2,382
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Promoting progression in higher education teacher training: how does cognitive support enhance student physics teachers’ content knowledge development?

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Anderson, J. R. 1982. “Acquisition of Cognitive Skill.” Psychological Review 89 (4): 369–406.
  • Blömeke, S., J.-E. Gustafsson, and R. J. Shavelson. 2015. “Beyond Dichotomies: Competence Viewed as a Continuum.” Zeitschrift für Psychologie 223 (1): 3–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000194 .
  • Bond, T. G., and C. M. Fox. 2007. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bransford, J. D., A. L. Brown, and R. R. Cocking. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • Brownell, S. E., and M. J. Kloser. 2015. “Toward a Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Effectiveness of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences in Undergraduate Biology.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (3): 525–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1004234 .
  • Childs, A., and J. McNicholl. 2007. “Science Teachers Teaching Outside of Subject Specialism: Challenges, Strategies Adopted and Implications for Initial Teacher Education.” Teacher Development 11 (1): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530701194538 .
  • de Jong, T., and M. G. M. Ferguson-Hessler. 1996. “Types and Qualities of Knowledge.” Educational Psychologist 31 (2): 105–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2 .
  • Ferguson-Hessler, M. G. M., and T. de Jong. 1990. “Studying Physics Texts: Differences in Study Processes Between Good and Poor Performers.” Cognition and Instruction 7 (1): 41–54.
  • Finney, S. J., and C. DiStefano. 2006. “Non-normal and Categorical Data in Structural Equation Modeling.” In Quantitative Methods in Education and the Behavioral Sciences. Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course, edited by G. R. Hancock, and R. O. Mueller, 269–314. Charlotte, NC: IAP Information Age Publishing.
  • Garet, M. S., A. C. Porter, L. Desimone, B. F. Birman, and K. S. Yoon. 2001. “What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (4): 915–45.
  • Gollwitzer, M., D. Kranz, and E. Vogel. 2006. “Die Validität studentischer Lehrveranstaltungsevaluationen und ihre Nützlichkeit für die Verbesserung der Hochschullehre: Neuere Befunde zu den Gütekriterien des Trierer Inventars zur Lehrevaluation (TRIL).” [The Validity of Students’ Ratings and Their Utility for Enhancing Teaching Quality: Recent Results on the Psychometric Properties of the Trier Inventory for Teaching Evaluation.] In Didaktik und Evaluation in der Psychologie, edited by G. Krampen and H. Zayer, 90–104. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  • Graham, J. W. 2003. “Adding Missing-Data-Relevant Variables to FIML-Based Structural Equation Models.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 10 (1): 80–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_4 .
  • Großschedl, J., U. Harms, T. Kleickmann, and I. Glowinski. 2015. “Preservice Biology Teachers’ Professional Knowledge: Structure and Learning Opportunities.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 26 (3): 291–318. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9423-6 .
  • Grossman, P. L. 1990. The Making of a Teacher: Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Education. New York: Teachers College.
  • Helaakoski, J., and J. Viiri. 2014. “Content and Content Structure of Physics Lessons and Students’ Learning Gains: Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland.” In Quality of Instruction in Physics: Comparing Finland, Switzerland and Germany, edited by H. E. Fischer, P. Labudde, K. Neumann, and J. Viiri. 1. Aufl., 93–110. Münster, New York: Waxmann Verlag.
  • Jüttner, M., W. Boone, S. Park, and B. J. Neuhaus. 2013. “Development and Use of a Test Instrument to Measure Biology Teachers’ Content Knowledge (CK) and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK).” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 25 (1): 45–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9157-y .
  • Kirschner, S., A. Borowski, H. E. Fischer, J. Gess-Newsome, and C. von Aufschnaiter. 2016. “Developing and Evaluating a Paper-and-Pencil Test to Assess Components of Physics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (8): 1343–72.
  • Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. E. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 75–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 .
  • Kleickmann, T., D. Richter, M. Kunter, J. Elsner, M. Besser, S. Krauss, and J. Baumert. 2013. “Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” Journal of Teacher Education 64 (1): 90–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398 .
  • Kleickmann, T., M. Steffensky, and A.-K. Praetorius. 2020. “Quality of Teaching in Science Education: More Than Three Basic Dimensions?” In Empirische Forschung zu Unterrichtsqualität: Theoretische Grundfragen und quantitative Modellierungen, edited by A.-K. Praetorius, J. Grünkorn, and E. Klieme, 37–53. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft 66. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
  • Koponen, I. T., and M. Pehkonen. 2010. “Coherent Knowledge Structures of Physics Represented as Concept Networks in Teacher Education.” Science & Education 19 (3): 259–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9200-z .
  • Kulgemeyer, C., A. Borowski, D. Buschhüter, P. Enkrott, M. Kempin, P. Reinhold, J. Riese, H. Schecker, J. Schröder, and C. Vogelsang. 2020. “Professional Knowledge Affects Action-Related Skills: The Development of Preservice Physics Teachers’ Explaining Skills During a Field Experience.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57 (10): 1554–1582.
  • Kultusministerkonferenz. 2019. Ländergemeinsame Inhaltliche Anforderungen für die Fachwissenschaften und Fachdidaktiken in der Lehrerbildung. (Beschluss der Kultusministerkonferenz vom 16.10.2008 i. d. F. vom 16.05.2019) [Requirements for the Federal Teacher Education (Resolution passed at the Kultusministerkonferenz on the 10-16-2008 as amended on the 05-16-2019)]. Bonn: KMK.
  • Mardia, K. V. 1970. “Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications.” Biometrika 57 (3): 519. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2334770 .
  • Marsh, H. W. 1982. “SEEQ: A Reliable, Valid, and Useful Instrument for Collecting Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 52 (1): 77–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1982.tb02505.x .
  • Mulhall, P., and R. Gunstone. 2012. “Views About Learning Physics Held by Physics Teachers with Differing Approaches to Teaching Physics.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 23: 429–49.
  • Neumann, K., H. Härtig, U. Harms, and I. Parchmann. 2017. “Science Teacher Preparation in Germany.” In Model Science Teacher Preparation Programs: An International Comparison of What Works, edited by J. E. Pedersen, T. Isozaki, and T. Hirano, 29–52. Charlotte, North Carolina: IAP Information Age Publishing.
  • Nixon, R. S., K. M. Hill, and J. A. Luft. 2017. “Secondary Science Teachers’ Subject Matter Knowledge Development Across the First 5 Years.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 28 (7): 574–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1388086 .
  • Puntambekar, S., and R. Hübscher. 2005. “Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed?” Educational Psychologist 40 (1): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_1 .
  • Rindermann, H., and M. Amelang. 1994. Das Heidelberger Inventar zur Lehrveranstaltungs-Evaluation [The Heidelberg Inventory of Course Evaluation]. Heidelberg: Asanger.
  • Rittle-Johnson, B., R. S. Siegler, and M. W. Alibali. 2001. “Developing Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Skill in Mathematics: An Iterative Process.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2), doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346 .
  • Robitzsch, A., T. Kiefer, and M. Wu. 2020. “TAM: Test Analysis Modules.” R package version 3.5-19. Accessed February 24, 2021. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TAM.
  • Rollnick, M., J. Bennett, M. Rhemtula, N. Dharsey, and T. Ndlovu. 2008. “The Place of Subject Matter Knowledge in Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Case Study of South African Teachers Teaching the Amount of Substance and Chemical Equilibrium.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (10): 1365–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187025 .
  • Rosseel, Y. 2012. “lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48 (2): 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/.
  • Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
  • Sahdra, B., and P. Thagard. 2003. “Procedural Knowledge in Molecular Biology.” Philosophical Psychology 16 (4): 477–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0951508032000121788 .
  • Schiering, D., S. Sorge, S. Tröbst, and K. Neumann. 2021. Course Quality in Higher Education Teacher Training: What Matters for Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Content Knowledge Development? [Manuscript submitted for publication].
  • Schneider, M., and F. Preckel. 2017. “Variables Associated With Achievement in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.” Psychological Bulletin 143 (6): 565–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000098 .
  • Seidel, T., R. Rimmele, and M. Prenzel. 2005. “Clarity and Coherence of Lesson Goals as a Scaffold for Student Learning.” Learning and Instruction 15 (6): 539–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.004 .
  • Shavelson, R. J., M. A. Ruiz-Primo, and E. W. Wiley. 2005. “Windows Into the Mind.” Higher Education 49: 413–30.
  • Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (4): 4–14.
  • Sorge, S., J. Kröger, S. Petersen, and K. Neumann. 2019. “Structure and Development of Pre-Service Physics Teachers’ Professional Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (7): 862–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1346326 .
  • Sun, R., E. Merrill, and T. Peterson. 2001. “From Implicit Skills to Explicit Knowledge: A Bottom-up Model of Skill Learning.” Cognitive Science 25: 204–44.
  • Taconis, R., M. G. M. Ferguson-Hessler, and H. Broekkamp. 2001. “Teaching Science Problem Solving: An Overview of Experimental Work.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38 (4): 442–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1013 .
  • von Davier, M., and A. A. von Davier. 2011. “A General Model for IRT Scale Linking and Scale Transformations.” In Statistical Models for Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking, edited by A. A. von Davier, 225–42. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Woitkowski, D. 2020. “Tracing Physics Content Knowledge Gains Using Content Complexity Levels.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (2): 1585–1608..
  • Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., H. A. Pant, C. Lautenbach, D. Molerov, M. Toepper, and S. Brückner. 2017. “Competency Orientation in Higher Education.” In Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education: Approaches to Challenges in Higher Education Policy and Practice, edited by O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, H. A. Pant, C. Lautenbach, D. Molerov, M. Toepper, and S. Brückner, 1–5. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.