3,192
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The community engagement for impact (CEFI) framework: an evidence-based strategy to facilitate social change

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 441-459 | Received 03 May 2022, Accepted 16 Jul 2023, Published online: 27 Jul 2023

References

  • Ahmed, S.M., C. Maurana, D. Nelson, T. Meister, S.N. Young, and P. Lucey. 2016. “Opening the Black box: Conceptualizing Community Engagement from 109 Community–Academic Partnership Programs.” Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 10 (1): 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2016.0019.
  • Aiello, E., C. Donovan, E. Duque, S. Fabrizio, R. Flecha, P. Holm, S. Molina, E. Oliver, and E. Reale. 2021. “Effective Strategies That Enhance the Social Impact of Social Sciences and Humanities Research.” Evidence & Policy 17 (1): 131–46. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X15834126054137.
  • Alperin, J.P., C. Muñoz Nieves, L.A. Schimanski, G.E. Fischman, M.T. Niles, and E.C. McKiernan. 2019. “How Significant are the Public Dimensions of Faculty Work in Review, Promotion, and Tenure Documents?” eLife 8: e42254. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.42254.
  • Althouse, B.M., J.D. West, C.T. Bergstrom, and T. Bergstrom. 2009. “Differences in Impact Factor Across Fields and Over Time.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 (1): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20936.
  • Anderson, J.A. 2014. “Engaged Learning, Engaged Scholarship: A Struggle for the Soul of Higher Education.” The Northwest Journal of Communication 42 (1): 143–66.
  • Ball, S.J. 2012. “Performativity, Commodification and Commitment: An i-spy Guide to the Neoliberal University.” British Journal of Educational Studies 60 (1): 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2011.650940.
  • Barnett, R. 2015. Thinking and Rethinking the University: The Selected Works of Ronald Barnett. New York: Routledge.
  • Barreno, L., P.W. Elliott, I. Madueke, and D. Sarny. 2013. Community Engaged Scholarship and Faculty Assessment: A Review of Canadian Practices. Regina: University of Regina. https://www.mtroyal.ca/AboutMountRoyal/TeachingLearning/CSLearning/_pdfs/adc_csl_pdf_res_revcanpract.pdf.
  • Benneworth, P., ed. 2013. University Engagement with Socially Excluded Communities. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4875-0.
  • Bentley, P., and S. Kyvik. 2011. “Academic Staff and Public Communication: A Survey of Popular Science Publishing Across 13 Countries.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (1): 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510384461.
  • Bernardo, M.A.C., J. Butcher, and P. Howard. 2014. “The Leadership of Engagement Between University and Community: Conceptualizing Leadership in Community Engagement in Higher Education.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 17 (1): 103–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2012.761354.
  • Besley, J.C., A. Dudo, and S. Yuan. 2018. “Scientists’ Views About Communication Objectives.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (6): 708–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517728478.
  • Bornmann, L. 2013. “What is Societal Impact of Research and how Can it be Assessed? A Literature Survey.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (2): 217–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803.
  • Bourke, A. 2015. Universities, Community Engagement, and Democratic Social Science. Toronto.: York University.
  • Boyer, E.L. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Boyer, E.L. 1996. “The Scholarship of Engagement.” Journal of Public Service & Outreach 1 (1): 11–20.
  • Burgess, M.M. 2014. “From ‘Trust us’ to Participatory Governance: Deliberative Publics and Science Policy.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512472160.
  • Butin, D.W., and S. Seider. 2012. The Engaged Campus: Certificates, Minors, and Majors as the new Community Engagement. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Carman, M. 2013. “Research Impact: The gap Between Commitment and Implementation Systems in National and Institutional Policy in Australia.” Australasian Journal of University-Community Engagement 8 (2): 1–14.
  • Chan, Y.E., and C.J.T. Farrington. 2018. “Community-Based Research: Engaging Universities in Technology-Related Knowledge Exchanges.” Information and Organization 28 (3): 129–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.08.001.
