Emphasizing uncertainty, celebrating community and valuing values: science communication remedies for the COVID-19 era and beyond

References

• Boyce, Tammy. 2006. “Journalism and Expertise.” Journalism Studies 7 (6): 889–906.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, Paul R., and Barbara L. Ley. 2010. “Media use and Public Perceptions of DNA Evidence.” Science Communication 32 (1): 93–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bultitude, Karen. 2011. “The Why and How of Science Communication.” In Science Communication, edited by P. Rosulek, 1–18. Pilsen: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Charney, Davdida. 2003. “Lone Geniuses in Popular Science: The Devaluation of Scientific Consensus.” Written Communication 20 (3): 215–241. doi:10.1177/0741088303257505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry, Andrew Bartlett, and Luis Reyes-Galindo. 2017. “Demarcating Fringe Science for Policy.” Perspectives on Science 25 (4): 411–438. doi:10.1162/POSC_a_00248.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry M., and Robert Evans. 2017. Why Democracies Need Science. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Harry, Robert Evans, Darrin Durant, and Martin Weinel. 2020. Experts and the Will of the People: Society, Populism and Science. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Evan. 2017. Post-Truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It. London: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Dhingra, Koshi. 2003. “Thinking About Television Science: How Students Understand the Nature of Science from Different Program Genres.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (2): 234–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2016. “Values in Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, edited by P. Humphreys, 609–630. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbner, George, Larry Gross, Michael Morgan, and Nancy Signorielli. 1981. “Scientists on the TV Screen.” Society 18 (4): 41–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbner, George, Larry Gross, Michael Morgan, and Nancy Signorielli. 1986. “Living with Television: The Dynamics of the Cultivation Process.” In Perspectives on Media Effects, edited by J. Bryant, and D. Zillmann, 17–40. Michigan: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Alexander. 2021. Evolution on British Television and Radio: Transmissions and Transmutations. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Darryl B. 2019. “Androcentrism and the Great Man Narrative in Psychology Textbooks: The Case of Ivan Pavlov.” Journal of Research in Gender Studies 9 (1): 9–37.
   Google Scholar
• Holliman, Richard. 2004. “Media Coverage of Cloning: A Study of Media Content, Production and Reception.” Public Understanding of Science 13 (2): 107–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Brian, Cynthia Miller-Idriss, Rachael Piltch-Loeb, Beth Goldberg, Kesa White, Meili Criezis and Elena Savoia. 2021. “Development of a Codebook of Online Anti-Vaccination Rhetoric to Manage COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (14): 7556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, Faisal. 2021. US Overtakes UK as Hardest hit by Covid Deaths in G7. London: BBC News. 10th June 2021. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57421886 [Accessed: 25/01/2022]
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan. M. 2015. “The Politically Motivated Reasoning Paradigm, Part 1: What Politically Motivated Reasoning is and how to Measure it.” In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by R. A. Scott, M. Buchmann and S. M. Kosslyn, 1–16. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Crystal, Tanya Yang, Gabrielle Inchoco, Graham M. Jones, and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2021. Viral Visualizations: How Coronavirus Skeptics Use Orthodox Data Practices to Promote Unorthodox Science Online”. Pre-print available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.07993.pdf [Accessed 22/10/2021].
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martín-Sempere, María José, Belén Garzón-García, and Jesús Rey-Rocha. 2008. “‘Scientists’ Motivation to Communicate Science and Technology to the Public: Surveying Participants at the Madrid Science Fair.” Public Understanding of Science 17 (3): 349–367. doi:10.1177/0963662506067660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason-Wilkes, Will. 2018. “Science as Religion? Science Communication and Elective Modernism.” [PhD Thesis]. Cardiff University.
   Google Scholar
• Mason-Wilkes, Will. 2020. “Divine DNA? ‘Secular’ and ‘Religious’ Representations of Science in Nonfiction Science Television Programs.” Zygon 55: 6–26. doi:10.1111/zygo.12574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, Robert K. 1973. “The Normative Structure of Science.” In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, edited by N. W. Storer, N267–N280. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitroff, Ian. 1974. “Norms and Counter-Norms in a Select Group of the Apollo Moon Scientists: A Case Study of the Ambivalence of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 39 (4): 579–595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, Rebkah H. 2014. “Adverse Outcomes Associated With Media Exposure to Contradictory Nutrition Messages.” Journal of Health Communication 19 (1): 24–40. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.798384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, Matthew C. 2009. “Framing Science: A New Paradigm in Public Engagement.” In Understanding and Communicating Science: New Agendas in Communication, edtied by L. Kahlor and P. Stout, 40–67. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ophir, Yotam, and Kathleen H Jamieson. 2021. “The Effects of Media Narratives About Failures and Discoveries in Science on Beliefs About and Support for Science.” Public Understanding of Science 30 (8): 1008–1023. doi:10.1177/09636625211012630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi. 2021. Why Trust Science? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Hans Peter, et al. 2008. “Science-Media Interface: It’s Time to Reconsider.” Science Communication 30 (2): 266–276. doi:10.1177/1075547008324809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Hans Peter. 2013. “Gap Between Science and Media Revisited: Scientists as Public Communicators.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (Supplement 3): 14102–14109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn, Emma K., Sajjad S. Fazel, and Cheryl E. Peters. 2021. “The Instagram Infodemic: Cobranding of Conspiracy Theories, Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Authority-Questioning Beliefs.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 24 (8): 573–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychkova, Iuliia. 2020. “Storytelling in TED Talks.” [PhD Thesis]. University of Mississippi. https://www.proquest.com/openview/e2abf931a97267112eb1524446f07170/1?pq-origsite = gscholar&cbl = 44156 [Accessed: 29/10/2021]
   Google Scholar
• Sky News. 2016. EU: In or Out? Faisal Islam Interview with Michael Gove. London: Sky News.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Lydia. 2017. “Trump Administration Deletes Mention of ‘Climate Change’ from Environmental Protection Agency’s Website.” The Independent 21, October. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-administration-climate-change-deleted-environmental-protection-agency-website-a8012581.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tait, Sue. 2006. “Autoptic Vision and the Necrophilic Imaginary in CSI.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 9 (1): 45–62.
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman, Gaye. 2000. “The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media.” In Culture and Politics: A Reader, edited by L. Crothers and C. Lockhart, 150–174. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tufecki, Z. 2020. “Why Telling People They Don’t Need Masks Backfired.” The New York Times, March 17. Accessed 12 September 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/opinion/coronavirus-face-masks.html.
   Google Scholar