Industrial doctorates: a systematic literature review and future research agenda

References

• Amaral, A., and T. Carvalho. 2020. “From the Medieval Disputation to the Graduate School.” In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education. Issues in Higher Education, edited by S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, and T. Carvalho, 143–173. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_6.
   Google Scholar
• Assbring, L., and C. Nuur. 2017. “What’s in it for Industry? A Case Study on Collaborative Doctoral Education in Sweden.” Industry and Higher Education 31 (3): 184–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422217705245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaban, C. 2020. “Diversifying the Missions and Expectations of Doctoral Education: Are We Losing the Distinctive ‘Added Value’ of the PhD?” In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education. Issues in Higher Education, edited by S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, and T. Carvalho, 325–345. Cham.: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_11.
   Google Scholar
• Barjak, F., and F. Heimsch. 2021. “Organisational Mission and the Involvement of Academic Research Units in Knowledge Sharing with Private Companies.” Industry and Innovation 28 (4): 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2020.1813090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baschung, L. 2016. “Identifying, Characterising and Assessing New Practices in Doctoral Education.” European Journal of Education 51 (4): 522–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baschung, L. 2020. “How Effective Are Doctoral Schools? Organisational Characteristics and Related Objectives.” In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education. Issues in Higher Education, edited by S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, and T. Carvalho, 175–202. Cham.: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_7.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, I., and A. K. Olsson. 2020. “University-Industry Collaboration in Higher Education: Exploring the Informing Flows Framework in Industrial PhD Education.” Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline 23: 147–63. https://doi.org/10.28945/4672.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, I., and A. K. Olsson. 2023. “One foot in academia and one in work-life – the case of Swedish industrial PhD students.” Journal of Workplace Learning 35 (6): 506–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2022-0157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrell-Damian, L. 2009. Collaborative Doctoral Education: University–Industry Partnerships for Enhancing Knowledge Exchange. Brussels: European University Association.
   Google Scholar
• Borrell-Damian, L., T. Brown, A. Dearing, J. Font, S. Hagen, J. Metcalfe, and J. Smith. 2010. “Collaborative Doctoral Education: University-Industry Partnerships for Enhancing Knowledge Exchange.” Higher Education Policy 23 (4): 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrell-Damian, L., R. Morais, and J. H. Smith. 2015. Collaborative Doctoral Education in Europe: Research Partnerships and Employability for Researchers Report on Doc-Careers II Project. Brussels: European University Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brekke, T. 2021. “What do we Know about the University Contribution to Regional Economic Development? A Conceptual Framework.” International Regional Science Review 44 (2): 229–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017620909538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briner, R. B., and D. Denyer. 2012. “Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool.” In In The Oxford Handbook of Evidence-Based Management: Companies, Classrooms, and Research, edited by D. Rousseau, 112–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bröchner, J., and O. Lagerqvist. 2016. “From Ideas to Construction Innovations: Firms and Universities Collaborating.” Construction Economics and Building 16 (1): 76–89. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v16i1.4668.
   Google Scholar
• Bröchner, J., and A. A. Sezer. 2020. “Effects of Construction Industry Support for PhD Projects: The Case of a Swedish Scheme.” Industry and Higher Education 34 (6): 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220904932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S. 2024. “The Transformation of Doctoral Education: Responding to the Needs and Expectations of Society and Candidates.” Teaching in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2024.2306255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S., S. Santos, S. Diogo, D. Soares, and T. Carvalho. 2022. “The Transformation of Doctoral Education: A Systematic Literature Review.” Higher Education 84 (4): 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00805-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S., O. Tavares, and C. Sin. 2019a. “Can you Judge a Book by its Cover? Industrial Doctorates in Portugal.” Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning 9 (3): 279–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-05-2018-0056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S., O. Tavares, and C. Sin. 2019b. “Reinventing Doctoral Education through University-Industry Collaboration: The Case of Industrial Doctorates in Portugal”.” INTED2019 Proceedings, 891–9. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.0304.
   Google Scholar
• Casano, L. V. 2015a. “Building Employability in Higher Education and Research Paths: Experimental Forms of Higher Apprenticeships and Industrial Doctorates in Italy.” E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies 4 (1): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Casano, L. V. 2015b. “When Research Moves up Regulation: A Trailblazing Experience of Industrial PhD in Italy.” International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 8 (1): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2015.077885.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, K.-H. 2011. “A Typology of Research Training in University—Industry Collaboration: The Case of Life Sciences in Finland.” Industry and Higher Education 25 (2): 93–107. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2011.0032.
