Incentivizing knowledge exchange engagement: direct and indirect benefits of external engagement

References

• Armstrong, J. S., and T. S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.” Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3): 396–402. doi:10.1177/002224377701400320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arqué-Castells, P., R. M. Cartaxo, J. García-Quevedo, and M. M. Godinho. 2016. “Royalty Sharing, Effort and Invention in Universities: Evidence from Portugal and Spain.” Research Policy 45 (9): 1858–72. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arza, V. 2010. “Channels, Benefits and Risks of Public–Private Interactions for Knowledge Transfer: Conceptual Framework Inspired by Latin America.” Science and Public Policy 37 (7): 473–84. doi:10.3152/030234210X511990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atta-Owusu, K., and R. D. Fitjar. 2022. “What Motivates Academics for External Engagement? Exploring the Effects of Motivational Drivers and Organizational Fairness.” Science and Public Policy 49 (2): 201–18. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldini, N. 2010. “Do Royalties Really Foster University Patenting Activity? An Answer from Italy.” Technovation 30 (2): 109–16. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barjak, F., N. Es-Sadki, and A. Arundel. 2015. “The Effectiveness of Policies for Formal Knowledge Transfer from European Universities and Public Research Institutes to Firms.” Research Evaluation 24 (1): 4–18. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvu024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaccorsi, A., F. Chiarello, and G. Fantoni. 2021. “SSH Researchers Make an Impact Differently. Looking at Public Research from the Perspective of Users.” Research Evaluation 30 (3): 269–289. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvab008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregn, K. 2013. “Detrimental Effects of Performance-Related pay in the Public Sector? On the Need for a Broader Theoretical Perspective.” Public Organization Review 13 (1): 21–35. doi:10.1007/s11115-012-0191-x.
   Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and P. Patel. 2007. “University–Industry Linkages in the UK: What are the Factors Underlying the Variety of Interactions with Industry?” Research Policy 36 (9): 1295–313. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P., and M. Perkmann. 2011. “Why do Academics Engage with Industry? The Entrepreneurial University and Individual Motivations.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 36 (3): 316–39. doi:10.1007/s10961-010-9153-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., and K. M. Schmidt. 2004. “Fairness and Incentives in a Multi-Task Principal–Agent Model.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106 (3): 453–74. doi:10.1111/j.0347-0520.2004.00372.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel, M., A. Persaud, and T. Chamberlin. 2019. “Faculty Ideals and Universities’ Third Mission.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 147 (C): 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., & Neckermann, S. 2008. “Academics Appreciate Awards: A new Aspect of Incentives in Research.” CESifo Working Paper, No. 2531, Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo), Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, R., V. Araújo, S. Mascarini, E. G. Santos, and A. R. Costa. 2019. “How the Benefits, Results and Barriers of Collaboration Affect University Engagement with Industry.” Science and Public Policy 46 (3): 347–57. doi:10.1093/scipol/scy062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, M., and T. Thune. 2017. “The Effects of non-Academic Work Experience on External Interaction and Research Performance.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 42 (4): 795–813. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9556-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, M. C., M. Weiß, A. Pechriggl, and D. Wutti. 2018. “Insights Into University Knowledge Transfer in the Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) and Other Scientific Disciplines – More Similarities Than Differences.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 3: 32. doi:10.3389/frma.2018.00032.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmert, M. 2017. “Knowledge Acquisition by University Researchers Through Company Collaborations: Evidence from South Korea.” Science and Public Policy 44 (2): 199–210. doi:10.1093/scipol/scw053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt-Dundas, N. 2012. “Research Intensity and Knowledge Transfer Activity in UK Universities.” Research Policy 41 (2): 262–75. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmstrom, B., and P. Milgrom. 1991. “Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and job Design.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 7: 24–52. doi:10.1093/jleo/7.special_issue.24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsley, A. F., T. G. Noordewier, and R. G. V. Bergh. 2017. “Overstating and Understating Interaction Results in International Business Research.” Journal of World Business 52 (2): 286–95. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, F., and C. Lightowler. 2013. “Knowledge Exchange: A Comparison of Policies, Strategies, and Funding Incentives in English and Scottish Higher Education.” Research Evaluation 22 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvs035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, A. 2011. “What Motivates Academic Scientists to Engage in Research Commercialization:‘Gold’,‘Ribbon’or ‘Puzzle’?” Research Policy 40 (10): 1354–68. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laredo, P. 2007. “Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities?” Higher Education Policy 20 (4): 441–56. doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300169.
   Google Scholar
• Markman, G. D., P. T. Gianiodis, P. H. Phan, and D. B. Balkin. 2004. “Entrepreneurship from the Ivory Tower: Do Incentive Systems Matter?” The Journal of Technology Transfer 29 (3): 353–64. doi:10.1023/B:JOTT.0000034127.01889.86.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K., A. Alexander, J. A. Cunningham, and E. Albats. 2018. “Entrepreneurial Academics and Academic Entrepreneurs: A Systematic Literature Review.” International Journal of Technology Management 77 (1-3): 9–37. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2018.091710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., and S. Ghoshal. 1998. “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage.” The Academy of Management Review 23 (2): 242–66. doi:10.2307/259373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neckermann, S., and B. S. Frey. 2013. “And the Winner is … ? The Motivating Power of Employee Awards.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 46: 66–77. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2013.06.006.
   Google Scholar
• Olmos-Peñuela, J., E. Castro-Martínez, and P. d’Este. 2014. “Knowledge Transfer Activities in Social Sciences and Humanities: Explaining the Interactions of Research Groups with non-Academic Agents.” Research Policy 43 (4): 696–706. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, R., P. V. Langa, and A. Pausits. 2015. “One and two Equals Three? The Third Mission of Higher Education Institutions.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (3): 233–49. doi:10.1080/21568235.2015.1044552.
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast, C. 1999. “The Provision of Incentives in Firms.” Journal of Economic Literature 37 (1): 7–63. doi:10.1257/jel.37.1.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reymert, I., and T. Thune. 2023. “Task Complementarity in Academic Work: A Study of the Relationship Between Research, Education and Third Mission Tasks among University Professors.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 48 (1): 331–360. doi:10.1007/s10961-021-09916-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosli, A., and F. Rossi. 2016. “Third-mission Policy Goals and Incentives from Performance-Based Funding: Are They Aligned?” Research Evaluation 25 (4): 427–441. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvw012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M. 2014. “Articulating the ‘Three-Missions’ in Spanish Universities.” Research Policy 43 (10): 1760–73. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. 2006. “The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations.” The Journal of Higher Education 77 (1): 1–39. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. M., F. Else, and P. A. Crookes. 2014. “Engagement and Academic Promotion: A Review of the Literature.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (4): 836–47. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.863849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thune, T. 2007. “University-industry Collaboration: The Network Embeddedness Approach.” Science and Public Policy 34 (3): 158–68. doi:10.3152/030234207X206902.
   Google Scholar
• van de Burgwal, L. H., A. Dias, and E. Claassen. 2019. “Incentives for Knowledge Valorisation: A European Benchmark.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 44 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10961-017-9594-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., R. Hu, W. Li, and X. Pan. 2016. “Does Teaching Benefit from University–Industry Collaboration? Investigating the Role of Academic Commercialization and Engagement.” Scientometrics 106 (3): 1037–55. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1818-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar