Knowing the same things: mass examinations, credentials, and infrastructures of shared knowledge

References

• Agar, Jon. 2003. The Government Machine. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alcock, Thomas. 1868. Questions on Huxley’s Lessons in Elementary Physiology. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1871. “A Competitive Examination Hall in China.” Once a Week 7: 323–325.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Henry Edward. 1973. “Our Need to Honour Huxley’s Will: Huxley Memorial Lecture.” In H.E. Armstrong and the Teaching of Science 1880–1930, edited by W. H. Brock, 55–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, William J. 2021. The Trinity Circle: Anxiety, Intelligence, and Knowledge Creation in Nineteenth-Century England. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Babbage, Charles. 1832. On the Economy of Machinery and Manufactures. London: Charles Knight.
   Google Scholar
• Babbage, Charles. 1864. Passages from the Life of a Philosopher. London: Longman & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Barry. 1982. T.S. Kuhn and Social Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Barry, David Bloor, and John Henry. 1996. Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Naomi. 2005. “‘Enrico Ferri’s Scientific Socialism: A Marxist Interpretation of Herbert Spencer’s Organic Analogy’.” Journal of the History of Biology 38: 301–325. doi:10.1007/s10739-004-3796-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, Lawrence. 2011. Standards: Recipes for Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Assessment. 2022. International Education. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, Edwin. 1829. “A General, Medical, and Statistical History of the Present Condition of Public Charity in France.” London Review of Politics, Society, Literature, Art, and Science 1 (2): 536–556.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, Rajendranath, to T.H. Huxley. 1888. Calcutta, May 22. Huxley Papers, Imperial College Archives, 12.174.
   Google Scholar
• Chevassus-au-Louis, Nicolas. 2019. Fraud in the Lab: The High Stakes of Scientific Research. Translated by Nicholas Elliott. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, William. 2006. Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Committee of Council on Education. 1868. Report of the Committee of Council of Education, 1867–8. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2004. “The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity.” Synthese 138 (3): 453–473. doi:10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016451.18182.91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, Matthew. 2016. “The Interactive Notebook: How Students Learned to Keep Notes During the Scottish Enlightenment.” Book History 19 (1): 86–131. doi:10.1353/bh.2016.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Edgerton, David. 2006. The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900. London: Profile.
   Google Scholar
• Elman, Benjamin A. 2013. Civil Examinations and Meritocracy in Late Imperial China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elwick, James. 2021. Making a Grade: Victorian Examinations and the Rise of Standardized Testing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fair Education Foundation. 2018. The Non-Moving Earth & Anti-Evolution Site. Accessed 5 May 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20180415065911/http://www.fixedearth.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Fardon, Richard. 1999. Mary Douglas: An Intellectual Biography. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, Robert, and Howard Becker. 2009. Do You Know: The Jazz Repertoire in Action. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foden, Frank. 1989. The Examiner: James Booth and the Origin of Common Examinations. Leeds: Leeds Studies in Adult and Continuing Education.
   Google Scholar
• Galison, Peter. 1987. How Experiments End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras, Yves. 2016. Bibliometrics and Research Evaluation: Uses and Abuses. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, Maya J. 2021. Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gooday, Graeme. 1991. “‘Nature’ in the Laboratory: Domestication and Discipline with the Microscope in Victorian Life-Science.” British Journal for the History of Science 24: 307–341. doi:10.1017/S0007087400027382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, Nick. 2015. Haeckel’s Embryos: Images, Evolution, and Fraud. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2009. Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, Edwin. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, T. H. 1895. Science and Education, Collected Essays Vol. III. London: MacMillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, T. H. 1899. “Technical Education [1877].” In Science & Education, 404–426. London: MacMillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Lampland, Martha, and Star, Susan Leigh. 2009. “Reckoning with Standards.” In Standards and Their Stories: How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life, edited by M. Lampland and S. L. Star, 3––24. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Light, Jennifer. 1999. “When Computers Were Women.” Technology and Culture 40 (3): 455–483. doi:10.1353/tech.1999.0128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightman, Bernard V2015. Global Spencerism: The Communication and Appropriation of a British Evolutionist. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, Geoffrey, and Nathan Sivin. 2002. The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, William J. 2013. Testing Wars in the Public Schools: A Forgotten History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, Marsha L. 2006. “The 1909 Darwin Celebration: Reexamining Evolution in the Light of Mendel, Mutation, and Meiosis.” Isis 97: 447–484. doi:10.1086/508076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudwick, M. J. S. 1985. The Great Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Scientific Knowledge among Gentlemanly Specialists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, Michael J. 2020. “The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? New York: Farrar.” Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Secord, James A. 2000. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stray, Christopher. 2001. “The Shift from Oral to Written Examination: Cambridge and Oxford 1700–1900.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 8: 33–50. doi:10.1080/09695940120033243.
   Google Scholar
• Teng, Ssu-yu. 1943. “Chinese Influence on the Western Examination System: I. Introduction.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 7: 267–312. doi:10.2307/2717830.
   Google Scholar
• University of London. 2022. “University of London Worldwide.” Accessed 5 May 2022. https://london.ac.uk/worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, Andrew. 2003. Masters of Theory: Cambridge and the Rise of Mathematical Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, Andrew, and David Kaiser. 2005. “Kuhn, Foucault, and the Power of Pedagogy.” In Pedagogy and the Practice of Science: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by D. Kaiser, 393–409. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Herbert George. 1893. Text-book of Biology, University Correspondence College Tutorial Series. London: W.B. Clive & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, Herbert George. 1895. The Correspondence of H.G. Wells, Volume 1, 1880–1903 (1998, ed. David C. Smith), December 10.
   Google Scholar
• Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. Third Impression (Work Some Corrections) Edition. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Alison. 1997. “The Construction of Orthodoxies and Heterodoxies in the Early Victorian Life Sciences.” In Victorian Science in Context, edited by B. Lightman, 24–50. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Kangmin. 1999. Dragon Gate: Competitive Examinations and Their Consequences. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Zilsel, Edgar. 2003. The Social Origins of Modern Science, edited by D. Raven, W. Krohn, and R. S. Cohen. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar