From researching to making futures: a design mindset for transdisciplinary collaboration

References

• Adelson, Beth. 1999. “Developing Strategic Alliances: A Framework for Collaborative Negotiation in Design.” Research in Engineering Design 11 (3): 133–144. doi:10.1007/s001630050010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguirre, Manuela, Natalia Agudelo, and Jonathan Romm. 2017. “Design Facilitation as Emerging Practice: Analyzing How Designers Support Multi-Stakeholder Co-Creation.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 3 (3): 198–209. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2017.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Akama, Yoko, and Tania Ivanka. 2010. “What Community? Facilitating Awareness of ‘Community’ Through Playful Triggers.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, PDC ‘10, 11–20. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900444.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Linden J., Balder Onarheim, and Bo T. Christensen. 2010. “Design Requirements, Epistemic Uncertainty and Solution Development Strategies in Software Design.” Design Studies, Special Issue Studying Professional Software Design 31 (6): 567–589. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Jay Hillel. 2015. “Transdisciplinarity: A Review of Its Origins, Development, and Current Issues.” Journal of Research Practice 11 (1): R1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björgvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2010. “Participatory Design and ‘Democratizing Innovation’.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, PDC ‘10, 41–50. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1900441.1900448.
   Google Scholar
• Björklund, Tua A., Teo Keipi, Sine Celik, and Kalevi Ekman. 2019. “Learning Across Silos: Design Factories as Hubs for Co-Creation.” European Journal of Education 54 (4): 552–565. doi:10.1111/ejed.12372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boon, Wouter P. C., Maryse M. H. Chappin, and Jaap Perenboom. 2014. “Balancing Divergence and Convergence in Transdisciplinary Research Teams.” Environmental Science & Policy 40: 57–68. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd Davis, Stephen, Olivia Vane, and Florian Kräutli. 2021. “Can I Believe What I See? Data Visualization and Trust in the Humanities.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 46 (4): 522–546. doi:10.1080/03080188.2021.1872874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassett, Jamie, and John O’Reilly. 2021. “Introduction to a Creative Philosophy of Anticipation.” In A Creative Philosophy of Anticipation: Futures in the Gaps of the Present, edited by Jamie Brassett and John O’Reilly, 79–98. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. 2009. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary. n.d. “Mindset.” In Cambridge Dictionary. Accessed July 9, 2021. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/mindset.
   Google Scholar
• Candy, Stuart, and Jake Dunagan. 2017. “Designing an Experiential Scenario: The People Who Vanished.” Futures 86: 136–153. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carew, Anna L., and Fern Wickson. 2010. “The TD Wheel: A Heuristic to Shape, Support and Evaluate Transdisciplinary Research.” Futures, Global Mindset Change 42 (10): 1146–1155. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlan, Peter, Jane Fulton Suri, and Katherine Canales. 2007. “Prototypes as (Design) Tools for Behavioral and Organizational Change: A Design-Based Approach to Help Organizations Change Work Behaviors.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 43 (1): 122–134. doi:10.1177/0021886306297722.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, Darlene. 1993. “Graphic Facilitation.” Communications of the ACM 36 (6): 64. doi:10.1145/153571.214820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dam, Rikke Friis, and Teo Yu Siang. 2021. 5 Stages in the Design Thinking Process. The Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/5-stages-in-the-design-thinking-process.
   Google Scholar
• Datta, Saugato, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2014. “Behavioral Design: A New Approach to Development Policy.” Review of Income and Wealth 60 (1): 7–35. doi:10.1111/roiw.12093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, Christopher, and Rosie Parnell. 2003. Consensus Design: Socially Inclusive Process. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De la Rosa, Juan Alfonso, and Stan Ruecker. 2020. “Using Prototypes to Produce High-Resolution Systemic Future Maps. A Proposed Model for Design Research and Knowledge.” Bitácora Urbano Territorial 30 (2): 87–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Rosa, Juan Alfonso, Stan Ruecker, and Carolina Giraldo Nohora. 2021. “Systemic Mapping and Design Research: Towards Participatory Democratic Engagement.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 7 (2): 282–298. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2021.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1923. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2011. “The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application.” Design Studies 32 (6): 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2015. “Frame Creation and Design in the Expanded Field.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 1 (1): 22–33. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2015.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2018. “Mixing Practices to Create Transdisciplinary Innovation: A Design-Based Approach.” Technology Innovation Management Review 8: 60–65. doi:10.22215/timreview/1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees, and Nigel Cross. 2001. “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of Problem–Solution.” Design Studies 22 (5): 425–437. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, Gary Lee, and Juan C. Lucena. 2004. “Knowledge and Professional Identity in Engineering: Code-Switching and the Metrics of Progress.” History and Technology 20 (4): 393–420. doi:10.1080/0734151042000304358.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dykes, Thomas H., Paul A. Rodgers, and Michael Smyth. 2009. “Towards a New Disciplinary Framework for Contemporary Creative Design Practice.” CoDesign 5 (2): 99–116. doi:10.1080/15710880902910417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, Adrian, Anabel Marin, Lakshmi Charli-Joseph, Dinesh Abrol, Marina Apgar, Joanes Atela, Becky Ayre, et al. 2020. “Structured Collaboration Across a Transformative Knowledge Network – Learning Across Disciplines, Cultures and Contexts?” Sustainability 12 (6): 2499. doi:10.3390/su12062499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Martyn. 2014. “Researching the Future by Design.” In The Routledge Companion to Design Research, edited by Paul A. Rodgers and J. Yee, 190–202. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Feast, Luke. 2012. “Professional Perspectives on Collaborative Design Work.” CoDesign 8 (4): 215–230. doi:10.1080/15710882.2012.734828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feist, Gregory J. 1991. “Synthetic and Analytic Thought: Similarities and Differences among Art and Science Students.” Creativity Research Journal 4 (2): 145–155. doi:10.1080/10400419109534382.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Arnout R. H., Hilde Tobi, and Amber Ronteltap. 2011. “When Natural Met Social: A Review of Collaboration Between the Natural and Social Sciences.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 36 (4): 341–358. doi:10.1179/030801811X13160755918688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, Michel. 2005. “The Discourse on Language.” In Truth: Engagements Across Philosophical Traditions, edited by José Medina and David Wood, 315–335. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi:10.1002/9780470776407.ch20.
   Google Scholar
• Frascara, J. 1988. “Graphic Design: Fine Art or Social Science?” Design Issues 5 (1): 18–29.
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, Robert. 2014. Sustainable Knowledge: A Theory of Interdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/9781137303028_4.
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, Robert. 2017. “The Future of Interdisciplinarity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein, and Roberto Carlos Dos Santos Pacheco, 2–8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallego, Carmenza, G. Mauricio Mejía, and Gregorio Calderon. 2020. “Strategic Design: Origins and Contributions to Intellectual Capital in Organizations.” Journal of Intellectual Capital 21 (6): 873–891. doi:10.1108/JIC-10-2019-0234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia Topete, Alex. 2021. “Transdisciplinary Intelligence: Linking Factors of Knowledge Production and the Cultural Dimensions of Industries.” Thesis. https://utd-ir.tdl.org/handle/10735.1/9417.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, Camilla, Margherita Pevere, Kirsi Niinimäki, and Pirjo Kääriäinen. 2020. “Conditions for Experiential Knowledge Exchange in Collaborative Research Across the Sciences and Creative Practice.” CoDesign 16 (4): 328–344. doi:10.1080/15710882.2020.1821713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Kara L., Daniel Stokols, Richard P. Moser, Brandie K. Taylor, Mark D. Thornquist, Linda C. Nebeling, Carolyn C. Ehret, et al. 2008. “The Collaboration Readiness of Transdisciplinary Research Teams and Centers: Findings from the National Cancer Institute’s TREC Year-One Evaluation Study.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, The Science of Team Science 35 (2, Supplement): S161–S172. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.03.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Frances, and Fergus Lyon. 2013. “Transdisciplinary Environmental Research: Building Trust Across Professional Cultures.” Environmental Science & Policy 31: 109–119. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2013.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, David A., and Katherine J. Klein. 2007. “What’s the Difference? Diversity Constructs as Separation, Variety, or Disparity in Organizations.” Academy of Management Review 32 (4): 1199–1228. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynie, J. Michael, Dean Shepherd, Elaine Mosakowski, and P. Christopher Earley. 2010. “A Situated Metacognitive Model of the Entrepreneurial Mindset.” Journal of Business Venturing 25 (2): 217–229. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, Danah, Carmen Richardson, and Rohit Mehta. 2017. “Design Thinking: A Creative Approach to Educational Problems of Practice.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 26: 140–153. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, Terry. 2015. “Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research.” Design and Culture 7 (2): 229–246. doi:10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, Terry. 2018. “The Emerging Transition Design Approach.” In Design Research Society Conference DRS2018, edited by C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, E. Bohemia, and P. Lloyd, Vol. 3, 968–989. Limerick.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, T. 2008. “Transdisciplinarity in the Practice of Research.” In Transdisziplinäre Forschung: Integrative Forschungsprozesse Verstehen Und Bewerten, edited by Matthias Bergmann and Engelbert Schramm, 21–37. Frankfurt/Main.
