Feedback as socialization in doctoral education: towards the enactment of authentic feedback

References

• Åkerlind, G., and L. McAlpine. 2017. “Supervising Doctoral Students: Variation in Purpose and Pedagogy.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (9): 1686–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1118031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basturkmen, H., M. East, and J. Bitchener. 2014. “Supervisors On-Script Feedback Comments on Drafts of Dissertations: Socialising Students Into the Academic Discourse Community.” Teaching in Higher Education 19 (4): 432–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2012.752728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D., and P. Dawson. 2023. “What Feedback Literate Teachers Do: An Empirically-Derived Competency Framework.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 48 (2): 158–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1910928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2021. “One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis?” Qualitative Research in Psychology 18 (3): 328–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D. 2023. “Teacher Feedback Literacy, Feedback Regimes and Iterative Change: Towards Enhanced Value in Feedback Processes.” Higher Education Research and Development, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2203472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and D. Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43 (8): 1315–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, D., and N. Winstone. 2023. “Teacher Feedback Literacy and its Interplay with Student Feedback Literacy.” Teaching in Higher Education 28 (1): 150–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, S., and V. Kumar. 2017. “‘Ignoring me is Part of Learning’: Supervisory Feedback on Doctoral Writing.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 54 (1): 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chugh, R., S. Macht, and B. Harreveld. 2022. “Supervisory Feedback to Postgraduate Research Students: A Literature Review.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 47 (5): 683–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1955241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P., D. Carless, and P. P. W. Lee. 2021. “Authentic Feedback: Supporting Learners to Engage in Disciplinary Feedback Practices.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 46 (2): 286–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1769022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esterhazy, R., and C. Damşa. 2019. “Unpacking the Feedback Process: An Analysis of Undergraduate Students’ Interactional Meaning-Making of Feedback Comments.” Studies in Higher Education 44 (2): 260–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakunle, O., M. Dollinger, J. Alla-Mensah, and B. Izard. 2019. “Academic Conferences as Learning Sites: A Multinational Comparison of Doctoral Students’ Perspectives and Institutional Policy.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 14:479–97. https://doi.org/10.28945/4383.
   Google Scholar
• González-Ocampo, G., and M. Castelló. 2018. “Writing in Doctoral Programs: Examining Supervisors’ Perspectives.” Higher Education 76 (3): 387–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0214-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grealy, L., and T. Laurie. 2017. “Higher Degree Research by Numbers: Beyond the Critiques of Neo-Liberalism.” Higher Education Research and Development 36 (3): 458–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1288710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzweiss, P. 2023. “The Challenges and Trade-Offs of Supporting Doctoral Student Writing: A Case Study of Faculty Experiences.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 60 (2): 286–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2065329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, N. 2010. “A Sociocultural View of Doctoral Students’ Relationships and Agency.” Studies in Continuing Education 32 (2): 103–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.487482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, H., and H. Li. 2023. “‘Nothing but Publishing’”: The Overriding Goal of PhD Students in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau.” Studies in Higher Education 48 (2): 263–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2131764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., and F. K. Jiang. 2020. “This Work is Antithetical to the Spirit of Research: An Anatomy of Harsh Peer Reviews.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 46:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye, K., and L. McAlpine. 2019. “Developing Academic Identity: A Review of the Literature on Doctoral Writing and Feedback.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 14:1–31. https://doi.org/10.28945/4168.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. M. 2018. “Academic Socialization of Doctoral Students Through Feedback Networks: A Qualitative Understanding of the Graduate Feedback Landscape.” Teaching in Higher Education 23 (8): 963–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzhabekova, A., and A. Temerbayeva. 2018. “The Role of Conferences in Doctoral Student Socialization.” Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education 9 (2): 181–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfström, E., and K. Pyhältö. 2017. “Ethics in the Supervisory Relationship: Supervisors’ and Doctoral Students’ Dilemmas in the Natural and Behavioural Sciences.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (2): 232–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1045475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lokhtina, I., E. Löfström, S. Cornér, and M. Castelló. 2022. “In Pursuit of Sustainable Co-authorship Practices in Doctoral Supervision: Addressing the Challenges of Writing, Authorial Identity and Integrity.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 59 (1): 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1799839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecka, B., D. Boud, and D. Carless. 2022. “Eliciting, Processing and Enacting Feedback: Mechanisms for Embedding Feedback Literacy Within the Curriculum.” Teaching in Higher Education 27 (7): 908–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantai, L. 2017. “Feeling Like a Researcher: Experiences of Early Doctoral Students in Australia.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (4): 636–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, S., M. Merga, and J. Morris. 2020. “Typical Scope of Time Commitment and Research Outputs of Thesis by Publication in Australia.” Higher Education Research and Development 39 (2): 244–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1674253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch, A., V. Kumar, S. van Schalkwyk, and G. Wisker. 2016. “Excellence in Doctoral Supervision: An Examination of Authoritative Sources Across Four Countries in Search of Performance Higher than Competence.” Quality in Higher Education 22 (1): 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2016.1144904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, N. T. B., and I. Mushin. 2022. “Understanding Equivocal Feedback in PhD Supervision Meetings: A Conversation Analysis.” Teaching in Higher Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2022.2068348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen, J. H., and D. Carless. 2023. “Feedback Literacy: A Critical Review of an Emerging Concept.” Higher Education 85 (6): 1381–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00895-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odena, O., and H. Burgess. 2017. “How Doctoral Students and Graduates Describe Facilitating Experiences and Strategies for Their Thesis Writing Learning Process: A Qualitative Approach.” Studies in Higher Education 42 (3): 572–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B., and S. Starfield. 2023. “The PhD by Publication in the Humanities and Social Sciences: A Cross-Country Analysis.” Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2190450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stracke, E., and V. Kumar. 2020. “Encouraging Dialogue in Doctoral Supervision: The Development of the Feedback Expectation Tool.” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 15:265–84. https://doi.org/10.28945/4568.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, T., and L. Y. Li. 2011. “‘Tell Me What to do’ vs. ‘Guide Me Through It’: Feedback Experiences of International Doctoral Students.” Active Learning in Higher Education 12 (2): 101–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., L. M. Zeng, A. Y. Zhu, and R. King. 2023. “Supervisors Matter, but What About Peers? The Distinct Contributions of Quality Supervision and Peer Support to Doctoral Students’ Research Experience.” Studies in Higher Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2212024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., R. Ajjawi, K. Dirkx, and D. Boud. 2022. “Measuring What Matters: The Positioning of Students in Feedback Processes Within National Student Satisfaction Surveys.” Studies in Higher Education 47 (7): 1524–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2021.1916909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., and B. Grant. 2020. “Doctoral Publishing and Academic Identity Work: Two Cases.” Higher Education Research and Development 39 (7): 1502–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1728522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar