1,330
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Professional identity and the adoption of learning management systems

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Al-Samarraie, Hosam, Bee Kim Teng, Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani, and Nasser Alalwan. 2017. “E-learning Continuance Satisfaction in Higher Education: A Unified Perspective from Instructors and Students.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (11): 2003–19. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1298088.
  • Anderson, S. E., J. G. Groulx, and R. M. Maninger. 2011. “Relationships among Preservice Teachers’ Technology-related Abilities, Beliefs, and Intentions to Use Technology in Their Future Classrooms.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 45 (3): 321–38. doi:10.2190/EC.45.3.d.
  • Baer, Markus, and Michael Frese. 2003. “Innovation is Not Enough: Climates for Initiative and Psychological Safety, Process Innovations, and Firm Performance.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 24 (1): 45–68. doi:10.1002/job.179.
  • Bandura, Albert. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change.” Psychological Review 84 (2): 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
  • Barki, Henri, Ryad Titah, and Céline Boffo. 2007. “Information System Use-related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-level Information System Use.” Information Systems Research 18 (2): 173–92. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0122.
  • Becher, Tony, and Paul Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
  • Benson, Robyn, and Tom Palaskas. 2006. “Introducing a New Learning Management System: An Institutional Case Study.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 22 (4): 548–567. doi: 10.14742/ajet.1285
  • Bentler, P. M. 1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.” Psychological Bulletin 107 (2): 238–246.
  • Berger, Jean-Louis, and Kim Lê Van. 2018. “Teacher Professional Identity as Multidimensional: Mapping its Components and Examining Their Associations with General Pedagogical Beliefs.” Educational Studies, 1–19. doi:10.1080/03055698.2018.1446324.
  • Browne, M. W., and R. Cudeck. 1993. “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit.” In Testing Structural Equation Models, edited by K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long, 136–162. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Brownell, Sara E., and Kimberly D. Tanner. 2012. “Barriers to Faculty Pedagogical Change: Lack of Training, Time, Incentives, and … Tensions with Professional Identity?” CBE-Life Sciences Education 11 (4): 339–46. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163.
  • Buchanan, Tom, Phillip Sainter, and Gunter Saunders. 2013. “Factors Affecting Faculty Use of Learning Technologies: Implications for Models of Technology Adoption.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 25 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1007/s12528-013-9066-6.
  • Burton-Jones, Andrew, and Detmar W. Straub. 2006. “Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test.” Information Systems Research 17 (3): 228–46. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0096.
  • Canrinus, Esther T., Michelle Helms-Lorenz, Douwe Beijaard, Jaap Buitink, and Adriaan Hofman. 2012. “Self-efficacy, Job Satisfaction, Motivation and Commitment: Exploring the Relationships between Indicators of Teachers’ Professional Identity.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 27 (1): 115–32. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0069-2.
  • Chreim, Samia, Bernard E. Williams, and C. R. Hinings. 2007. “Interlevel Influences on the Reconstruction of Professional Role Identity.” Academy of Management Journal 50 (6): 1515–39. doi:10.2307/20159487 doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.28226248
  • Cigdem, Harun, and Abdullah Topcu. 2015. “Predictors of Instructors’ Behavioral Intention to Use Learning Management System: A Turkish Vocational College Example.” Computers in Human Behavior 52: 22–28. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049.
  • Conroy, Samantha A., and Anne M. O’Leary-Kelly. 2014. “Letting Go and Moving On: Work-related Identity Loss and Recovery.” Academy of Management Review 39 (1): 67–87. doi:10.5465/amr.2011.0396.
  • Dahlstrom, Eden, D. Christopher Brooks, and Jacqueline Bichsel. 2014. The Current Ecosystem of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Student, Faculty, and IT Perspectives. Louisville, CO: ECAR: Educause Center for Analysis and Research Research report.
  • Davis, Fred D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly, 319–40. doi:10.2307/249008.
  • Deutskens, Elisabeth, Ko De Ruyter, Martin Wetzels, and Paul Oosterveld. 2004. “Response Rate and Response Quality of Internet-based Surveys: An Experimental Study.” Marketing Letters 15 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1023/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00.
  • Drent, Marjolein, and Martina Meelissen. 2008. “Which Factors Obstruct or Stimulate Teacher Educators to Use ICT Innovatively?” Computers & Education 51 (1): 187–99. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.001.
  • Flores, Maria Assunção, and Christopher Day. 2006. “Contexts Which Shape and Reshape New Teachers’ Identities: A Multi-perspective Study.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22 (2): 219–32. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002.
  • Herscovitch, Lynne, and John P. Meyer. 2002. “Commitment to Organizational Change: Extension of a Three-component Model.” Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (3): 474. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474.
  • Hong, Ji Y. 2010. “Pre-service and Beginning Teachers’ Professional Identity and Its Relation to Dropping Out of the Profession.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (8): 1530–43. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.003.
  • Hoyle, Eric. 2012. “Deprofessionalization in Education.” In World Yearbook of Education 1980: The Professional Development of Teachers, edited by Eric Hoyle, and Jacquetta Megarry, 42–54. New York: Kogan Page Limited.
  • Hu, Li-tze, and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
  • Ibarra, Herminia. 1999. “Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (4): 764–91. doi:10.2307/2667055.
  • Igbaria, Magid, Nancy Zinatelli, Paul Cragg, and Angèle L. M. Cavaye. 1997. “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model.” MIS Quarterly, 279–305. doi:10.2307/249498.
  • Kline, Rex B. 2015. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. London: Guilford Publications.
  • Klobas, J. E., and T. J. McGill. 2010. “The Role of Involvement in Learning Management System Success.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 22 (2): 114–34. doi:10.1007/s12528-010-9032-5.
  • Kyratsis, Y., R. Atun, N. Phillips, P. Tracey, and G. George. 2017. “Health Systems in Transition: Professional Identity Work in the Context of Shifting Institutional Logics.” Academy of Management Journal 60 (2): 610–41. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0684.
  • Lamote, Carl, and Nadine Engels. 2010. “The Development of Student Teachers’ Professional Identity.” European Journal of Teacher Education 33 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1080/02619760903457735.
  • Lee, Y. H., Y. C. Hsieh, and C. N. Hsu. 2011. “Adding Innovation Diffusion Theory to the Technology Acceptance Model: Supporting Employees’ Intentions to Use E-learning Systems.” Educational Technology & Society 14 (4): 124–37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ963285.
  • Lonn, S., and S. D. Teasley. 2009. “Saving Time or Innovating Practice: Investigating Perceptions and Uses of Learning Management Systems.” Computers & Education 53 (3): 686–94. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.008.
  • Markauskaite, Lina. 2007. “Exploring the Structure of Trainee Teachers’ ICT Literacy: The Main Components of, and Relationships between, General Cognitive and Technical Capabilities.” Educational Technology Research and Development 55 (6): 547–72. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9043-8.
  • McGill, Tanya J., and Jane E. Klobas. 2009. “A Task–Technology Fit View of Learning Management System Impact.” Computers & Education 52 (2): 496–508. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.002.
  • McNaughton, S. M., and J. Billot. 2016. “Negotiating Academic Teacher Identity Shifts during Higher Education Contextual Change.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (6): 644–58. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1163669.
  • Meyer, John P., E. S. Srinivas, Jaydeep B. Lal, and Laryssa Topolnytsky. 2007. “Employee Commitment and Support for an Organizational Change: Test of the Three-Component Model in Two Cultures.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 80 (2): 185–211. doi:10.1348/096317906X118685.
  • Nixon, J. 1996. “Professional Identity and the Restructuring of Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 21 (1): 5–16. doi:10.1080/03075079612331381417.
  • Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., K. D. Glazewski, T. J. Newby, and P. A. Ertmer. 2010. “Teacher Value Beliefs Associated with Using Technology: Addressing Professional and Student Needs.” Computers & Education 55 (3): 1321–35. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002.
  • Owens, Tessa. 2015. “Practising What They Preach? An Investigation into the Pedagogical Beliefs and Online Teaching Practices of National Teaching Fellows.” International Journal for Academic Development 20 (1): 76–92. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2014.983112.
  • Oyserman, Daphna. 2009. “Identity-based Motivation: Implications for Action-readiness, Procedural-readiness, and Consumer Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Psychology 19 (3): 250–60. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.008.
  • Park, Namkee, Kwan Min Lee, and Pauline Hope Cheong. 2007. “University Instructors’ Acceptance of Electronic Courseware: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 163–86. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00391.x.
  • Parker, S. K., H. M. Williams, and N. Turner. 2006. “Modeling the Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work.” Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (3): 636–52. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636.
  • Pereira, Rex Eugene. 2002. “An Adopter-centered Approach to Understanding Adoption of Innovations.” European Journal of Innovation Management 5 (1): 40–49. doi:10.1108/14601060210415162.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  • Porter, W. W., and C. R. Graham. 2016. “Institutional Drivers and Barriers to Faculty Adoption of Blended Learning in Higher Education.” British Journal of Educational Technology 47 (4): 748–62. doi:10.1111/bjet.12269.
  • Ramsden, P., and I. Moses. 1992. “Associations between Research and Teaching in Australian Higher Education.” Higher Education 23 (3): 273–95. doi:10.1007/Bf00145017.
  • Renda dos Santos, Luiz Miguel, and Shintaro Okazaki. 2016. “Planned E-learning Adoption and Occupational Socialisation in Brazilian Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (11): 1974–94. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.1007940.
  • Rogers, Everett M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th ed. New York: Free Press.
  • Roxa, T., and K. Martensson. 2015. “Microcultures and Informal Learning: A Heuristic Guiding Analysis of Conditions for Informal Learning in Local Higher Education Workplaces.” International Journal for Academic Development 20 (2): 193–205. doi:10.1080/1360144x.2015.1029929.
  • Schoonenboom, Judith. 2014. “Using an Adapted, Task-level Technology Acceptance Model to Explain Why Instructors in Higher Education Intend to Use Some Learning Management System Tools More Than Others.” Computers & Education 71: 247–56. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016.
  • Sinclair, Jane, and Anne-Maria Aho. 2018. “Experts on Super Innovators: Understanding Staff Adoption of Learning Management Systems.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (1): 158–72. doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1342609.
  • Skelton, Alan. 2012. “Teacher Identities in a Research-led Institution: In the Ascendancy or on the Retreat?” British Educational Research Journal 38 (1): 23–39. doi:10.1080/01411926.2010.523454.
  • Smith, Karen. 2012. “Lessons Learnt from Literature on the Diffusion of Innovative Learning and Teaching Practices in Higher Education.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 (2): 173–82. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.677599.
  • Sørebø, Øystein, Hallgeir Halvari, Vebjørn Flaata Gulli, and Roar Kristiansen. 2009. “The Role of Self-determination Theory in Explaining Teachers’ Motivation to Continue to Use E-learning Technology.” Computers & Education 53 (4): 1177–87. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001.
  • Tarling, Isabel, and Dick Ng’ambi. 2016. “Teachers Pedagogical Change Framework: A Diagnostic Tool for Changing Teachers’ Uses of Emerging Technologies.” British Journal of Educational Technology 47 (3): 554–72. doi:10.1111/bjet.12454.
  • Thompson, M. 2012. “People, Practice, and Technology: Restoring Giddens’ Broader Philosophy to the Study of Information Systems.” Information and Organization 22 (3): 188–207. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2012.04.001.
  • Tierney, William G., and Michael Lanford. 2016. “Conceptualizing Innovation in Higher Education.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 1–40. Cham: Springer.
  • Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser. 2004. “Development and Use of the Approaches to Teaching Inventory.” Educational Psychology Review 16 (4): 409–24. doi:10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9.
  • Utesheva, Anastasia, Jason R. Simpson, and Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic. 2016. “Identity Metamorphoses in Digital Disruption: A Relational Theory of Identity.” European Journal of Information Systems 25 (4): 344–63. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2015.19
  • van Lankveld, Thea, Judith Schoonenboom, Monique Volman, Gerda Croiset, and Jos Beishuizen. 2017. “Developing a Teacher Identity in the University Context: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Higher Education Research & Development 36 (2): 325–42. doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1208154.
  • Van Veen, Klaas, and Peter Sleegers. 2006. “How Does It Feel? Teachers’ Emotions in a Context of Change.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 38 (1): 85–111. doi:10.1080/00220270500109304.
  • Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.