1,062
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Research independence: drivers and impact on PhD students’ careers

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 03 Nov 2023, Accepted 31 Jan 2024, Published online: 07 Feb 2024

References

  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. 2022. “Sloan Research Fellowships.” Accessed August 31, 2022. https://sloan.org/fellowships.
  • Allison, P. D., J. S. Long, and T. K. Krauze. 1982. “Cumulative Advantage and Inequality in Science.” American Sociological Review 47: 615–25.
  • Aristizábal, N. 2021. “I Bombed the GRE—But I’m Thriving as a Ph.D. Student,” June 3. Accessed June 17, 2021. https://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2021/06/i-bombed-gre-i-m-thriving-phd-student.
  • Austin, A. E. 2002. “Preparing the Next Generation of Faculty: Graduate School as Socialization to the Academic Career.” The Journal of Higher Education 73: 94–122.
  • Bagues, M., M. Sylos-Labini, and N. Zinovyeva. 2017. “Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?” American Economic Review 107: 1207–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151211.
  • Barres, B. A. 2017. “Stop Blocking Postdocs’ Paths to Success.” Nature 548: 517–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/548517a.
  • Bastalich, W. 2017. “Content and Context in Knowledge Production: A Critical Review of Doctoral Supervision Literature.” Studies in Higher Education 42: 1145–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1079702.
  • Birch, S. H., and G. W. Ladd. 1997. “The Teacher-Child Relationship and Children’s Early School Adjustment.” Journal of School Psychology 35: 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5.
  • Black, G. C., and P. E. Stephan. 2010. “The Economics of University Science and the Role of Foreign Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars.” In American Universities in a Global Market, edited by Charles T. Clotfelter, 129–161. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Blackburn, R. T., D. W. Chapman, and S. M. Cameron. 1981. “‘Cloning’ in Academe: Mentorship and Academic Careers.” Research in Higher Education 15: 315–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00973512.
  • Bozeman, B., and E. Corley. 2004. “Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital.” Research Policy 33: 599–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008.
  • Brischoux, F., and F. Angelier. 2015. “Academia’s Never-Ending Selection for Productivity.” Scientometrics 103: 333–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1534-5.
  • Campbell, R. A. 2003. “Preparing the Next Generation of Scientists: The Social Process of Managing Students.” Social Studies of Science 33: 897–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312703336004.
  • Chubin, D. E., and T. Connolly. 1982. “Research Trails and Science Policies: Local and Extra-Local Negotiation of Scientific Work.” In Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, edited by N. Elias, H. Martins, and R. Whitley, 293–311. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Sociology of the Sciences a Yearbook. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7729-7_11
  • Clauset, A., S. Arbesman, and D. B. Larremore. 2015. “Systematic Inequality and Hierarchy in Faculty Hiring Networks.” Science Advances 1: e1400005. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400005.
  • Corsini, A., M. Pezzoni, and F. Visentin. 2022. “What Makes a Productive Ph.D. Student?” Research Policy 51: 104561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104561.
  • “Country Comparison”. 2022. Accessed September 10, 2022. https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/.
  • Cross, S. E., and L. Madson. 1997. “Models of the Self: Self-Construals and Gender.” Psychological Bulletin 122: 5–37.
  • Cyranoski, D., N. Gilbert, H. Ledford, A. Nayar, and M. Yahia. 2011. “Education: The PhD factory.” Nature 472: 276–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/472276a.
  • Daniels, R. J. 2015. “A Generation at Risk: Young Investigators and the Future of the Biomedical Workforce.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112: 313–18. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418761112.
  • Delamont, S., and P. Atkinson. 2001. “Doctoring Uncertainty: Mastering Craft Knowledge.” Social Studies of Science 31: 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631201031001005.
  • “From Horizon 2020 to Horizon Europe”. 2018.
  • Furman, J. L., and F. Teodoridis. 2020. “Automation, Research Technology, and Researchers’ Trajectories: Evidence from Computer Science and Electrical Engineering.” Organization Science 31: 330–54. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1308.
  • Gardner, S. K. 2008. “‘What’s Too Much and What’s Too Little?’ The Process of Becoming an Independent Researcher in Doctoral Education.” The Journal of Higher Education 26: 326–350.
  • Gentzkow, M., B. Kelly, and M. Taddy. 2019. “Text as Data.” Journal of Economic Literature 57: 535–74. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20181020.
