Strengthening academic leadership from above: the ‘Renewal’ of Russian university leaders

References

• Abramo, Giovanni, Tindaro Cicero, and Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo. 2013. “Individual Research Performance: A Proposal for Comparing Apples to Oranges.” Journal of Informetrics 7 (2): 528–539. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askling, Berit, and Mary Henkel. 2006. “Higher Education Institutions.” In Transforming Higher Education. A Comparative Study, edited by Maurice Kogan, Marianne Bauer, Ivar Bleiklie, and Mary Henkel, 85–101. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Badillo-Vega, Rosalba, Georg Krücken, and Pedro Pineda. 2019. “Changing Analytical Levels and Methods of Leadership Research on University Presidents.” Studies in Higher Education 1 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1647417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltaru, Roxana-Diana. 2019. “Do Non-Academic Professionals Enhance Universities’ Performance? Reputation vs. Organization.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (7): 1183–96. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1421156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, Robert. 1989. “Presidential Succession and Institutional Functioning in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education 60 (2): 123. doi:10.2307/1982173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiklie, Ivar, and Svein Michelsen. 2013. “Comparing HE Policies in Europe: Structures and Reform Outputs in Eight Countries.” Higher Education 65 (1): 113–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boer, Harry de, and Leo Goedegebuure. 2009. “The Changing Nature of the Academic Deanship.” Leadership 5 (3): 347–64. doi:10.1177/1742715009337765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breakwell, Glynis M., and Michelle Y. Tytherleigh. 2008. “UK University Leaders at the Turn of the 21st Century: Changing Patterns in Their Socio-Demographic Characteristics.” Higher Education 56 (1): 109–27. doi:10.1007/s10734-007-9092-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannella, Albert, and Michael Lubatkin. 1993. “Succession as a Sociopolitical Process: Internal Impediments to Outsider Selection.” Academy of Management Journal 36 (4): 763–93. doi:10.2307/256758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, Giliberto, and Andrea Pritoni. 2019. “Varieties of Hybrid Systemic Governance in European Higher Education.” Higher Education Quarterly 73 (1): 10–28. doi:10.1111/hequ.12180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, Teresa, and Rui Santiago. 2010. “Still Academics After All.” Higher Education Policy 23: 397–411. doi:10.1057/hep.2010.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, Barbara, and Bernward Joerges. 1996. “The Travel of Ideas.” In Translating Organizational Change, edited by Barbara Czarniawska, Bernward Joerges, and Guje Sevón, 13–48. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Demchenko, Oleg, and Grigoriy Golosov. 2016. “Federalism, Gubernatorial Power and the Incorporation of Subnational Authoritarianism in Russia: A Theory-Testing Empirical Inquiry.” Acta Politica 51 (1): 61–79. doi:10.1057/ap.2014.37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, Thomas. 2009. “New Public Management in Public Sector Organizations: The Dark Sides of Managerialism.” Public Administration 87 (4): 892–909. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01766.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, Paul, and Walter Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 148–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diogo, Sara, Teresa Carvalho, and Zélia Breda. 2021. “Nomination vs. Election: Do They Influence Women’s Access to Institutional Decision-Making Bodies?” Journal of Management and Governance 25: 879–898. doi:10.1007/s10997-020-09538-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbins, Michael, and Christoph Knill. 2009. “Higher Education Policies in Central and Eastern Europe: Convergence Toward a Common Model?” Governance 22 (3): 397–430. d oi:10.1111%2Fj.1468-0491.2009.01445.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donina, Davide, and Stefano Paleari. 2019. “New Public Management: Global Reform Script or Conceptual Stretching? Analysis of University Governance Structures in the Napoleonic Administrative Tradition.” Higher Education 78 (2): 193–219. doi:10.1007/s10734-018-0338-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyachenko, Ekaterina, and Asya Mironenko. 2019. ““Academic Leadership Through the Prism of Managerialism: The Relationship Between University Development and Rector’s Specialization” [In Russ.].” Educational Studies Moscow 1: 137–161. doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2019-1-137-161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, Lars. 2014. “The Recruitment of University Top Leaders: Politics, Communities and Markets in Interaction.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 30 (3): 332–43. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engwall, Lars, Charlotta Levay, and Rufus Lidman. 1999. “The Roles of University and College Rectors.” Higher Education Management 11 (2): 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, Ewan, Christine Musselin, and Gianluca Andresani. 2008. “The Steering of Higher Education Systems: A Public Management Perspective.” Higher Education 56 (3): 325–48. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9125-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, Sidney, and Donald Hambrick. 1996. Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, James, Martha Tack, and Karen Wheeler. 