432
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The implied peer: thesis writers’ feedback activities and experiences in group supervision

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1754-1766 | Received 13 Oct 2022, Accepted 05 May 2023, Published online: 11 May 2023

References

  • Agné, H., and U. Mörkenstam. 2018. “Should First-Year Doctoral Students Be Supervised Collectively or Individually? Effects on Thesis Completion and Time to Completion.” Higher Education Research and Development 37 (4): 669–82. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1453785.
  • Akister, J., I. Williams, and A. Maynard. 2009. “Using Group Supervision for Undergraduate Dissertations: A Preliminary Enquiry into the Student Experience.” Practice and Evidence of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 4 (2): 77–94. Retrieved from https://www.pestlhe.org/index.php/pestlhe/issue/view/8.
  • Baker, M., E. Cluett, L. Ireland, S. Reading, and S. Rourke. 2014. “Supervising Undergraduate Research: A Collective Approach Utilising Group Work and Peer Support.” Nurse Education Today 34 (4): 637–42. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.006.
  • Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2021. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
  • Chanock, K. 2000. “Comments on Essays: Do Students Understand What Tutors Write?” Teaching in Higher Education 5 (1): 95–105. doi:10.1080/135625100114984.
  • Chiu, Y. T., B. Wong, and M. Charalambous. 2021. “‘It’s for Others to Judge’: What Influences Students’ Construction of the Ideal Student?” Journal of Further and Higher Education 15 (10): 1424–37. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2021.1945553.
  • Dahler-Larsen, P. 2008. At fremstille kvalitative Data. 2nd ed. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
  • Dysthe, O., A. Samara, and K. Westrheim. 2006. “Multivoiced Supervision of Master’s Students: A Case Study of Alternative Supervision Practices in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (3): 299–318. doi:10.1080/03075070600680562.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–45. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
  • Hammond, L. 2021. “The Activity of Student Research: Using Activity Theory to Conceptualise Student Research for Master’s Programmes.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (6): 1055–67. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1666261.
  • Hyland, K., and F. Hyland. 2006. “Feedback on Second Language Students’ Writing.” Language Teaching 39 (2): 83–101. doi:10.1017/S0261444806003399.
  • Hyldegård, J. 2006. “Using Diaries in Group Based Information Behaviour Research – A Methodological Study.” Paper presented at: Information interaction in context: International Symposium on Information Interaction in Context, IIiX 2006 (261-274). Copenhagen: ACM Press.
  • Hyldegård, J. S., and H. N. Jensen. 2020. “Klyngevejledning som Driver for specialestuderendes videnskabelsesproces.” Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 15 (29): 87–104. doi:10.7146/dut.v15i29.119330.
  • Jensen, H. N. 2015. Opgave- og skrivevejledning i klynger. Håndbog for undervisere og vejledere på videregående uddannelser. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
  • Jonsson, A. 2012. “Facilitating Productive Use of Feedback in Higher Education.” Active Learning in Higher Education 14 (1): 63–76. doi:10.1177/1469787412467125.
  • Kember, D. 2001. “Beliefs About Knowledge and the Process of Teaching and Learning as a Factor in Adjusting to Study in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 26 (2): 205–21. doi:10.1080/03075070120052116.
  • Lillejord, S., and O. Dysthe. 2008. “Productive Learning Practice – A Theoretical Discussion Based on Two Cases.” Journal of Education and Work 21 (1): 75–89. doi:10.1080/13639080801957154.
  • Man, D., Y. Xu, and J. M. O’Toole. 2018. “Understanding Autonomous Peer Feedback Practices among Postgraduate Students: A Case Study in a Chinese University.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (4): 527–36. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1376310.
  • Mauss, M. 1950/2001. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. 2nd ed. London & New York: Taylor and Francis, Routledge Classics.
  • Nicol, D., and D. Macfarlane-Dick. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090.
  • Nicol, D., and S. McCallum. 2022. “Making Internal Feedback Explicit: Exploiting the Multiple Comparisons That Occur During Peer Review.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (3): 424–43. doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620.
  • Nicol, D., A. Thomson, and C. Breslin. 2014. “Rethinking Feedback Practices in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–22. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518.
  • Nordentoft, H. M., H. Hvass, K. Mariager-Anderson, S. S. Bengtsen, A. Smedegaard, and S. D. Warrer. 2019. Kollektiv akademisk vejledning: fra forskning til praksis. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
  • Nordentoft, H. M., T. W. Jensen, and S. S. Bengtsen. 2020. “‘Vi er rigtig meget ens’: Peer-dynamik i samarbejdet mellem specialeskrivende par.” Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 16 (28): 107–23. doi:10.7146/dut.v15i28.113469.
  • Nordentoft, H. M., R. Thomsen, and G. Wichmann-Hansen. 2013. “Collective Academic Supervision: A Model for Participation and Learning in Higher Education.” Higher Education 65 (5): 581–93. doi:10.1007/s10734-012-9564-x.
  • Reddy, K., T. Harland, R. Wass, and N. Wald. 2020. “Student Peer Review as a Process of Knowledge Creation Through Dialogue.” Higher Education Research and Development 40 (4): 825–37. doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1781797.
  • Rønn, K. V., and K. L. Petersen. 2018. “Collective Supervision of Master’s Thesis Students: Experiences, Expectations and New Departures from the Security Risk Management Programme.” Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 13 (25): 179–93. doi:10.7146/dut.v13i25.104440.
  • Stracke, E., and V. Kumar. 2014. “Realising Graduate Attributes in the Research Degree: The Role of Peer Support Groups.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (6): 616–29. doi:10.1080/13562517.2014.901955.
  • Ulriksen, L. 2009. “The Implied Student.” Studies in Higher Education 34 (5): 517–32. doi:10.1080/03075070802597135.
  • Vehviläinen, S., and E. Löfström. 2016. “‘I Wish I Had a Crystal Ball’: Discourses and Potentials for Developing Academic Supervising.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (3): 508–24. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.942272.
  • von Müllen, R., T. B. Jensen, and H. Hansen. 2018. Feedback i Studenterperspektiv: en kvalitativ analyse på to samfundsvidenskabelige uddannelser. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Social Sciences. https://samf.ku.dk/pcs/feedbackrapport.pdf.
  • Wichmann-Hansen, G., R. Thomsen, and H. M. Nordentoft. 2015. “Challenges in Collective Academic Supervision: Supervisors’ Experiences from a Master Programme in Guidance and Counselling.” Higher Education 70 (1): 19–33. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9821-2.
  • Winstone, N. E., and D. Carless. 2019. Designing Effective Feedback Processes in Higher Education: A Learning Focused Approach. London: Routledge.
  • Wong, B., and Y. T. Chiu. 2021. “Exploring the Concept of ‘Ideal’ University Student.” Studies in Higher Education 46 (3): 497–508. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1643302.
  • Yin, R. K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Yu, S., Y. Zhang, Y. Zheng, K. Yuan, and L. Zhang. 2018. “Understanding Student Engagement with Peer Feedback on Master’s Thesis: A Macau Study.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 44 (1): 50–65. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1467879.
  • Zhang, Y., S. Yu, and K. Yuan. 2020. “Understanding Master’s Students’ Peer Feedback Practices from the Academic Discourse Community Perspective: A Rethinking of Postgraduate Pedagogies.” Teaching in Higher Education 25 (2): 126–40. doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1543261.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.