   Google Scholar
• Colacino, M., and R. Mineo. 2023. “The Reggio Childhood Studies PhD as a Learning Community.” In 9th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’23). Valencia: Universitat Politecnica de Valencia.
   Google Scholar
• Compagnucci, L., and F. Spigarelli. 2020. “The Third Mission of the University: A Systematic Literature Review on Potentials and Constraints.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. H. M. 2010. Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation. 2011. Analysis of the Industrial PhD Programme. Accessed March 7, 2024. https://ufm.dk/en/publications/2011/analysis-of-the-industrial-phd-programme.
   Google Scholar
• Debois, S., T. Hildebrandt, M. Marquard, and T. Slaats. 2015. “Bridging the Valley of Death: A Success Story on Danish Funding Schemes Paving a Path from Technology Readiness Level 1 to 9.” IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice, 54–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/SERIP.2015.18.
   Google Scholar
• De Carvalho Ferreira, M. C. R., M. V. Amorim Sobreiro, H. Kimura, Luiz de Moraes, and F. A. Barboza. 2016. “A Systematic Review of Literature about Finance and Sustainability.” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 6 (2): 112–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1177438.
   Google Scholar
• Denyer, D., and A. Neely. 2004. “Introduction to Special Issue: Innovation and Productivity Performance in the UK.” International Journal of Management Reviews 5-6 (3-4): 131–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00100.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dominguez-Whitehead, Y., and F. Maringe. 2020. “A Cross-National Analysis of PhD Models.” International Journal of Comparative Education and Development 22 (3): 233–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-01-2020-0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durach, C. F., J. Kembro, and A. Wieland. 2017. “A New Paradigm for Systematic Literature Reviews in Supply Chain Management.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 53 (4): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H. 1998. “The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science: Cognitive Effects of the New University-Industry Linkages.” Research Policy 27 (8): 823–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Research Policy 29 (2): 109–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and C. Zhou. 2018. “Innovation Incommensurability and the Science Park.” R&D Management 48 (1): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. An Agenda for New Skills and Jobs: A European Contribution Towards Full Employment. Com(2010)682 Final. Accessed 14 March 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri = COM:2010:0682:FIN:en:PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Mapping Exercise on Doctoral Training in Europe – Toward a Common Approach. Accessed 9 February 2024. https://euraxess.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/policy_library/report_of_mapping_exercise_on_doctoral_training_final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, D. 2016. “Advanced Manufacturing Industrial Doctorate Centre: Engineering Doctorate Students Collaborating with Industry within an Academic and Industrial Environment.” Proceedings of the 18^th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (E&PDE16), 632–7.
   Google Scholar
• Falagas, M. E., E. I. Pitsouni, G. A. Malietzis, and G. Pappas. 2008. “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and Weaknesses.” The FASEB Journal 22 (2): 338–42. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganzarain, J., L. Markuerkiaga, and J. I. Igartua. 2019. “How Does Working on University-Business Collaborative Projects Foster the Industrial Doctorates’ Learning Process?” Engineering Digital Transformation. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96005-0_4.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., K. G. Corley, and A. L. Hamilton. 2013. “Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology.” Organizational Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granata, S. N., and F. Dochy. 2016. “Applied PhD Research in a Work-Based Environment: An Activity Theory-Based Analysis.” Studies in Higher Education 41 (6): 990–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, B., M. Nerad, C. Balaban, R. Deem, M. Grund, C. Herman, A. K. Mrčela, S. Porter, J. Rutledge, and R. Strugnell. 2022. “The Doctoral-Education Context in the Twenty-First Century: Change at Every Level.” In In Towards a Global Core Value System in Doctoral Education, edited by M. Nerad, D. Bogle, U. Kohl, C. O’Carroll, C. Peters, and B. Scholz, 18–42. London, UK: UCL Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2f4v5mf.8.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., and R. Peacock. 2005. “Effectiveness and Efficiency of Search Methods In Systematic Reviews of Complex Evidence: Audit of Primary Sources.” British Medical Journal 331 (7524): 1064–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. 2018. “Assessing the Industrial PhD: Stakeholder Insights.” Journal of Technology and Science Education 8 (4): 214–30. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.320.
   Google Scholar
• Gusenbauer, M., and N. R. Haddaway. 2020. “Which Academic Search Systems are Suitable for Systematic Reviews or Meta-analyses? Evaluating Retrieval Qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 Other Resources.” Research Synthesis Methods 11 (2): 181–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, L., C. Nuur, and J. Söderlind. 2016. “An Impact Analysis of Regional industry—University Interactions: The Case of Industrial PhD Schools.” Industry and Higher Education 30 (1): 41–51. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2016.0291.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, K. M. 2002. “The Research Training Experiences of Doctoral Students Linked to Australian Cooperative Research Centres.” Higher Education 44 (3/4): 469–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019894323421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, K. M. 2004. “Producing ‘Industry-Ready’ Doctorates: Australian Cooperative Research Centre Approaches to Doctoral Education.” Studies in Continuing Education 26 (3): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037042000265944.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, K. M. 2008. “Challenging Traditional Research Training Culture: Industry-Oriented Doctoral Programs in Australian Cooperative Research Centres.” In In Cultural Perspectives on Higher Education, edited by J. Välimaa and O. H. Ylijoki, 179–195. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6604-7_12
   Google Scholar
• Heldal, I., R. Murby, and S. Tobba Therkildsen. 2021. “Assessing Feasibility and Critical Success Factors for Knowledge Sharing within Industrial PhD-Projects in Sweden and Norway: A Case Study.” Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM, https://doi.org/10.34190/EKM.21.166.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, C. 2013. “Industry Perceptions of Industry–University Partnerships related to Doctoral Education in South Africa.” Industry and Higher Education 27 (3): 217–25. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0154.
   Google Scholar
• Horta, H. 2020. “PhD Students’ Self-Perception of Skills Acquired During Their PhD and Plans for Their Postdoctoral Careers: A Joint Analysis of Doctoral Students at Three Flagship Universities in Asia.” In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education. Issues in Higher Education, edited by S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, and T. Carvalho, 275–323. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_10
   Google Scholar
• Izquierdo, M., P. Marzal, F. J. Álvarez-Hornos, and C. Gabaldón. 2015. “Design and Implementation of a University-Industry Training Programme for Early-Stage Researchers of Marie Curie Actions–Itn Projects: The Trainonsec Case Study.” EDULEARN15 Proceedings, 5209–13.
   Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, H., T. Mikkonen, and K. Systa. 2021. “Anti-Patterns for an Industrial PhD in the Field of ICT.” IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9273826.
   Google Scholar
• Jalali, S., and C. Wohlin. 2012. “Systematic Literature Studies: Database Searches vs. Backward Snowballing.” Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on Empirical software engineering and measurement, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2372251.2372257.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. 2018. “Contemporary Trends in Professional Doctorates.” Studies in Higher Education 43 (5): 814–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, M. M. V. 2020. “Testing Relevance and Applicability: Reflections on Organizational Anthropology.” Journal of Organizational Ethnography 9 (2): 159–72. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-01-2019-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. M. 2006. “Doctoral Education in Europe and North America: A Comparative Analysis.” In The Formative Years of Scholars (Wenner Gren International Series, 83), edited by U. Teichler, 67–78. London: Portland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. M. 2007. “Quo Vadis Doctoral Education? New European Approaches in the Context of Global Changes.” European Journal of Education 42 (3): 307–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00308.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. M. 2020. “Reforms of Doctoral Education in Europe and Diversification of Types.” In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education. Issues in Higher Education, edited by S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, and T. Carvalho, 85–104. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_4.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlander, I., S. Nilsson, K. Lund, S. Ritzén, and M. N. Bergendahl. 2011. “Planning Industrial PhD Projects in Practice: Speaking both ‘Academia’ and ‘Practitionese’.” ICED 11 - 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - Impacting Society Through Engineering Design 8: 100–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, M. A., C. Kelley, N. Yankey, S. A. Birken, B. Abadie, and L. Damschroder. 2015. “A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.” Implementation Science 11 (1): 72. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0437-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, F. 2015. “Crossing Boundaries between Science and Innovation – Career Mobility and Impacts of Graduates of the UK Industrial Doctorate Centres.” International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 8 (1): 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2015.077884.
   Google Scholar
• Kolmos, A., L. B. Kofoed, and X. Y. Du. 2008. “PhD Students’ Work Conditions and Study Environment in University- and Industry-Based PhD Programmes.” European Journal of Engineering Education 33 (5-6): 539–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802588383.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén, M., and M. Björkman. 2019. “Experience from Industrial Graduate (PhD) Schools.” IFMBE Proceedings 68 (3), 731–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-9023-3_132.
   Google Scholar
• Lindén, M., M. Björkman, C. Gerdtman, and B. Hök. 2018. “Embedded Sensor Systems for Health – Collaboration between Industry, Academia and Healthcare.” IFMBE Proceedings 65: 964–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5122-7_241.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A., and G.-M. Löfdahl. 2020. “Engaging Stakeholders for Improved IAM Implementation.” Water Practice and Technology 15 (2): 350–5. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2020.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manathunga, C., R. Pitt, L. Cox, P. Boreham, G. Mellick, and P. Lant. 2012. “Evaluating Industry-Based Doctoral Research Programs: Perspectives and Outcomes of Australian Cooperative Research Centre Graduates.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (7): 843–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.554607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinelli, E., A. Cavicchi, A. Fiore, G. Paviotti, E. Gerussi, and S. Iammarino. 2018. Higher Education Instruments and Smart Specialisation Innovative Industrial Doctorates and Higher Technical Institutes in Puglia, EUR 29389 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92-79-96378-0, doi:10.2760/078136, JRC113412.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam-Saman, S. 2020. “Collaboration of Doctoral Researchers with Industry: A Critical Realist Theorization.” Industry and Higher Education 34 (1): 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219865098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerad, M. 2020. “Governmental Innovation Policies, Globalisation, and Change in Doctoral Education Worldwide: Are Doctoral Programmes Converging? Trends and Tensions.” In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education. Issues in Higher Education, edited by S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, and T. Carvalho, 43–84. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38046-5_3
   Google Scholar
• Nerad, M., D. Bogle, U. Kohl, C. O’Carroll, C. Peters, and B. Scholz. 2022. “Guiding Principles.” In In Towards a Global Core Value System in Doctoral Education, edited by M. Nerad, D. Bogle, U. Kohl, C. O’Carroll, C. Peters, and B. Scholz, 43–50. London: University College London (UCL). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2f4v5mf.9.
   Google Scholar
• O’Carroll, C., L. Purser, M. Wislocka, S. Lucey, and N. McGuinness. 2012. “The PhD in Europe: Developing a System of Doctoral Training that will Increase the Internationalisation of Universities.” In In European Higher Education at the Crossroads edited by, edited by A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Vlasceanu, and L. Wilson, 461–484. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3937-6_26.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, J., W. M. Lim, A. O’Cass, A. W. Hao, and S. Bresciani. 2021. “Scientific Procedures and Rationales for Systematic Literature Reviews (SPAR-4-SLR).” International Journal of Consumer Studies 45 (4): O1–O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, A. G. 2018. “Industry and PhD Engagement Programs: Inspiring Collaboration and Driving Knowledge Exchange.” Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 22 (4): 115–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2018.1456492.
   Google Scholar
• Roolaht, T. 2015. “Enhancing the Industrial PhD Programme as a Policy Tool for University—Industry Cooperation.” Industry and Higher Education 29 (4): 257–69. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2015.0259.
   Google Scholar
• Rosas, S., and M. Kane. 2012. “Quality and Rigor of the Concept Mapping Methodology: A Pooled Study Analysis.” Evaluation and Program Planning 35 (2): 236–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotolo, D., R. Camerani, N. Grassano, and B. R. Martin. 2022. “Why Do Firms Publish? A Systematic Literature Review and a Conceptual Framework.” Research Policy 51 (10), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen-Karlsson, M., and L. Wallgren. 2008. “The Interaction of Academic and Industrial Supervisors in Graduate Education.” Higher Education 56 (1): 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9090-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, P. S., and M. T. Patrício. 2020. “Academic Culture in Doctoral Education: Are Companies Making a Difference in the Experiences and Practices of Doctoral Students in Portugal?” International Journal of Doctoral Studies 15: 685–704. https://doi.org/10.28945/4665.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrico, C. S. 2022. “The Expansion of Doctoral Education and the Changing Nature and Purpose of the Doctorate.” Higher Education 84 (6): 1299–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00946-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel, J., and M. Keitsch. 2016. “Bridging the Gap between Professional Practice and Academic Research - The Industrial PhD.” Proceedings of the 18^th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Design Education: Collaboration and Cross-Disciplinarity, 198–203.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D., A. Brown, I. Lunt, and L. Thorne. 2004. Professional Doctorates: Integrating Professional and Academic Knowledge. Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sin, C., D. Soares, and O. Tavares. 2021. “Coursework in Industrial Doctorates: A Worthwhile Contribution to Students’ Training?” Higher Education Research & Development 40 (6): 1298–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1807918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., T. Campbell, M. Holleman, and E. Morgan. 2002. “The “Traffic” in Graduate Students: Graduate Students as Tokens of Exchange between Academe and Industry.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 27 (2): 282–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundström, A., G. Widforss, M. Rosqvist, and A. Hallin. 2016. “Industrial PhD Students and their Projects.” Procedia Computer Science 100: 739–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.219.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, O., C. Sin, and D. Soares. 2019. “Are Industrial Doctorates Capable of Overcoming Skills Mismatch?” EDULEARN19 Proceedings, 3019–24. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.0805.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, O., C. Sin, and D. Soares. 2020a. “Building Bridges Between Industry and Academia: What is the Profile of an Industrial Doctorate Student?” In In Structural and Institutional Transformations in Doctoral Education: Social, Political and Student Expectations, edited by S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, and T. Carvalho, 347–73. Springer Nature Switzerland. Cham: Palmgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, O., D. Soares, and C. Sin. 2020b. “Industry–University Collaboration in Industrial Doctorates: A Trouble-Free Marriage?” Industry and Higher Education 34 (5): 312–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219900155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennant, M. 2004. “Doctoring the Knowledge Worker.” Studies in Continuing Education 26 (3): 431–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037042000265971.
   Google Scholar
• Thune, T. 2009. “Doctoral Students on the University–Industry Interface: A Review of the Literature.” Higher Education 58 (5): 637–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9214-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thune, T. 2010. “The Training of “Triple Helix workers”? Doctoral Students in University–Industry–Government Collaborations.” Minerva 48 (4): 463–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9158-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thune, T., and P. Børing. 2015. “Industry PhD Schemes: Developing Innovation Competencies in Firms?” Journal of the Knowledge Economy 6 (2): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0214-7.
   Google Scholar
• Thune, T., S. Kyvik, S. Sörlin, T. B. Olsen, A. Vabø, and C. Tømte. 2012. PhD Education in a Knowledge Society: An Evaluation of PhD Education in Norway. Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education. Report 25/2012. ISBN 978-82-7218-846-6.
   Google Scholar
• Tiraboschi, M. 2015. “Introduction: Innovative Industrial Doctorates: Issues and Prospects.” International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 8 (1): i–v.
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., D. Denyer, and P. Smart. 2003. “Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review.” British Journal of Management 14 (3): 207–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher, R. 2002. “A Diversity of Doctorates: Fitness for the Knowledge Economy?” Higher Education Research & Development 21 (2): 143–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360220144060.
   Google Scholar
• Vassar, M., P. Atakpo, and M. J. Kash. 2016. “Manual Search Approaches Used by Systematic Reviewers in Dermatology.” Journal of the Medical Library Association 104 (4): 302–4. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitiello, V., and R. Castelluccio. 2019. “University and Enterprise: Research in Doctoral Studies with Industrial Characterization.” Proceedings of INTED2019 Conference, https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1673.
   Google Scholar
• Wallgren, L., and L. O. Dahlgren. 2005. “Doctoral Education as Social Practice for Knowledge Development: Conditions and Demands Encountered by Industry PhD Students.” Industry and Higher Education 19 (6): 433–43. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000005775354446.
   Google Scholar
• Wallgren, L., and L. O. Dahlgren. 2007. “Industrial Doctoral Students as Brokers between Industry and Academia: Factors Affecting their Trajectories, Learning at the Boundaries and Identity Development.” Industry and Higher Education 21 (3): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000007781236871.
   Google Scholar
• Wildy, H., S. Peden, and K. Chan. 2015. “The Rise of Professional Doctorates: Case Studies of the Doctorate in Education in China, Iceland and Australia.” Studies in Higher Education 40 (5): 761–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H. 2022. “A Triple Helix Model of Doctoral Education: A Case Study of an Industrial Doctorate.” Sustainability 14 (17): 10942. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., and R. Jeffrey. 2021. “Industrial Doctorate: A Case Study of Doctor of Engineering in the United Kingdom.” IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678565.
   Google Scholar
• Yearworth, M. 2011. “Systems Practice in Engineering: Reflections on Doctoral Level Systems Supervision.” 55th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences 2011, 1073–82.
   Google Scholar