  • Gilligan, C. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Hamilton, J. G., W. C. Birmingham, P. Tehranifar, M. L. Irwin, W. M. P. Klein, L. Nebeling, and J. Chubak. 2013. “Transitioning to Independence and Maintaining Research Careers in a New Funding Climate: American Society of Preventive Oncology Junior Members Interest Group Report.” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 22: 2138–42. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0807.
  • Hancock, S. 2023. “Knowledge or Science-based Economy? The Employment of UK PhD Graduates in Research Roles beyond Academia.” Studies in Higher Education 48: 1523–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2249023.
  • Heggeness, M. L., K. T. W. Gunsalus, J. Pacas, and G. McDowell. 2017. “The New Face of US Science.” Nature News 541: 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/541021a.
  • Hilmer, M. J., and C. E. Hilmer. 2009. “Fishes, Ponds, and Productivity: Student-Advisor Matching and Early Career Publishing Success for Economics Phds.” Economic Inquiry 47: 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00108.x.
  • Hofstede, G. 1980. “Culture and Organizations.” International Studies of Management & Organization 10: 15–41.
  • Horta, H., and J. M. Santos. 2016. “The Impact of Publishing during PhD Studies on Career Research Publication, Visibility, and Collaborations.” Research in Higher Education 57: 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9380-0.
  • Hunt, J. 2010. “Why Do Women Leave Science and Engineering?” Working Paper 15853. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w15853.
  • Jones, B. F., and B. A. Weinberg. 2011. “Age Dynamics in Scientific Creativity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 18910–14. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102895108.
  • Kam, B. H. 1997. “Style and Quality in Research Supervision: the Supervisor Dependency Factor.” Higher Education 34: 81–103.
  • Koepke, M. F., and D. A. Harkins. 2008. “Conflict in the Classroom: Gender Differences in the Teacher–Child Relationship.” Early Education and Development 19: 843–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802516108.
  • Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 2013. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Laudel, G., and J. Bielick. 2018. “The Emergence of Individual Research Programs in the Early Career Phase of Academics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 43: 972–1010. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918763100.
  • Laudel, G., and J. Gläser. 2008. “From Apprentice to Colleague: The Metamorphosis of Early Career Researchers.” Higher Education 55: 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9063-7.
  • Lee, A. 2008. “How Are Doctoral Students Supervised? Concepts of Doctoral Research Supervision.” Studies in Higher Education 33: 267–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802049202.
  • Lee, A., C. Dennis, and P. Campbell. 2007. “Nature’s Guide for Mentors.” Nature 447: 791–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/447791a.
  • Lerchenmueller, M. J., and O. Sorenson. 2018. “The Gender Gap in Early Career Transitions in the Life Sciences.” Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.009.
  • Levin, S. G., and P. E. Stephan. 1991. “Research Productivity Over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists.” The American Economic Review 81: 114–32.
  • Levine, I. S. 2007. “Making the Leap to Independence.” Science March. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.a0700029.
  • Liénard, J. F., T. Achakulvisut, D. E. Acuna, and S. V. David. 2018. “Intellectual Synthesis in Mentorship Determines Success in Academic Careers.” Nature Communications 9: 4840. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07034-y.
  • Ma, Y., S. Mukherjee, and B. Uzzi. 2020. “Mentorship and Protégé Success in STEM Fields.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117: 14077–83. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915516117.
  • Maher, B., and M. Sureda Anfres. 2016. “Young Scientists under Pressure: What the Data Show.” Nature 538: 444–45.
  • Mainhard, T., R. van der Rijst, J. van Tartwijk, and T. Wubbels. 2009. “A Model for the Supervisor–Doctoral Student Relationship.” Higher Education 58: 359–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9199-8.
  • Mangematin, V. 2000. “PhD Job Market: Professional Trajectories and Incentives during the PhD.” Research Policy 29: 741–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00047-5.
  • Marwell, G., R. Rosenfeld, and S. Spilerman. 1979. “Geographic Constraints on Women’s Careers in Academia.” Science 205: 1225–31.
  • Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159: 56–63.
  • MESRI. 2023. “Le Doctorat et les Docteurs - état de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation en France n°16.” Accessed January 20, 2024. https://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/eesr/FR/T744/le_doctorat_et_les_docteurs/.
  • Metcalfe, T. S. 2008. “The Production Rate and Employment of Ph.D. Astronomers.” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 120: 229–34. https://doi.org/10.1086/528878.
  • Mikolov, T., K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean. 2013. “Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space.” arXiv:1301.3781 [Cs], January.
  • National Research Council. 2005. Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of New Investigators in Biomedical Research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  • Nguyen, M., A. Panyadahundi, C. Olagun-Samuel, S. I. Chaudhry, M. M. Desai, A. Dardik, and D. Boatright. 2023. “Transition From Mentored to Independent NIH Funding by Gender and Department.” JAMA 329: 2189–90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.7693.
  • “NIH Data Book - Funding Rates”. 2022.
  • OECD. 2021. “Reducing the Precarity of Academic Research Careers.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers.
  • Paglis, L. L., S. G. Green, and T. N. Bauer. 2006. “Does Adviser Mentoring Add Value? A Longitudinal Study of Mentoring and Doctoral Student Outcomes.” Research in Higher Education 47: 451–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2.
  • Petersen, A. M., S. Fortunato, R. K. Pan, K. Kaski, O. Penner, A. Rungi, M. Riccaboni, H. E. Stanley, and F. Pammolli. 2014. “Reputation and Impact in Academic Careers.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111: 15316–21. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323111111.
  • Pezzoni, M., J. Mairesse, P. Stephan, and J. Lane. 2016. “Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study.” PLoS One 11: e0145146. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145146.
  • Roach, M., and H. Sauermann. 2010. “A Taste for Science? PhD Scientists’ Academic Orientation and Self-selection into Research Careers in Industry.” Research Policy 39: 422–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.004.
  • Rose, G. L. 2005. “Group Differences in Graduate Students’ Concepts of the Ideal Mentor.” Research in Higher Education 46: 53–80.
  • Sabatier, M. 2010. “Do Female Researchers Face a Glass Ceiling in France? A Hazard Model of Promotions.” Applied Economics 42: 2053–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701765338.
  • Sauermann, H., and C. Haeussler. 2017. “Authorship and Contribution Disclosures.” Science Advances 3: e1700404. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700404.
  • Schiffbaenker, H., M. Haas, and F. Holzinger. 2022. “The Gendered Nature of Independence in the Context of Research Funding and Excellence.” SN Social Sciences 2: 275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00563-w.
  • Shauman, K. A., and Y. Xie. 1996. “Geographic Mobility of Scientists: Sex Differences and Family Constraints.” Demography 33: 455–68.
  • Shibayama, S. 2019. “Sustainable Development of Science and Scientists: Academic Training in Life Science Labs.” Research Policy 48: 676–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.030.
  • Shibayama, S., Y. Baba, and J. P. Walsh. 2015. “Organizational Design of University Laboratories: Task Allocation and Lab Performance in Japanese Bioscience Laboratories.” Research Policy 44: 610–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.12.003.
  • Stephan, P. E. 1996. “The Economics of Science.” Journal of Economic Literature 34: 1199–1235.
  • Stephan, P. 2012. “Research Efficiency: Perverse Incentives.” Nature 484: 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/484029a.
  • Stephan, P. E., and S. G. Levin. 1992. Striking the Mother Lode in Science. The Importance of Age, Place, and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Stephan, P. E., and S. G. Levin. 1997. “The Critical Importance of Careers in Collaborative Scientific Research.” Revue d’économie Industrielle 79: 45–61. https://doi.org/10.3406/rei.1997.1652.
  • Stephan, P., and S. Levin. 2002. “The Importance of Implicit Contracts in Collaborative Scientific Research.” In Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science, edited by Philip Miroski and Esther- Mirjam Sent, 412–430. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • The University of Arizona. 2009. “Promotion Tips and Strategies for Assistant Professors.” Accessed August 31, 2022. https://hr.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/AdviceFromOthers.pdf.
  • van den Besselaar, P., and U. Sandström. 2019. “Measuring Researcher Independence Using Bibliometric Data: A Proposal for a New Performance Indicator.” PLoS One 14: e0202712. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202712.
  • van Dijk, D., O. Manor, and L. B. Carey. 2014. “Publication Metrics and Success on the Academic Job Market.” Current Biology 24: R516–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.04.039.
  • Yoshioka-Kobayashi, T., and S. Shibayama. 2020. “Early Career Training and Development of Academic Independence: a Case of Life Sciences in Japan.” Studies in Higher Education September: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1817889.
  • Zuckerman, H., and R. K. Merton. 1972. “Age, Aging, and Age Structure in Science.” Higher Education 4: 1–4.