  • Chapman, S., A. Haynes, G. Derrick, H. Sturk, W.D. Hall, and A. St. George. 2014. “Reaching “an Audience That you Would Never Dream of Speaking to”: Influential Public Health Researchers’ Views on the Role of News Media in Influencing Policy and Public Understanding.” Journal of Health Communication 19 (2): 260–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.811327.
  • Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Clark, T. 2008. “`We’re Over-Researched Here!’: Exploring Accounts of Research Fatigue Within Qualitative Research Engagements.” Sociology 42 (5): 953–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094573.
  • Crabill, S.L., and D. Butin. 2014. Community Engagement 2.0: Dialogues on the future of the Civic in the Disrupted University. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dempsey, S.E.. 2010. “Critiquing Community Engagement.” Management Communication Quarterly 24 (3): 359–390.
  • Dostilio, L.D. 2017. The Community Engagement Professional in Higher Education: A Competency Model for an Emerging Field. Boston, MA: Stylus Publishing.
  • Doyle, J. 2018. “Reconceptualising Research Impact: Reflections on the Real-World Impact of Research in an Australian Context.” Higher Education Research & Development 37 (7): 1366–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1504005.
  • Du, J.T., and C.M. Chu. 2022. “Toward Community-Engaged Information Behavior Research: A Methodological Framework.” Library & Information Science Research 44 (4), 101189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101189.
  • Dudo, A. 2012. “Towards a Model of Scientists’ Public Communication Activity: The Case of Biomedical Researchers.” Science Communication 35 (4): 476–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012460845.
  • Entradas, M., and M.M. Bauer. 2017. “Mobilisation for Public Engagement: Benchmarking the Practices of Research Institutes.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (7): 771–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516633834.
  • Fitzgerald, H.E., K. Bruns, S.T. Sonka, A. Furco, and L. Swanson. 2016. “The Centrality of Engagement in Higher Education.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 20 (1): 223–245.
  • Flaherty, C. 2014. “So Much To Do, So Little Time.” Inside Higher Ed. April 9. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2014/04/09/research-shows-professors-work-long-hours-and-spend-much-day-meetings.
  • Given, L.M., W. Kelly, and R. Willson. 2015. “Bracing for Impact: The Role of Information Science in Supporting Societal Research Impact.” Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 52 (1): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010048.
  • Given, L.M., D. Winkler, and R. Willson. 2014. Qualitative Research Practice: Implications for the Design & Implementation of a Research Impact Assessment Exercise in Australia (pp. 1–31). Wagga Wagga: Research Institute for Professional Practice, Learning and Education.
  • Glass, C.R., D.M. Doberneck, and J.H. Schweitzer. 2011. “Unpacking Faculty Engagement: The Types of Activities Faculty Members Report as Publicly Engaged Scholarship During Promotion and Tenure.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 15 (1): 7–30.
  • Goodman, H.P. 2014. “The Tie That Binds: Leadership and Liberal Arts Institutions’ Civic Engagement Commitment in Rural Communities.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 18 (3): 119–24.
  • Gunter, H.M. 2012. “Academic Work and Performance.” In Vol. 7 of Hard Labour? Academic Work and the Changing Landscape of Higher Education, edited by T. Fitzgerald, J. White, and H.M. Gunter, 65–85.
  • Harré, N., B.M. Grant, K. Locke, and S. Sturm. 2017. “The University as an Infinite Game.” Australian Universities Review 59 (2): 5–13.
  • Ho, S.S., J. Looi, and T.J. Goh. 2020. “Scientists as Public Communicators: Individual- and Institutional-Level Motivations and Barriers for Public Communication in Singapore.” Asian Journal of Communication 30 (2): 155–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2020.1748072.
  • Jensen, P., J.-B. Rouquier, P. Kreimer, and Y. Croissant. 2008. “Scientists who Engage with Society Perform Better Academically.” Science and Public Policy 35 (7): 527–41. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X329130.
  • Langfeldt, L., and L. Scordato. 2015. Assessing the Broader Impacts of Research. A Review of Methods and Practices. Oslo: Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU).
  • Leavy, P. 2017. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York: Guilford Press.
  • Macfarlane, B. 2007. “Defining and Rewarding Academic Citizenship: The Implications for University Promotions Policy.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 29 (3): 261–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800701457863.
  • Miller, F.Q. 2015. “Experiencing Information use for Early Career Academics’ Learning: A Knowledge Ecosystem Model.” Journal of Documentation 71 (6): 1228–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2014-0058.
  • Miller, J. 2019. “Where Does the Time go? An Academic Workload Case Study at an Australian University.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 41 (6): 633–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1635328.
  • Moore, T., and J. Morton. 2017. “The Myth of job Readiness? Written Communication, Employability, and the ‘Skills Gap’ in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1067602.
  • Mtawa, N.N., S.N. Fongwa, and G. Wangenge-Ouma. 2016. “The Scholarship of University-Community Engagement: Interrogating Boyer’s Model.” International Journal of Educational Development 49: 126–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.01.007.
  • Neresini, F., and M. Bucchi. 2011. “Which Indicators for the new Public Engagement Activities? An Exploratory Study of European Research Institutions.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (1): 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510388363.
  • Olmos-Peñuela, J., E. Castro-Martínez, and P. D’Este. 2014. “Knowledge Transfer Activities in Social Sciences and Humanities: Explaining the Interactions of Research Groups with non-Academic Agents.” Research Policy 43 (4): 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.12.004.
  • Orr, G. 2010. “Academics and the Media in Australia.” Australian Universities Review 52 (1): 23–31.
  • Pearson, G. 2001. “The Participation of Scientists in Public Understanding of Science Activities: The Policy and Practice of the U.K.” Research Councils. Public Understanding of Science 10 (1): 121–37. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/309.
  • Pedersen, D.B., J.F. Grønvad, and R. Hvidtfeldt. 2020. “Methods for Mapping the Impact of Social Sciences and Humanities—A Literature Review.” Research Evaluation 29 (1): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz033.
  • Phipps, D., S. Gaetz, and J. Wedlock. 2014. “Editorial: York Symposium on the Scholarship of Engagement.” Scholarly and Research Communication 5 (3): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.22230/src.2014v5n3a169.
  • Poliakoff, E., and T.L. Webb. 2007. “What Factors Predict Scientists’ Intentions to Participate in Public Engagement of Science Activities?” Science Communication 29 (2): 242–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009.
  • Polkinghorne, S., and L.M. Given. 2021. “Holistic Information Research: From Rhetoric to Paradigm.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 72 (10): 1261–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24450.
  • Prysor, D., and A. Henley. 2017. “Boundary Spanning in Higher Education Leadership: Identifying Boundaries and Practices in a British University.” Studies in Higher Education, 2210–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1318364.
  • Purcell, Jennifer W., A. Pearl, and T. Van Schyndel. 2021. “Boundary Spanning Leadership among Community-Engaged Faculty: An Exploratory Study of Faculty Participating in Higher Education Community Engagement.” Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning 6 (2): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.15402/esj.v6i2.69398.
  • Randall, J. 2010. “Community Engagement and Collective Agreements: Patterns at Canadian Universities.” In The Community Engagement and Service Mission of Universities, edited by P. Inman, and H.G. Schütze, 261–77. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (England and Wales): NIACE.
  • Reale, E., D. Avramov, K. Canhial, C. Donovan, R. Flecha, P. Holm, … R. Van Horik. 2017. “A Review of Literature on Evaluating the Scientific, Social and Political Impact of Social Sciences and Humanities Research.” Research Evaluation 27 (4): 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx025.
  • Sandmann, L.R. 2008. “Conceptualization of the Scholarship of Engagement in Higher Education: A Strategic Review, 1996–2006.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement 12 (1): 91–104.
  • Savan, B., S. Flicker, B. Kolenda, and M. Mildenberger. 2009. “How to Facilitate (or Discourage) Community-Based Research: Recommendations Based on a Canadian Survey.” Local Environment 14 (8): 783–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549830903102177.
  • Schimanski, L.A., and J.P. Alperin. 2018. “The Evaluation of Scholarship in Academic Promotion and Tenure Processes: Past, Present, and Future.” F1000Research 7: 1605. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16493.1.
  • Smith, K.M., F. Else, and P.A. Crookes. 2014. “Engagement and Academic Promotion: A Review of the Literature.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (4): 836–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.863849.
  • Trench, B., and S. Miller. 2012. “Policies and Practices in Supporting Scientists’ Public Communication Through Training.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 722–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs090.
  • Turner, V.K., K. Benessaiah, S. Warren, and D. Iwaniec. 2015. “Essential Tensions in Interdisciplinary Scholarship: Navigating Challenges in Affect, Epistemologies, and Structure in Environment–Society Research Centers.” Higher Education 70 (4): 649–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9859-9.
  • Watermeyer, R. 2014. “Impact in the REF: Issues and Obstacles.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (2): 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.915303.
  • Watermeyer, R. 2015. “Lost in the ‘Third Space’: The Impact of Public Engagement in Higher Education on Academic Identity, Research Practice and Career Progression.” European Journal of Higher Education 5 (3): 331–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2015.1044546.
  • Watson, D. 2007. Managing Civic and Community Engagement. England: Open University Press.
  • Weerts, D.J., and L.R. Sandmann. 2010. “Community Engagement and Boundary-Spanning Roles at Research Universities.” The Journal of Higher Education 81 (6): 632–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779075.
  • Welch, M., and S. Plaxton-Moore. 2017. “Faculty Development for Advancing Community Engagement in Higher Education: Current Trends and Future Directions.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 21 (2): 131–66.
  • Wendling, L.A. 2020. “Valuing the Engaged Work of the Professoriate: Reflections on Ernest Boyer’s Scholarship Reconsidered.” Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 20 (2), https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i2.25679.
  • Wenger, L., L. Hawkins, and S.D. Seifer. 2012. “Community-engaged Scholarship: Critical Junctures in Research, Practice, and Policy.” Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement 16 (1): 171–82.
  • Whiteford, L., and E. Strom. 2013. “Building Community Engagement and Public Scholarship Into the University.” Annals of Anthropological Practice 37 (1): 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/napa.12018.
  • Wilkinson, C., and E. Weitkamp. 2013. “A Case Study in Serendipity: Environmental Researchers use of Traditional and Social Media for Dissemination.” PLoS ONE 8 (12): e84339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084339.
  • Willson, R. 2018. “Systemic Managerial Constraints: How Universities Influence the Information Behaviour of HSS Early Career Academics.” Journal of Documentation 74 (4): 862–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2017-0111.
  • Willson, R., and L.M. Given. 2020. “I’m in Sheer Survival Mode”: Information Behaviour and Affective Experiences of Early Career Academics.” Library and Information Science Research 42 (2), 101014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2020.101014.
  • Winter, A., J. Wiseman, and B. Muirhead. 2006. “University-community Engagement in Australia Practice, Policy and Public Good.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 1 (3): 211–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197906064675.
  • Youn, T.I.K., and T.M. Price. 2009. “Learning from the Experience of Others: The Evolution of Faculty Tenure and Promotion Rules in Comprehensive Institutions.” The Journal of Higher Education 80 (2): 204–37. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.0.0041.
  • Zuber-Skerritt, O. 2015. “Participatory Action Learning and Action Research (PALAR) for Community Engagement: A Theoretical Framework.” Educational Research for Social Change 4 (1): 5–25.