173
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Communication and mobility issues of visually impaired pedestrians with connected autonomous vehicles

, , &
Pages 998-1023 | Received 09 Apr 2022, Accepted 13 Jun 2023, Published online: 15 Jul 2023

References

  • Ackermans, S., D. Dey, P. Ruijten, R. H. Cuijpers, and B. Pfleging. 2020. “The Effects of Explicit Intention Communication, Conspicuous Sensors, and Pedestrian Attitude in Interactions with Automated Vehicles.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376197
  • Ahangar, M. N., Q. Z. Ahmed, F. A. Khan, and M. Hafeez. 2021. “A Survey of Autonomous Vehicles: Enabling Communication Technologies and Challenges.” Sensors 21 (3): 706–733. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030706.
  • Alvarez, S. 2019. Tesla, other EVs Required to have ‘Traditional Engine’ Sound to Meet New EU Rule. https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-model-3-evs-gas-cars-noisemaker-law-uk/
  • Azizi Soldouz, S. 2019. Understanding the Impacts of Connected Autonomous Vehicles on Pedestrians with Visual Impairment. MASc Thesis. University of Toronto. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1807/98376
  • Bai, S., D. D. Legge, A. Young, S. Bao, and F. Zhou. 2021. “Investigating External Interaction Modality and Design Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians at Crossings.” 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), 1691–1696. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9564867.
  • Bansal, P., and K. M. Kockelman. 2017. “Forecasting Americans’ Long-Term Adoption of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 95: 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.013.
  • Baseri, N. H. H., E. Y. Ng, A. Safdari, M. Moghavvemi, and N. M. Shah. 2017. “A Low Cost Street Crossing Electronic Aid for the Deaf and Blind.” 2nd International Conference for Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Life Sciences.
  • Baqer, M., A. Krings, M. Lowry, and A. Abdel-Rahim. 2021. Connected Vehicle Safety Applications Using V2X Under Consideration of Bicycles, Pedestrians and Persons With Special Needs, edited by P. N. T. Consortium. U. of Idaho. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/58697
  • Blindness in Canada CNIB. 2019. https://cnib.ca/en/sight-loss-info/blindness/blindness-canada?region = on
  • Bollen, K. A., and M. D. Noble 2011. “Structural Equation Models and the Quantification of Behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (supplement_3): 15639–15646. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010661108
  • Brinkley, J. 2021. “Using Personas with Visual Impairments to Explore the Design of an Accessible Self-Driving Vehicle Human-Machine Interface.” Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 65 (1): 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651223.
  • Brinkley, J., and J. E. Gilbert. 2018. “A Survey of Visually Impaired Consumers About Self-Driving Vehicles.” The Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities 6: 274–283. https://scholarworks.csun.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/203001/JTPD-2018-ID32-p274-283.pdf?sequence=1
  • Brinkley, J., E. W. Huff, B. Posadas, J. Woodward, S. B. Daily, and J. E. Gilbert. 2020. “Exploring the Needs, Preferences, and Concerns of Persons with Visual Impairments Regarding Autonomous Vehicles.” ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 13 (1): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372280.
  • Brinkley, J., B. Posadas, I. Sherman, S. B. Daily, and J. E. Gilbert. 2019. “An Open Road Evaluation of a Self-Driving Vehicle Human–Machine Interface Designed for Visually Impaired Users.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 35 (11): 1018–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1561787.
  • Brinkley, J., B. Posadas, J. Woodward, and J. E. Gilbert. 2017. “Opinions and Preferences of Blind and Low Vision Consumers Regarding Self-Driving Vehicles.” Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS ‘17: 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132532
  • Cao, J., L. Lin, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, and J. Wang.  2021. “The Development and Validation of the Perceived Safety of Intelligent Connected Vehicles Scale.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 154 (March): 106092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106092
  • Carlsson, M., and P. Nilsson. 2016. The Smiling Car - Concept for Autonomous Cars - Semcon. https://semcon.com/smilingcar/
  • Chikaraishi, M., D. Khan, B. Yasuda, and A. Fujiwara. 2020. “Risk Perception and Social Acceptability of Autonomous Vehicles: A Case Study in Hiroshima, Japan.” Transport Policy 98: 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.05.014.
  • Colley, M., M. Walch, J. Gugenheimer, A. Askari, and E. Rukzio. 2020. “Towards Inclusive External Communication of Autonomous Vehicles for Pedestrians with Vision Impairments.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376472.
  • Das, S., A. Dutta, and K. Fitzpatrick. 2020. “Technological Perception on Autonomous Vehicles: Perspectives of the non-Motorists.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 32 (11): 1335–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1768235.
  • Deb, S., D. W. Carruth, and C. R. Hudson. 2020. “How Communicating Features Can Help Pedestrian Safety in the Presence of Self-Driving Vehicles: Virtual Reality Experiment.” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 50 (2): 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2019.2960517.
  • Deb, S., S. Poudel, S. Bhandari, and B. Warner. 2016. Identification of External Design Preferences in Autonomous Vehicles.
  • Deb, S., M. M. Rahman, L. J. Strawderman, and T. M. Garrison. 2018. “Pedestrians’ Receptivity Toward Fully Automated Vehicles: Research Review and Roadmap for Future Research.” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 48 (3): 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2018.2799523.
  • Deka, D., and C. T. Brown. 2021. “Self-Perception and General Perception of the Safety Impact of Autonomous Vehicles on Pedestrians, Bicyclists, and People with Ambulatory Disability.” Journal of Transportation Technologies 11 (03): 357–377. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2021.113023.
  • Dey, D., A. Habibovic, B. Pfleging, M. Martens, and J. Terken. 2020. “Color and Animation Preferences for a Light Band eHMI in Interactions Between Automated Vehicles and Pedestrians.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376325.
  • Dey, D., M. Martens, B. Eggen, and J. Terken. 2017. “The Impact of Vehicle Appearance and Vehicle Behavior on Pedestrian Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles.” Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct - AutomotiveUI ‘17, 158–162. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131750
  • Dommes, A., G. Merlhiot, R. Lobjois, N. T. Dang, F. Vienne, J. Boulo, A. H. Oliver, A. Crétual, and V. Cavallo. 2021. “Young and Older Adult Pedestrians’ Behavior When Crossing a Street in Front of Conventional and Self-Driving Cars.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 159 (September 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106256
  • Dunn, P. T. 2021. “Autonomous People: Identity, Agency, and Automated Driving.” Journal of Urban Technology 28 (3-4): 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2021.1950104
  • Ezzati Amini, R., C. Katrakazas, A. Riener, and C. Antoniou. 2021. “Interaction of Automated Driving Systems with Pedestrians: Challenges, Current Solutions, and Recommendations for eHMIs.” Transport Reviews 41 (6): 788–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1914771
  • Faas, S. M., and M. Baumann. 2021. “Pedestrian Assessment: Is Displaying Automated Driving Mode in Self-Driving Vehicles as Relevant as Emitting an Engine Sound in Electric Vehicles?” Applied Ergonomics 94 (March): 103425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.10342
  • Faas, S. M., A. C. Kao, and M. Baumann. 2020a. “A Longitudinal Video Study on Communicating Status and Intent for Self-Driving Vehicle – Pedestrian Interaction.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376484.
  • Faas, S. M., L. A. Mathis, and M. Baumann. 2020b. “External HMI for Self-Driving Vehicles: Which Information Shall be Displayed?” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 68: 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.009.
  • Faas, S. M., V. Stange, and M. Baumann. 2021. “Self-Driving Vehicles and Pedestrian Interaction: Does an External Human-Machine Interface Mitigate the Threat of a Tinted Windshield or a Distracted Driver?” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 37 (14): 1364–1374. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2021.1886483.
  • Fagnant, D. J., and K. Kockelman. 2015. “Preparing a Nation for Autonomous Vehicles: Opportunities, Barriers and Policy Recommendations.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 77: 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003.
  • Finn, D., H. Grzybowska, N. Hudson, A. Lau, A. Li-Kim-Mui, D. Logan, B. Lyon, et al. 2017. Automated Vehicles. Do we know Which Road we Take?
  • Gibson, B. 2017. Analysis of Autonomous Vehicle Policies.
  • Grapentine, T. 2000. “Path vs Strutral Equation Modeling do the Relative Merits of Path Analysis and Structure Equation Modeling Outweight Their Limitiations?” Marketing Research 12 (3): 13–19.
  • Hasan Baseri, N. H., E. Y. Ng, A. Safdari, M. Moghavvemi, and N. M. Shah. 2017, December. “A Low Cost Street Crossing Electronic Aid for the Deaf and Blind.” International Conference for Innovation in Biomedical Engineering and Life Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7554-4_12
  • He, S., J. Li, and T. Z. Qiu. 2017. “Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Communication Modeling and Collision Avoiding Method in Connected Vehicle Environment.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2621 (1): 21–30. https://doi.org/10.3141/2621-03
  • Hwang, J., W. Li, L. M. Stough, C. Lee, and K. Turnbull. 2021. “People with Disabilities’ Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles as a Viable Transportation Option to Improve Mobility: An Exploratory Study Using Mixed Methods.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 15 (12): 924–942. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1833115
  • Joisten, P., P. Niessen, and B. Abendroth. 2021. “Pedestrians’ Attitudes Towards Automated Vehicles: A Qualitative Study Based on Interviews in Germany.” In Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021), edited by N. L. Black, W. P. Neumann, and I. Noy, 664–673. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Kassens-Noor, E., M. Wilson, M. Cai, N. Durst, and T. Decaminada. 2021. “Autonomous vs. Self- Driving Vehicles: The Power of Language to Shape Public Perceptions.” Journal of UrbanTechnology 28 (3-4): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2020.1847983
  • Kaye, S. A., X. Li, O. Oviedo-Trespalacios, and A. Pooyan Afghari. 2022. “Getting in the Path of the Robot: Pedestrians Acceptance of Crossing Roads Near Fully Automated Vehicles.” Travel Behaviour and Society 26 (July 2021): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.07.012
  • Keferböck, F., and A. Riener. 2015. “Strategies for Negotiation Between Autonomous Vehicles and Pedestrians.” Mensch Und Computer 2015 Workshopband SEPTEMBER: 525–532.
  • Khosravi, S., B. Beak, K. L. Head, and F. Saleem. 2018. “Assistive System to Improve Pedestrians’ Safety and Mobility in a Connected Vehicle Technology Environment.” Transportation Research Record 2672 (19): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118783598
  • Lanzer, M., F. Babel, F. Yan, B. Zhang, F. You, J. Wang, and M. Baumann. 2020. “Designing Communication Strategies of Autonomous Vehicles with Pedestrians: An Intercultural Study.” Proceedings - 12th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2020, 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410653
  • Liu, P., Q. Guo, F. Ren, L. Wang, and Z. Xu. 2019. “Willingness to pay for Self-Driving Vehicles: Influences of Demographic and Psychological Factors.” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 100: 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.022.
  • Loa, P., S. Mashrur, and K. Nurul Habib. 2021. “What Influences the Substitution of Ride-Sourcing for Public Transit and Taxi Services in Toronto? An Exploratory Structural Equation Model-Based Study.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1978018
  • Lyon, B., N. Hudson, M. Twycross, D. Finn, S. Porter, Z. Maklary, and P. S. T. Waller. 2017. Automated Vehicles: Do we know which Road to Take?
  • Ma, Z., X. Lu, S. I. J. Chien, and D. Hu. 2018. “Investigating Factors Influencing Pedestrian Injury Severity at Intersections.” Traffic Injury Prevention 19 (2): 159–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1354371.
  • Madigan, R., S. Nordhoff, C. Fox, R. Ezzati Amini, T. Louw, M. Wilbrink, A. Schieben, and N. Merat. 2019. “Understanding Interactions Between Automated Road Transport Systems and Other Road Users: A Video Analysis.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 66: 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.09.006.
  • Markkula, G., R. Madigan, D. Nathanael, E. Portouli, Y. M. Lee, A. Dietrich, J. Billington, A. Schieben, and N. Merat. 2020. “Defining Interactions: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Interactive Behaviour in Human and Automated Road Traffic.” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 21 (6): 728–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1736686.
  • Martinho, A., N. Herber, M. Kroesen, and C. Chorus. 2021. “Ethical Issues in Focus by the Autonomous Vehicles Industry.” Transport Reviews 41 (5): 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1862355.
  • McAslan, D., M. Gabriele, and T. R. Miller. 2021. “Planning and Policy Directions for Autonomous Vehicles in Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) in the United States.” Journal of Urban Technology 28 (3-4): 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2021.1944751
  • Merat, N., T. Louw, R. Madigan, M. Wilbrink, and A. Schieben. 2018. “What Externally Presented Information do VRUs Require When Interacting with Fully Automated Road Transport Systems in Shared Space?” Accident Analysis & Prevention 118 (March): 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.018
  • Métayer, N., and S. Coeugnet. 2021. “Improving the Experience in the Pedestrian’s Interaction with an Autonomous Vehicle: An Ergonomic Comparison of External HMI.” Applied Ergonomics 96(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103478.
  • Miao, L., J. J. Virtusio, and K. L. Hua. 2021. “Pc5-based Cellular-v2x Evolution and Deployment.” Sensors 21 (3): 843–814. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030843.
  • Milakis, D., B. Van Arem, and B. Van Wee. 2017. “Policy and Society Related Implications of Automated Driving: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research.” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems: Technology, Planning, and Operations 21 (4): 324–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1291351.
  • Mirnig, N., N. Perterer, G. Stollnberger, and M. Tscheligi. 2017. “Three Strategies for Autonomous Car-to-Pedestrian Communication.” Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ‘17, 209–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/3029798.3038402
  • Momota, K. 2018. Companies Attempt New Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communications, Including Traffic Volume Measurements and Vehicle Positioning. -ITS Asia Pacific Forum in Fukuoka - FURUNO ITS Journal - FURUNO. https://www.furuno.com/en/its/articles/20180528/
  • Nordhoff, S., J. Stapel, B. van Arem, and R. Happee. 2020. “Passenger Opinions of the Perceived Safety and Interaction with Automated Shuttles: A Test Ride Study with ‘Hidden’ Safety Steward.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 138 (March): 508–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.05.009
  • Parkin, J., C. Ben, C. William, M. Ricci, and G. Parkhurst. 2016. “Understanding Interactions Between Autonomous Vehicles and Other Road Users A Literature Review.” https://interact.innovateuk.org/competition-display-page/-/asset_publisher/RqEt2AKmEBhi/content/introducing-driverless-cars-to-uk-roads?p_p_auth=CjGJE10t
  • Parkin, J., F. Crawford, J. Flower, C. Alford, P. Morgan, and G. Parkhurst. 2022. “Cyclist and Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles:An on-Road and Simulator Trial.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2093147.
  • Paul, C., I. James, and A. D. Jiajun. 2015. United States Patent: 9196164. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=9196164.PN.&OS=PN/9196164&RS=PN/9196164
  • Piazzoni, A., J. Cherian, M. Slavik, and J. Dauwels. 2020. “Modeling Perception Errors Towards Robust Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles.” IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021-Janua (March 2018): 3494–3500. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/483
  • Pyrialakou, V. D., C. Gkartzonikas, J. D. Gatlin, and K. Gkritza. 2020. “Perceptions of Safety on a Shared Road: Driving, Cycling, or Walking Near an Autonomous Vehicle.” Journal of Safety Research 72 (January): 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.017
  • Rahman, M. T., K. Dey, S. Das, and M. Sherfinski. 2021. “Sharing the Road with Autonomous Vehicles: A Qualitative Analysis of the Perceptions of Pedestrians and Bicyclists.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 78: 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.008.
