240
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Reports of practitioners’ use of public affairs faculty published research

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 719-732 | Received 18 Jan 2023, Accepted 29 Jan 2023, Published online: 06 Mar 2023

References

  • Abreu, M., and V. Grinevich. 2013. “The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities.” Research Policy 42: 408–22. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005.
  • Akinbinu, Temitope, and Mutawakilu Tiamiyu. 2016. Attitude of Civil Servants Towards the Use of Research Information in Policymaking in Selected Ministries in Lagos State, Nigeria.
  • Almeida, Celia, and Ernesto Báscolo. 2006. “Use of Research Results in Policy Decision-Making, Formulation, and Implementation: A Review of the Literature.” Cadernos de saude publica 22: S7–19. doi:10.1590/s0102-311 ( 2006001300002.
  • Amara, Nabil, Mathieu Ouimet, and Réjean Landry. 2004. “New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies.” Science Communication 26 (1): 75–106. doi:10.1177/1075547004267491.
  • Arnott, James C., Rachel J. Neuenfeldt, and Maria Carmen Lemos. 2020. “Co-Producing Science for Sustainability: Can Funding Change Knowledge Use?” Global Enviromental Change 60: 101979. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101979.
  • Bastow, Simon, Patrick Dunleavy, and Jane Tinkler. 2014. The Impact of the Social Sciences: How Academics and Their Research Make a Difference. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bédard, Pierre-Olivier. 2015. “The Mobilization of Scientific Evidence by Public Policy Analysts: Path Analysis and Predicted Probabilities.” SAGE Open 5 (3): 1–15. doi:10.1177/2158244015604193.
  • Belkhodja, Omar, and Réjean Landry. 2007. “What Factors Induce Canadian Health Organizations’ Managers And Professionals To Use Research Results? - A Path Analysis Model.” ASAC 2007 Conference, 45–65. Ottawa, Ontario: ResearchGate.
  • Belton, Kathy L. 2016. “Research in the Role of Trust in an Evolving Network for Knowledge Translation.” PhD diss., University of Alberta.
  • Blake, Sarah C., and Judith M. Ottoson. 2009. “Knowledge Utilization: Implications for Evaluation.” New Directions for Evaluation 124: 21–34. doi:10.1002/ev.311.
  • Bogenschneider, Karen, Olivia M. Little, and Kristen Johnson. 2013. “Policymakers’ Use of Social Science Research: Looking Within and Across Policy Actors.” Journal of Marriage and Family 75 (2): 263–75. doi:10.1111/jomf.12009.
  • Bonaccorsi, A., F. Chiarello, and G. Fantoni. 2021. “SSH Researchers Make an Impact Differently. Looking at Public Research from the Perspective of Users.” Research Evaluation 30 (3): 269–89. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvab008.
  • Broström, A., and M. McKelvey. 2018. “Engaging Experts: Science-Policy Interactions and the Introduction of Congestion Charging in Stockholm.” Minerva 56 (2): 183–207. doi:10.1007/s11024-017-9331-3.
  • Caplan, Nathan. 1979. “The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization.” American Behavioral Scientist 22 (3): 459–70. doi:10.1177/000276427902200308.
  • Chen, Shuangye. 2015. “Boundary Objects and Boundary Brokering to Make the Research-Policy-Practice Nexus Possible: The Case of the Chinese Higher Education Field.” Higher Education Policy 28 (4): 441–57. doi:10.1057/hep.2015.13.
  • Cherney, Adrian, and Tara Renae McGee. 2011. “Utilization of Social Science Research: Results of a Pilot Study among Australian Sociologists and Criminologists.” Journal of Sociology 47 (2): 144–62. doi:10.1177/1440783310386831.
  • Chubb, J., and G. E. Derrick. 2020. “The Impact A-Gender: Gendered Orientations Towards Research Impact and Its Evaluation.” Palgrave Communications 6: 72. doi:10.1057/s41599-020-0438-z.
  • Davidson, Katherine. 2011. “The Research to Practice Gap in the Identification and Instruction of Students at Risk for Reading Disabilities: Teachers’ Perspectives.” PhD diss. University of Western Ontario.
  • Desmarais, B. A., and J. A. Hird. 2014. “Public Policy's Bibliography: The use of Research in US Regulatory Impact Analyses.” Regulation and Governance 8 (4): 497–510. doi:10.1111/rego.12041.
  • Garvey, William D, Nan Lin, and Carnot E. Nelson. 1970. “Communication in the Physical and the Social Sciences: The Processes of Disseminating and Assimilating Information Differ in These Two Groups of Sciences.” Science 170 (3963): 1166–73. doi:10.1126/science.170.3963.1166.
  • Gornitzka, Åse. 2013. “The Interface Between Research and Policy–A Note with Potential Relevance for Higher Education.” European Journal of Higher Education 3 (3): 255–64. doi:10.1080/21568235.2013.816469.
  • Gulbrandsen, Magnus, and Taran Thune. 2017. “The Effects of Non-Academic Work Experience on External Interaction and Research Performance.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (4): 795–813. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9556-1.
  • Heinsch, Milena. 2018. “Exploring the Potential of Interaction Models of Research Use for Social Work.” The British Journal of Social Work 48 (2): 468–86. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcx034.
  • Henry, Gary T., and Melvin M. Mark. 2003. “Beyond Use: Understanding Evaluation’s Influence on Attitudes And Actions.” American Journal of Evaluation 24 (3): 293–314. doi:10.1177/109821400302400302.
  • Hughes, Alan, and Michael Kitson. 2012. “Pathways to Impact and the Strategic Role of Universities: New Evidence on the Breadth and Depth of University Knowledge Exchange in the UK and the Factors Constraining its Development.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (3): 723–50. doi:10.1093/cje/bes017.
  • Jensen, P., J. B. Rouquier, P. Kreimer, and Y. Croissant. 2008. “Scientists Who Engage with Society Perform Better Academically.” Science and Public Policy 35/7: 527–41. doi:10.3152/030234208X329130.
  • Kerr, S., M. A. Von Glinow, and J. Schriesheim. 1977. “Issues in the Study of “Professionals” in Organizations: The Case of Scientists and Engineers.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 18 (2): 329–45. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90034-4.
  • Klenk, Nicole Lisa, and Stephen Wyatt. 2015. “The Design and Management of Multi-Stakeholder Research Networks to Maximize Knowledge Mobilization and Innovation Opportunities in the Forest Sector.” Forest Policy and Economics 61: 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2015.06.008.
  • Knott, J., and A. Wildavsky. 1980. “If Dissemination Is the Solution, What Is the Problem ? .” Knowledge 537–578. doi:10.1177/107554708000100404.
  • Koontz, Tomas M. 2019. “The Science–Policy Nexus in Collaborative Governance: Use of Science in Ecosystem Recovery Planning.” Review of Policy Research 36 (6): 708–35. doi:10.1111/ropr.12362.
  • Kothari, Anita, Lynne MacLean, and Nancy Edwards. 2009. “Increasing Capacity for Knowledge Translation: Understanding How Some Researchers Engage Policy Makers.” Evidence & Policy 5 (1): 33–51. doi:10.1332/174426409X395402.
  • Landry, Réjean, Nabil Amara, and Moktar Lamari. 2001. “Utilization of Social Science Research Knowledge in Canada.” Research Policy 30 (2): 333–49. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00081-0.
  • Landry, R., M. Lamari, and N. Amara. 2003. “The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies.” Public Administration Review 63 (2): 192–205. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00279.
  • Landry, R., M. Saïhi, N. Amara, and M. Ouimet. 2010. “Evidence On How Academics Manage Their Portfolio of Knowledge Transfer Activities.” Research Policy 39: 1387–403. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.003.
  • Lavis, J. N., S. E. Ross, and J. E. Hurley. 2003. “Examining the Role of Health Services Research in Public Policymaking.” The Milbank Quarterly 125–154. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00005.
  • Lemos, Maria Carmen, Kimberly S. Wolske, Laura V. Rasmussen, James C. Arnott, Margaret Calcic, and Christine J. Kirchhoff. 2019. ““The Closer, the Better? Untangling Scientist–Practitioner Engagement, Interaction, and Knowledge Use.” Weather, Climate, and Society 11 (3): 535–48. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0075.1.
  • Marsh, David D., and Judith M. Glassick. 1988. “Knowledge Utilization in Evaluation Efforts: The Role of Recommendations.” Knowledge 9 (3): 323–41. doi:10.1177/107554708800900301.
  • Moyson, Stéphane, Peter Scholten, and Christopher M. Weible. 2017. “Policy Learning and Policy Change: Theorizing Their Relations from Different Perspectives.” Policy and Society 36 (2): 161–77. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1331879.
  • Muhonen, R., P. Benneworth, and J. Olmos-Peñuela. 2020. “From Productive Interactions To Impact Pathways: Understanding the Key Dimensions in Developing SSH Research Societal Impact.” Research Evaluation 29/1: 34–47. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvz003.
  • Neilson, Stephanie. 2001. Knowledge Utilization and Public Policy Processes: A Literature Review. Ottowa, Canada: IRDC.
  • Ness, Erik C. 2010. “The Role of Information in the Policy Process: Implications for the Examination of Research Utilization in Higher Education Policy.” In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by John C. Smart, 1–41. Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Newman, Joshua, Adrian Cherney, and Brian W. Head. 2015. “Do Policy Makers Use Academic Research? Reexamining the ‘Two Communities’ Theory of Research Utilization.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 24–32. doi:10.1111/puar.12464.
  • Oliver, Kathryn, Simon Innvar, Theo Lorenc, Jenny Woodman, and James Thomas. 2014. “A Systematic Review of Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Evidence by Policymakers.” BMC Health Services Research 14: 1–12. Article no. 2. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
  • Olmos-Peñuela, J., P. Benneworth, and E. Castro-Martinez. 2014a. “Are ‘STEM from Mars and SSH from Venus’? Challenging Disciplinary Stereotypes of Research’s Social Value.” Science and Public Policy 41 (3): 384–400. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct071.
  • Olmos-Peñuela, J., P. Benneworth, and E. Castro-Martínez. 2015. “What Stimulates Researchers to Make Their Research Usable? Towards an ‘Openness’ Approach.” Minerva 53 (4): 381–410. doi:10.1007/s11024-015-9283-4.
  • Ouimet, M., P. O. Bédard, J. Turgeon, J. N. Lavis, F. Gélineau, F. Gagnon, and C. Dallaire. 2010. “Correlates of Consulting Research Evidence among Policy Analysts in Government Ministries: A Cross-Sectional Survey.” Evidence and Policy 6 (4): 433–60. doi:10.1332/174426409X478734.
  • Pandey, S. K., A. E. Smith, S. Pandey, and O. A. Ojelabi. 2022. “Reimagining Race and Gender in Public Administration and Public Policy: Insights from an Interdisciplinary Systematic Review.” Public Administration Review 83 (1): 14–34. doi:10.1111/puar.13570.
  • Pelz, D. C., M. Yiner, and S. J. Cutler. 1978. “Major social issues: A multidisciplinary view.” In Some expanded perspectives on use of social science in public policy, edited by J. M. Yinger and S. J. Cutler, 346–357. New York: Free Press.
  • Perkmann, M., R. Salandra, V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, and A. Hughes. 2021. “Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019.” Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114.
  • Pittman, Patricia, and Celia Almeida. 2006. “Cross-Sector Learning among Researchers and Policy-Makers: The Search for New Strategies to Enable Use of Research Results.” Cadernos de Saúde Pública 22: 97–108. doi:10.1590/S0102-311X2006001300019.
  • Rodríguez, Daniela C., Connie Hoe, Elina M. Dale, M. Hafizur Rahman, Sadika Akhter, Assad Hafeez, Wayne Irava, et al. 2017. “Assessing the Capacity of Ministries of Health to Use Research in Decision-Making: Conceptual Framework and Tool.” Health Research Policy and Systems 15, article no. 65. doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0227-3.
  • Shanley, Patricia, and Citlalli López. 2009. “Out of the Loop: Why Research Rarely Reaches Policy Makers and the Public and What Can Be Done.” BioTropica 41 (5): 535–44. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00561.x.
  • Shepherd, C. R. 1961. “Orientations of Scientists and Engineers.” Pacific Sociological Review 4 (2): 79–83. doi:10.2307/1388676.
  • Shulock, Nancy. 1999. “The Paradox of Policy Analysis: If It Is Not Used, Why Do We Produce So Much of It?” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 18 (2): 226–44. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199921)18:2<226::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-J.
  • Smith, Karen, Scott Fernie, and Nick Pilcher. 2020. “Aligning the Times: Exploring the Convergence of Researchers, Policy Makers and Research Evidence in Higher Education Policy Making.” Research in Education 110 (1): 38–57. doi:10.1177/0034523720920677.
  • Suls, Jerry, and Barbara Fletcher. 1983. “Social Comparison in the Social and Physical Sciences: An Archival Study.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44 (3): 575–80. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.3.575.
  • Sun, Xiangwen, and Yongyan Feng. 2010. “Study on Principles of Knowledge Translation.” In The Conference on Web Based Business Management, 1155–61. Chengdu, China: Scientific Research.
  • Tartari, V., and S. Bresch. 2012. “Set Them Free: Scientists’ Evaluations of the Benefits and Costs of University-Industry Research Collaboration.” Industrial & Corporate Change 21: 1117–47. doi:10.1093/icc/dts004.
  • Thomas, R., and N. Ormerod. 2017. “The (Almost) Imperceptible Impact of Tourism Research on Policy and Practice.” Tourism Management 62: 379–89. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2017.02.009.
  • Valente, Adriana, Tommaso Castellani, Maja Larsen, and Arja R. Aro. 2015. “Models and Visions of Science–Policy Interaction: Remarks from a Delphi Study in Italy.” Science and Public Policy 42 (2): 228–41. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu039.
  • Walker, L. A., N. S. Lawrence, C. D. Chambers, M. Wood, J. Barnett, H. Durrant, L. Pike, G. O’Grady, S. Bestmann, and A. P. Kythreotis. 2019. “Supporting Evidence-Informed Policy and Scrutiny: A Consultation of UK Research Professionals.” PLoS ONE 14/3: e0214136. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214136.
  • Weiss, Carol H. 1979. “The Many Meanings of Research Utilization.” Public Administration Review 39 (5): 426–31. doi:10.2307/3109916.
  • Weiss, Carol H. 1982. “Policy Research in the Context of Diffuse Decision Making.” The Journal of Higher Education 53 (6): 619–39. doi:10.2307/1981522.
  • Wingens, Matthias. 1990. “Toward a General Utilization Theory: A Systems Theory Reformulation of the Two-Communities Metaphor.” Science Communication 12 (1): 27–42. doi:10.1177/107554709001200103.
  • Zardo, Pauline, and Alex Collie. 2014. “Predicting Research Use in a Public Health Policy Environment: Results of a Logistic Regression Analysis.” Implementation Science 9, article no. 142. doi:10.1186/s13012-014-0142-8.
  • Zi, A., and K. Blind. 2015. “Researchers’ Participation in Standardization: A Case Study from a Public Research Institute in Germany.” Journal of Technology Transfer 40: 346–60. doi:10.1007/s10961-014-9370-y.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.