On the use of common random numbers in activity-based travel demand modeling for scenario comparison

References

• Bao, Q., B. Kochan, T. Bellemans, D. Janssens, and G. Wets. 2015. “Investigating Micro-Simulation Error in Activity-Based Travel Demand Forecasting: A Case Study of the FEATHERS Framework.” Transportation Planning and Technology 38 (4): 425–441. doi:10.1080/03081060.2015.1026102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekhor, S., L. Kheifits, and M. Sorani. 2014. “Stability Analysis of Activity-Based Models: Case Study of the Tel Aviv Transportation Model.” European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research 14 (4): 311–331. doi:10.18757/EJTIR.2014.14.4.3039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castiglione, J., J. Freedman, and M. Bradley. 2003. “Systematic Investigation of Variability Due to Random Simulation Error in an Activity-Based Microsimulation Forecasting Model.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1831 (1): 76–88. doi:10.3141/1831-09.
   Google Scholar
• Gali, E., S. Eidenbenz, S. Mniszewski, L. Cuellar, and C. Teuscher. 2008. “ActivitySim: Large-Scale Agent Based Activity Generation for Infrastructure Simulation.”
   Google Scholar
• Glasserman, P., and D. D. Yao. 1992. “Some Guidelines and Guarantees for Common Random Numbers.” Management Science 38 (6): 884–908. doi:10.1287/mnsc.38.6.884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horni, A., D. Charypar, and K. W. Axhausen. 2011. “Variability in Transport Microsimulations Investigated With the Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim.” Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs-und Raumplanung 692. doi:10.3929/ethz-a-006686329.
   Google Scholar
• Horni, A., K. Nagel, and K. W. Axhausen. 2016. The Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim. London: Ubiquity Press. doi:10.5334/baw.
   Google Scholar
• Jittrapirom, P., V. Caiati, A. M. Feneri, S. Ebrahimigharehbaghi, M. J. A. González, and J. Narayan. 2017. “Mobility as a Service: A Critical Review of Definitions, Assessments of Schemes, and Key Challenges.” Urban Planning 2 (2): 13–25. doi:10.17645/up.v2i2.931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinjari, A., N. Eluru, S. Srinivasan, J. Guo, R. Copperman, I. Sener, and C. Bhat. 2008. “CEMDAP: Modeling and Microsimulation Frameworks, Software Development, and Verification.” In Proceeding of the Transportation Research Board 87th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Rasouli, S., and H. Timmermans. 2012. “Uncertainty in Travel Demand Forecasting Models: Literature Review and Research Agenda.” Transportation Letters 4 (1): 55–73. doi:10.3328/TL.2012.04.01.55-73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, S. M. 2013. Simulation: Fifth Edition. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Snelder, M., Y. Araghi, B. Ashari, E. Charoniti, G. Klunder, R. Sterkenburg, and M. Van der Tuin, et al. 2021. “Rapport A: Methode Urban Tools Next II -- toelichting op gekozen aanpak voor parkeren, ketens en hubs, nieuwe mobiliteitsconcepten. Den Haag (The Netherlands).” https://publications.tno.nl/publication/34639979/i0dl3z/TNO-2021-R10644.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Veldhuisen, J., H. Timmermans, and L. Kapoen. 2000. “Microsimulation Model of Activity-Travel Patterns and Traffic Flows: Specification, Validation Tests, and Monte Carlo Error.” Transportation Research Record 1706 (1): 126–135. doi:10.3141/1706-15.
   Google Scholar
• Vovsha, P., R. Donnelly, and S. Gupta. 2008. “Network Equilibrium with Activity-Based Microsimulation Models: The New York Experience.” Transportation Research Record 2054 (1): 102–109. doi:10.3141/2054-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Werken A. 2018. Verkeersmodel MRDH 2.0 Technische rapportage. 001594.20181026.R1.02, Deventer (The Netherlands). https://mrdh.nl/project/verkeersmodel.
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, K. E., M. Vasudevan, and P. Wang. 2019. TAT Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software 2019 Update to the 2004 Version. FHWA-HOP-18-036.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., J. Dorsman, M. Mandjes, and M. Snelder. 2020. “A Tour-Based Multimodal Mode Choice Model for Impact Assessment of New Mobility Concepts and Mobility as a Service.” Ph.D. thesis. https://publications.tno.nl/publication/34639987/crS65z/zhou-2022-tour-based.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., J. Dorsman, M. Mandjes, and M. Snelder. 2022. “Sustainable Mobility Strategies and Their Impact: A Case Study Using a Multimodal Activity Based Model.” Ph.D. thesis. https://publications.tno.nl/publication/34639988/iDbCfO/zhou-2022-sustainable.pdf.
   Google Scholar