1988. The Effective College President. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fligstein, Neil. 1987. “The Intraorganizational Power Struggle: Rise of Finance Personnel to Top Leadership in Large Corporations, 1919-1979.” American Sociological Review 52 (1): 44. doi:10.2307/2095391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrat, Natalia. 2016. “The Political Economy of Russian Higher Education: Why Does Putin Support Research Universities?” Post-Soviet Affairs 32 (4): 299–337. doi:10.1080/1060586X.2015.1051749. Gibbons et al. 1994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerashchenko, Daria. 2022. “University Leader Appointment Procedure in Russia: Building a Vertical of Power in Higher Education.” Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization 30 (1): 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• Golosov, Grigoriy. 2013. “Machine Politics: The Concept and its Implications for Post-Soviet Studies.” Demokratizatsiya 21 (4): 459–480.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, Amanda H. 2009. “Highly Cited Leaders and the Performance of Research Universities.” Research Policy 38 (7): 1079–92. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, Paul J. 2007. “The Puzzle of Putin's Gubernatorial Appointments.” Europe-Asia Studies 59 (3): 365–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Royston, and C. R. Hinings. 1996. “Understanding Radical Organizational Change: Bringing Together the Old and the New Institutionalism.” The Academy of Management Review 21 (4): 1022. doi:10.2307/259163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba, Katerina, and Angelika Tsivinskaya. 2021. “Evaluating the Evaluators in Russia: When Academic Citizenship Fails.” Europe-Asia Studies 73 (6): 1010–1036. doi:10.1080/09668136.2021.1932759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmich, Donald L. 1975. “Succession: A Longitudinal Look.” Journal of Business Research 3 (4): 355–64. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(75)90016-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, Diana. 2004. “The Four Literatures of Social Science.” In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems, edited by Henk Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, and Ulrich Schmoch, 473–496. Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hüther, Otto, and Georg Krücken. 2016. “Nested Organizational Fields: Isomorphism and Differentiation among European Universities.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 46: 53–83. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X20160000046003.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarska, Katarzyna. 2019. “Academic Community and Policymaking in Russia.” Problems of Post-Communism 66 (4): 240–252. doi:10.1080/10758216.2018.1520603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehm, Barbara. 2015. “Academics and New Higher Education Professionals: Tensions, Reciprocal Influences and Forms of Professionalization.” In Academic Work and Careers in Europe: Trends, Challenges, Perspectives, edited by Tatiana Fumasoli, Gaële Goastellec, and Barbara Kehm, 177–200. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kraatz, Matthew, and James Moore. 2002. “Executive Migration and Institutional Change.” Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 120–43. doi:10.2307/3069288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretek, Peter M., Žarko Dragšić, and Barbara M. Kehm. 2013. “Transformation of University Governance: On the Role of University Board Members.” Higher Education 65 (1): 39–58. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9580-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzminov, Yaroslav, and Maria Yudkevich. 2021. Universitety Rossii: Kak Eto Rabotayet [Russian Universities: How The System Works]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Logue, Danielle. 2013. “Adoption and Abandonment: Global Diffusion and Local Variation in University Top Management Teams.” In Global Themes and Local Variations in Organization and Management, edited by Gili S. Drori, Markus A. Höllerer, and Peter Walgenbach, 191–204. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, Seyfried, Matthias Döring, and Moritz Ansmann. 2022. “The Sequence of Isomorphism: The Temporal Diffusion Patterns of Quality Management in Higher Education Institutions and Hospitals.” Administration & Society, doi:10.1177/00953997211017137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, John, Larry D. Singell, and Mark Stater. 2009. “Congratulations or Condolences? The Role of Human Capital in the Cultivation of a University Administrator.” Economics of Education Review 28 (2): 258–267. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, John, and Brian Rowan B. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignot-Gérard, Stéphanie. 2010. “Presidents and Deans in French Universities: A Collective Approach to Academic Leadership.” In The Changing Dynamics of Higher Education Middle Management, edited by V. Lynn Meek, Leo Goedegebuure, Rui Santiago, and Teresa Carvalho, 119–145. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moskaleva, Olga, Vladimir Pislyakov, Ivan Sterligov, Mark Akoev, and S. Svetlana Shabanova. 2018. “Russian Index of Science Citation. Overview and Review.” Scientometrics 116: 449–462. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2758-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Meara, Bernard, and Stanley Petzall. 2005. “Vice Chancellors for the 21st Century? A Study of Contemporary Recruitment and Selection Practices in Australian Universities.” Management Research News 28 (6): 18–35. doi:10.1108/01409170510784850.
   Google Scholar
• Paradeise, Catherine, and Jean-Claude Thoenig. 2013. “Academic Institutions in Search of Quality: Local Orders and Global Standards.” Organization Studies 34 (2): 189–218. doi:10.1177/0170840612473550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, Francisco, and Tom Christensen. 2013. “The Formalization of the University: Rules, Roots, and Routes.” Higher Education 65: 695–708. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9571-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, Michael. 2002. “New Managerialism, Professional Power and Organisational Governance in UK Universities: A Review and Assessment.” In Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, edited by Alberto Amaral, Glen A. Jones, and Berit Karseth, 163–185. Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9946-7_9.
   Google Scholar
• Reuter, Ora John, and Graeme Robertson. 2012. “Subnational Appointments in Authoritarian Regimes: Evidence from Russian Gubernatorial Appointments.” The Journal of Politics 74 (4): 1023–1037. doi:10.1017/s0022381612000631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozovsky, Henry. 1990. The University: An Owner's Manual. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, Kerstin, and Linda Wedlin. 2008. “Circulating Ideas: Imitation, Translation and Editing.” In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, edited by Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin, and Roy Suddaby, 218–242. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sevon, Guje. 1996. “Organizational Imitation in Identity Transformation.” In Translating Organizational Change, edited by Barbara Czarniawska, Bernward Joerges, and Guje Sevón, 49–67. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, Sue. 2018. “Strengthening the University Executive: The Expanding Roles and Remit of Deputy and pro-Vice-Chancellors.” Higher Education Quarterly 72 (1): 40–50. doi:10.1111/hequ.12150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegfried, John. 1997. “Should Economists Be Kicked Upstairs?” Southern Economic Journal 63 (4): 853–871. doi:10.2307/1061227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singell, Larry, and Hui-Hsuan Tang. 2013. “Pomp and Circumstance: University Presidents and the Role of Human Capital in Determining who Leads U.S. Research Institutions.” Economics of Education Review 32 (1): 219–233. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivak, Elezaveta, and Maria Yudkevich. 2017. “The Academic Profession in Russia’s Two Capitals: The Impact of 20 Years of Transition.” European Educational Research Journal 16 (5): 626–644. doi:10.1177/1474904117701142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smerek, Ryan E. 2013. “Sensemaking and New College Presidents: A Conceptual Study of the Transition Process.” The Review of Higher Education 36 (3): 371–403. doi:10.1353/rhe.2013.0028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, David, Catherine Bargh, Jean Bocock, and Peter Scot. 1999. “New Leaders at the Top? The Educational and Career Paths of UK University Vice-Chancellors (1960-1996).” Higher Education Management 11 (2): 113–135.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov, Mikhail. 2021. “Can the Russian Research Policy be Called Neo-Liberal? A Study in the Comparative Sociology of Quantification.” Europe-Asia Studies 73 (6): 989–109. doi:10.1080/09668136.2021.1902945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov, Mikhail, Sofia Lopatina, and Gennady Yakovlev. 2018. “From Partnerships to Bureaucracies: The Constitutional Evolution of Russian Universities.” Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow 3: 120–45. doi:10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-120-145.
   Google Scholar
• Stage, Andreas K. 2020. “Are National University Systems Becoming More Alike? Long-Term Developments in Staff Composition Across Five Countries.” Policy Reviews in Higher Education 4 (1): 68–104. doi:10.1080/23322969.2019.1702088.
   Google Scholar
• Stage, Andreas K., and Kaare Aagaard. 2020. “National Policies as Drivers of Organizational Change in Universities: A String of Reinforcing Reforms.” Quantitative Science Studies 55 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00046.
   Google Scholar
• Staw, Barry. 1980. “The Consequences of Turnover.” Journal of Occupational Behaviour 1 (4): 253–273.
   Google Scholar
• Tkacheva, Tatiana, and Grigoriy Golosov. 2019. “United Russia’s Primaries and the Strength of Political Machines in the Regions of Russia: Evidence from the 2016 Duma Elections.” Europe-Asia Studies 71 (5): 824–839. doi:10.1080/09668136.2019.1613515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Yan, and Nandini Rajagopalan. 2004. “When the Known Devil is Better Than an Unknown God: An Empirical Study of the Antecedents and Consequences of Relay CEO Successions.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (4): 483–500. doi:10.5465/20159598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar