult Education Quarterly, 44 (4): 222–32. doi: 10.1177/074171369404400403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowbray, S., and C. Halse. 2010. “The Purpose of the PhD: Theorising the Skills Acquired by Students.” Higher Education Research and Development 29 (6): 653–64. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2010.487199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerland, M., and K. Jensen. 2012. “Epistemic Practices and Object Relations in Professional Work.” Journal of Education and Work 25 (1): 101–20.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, S., and M. Hayden. 1999. “Experiences of Supervisors in Facilitating the Induction of Research Higher Degree Students to Fields of Education”. epubs.scu.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• Perriton, L., and V. Hodgson. 2013. “Positioning Theory and Practice Question(s) Within the Field of Management Learning.” Management Learning 44 (2): 144–60. doi: 10.1177/1350507612443939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, N., M. Tedder, R. Boyask, and P. Kelly. 2015. “Pedagogic Relations and Professional Change: A Sociocultural Analysis of Students’ earning in a Professional Doctorate.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (1): 43–59. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.818640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rheinberger, H. 1997. “Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube”.
   Google Scholar
• Savigny, E. V., K. Knorr-Cetina, and T. R. Schatzki. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scohn, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. 1993. Cultural Politics of Everyday Life: Social Constructionism, Rhetoric and Knowing of the Third Kind. Ontario: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens-Long, J., S. A. Schapiro, and C. Mclintock. 2012. “Passionate Scholars: Transformative Learning in Doctoral Education.” Adult Education Quarterly 62 (2): 180–98. doi: 10.1177/0741713611402046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, I. C., and K. E. Kram. 2009. “Enacting the Scholar–Practitioner Role. An Exploration of Narratives.” The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science 45 (1): 12–38. doi: 10.1177/0021886308327238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1988. Wittgenstein's Lectures on Philosophical Psychology, 1946–47. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeegers, M., and D. Barron. 2012. “Pedagogical Concerns in Doctoral Supervision: A Challenge for Pedagogy.” Quality Assurance in Education 20 (1): 20–30. doi: 10.1108/09684881211198211
   Google Scholar