   Google Scholar
• Jantsch, E. 1972. “Towards Interdisciplinarity and Transdisciplinarity in Education and Innovation.” In Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research. Proceedings of Seminar on Interdisciplinarity in Universities, edited by G. Berger, A. Briggs, and G. Michaud, 97–121. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2003. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.” The American Economic Review 93 (5): 1449–1475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy. 2011. “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I.” Design and Culture 3 (3): 285–306. doi:10.2752/175470811X13071166525216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy. 2012. “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II.” Design and Culture 4 (2): 129–148. doi:10.2752/175470812X13281948975413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie Thompson. 2000. “Integration, Evaluation, and Disciplinarity.” In Transdisciplinarity: ReCreating Integrated Knowledge, edited by M. A. Sommerville and D. J. Rapport, 49–59. Oxford: EOLSS.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie Thompson. 2004. “Prospects for Transdisciplinarity.” Futures, Transdisciplinarity 36 (4): 515–526. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie Thompson. 2010. “A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by Julie Thompson Klein and Carl Mitcham. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Julie Thompson. 2015. “Reprint of ‘Discourses of Transdisciplinarity: Looking Back to the Future.” Futures, “Advances in Transdisciplinarity 2004–2014” 65 (January): 10–16. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolko, Jon. 2010. “Abductive Thinking and Sensemaking: The Drivers of Design Synthesis.” Design Issues 26 (1): 15–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2007. “Design Research, an Oxymoron?” In Design Research Now. Essays and Selected Projects, edited by Ralf Michel, 67–80. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, Daniel J., Arnim Wiek, Matthias Bergmann, Michael Stauffacher, Pim Martens, Peter Moll, Mark Swilling, and Christopher J. Thomas. 2012. “Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and Challenges.” Sustainability Science 7 (1): 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Bryan. 2006. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, James. 2005. “‘Being in Between’: Art-Science Collaborations and a Technological Culture.” Social Analysis 49 (1): 141–162. doi:10.3167/015597705780996246.
   Google Scholar
• Lieven, O., and S. Maasen. 2007. “Transdisziplinäre Forschung: Vorbote Eines ‘New Deal’ Zwischen Wissenschaft Und Gesellschaft.” Gaia 16 (1): 35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Peter, and Arlene Oak. 2018. “Cracking Open Co-Creation: Categories, Stories, and Value Tension in a Collaborative Design Process.” Design Studies, Designing in the Wild 57 (July): 93–111. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løgager, Cathrine, Luca Simeone, and G. Mauricio Mejía. 2021. “A Foresight-Oriented Service Design Approach to Foster Longer-Term Thinking and Sustainable Practices.” In EAD 2021. Lancaster.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, Rachael, and Janet McDonnell. 2006. “Architect and User Interaction: The Spoken Representation of Form and Functional Meaning in Early Design Conversations.” Design Studies 27 (2): 141–166. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2005.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, Jonas, and Mattias Arvola. 2007. “Lessons Learned from Facilitation in Collaborative Design.” In Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series, edited by Wayne Piekarski and Beryl Plimmer, Vol. 241, 51–54. Ballarat.
   Google Scholar
• Malina, Roger, Carol Strohecker, and Carol LaFayette. 2013. Steps to an Ecology of Networked Knowledge and Innovation: Enabling New Forms of Collaboration Among Sciences, Engineering, Arts, and Design. SEAD. MIT Press. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/page/NSF_SEAD.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbrojt, Jacques. 1994. “Art and Science: Similarities, Differences and Interactions.” Leonardo 27 (3): 179–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje, Michael Guggenheim, and Alex Wilkie. 2018. “Introduction: From Performance to Inventing the Social.” In Inventing the Social, edited by Noortje Marres, Michael Guggenheim, and Alex Wilkie, 17–37. Manchester: Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, Manfred A. 2005. “Foundations of Transdisciplinarity.” Ecological Economics 53 (1): 5–16. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazé, Ramia. 2019. “Politics of Designing Visions of the Future.” Journal of Futures Studies 23 (3): 23–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, Janet. 2009. “Collaborative Negotiation in Design: A Study of Design Conversations Between Architect and Building Users.” CoDesign 5 (1): 35–50. doi:10.1080/15710880802492862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, Sue L. T., and Gabrielle Donnelly. 2014. “Transleadership for Transdisciplinary Initiatives.” World Futures 70 (3–4): 164–185. doi:10.1080/02604027.2014.934625.
   Google Scholar
• Mejía, G. Mauricio. 2021. “Theory-Driven or Theory-Informed? A Review of Behavioral Economics in Design.” The Design Journal 24 (4): 567–587. doi:10.1080/14606925.2021.1935089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía, G. Mauricio. 2022. “Anticipatory Justice in Design Speculation.” In Anticipation 22, edited by Cynthia Selin. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Mejía, G. Mauricio, Roger F. Malina, and Andrés F. Roldán. 2017. “Towards an Inventory of Best Practices for Transdisciplinary Collaboration.” In 23rd International Symposium on Electronic Arts ISEA2017, 681–687. Manizales: Universidad de Caldas.
   Google Scholar
• Mejía, G. Mauricio, Roger F. Malina, Yumeng Xie, and Alex Garcia Topete. 2020. “Translating Disciplinary Practices for Trans-Sentient Collaboration.” In 26th International Symposium on Electronic Arts, ISEA2020, 283–290. Montreal, QC.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, Matthew B., A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Raymond C. 1982. “Varieties of Interdisciplinary Approaches in the Social Sciences: A 1981 Overview.” Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies 1: 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Cynthia, Dana Cordell, and Dena Fam. 2015. “Beginning at the End: The Outcome Spaces Framework to Guide Purposive Transdisciplinary Research.” Futures, “Advances in Transdisciplinarity 2004–2014” 65 (January): 86–96. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobjörk, Malin. 2010. “Consulting Versus Participatory Transdisciplinarity: A Refined Classification of Transdisciplinary Research.” Futures 42 (8): 866–873. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, Wayde, Max Nielsen-Pincus, Jo Ellen Force, and J. D. Wulfhorst. 2007. “Bridges and Barriers to Developing and Conducting Interdisciplinary Graduate-Student Team Research.” Ecology and Society 12 (2). doi:10.5751/ES-02082-120208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, Bonnie. 2019. “Design in the Age of Climate Change.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 5 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2019.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Damien. n.d. “The Design Squiggle.” https://thedesignsquiggle.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, Betsy. 2018. “The Neuroscience of Growth Mindset and Intrinsic Motivation.” Brain Sciences 8 (2): 20. doi:10.3390/brainsci8020020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, Basarab. 2002. Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, Donald, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2015. “DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 1 (2): 83–106. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Oak, Arlene. 2009. “Performing Architecture: Talking ‘Architect’ and ‘Client’ into Being.” CoDesign 5 (1): 51–63. doi:10.1080/15710880802518054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah, Yoko Akama, and Shanti Sumartojo. 2018. Uncertainty and Possibility: New Approaches to Future Making in Design Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah, Katalin Osz, Kaspar Raats, Thomas Lindgren, and Vaike Fors. 2020. “Design Anthropology for Emerging Technologies: Trust and Sharing in Autonomous Driving Futures.” Design Studies 69 (July): 100942. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2020.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, Christian. 2005. “Transdisciplinary Collaboration in Environmental Research.” Futures 37 (10): 1159–1178. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, Christian. 2011. “What Is Progress in Transdisciplinary Research?” Futures, Wendell Bell 43 (6): 618–626. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priaulx, Nicky, and Martin Weinel. 2018. “Connective Knowledge: What We Need to Know about Other Fields to ‘Envision’ Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration.” European Journal of Futures Research 6 (1): 21. doi:10.1186/s40309-018-0150-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Root-Bernstein, Robert, and Michele Root-Bernstein. 2013. “The Art and Craft of Science.” Educational Leadership 70 (5): 16–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, A. Wendy, Fern Wickson, and Anna L. Carew. 2008. “Transdisciplinarity: Context, Contradictions and Capacity.” Futures 40 (5): 460–472. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2007.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rylander, Anna. 2009. “Design Thinking as Knowledge Work: Epistemological Foundations and Practical Implications.” Design Management Journal 4 (1): 7–19. doi:10.1111/j.1942-5074.2009.00003.x.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, Neil. 2019. “How AI and Neuroscience Drive Each Other Forwards.” Nature 571 (7766): S15–S17. doi:10.1038/d41586-019-02212-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savary, Jennifer, Tali Kleiman, Ran R. Hassin, and Ravi Dhar. 2015. “Positive Consequences of Conflict on Decision Making: When a Conflict Mindset Facilitates Choice.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 144 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1037/a0038551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Tristan. 2018. “Mapping Indigenous Futures: Decolonising Techno-Colonising Designs.” Strategic Design Research Journal 11 (2): 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia, Lucy Kimbell, Rafael Ramirez, and Yasser Bhatti. 2015. “Scenarios and Design: Scoping the Dialogue Space.” Futures 74: 4–17. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert Alexander. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. P. 1990. “The Two Cultures.” Leonardo 23 (2/3): 169–173. doi:10.2307/1578601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa, Ricardo, G. Mauricio Mejía, and Joni Adamson. 2021. “Fluid Worldviews: Designing within the Common Good.” In Design as Common Good, edited by Massimo Botta and Sabine Junginger, 1016–1028. Manno: Swiss Design Network.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, Zachary. 2007. “Modeling the Demands of Interdisciplinarity: Toward a Framework for Evaluating Interdisciplinary Endeavors.” Integral Review 4: 92–107.
   Google Scholar
• Sterling, Bruce. 2009. “Design Fiction.” Interactions 16 (3): 20–24. doi:10.1145/1516016.1516021.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, Paul, and Rob J. F. Burton. 2011. “Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research.” Sustainability 3 (8): 1090–1113. doi:10.3390/su3081090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolterman, E. 2008. “The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research.” International Journal of Design 2 (1): 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Tötzer, Tanja, Sabine Sedlacek, and Markus Knoflacher. 2011. “Designing the Future – a Reflection of a Transdisciplinary Case Study in Austria.” Futures, Futures of Evolutionary Psychology 43 (8): 840–852. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Baalen, Wander M., Tamara De Groot, and Liesbeth Noordegraaf-Eelens. 2021. “Higher Education, the Arts, and Transdisciplinarity: A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Research in Education 111 (1): 24–45. doi:10.1177/00345237211005799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, Peter-Paul. 2006. “Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (3): 361–380. doi:10.1177/0162243905285847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voros, Joseph. 2003. “A Generic Foresight Process Framework.” Foresight 5 (3): 10–21. doi:10.1108/14636680310698379.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, Immanuel Maurice. 2004. The Uncertainties of Knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F., A. L. Carew, and A. W. Russell. 2006. “Transdisciplinary Research: Characteristics, Quandaries and Quality.” Futures 38 (9): 1046–1059. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, Edward O. 1999. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Yumeng, G. Mauricio Mejía, Paul Coseo, and Chingwen Cheng. 2020. “A Participatory Design Case Study in Environmental Design Education.” In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 – Participation(s) Otherwise, PDC ’20, Vol. 2, 87–94. Manizales: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3384772.3385152.
   Google Scholar
• Xie, Yumeng, G. Mauricio Mejía, and Wenqi Zheng. 2021. “An Exploratory Study of Co-Design Skills in the U.S. Job Postings.” In Proceedings of IASDR 2021, Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar