Career mobility from associate to full professor in academia: micro-political practices and implicit gender stereotypes

References

• Acker, J. 1990. “Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations.” Gender and Society 4 (2): 139–58. doi: 10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. 2006. “Inequality Regimes Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations.” Gender and Society 20 (4): 441–64. doi: 10.1177/0891243206289499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. 2009. “From Glass Ceiling to Inequality Regimes.” Sociologie du Travail 51 (2): 199–217. doi: 10.4000/sdt.16407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angervall, P. 2018. “The Academic Career: A Study of Subjectivity, Gender and Movement among Women University Lecturers.” Gender and Education 30 (1): 105–118. doi: 10.1080/09540253.2016.1184234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barter, C., and E. Renold. 1999. “The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research.” Social Research Update 25 (9): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bleijenbergh, I. L., M. L. van Engen, L. Schulte, and E. Blonk. 2010. “Vrouwen naar de top.” Women to the Top. Tijdschrift voor HRM, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Bolino, M., D. Long, and W. Turnley. 2016. “Impression Management in Organizations: Critical Questions, Answers, and Areas for Future Research.” Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 3: 377–406. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062337
   Google Scholar
• Bussemaker, J. 2015. Genant hoe de vrouw achterblijft (Embarrassing how women lag behind). Downloaded from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2015/11/19/genant-hoe-de-vrouw-achterblijft-1560193-a784769.
   Google Scholar
• Castilla, E. J., and S. Benard. 2010. “The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55: 543–76. doi: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daft, R. 2012. Organization Theory and Design. 12th ed. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Derks, B., N. Ellemers, C. van Laar, and K. de Groot. 2011. “Do Sexist Organizational Cultures Create the Queen Bee?” British Journal of Social Psychology 50 (3): 519–535. doi: 10.1348/014466610X525280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., C. van Laar, and N. Ellemers. 2009. “Working for the Self or Working for the Group: How Self- Versus Group Affirmation Affects Collective Behavior in Low-status Groups.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (1): 183. doi: 10.1037/a0013068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, P. L., K. Ward, and T. Khwaja, eds. 2017. Critical Approaches to Women and Gender in Higher Education. Palgrave, MacMillan. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-59285-9.
   Google Scholar
• Eisinga, R., and P. Scheepers. 1989. Etnocentrisme in Nederland, theoretische en empirische modellen. Nijmegen: Instituut voor Toegepaste Sociale Wetenschappen.
   Google Scholar
• El-Alayli, A., A. A. Hansen-Brown, and M. Ceynar. 2018. “Dancing Backwards in High Heels: Female Professors Experience More Work Demands and Special Favor Requests, Particularly from Academically Entitled Students.” Sex Roles 79 (3–4): 136–150. doi:10.1007/s11199-017-0872-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009a. She Figures 2009, Statistics and Indicators on Gender Equality in Science. Accessed September 10, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she_figures_2009_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009b. “Mapping the Maze: Getting More Women to the Top in Research.” Equal Opportunities International 28 (1): 12–113.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. She Figures 2015; Gender in Research and Innovation. Brussel.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. Report on Equality Between Women and Men in the EU. Accessed September 11, 2018. ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/document.cfm?doc_id = 50074.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. 2000. “Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination at the Seam Between the Centuries: Evolution, Culture, Mind, and Brain.” European Journal of Social Psychology 30 (3): 299–322. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(200005/06)30:3<299::AID-EJSP2>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., and L. E. Stevens. 1993. “What’s so Special About Sex? Gender Stereotyping and Discrimination.” In Gender Issues in Contemporary Society, edited by S. Oskamp and M. Costanzo, 173–96. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fotaki, M. 2013. “No Woman is Like a Man (in Academia): The Masculine Symbolic Order and the Unwanted Female Body.” Organization Studies 34 (9): 1251–75. doi: 10.1177/0170840613483658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goy, E. V., Y. L. Wong, W. Y. Low, S. N. M. Noor, Z. Fazli-Khalaf, N. Onyeneho, E. Daniel, S. Azizan, M. Hasbullah, and A. Ginika Uzoigwe. 2018. “Swimming Against the Tide” in STEM Education and Gender Equality, a Problem of Recruitment and Retention in Malasia.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (11): 1793–1809. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1277383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, G. G., A. B. Banaji, A. R. Rudman, S. D. Farnham, B. A. Nosek, and A. Mellott. 2002. “A Unified Theory of Implicit Attitudes, Stereotypes, Self-esteem, and Self-concept.” Psychological Review 109 (1): 3–25. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, D. L., and T. K. Trolier. 1986. “Stereotypes and Stereotyping: An Overview of the Cognitive Approach.” In Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, edited by J. Dovidio and S. L. Gaertner, 127–63. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harford, J. 2018. “The Perspectives of Women Professors on the Professoriate: A Missing Piece in the Narrative on Gender Equality in the University.” Education Sciences 8 (2): 50. doi:10.3390/educsci8020050. Special Issue on Gender and Leadership, ed. Pat O' Connor.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofhuis, J., K. I. van der Zee, and S. Otten. 2008. Uitstroom van allochtonen bij de Rijksoverheid. Den Haag: A&O-fonds Rijk.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. 1998. Masculinity and Femininity. The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, N., M. Bloor, J. Fischer, L. Berney, and J. Neale. 2010. “Putting It in Context: The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Interviewing.” Qualitative Research 10 (2): 175–98. doi: 10.1177/1468794109356737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaatz, A., B. Gutierrez, and M. Carnes. 2014. “Threats to Objectivity in Peer Review: The Case of Gender.” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 35 (8): 371–3. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2014.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirton, G., and A. M. Greene. 2015. The Dynamics of Managing Diversity: A Critical Approach. 4th ed. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leisyte, L. 2016. “New Public Management and Research Productivity – a Precarious State of Affairs of Academic Work in the Netherlands.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (5): 828–46. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2016.1147721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, J. D., and D. Young. 2010. “Implicit Gender Bias in the Legal Profession: An Empirical Study.” Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 18 (1): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• LNVH. 2018. Monitor Female Full Professors. Publication by the LNVH (Dutch national network of female full professors). www.lnvh.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. 2010. “Carelessness: A Hidden Doxa of Higher Education.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 9: 54–67. doi: 10.1177/1474022209350104
   Google Scholar
• Morley, L. 1999. Organising Feminisms: The Micropolitics of the Academy. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A., R. White, and E. van Velsor. 1987. Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Can Women Reach the Top of America? The Center of Creative Leadership. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin, C. A., J. F. Dovidio, V. L. Brescoll, M. Graham, and J. Handelsman. 2012. “Science Faculty’s Subtle Gender Biases Favor Male Students.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 16474–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. W. 2016a. “Limits to Meritocracy? Gender in Academic Recruitment and Promotion Processes.” Science and Public Policy 43 (3): 386–99. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. W. 2016b. “Gender Inequality and Research Performance: Moving Beyond Individual-meritocratic Explanations of Academic Advancement.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (11): 2044–60. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1007945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, M. W. 2017. “Reasons for Leaving the Academy: A Case Study on the ‘Opt Out’ Phenomenon among Younger Female Researchers.” Gender, Work and Organization 24 (2): 134–55. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P., E. Montez López, C. O’ Hagan, A. Wolffram, M. Aye, V. Chizzola, O. Mich, et al. 2017. “Micro-political Practices in Higher Education: A Challenge to Excellence as a Rationalising Myth?” Critical Studies in Education. doi:10.1080/17508487.2017.1381629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P., and C. O’Hagan. 2016. “Excellence in University Academic Staff Evaluation: A Problematic Reality.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (11): 1943–57. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2014.1000292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, M., T. Rees, M. Bosch, C. Hermann, J. Hilden, A. McLaren, R. Palomba, et al. 2000. Science Policies in the European Union – Promoting Excellence Through Mainstreaming Gender Equality. Report from the ETAN (European Technology Assessment Network). Luxembourg: Expert Working Group on Women and Science (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C. 2002. Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, K., T. M. Willemsen, and C. C. Millar. 2009. “Views from Above the Glass Ceiling: Does the Academic Environment Influence Women Professors’ Careers and Experiences?” Sex Roles 60 (5–6): 301–12. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9547-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She-figures. 2015. Published by the European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/she_figures_2015-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. G. 2017. “‘Gender Research: Women, the Academy and the Workplace.’ Special Issue Paper. Progress and Paradox for Women in US Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (4): 812–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinpreis, R. E., K. A. Anders, and D. Ritzke. 1999. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.” Sex Roles 41: 509–28. doi: 10.1023/A:1018839203698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teelken, C., and R. Deem. 2013. “All Are Equal, but Some Are More Equal Than Others: Managerialism and Gender Equality in Higher Education in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Education 49 (4): 520–35. doi: 10.1080/03050068.2013.807642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M., and Y. Benschop. 2014. “Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment.” Journal of Management Studies 51 (3): 460–92. doi: 10.1111/joms.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, M. C. L., and M. L. M. Brouns. 2006. Gender and excellence: een landelijk onderzoek naar benoemingsprocedures van hoogleraren. Den Haag: OCW.
   Google Scholar
• Van Engen, M. L., I. L. Bleijenbergh, and J. Paauwe. 2008. Vrouwen in hogere wetenschappelijke posities aan de Universiteit van Tilburg: Processen van instroom, doorstroom en uitstroom nader bekeken. Research Report. University of Tilburg.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K., and L. E. Wolf-Wendel. 2012. Academic Motherhood: Managing Work and Family. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar