1,303
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The reverse engagement gap: gender differences in external engagement among UK academics

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 695-706 | Received 08 Feb 2023, Accepted 11 Feb 2023, Published online: 07 Mar 2023

References

  • Abreu, M., and V. Grinevich. 2013. “The Nature of Academic Entrepreneurship in the UK: Widening the Focus on Entrepreneurial Activities.” Research Policy 42 (2): 408–22. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.10.005
  • Abreu, M., and V. Grinevich. 2017. “Gender Patterns in Academic Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (4): 763–94. doi:10.1007/s10961-016-9543-y
  • Babcock, L., M. P. Recalde, L. Vesterlund, and L. Weingart. 2017. “Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability.” American Economic Review 107: 714–47. doi:10.1257/aer.20141734
  • Beck, S., C. Bergenholtz, M. Bogers, et al. 2022. “The Open Innovation in Science Research Field: A Collaborative Conceptualisation Approach.” Industry and Innovation 29: 136–85. doi:10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274
  • Bekkers, R., and I. M. Bodas Freitas. 2008. “Analysing Knowledge Transfer Channels Between Universities and Industry: To What Degree do Sectors Also Matter?” Research Policy 37 (10): 1837–53. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.007
  • Belz, A., A. Graddy-Reed, I. Hanewicz, and R. Terrile. 2022. “Gender Differences in Peer Review of Innovation.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 16 (2): 255–80. doi:10.1002/sej.1429
  • Blind, K., J. Pohlisch, and A. Zi. 2018. “Publishing, Patenting, and Standardization: Motives and Barriers of Scientists.” Research Policy 47: 1185–97. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.011
  • Bodas Freitas, I. M., A. Geuna, and F. Rossi. 2013. “Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and Personal Modes of Governance of University–Industry Interactions.” Research Policy 42 (1): 50–62. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.007
  • Bozeman, B., and M. Gaughan. 2007. “Impacts of Grants and Contracts on Academic Researchers’ Interactions with Industry.” Research Policy 36: 694–707. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007
  • Bozeman, B., and M. Gaughan. 2011. “How Do Men and Women Differ in Research Collaborations? An Analysis of the Collaborative Motives and Strategies of Academic Researchers.” Research Policy 40: 1393–1402. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002
  • Cardador, M. T. 2017. “Promoted Up but Also Out? The Unintended Consequences of Increasing Women’s Representation in Managerial Roles in Engineering.” Organization Science 28 (4): 597–617. doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1132
  • Ceci, S. J., and W. M. Williams. 2011. “Understanding Current Causes of Women’s Underrepresentation in Science.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 3157–62. doi:10.1073/pnas.1014871108
  • Cole, J. R., and H. Zuckerman. 1984. The Productivity Puzzle. Advances in Motivation and Achievement. Women in Science. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Colyvas, J. A., K. Snellman, J. Bercovitz, and M. Feldman. 2012. “Disentangling Effort and Performance: A Renewed Look at Gender Differences in Commercializing Medical School Research.” Journal of Technology Transfer 37: 478–89. doi:10.1007/s10961-011-9235-6
  • Ding, W., F. Murray, and T. Stuart. 2013. “From Bench to Board: Gender Differences in University Scientists’ Participation in Corporate Scientific Advisory Boards.” Academy of Management Journal 56: 1443–64. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0020
  • Di Paola, N. 2021. “Pathways to Academic Entrepreneurship: The Determinants of Female Scholars’ Entrepreneurial Intentions.” Journal of Technology Transfer 46: 1417–41. doi:10.1007/s10961-020-09824-3
  • Etzkowitz, H., C. Kemelgor, and B. Uzzi. 2000. Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Frehill, L., A. Abreu, and K. Zippel. 2015. “Gender, Science, and Occupational Sex Segregation.” In Advancing Women in Science, edited by W. Pearson, L. Frehill, and C. McNeely, 51–92. Cham: Springer.
  • Fudickar, R., H. Hottenrott, and C. Lawson. 2018. “What’s the Price of Academic Consulting? Effects of Public and Private Sector Consulting on Academic Research.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (4): 699–722. doi:10.1093/icc/dty007
  • Giuri, P., R. Grimaldi, A. Kochenkova, F. Munari, and L. Toschi. 2020. “The Effects of University-Level Policies on Women’s Participation in Academic Patenting in Italy.” Journal of Technology Transfer 45 (1): 122–50. doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9673-5
  • Guarino, C. M., and V. M. Borden. 2017. “Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women Taking Care of the Academic Family?” Research in Higher Education 58 (6): 672–94. doi:10.1007/s11162-017-9454-2
  • Howe-Walsh, L., and S. Turnbull. 2016. “Barriers to Women Leaders in Academia: Tales from Science and Technology.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (3): 415–28. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.929102
  • Hughes, A., M. Kitson, C. Lawson, A. Salter, A. Bullock, and R. Hughes. 2017. Cambridge Centre for Business Research National Survey of Knowledge Exchange Activity by United Kingdom Academics, 2012-2015 UK Data Service. SN: 8303.
  • Hughes, A., C. Lawson, A. Salter, M. Kitson, A. Bullock, and R. B. Hughes. 2016. The Changing State of Knowledge Exchange: UK Academic Interactions with External Organisations 2005–2015. London: NCUB.
  • Iorio, R., S. Labory, and F. Rentocchini. 2017. “The Importance of Pro-social Behaviour for the Breadth and Depth of Knowledge Transfer Activities: An Analysis of Italian Academic Scientists.” Research Policy 46 (2): 497–509. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.12.003
  • Karataş-Özkan, M., and E. Chell. 2015. “Gender Inequalities in Academic Innovation and Enterprise: A Bourdieuian Analysis.” British Journal of Management 26 (1): 09–125. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12020
  • Lauto, G., E. Salvador, and F. Visintin. 2022. “For What They Are, Not for What They Bring: The Signaling Value of Gender for Financial Resource Acquisition in Academic Spin-offs.” Research Policy 51 (7): 104554. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104554
  • Lawson, C., A. Geuna, and U. Finardi. 2021. “The Funding-Productivity-Gender Nexus in Science, a Multistage Analysis.” Research Policy 50 (3): 104182. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104182
  • Lawson, C., A. Salter, A. Hughes, and M. Kitson. 2019. “Citizens of Somewhere: Examining the Geography of Foreign and Native-Born Academics’ Engagement with External Actors.” Research Policy 48 (3): 759–74. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.008
  • Lechner, M. 2001. “Identification and Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments Under the Conditional Independence Assumption.” In Econometric Evaluation of Labour Market Policies, edited by M. Lechner and F. Pfeiffer, 43–58. Heidelberg: Physica.
  • Lerchenmueller, M., and O. Sorenson. 2018. “The Gender Gap in Early Career Transitions in the Life Sciences.” Research Policy 47 (6): 1007–17. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.009
  • Maranto, C. L., and A. E. Griffin. 2011. “The Antecedents of a ‘Chilly Climate’ for Women Faculty in Higher Education.” Human Relations 64 (2): 139–59. doi:10.1177/0018726710377932
  • Meng, Y. 2016. “Collaboration Patterns and Patenting: Exploring Gender Distinctions.” Research Policy 45: 56–67. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.004
  • Murray, F., and L. Graham. 2007. “Buying Science and Selling Science: Gender Differences in the Market for Commercial Science.” Industrial and Corporate Change 16: 657–89. doi:10.1093/icc/dtm021
  • NCVO. 2021. UK Civil Society Almanac 2021. London: NCVO. Accessed 28 January 2023. https://www.ncvo.org.uk/news-and-insights/news-index/uk-civil-society-almanac-2021.
  • OECD. 2015. “Women in Public Sector Employment.” In Government at a Glance 2015, 86–87. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Perkmann, M., R. Salandra, V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, and A. Hughes. 2021. “Academic Engagement: A Review of the Literature 2011-2019.” Research Policy 50: 104114. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
  • Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Broström, P. D'Este, R. Fini, et al. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University–Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42: 423–42. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
  • Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrica 70: 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  • Rubin, D. B. 1977. “Assignment to Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate.” Journal of Educational Statistics 2: 1–26. doi:10.3102/10769986002001001
  • Smeding, A. 2012. “Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM).” Sex Roles 67: 617–29. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0209-4
  • Stater, K. J., and M. Stater. 2019. “Is It ‘Just Work’? The Impact of Work Rewards on Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intent in the Nonprofit, for-Profit, and Public Sectors.” The American Review of Public Administration 49 (4): 495–511. doi:10.1177/0275074018815261
  • Stephan, P. E., and A. El-Ganainy. 2007. “The Entrepreneurial Puzzle: Explaining the Gender gap.” Journal of Technology Transfer 32: 475–87. doi:10.1007/s10961-007-9033-3
  • Tartari, V., and A. Salter. 2015. “The Engagement gap: Exploring Gender Differences in University – Industry Collaboration Activities.” Research Policy 44: 1176–91. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.014
  • Whittington, K. B., and L. Smith-Doerr. 2005. “Gender and Commercial Science: Women’s Patenting in the Life Sciences.” Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (4): 355–70. doi:10.1007/s10961-005-2581-5