  • Rasouli, A., and J. K. Tsotsos. 2018. “Autonomous Vehicles That Interact with Pedestrians : A Survey of Theory and Practice.” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2901817.
  • Razmi Rad, S., G. Homem de Almeida Correia, and M. Hagenzieker. 2020. “Pedestrians’ Road Crossing Behaviour in Front of Automated Vehicles: Results from a Pedestrian Simulation Experiment Using Agent-Based Modelling.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 69: 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.01.014
  • Rosseel, Y. 2022. The Lavaan Tutorial. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lavaan/lavaan.pdf
  • Schoettle, B., and M. Sivak. 2014. A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-driving Vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/108384
  • Sewalkar, P. 2021. A Framework for Quality of Service in Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Safety Communication [Universitätsverlag Ilmenau]. In Communication. https://doi.org/10.22032/dbt.47972
  • Tkachuk, D., D. Dawson, P. Bovey, P.-H. Boisvenu, P.-H. B. R. Cormier, R. Gagné, R. Galvez, D. F. Griffin, M. L. MacDonald, T. M. Mercer, T. H. Ngo and D. N. P. Ex. 2018. Driving Change-Technology and the Future of the Automated Vehicle. Retrieved from Sencanada.ca/Trcm
  • TransportCanada. 2018. The Future of Automated Vehicles in Canada Report of the PPSC Working Group on Connected and Automated Vehicles.
  • Uddin, M., and F. Ahmed. 2018. “Pedestrian Injury Severity Analysis in Motor Vehicle Crashes in Ohio.” Safety 4 (2): 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety4020020.
  • Ullman, J. B. 2010. “Review of the Eating Disorder Inventory–3 Eating.” Journal of Personality Assessment 87 (1): 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_03.
  • Uttley, J., Y. M. Lee, R. Madigan, and N. Merat. 2020. “Road User Interactions in a Shared Space Setting: Priority and Communication in a UK car Park.” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 72: 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.004.
  • Wang, K., G. Li, J. Chen, Y. Long, T. Chen, L. Chen and Q. Xia. 2020. “The Adaptability and Challenges of Autonomous Vehicles to Pedestrians in Urban China.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 145 (June): 105692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105692
  • Woods, C. M., and M. C. Edwards. 2011. “6 - Factor Analysis and Related Methods.” In Essential Statistical Methods for Medical Statistics, edited by C. R. Rao, J. P. Miller, and D. C. Rao, 174–201. Boston: North-Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53737-9.50009-8
  • Yang, X. 2021. Project Guideline: Enabling Those with Low Vision to Run Independently. https://ai.googleblog.com/2021/05/project-guideline-enabling-those-with.html
  • Yogarayan, S., S. F. A. Razak, A. Azman, and M. F. A. Abdullah. 2021. “Vehicle to Everything (V2X). Communications Technology for Smart Mobility in Malaysia: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University 56 (4): 534–563. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.4.47.
  • Yoo, S. K., S. L. Cotton, L. Zhang, M. G. Doone, J. S. Song, and S. Rajbhandari. 2021. “Evaluation of a Switched Combining Based Distributed Antenna System (DAS) for Pedestrian-to-Vehicle Communications.” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 70 (10): 11005–11010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2021.3102700.
  • Yuen, K. F., F. Ma, X. Wang, and G. Lee. 2021. “The Role of Trust in Influencing Consumers’ Adoption of Automated Vehicles: An Application of the Health Belief Model.” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 15 (11): 837–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1821416.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.