705
Views
224
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A survey of preference relations

Pages 179-203 | Received 28 Feb 2006, Accepted 07 Jul 2006, Published online: 14 Feb 2007

References

  • Alonso , S. , Chiclana , F. , Herrera , F. and Herrera-Viedma , E. 2004 . A procedure for learning missing values in fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency . Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 3131 : 227 – 238 .
  • Arbel , A. 1989 . Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation . European Journal of Operational Research , 43 : 317 – 326 .
  • Atanassov , K. 1986 . Intuitionistic fuzzy sets . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 20 : 87 – 96 .
  • Atanassov , K. 1999 . Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications , Heidelberg : Physica-Verlag .
  • Atanassov , K. and Gargov , G. 1989 . Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 31 : 343 – 349 .
  • Blankmeyer , E. 1987 . Approaches to consistency adjustment . Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , 54 : 479 – 488 .
  • Bordogna , G. , Fedrizzi , M. and Passi , G. 1997 . A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operator . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A , 27 : 126 – 132 .
  • Cai , L.C. and Deng , X.J. 1996 . “ An approach to constructing judgment matrix with desirable consistency in AHP ” . In Decision Science and Its Application , Edited by: Sun , H.C. 88 – 91 . Beijing : Haiyang Press .
  • Chang , D.Y. 1996 . Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP . European Journal of Operational Research , 95 : 649 – 655 .
  • Chen , S.M. and Tan , J.M. 1994 . Handling multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 67 : 163 – 172 .
  • Chiclana , F. , Herrera , F. and Herrera-Viedma , E. 1998 . Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 97 : 33 – 48 .
  • Chiclana , F. , Herrera , F. and Herrera-Viedma , E. 2001 . Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 122 : 277 – 291 .
  • Chiclana , F. , Herrera , F. and Herrera-Viedma , E. 2002 . A note on the internal consistency of various preference representations . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 131 : 75 – 78 .
  • Cogger , K.O. and Yu , P.L. 1985 . Eigenweight vectors and least-distance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratios . Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , 46 : 483 – 491 .
  • Crawford , G. and Williams , C. 1985 . A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices . Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 29 : 387 – 405 .
  • Delgado , M. , Verdegay , J.L. and Vila , M.A. 1993 . On aggregation operators of linguistic labels . International Journal of Intelligent Systems , 8 : 351 – 370 .
  • Deschrijver , G. and Kerre , E.E. 2003 . On the composition of intuitionistic fuzzy relations . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 136 : 333 – 361 .
  • Dubois , D. and Prade , H. 1980 . Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Application , New York, NY : Academic Press .
  • Gass , S.I. 1998 . Tournaments, transitivity and pairwise comparison matrices . Journal of the Operational Research Society , 49 : 616 – 624 .
  • Haines , L.M. 1998 . A statistical approach to the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments . European Journal of Operational Research , 110 : 112 – 125 .
  • Harker , P.T. 1987 . Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process . Mathematical Modelling , 9 : 353 – 360 .
  • Herrera , F. and Herrera-Viedma , E. 2000a . Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations . European Journal of Operational Research , 120 : 144 – 161 .
  • Herrera , F. and Herrera-Viedma , E. 2000b . Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 115 : 67 – 82 .
  • Herrera , F. , Herrera-Viedma , E. and Verdegay , J.L. 1996a . A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 78 : 73 – 87 .
  • Herrera , F. , Herrera-Viedma , E. and Verdegay , J.L. 1996b . Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 79 : 175 – 190 .
  • Herrera , F. , Herrera-Viedma , E. and Verdegay , J.L. 1997 . A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 88 : 31 – 49 .
  • Herrera , F. and Martínez , L. 2000 . A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words . IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems , 8 : 746 – 752 .
  • Herrera , F. , Herrera-Viedma , E. and Chiclana , F. 2001 . Multiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relations . European Journal of Operational Research , 129 : 372 – 385 .
  • Herrera , F. and Martínez , L. 2001 . A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B , 31 : 227 – 234 .
  • Herrera , F. , Martínez , L. and Sánchez , P.J. 2005 . Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making . European Journal of Operational Research , 166 : 115 – 132 .
  • Herrera-Viedma , E. , Herrera , F. , Chiclana , F. and Luque , M. 2004 . Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations . European Journal of Operational Research , 154 : 98 – 109 .
  • Herrera-Viedma , E. , Herrera , F. and Chiclana , F. 2002 . A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A , 32 : 394 – 402 .
  • Hong , D.H. and Choi , C.H. 2000 . Multicriteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 114 : 103 – 113 .
  • Islam , R. , Biswal , M.P. and Alam , S.S. 1997 . Preference programming and inconsistent interval judgments . European Journal of Operational Research , 97 : 53 – 62 .
  • Jensen , R.E. 1984a . An alternative scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures . Journal of Mathematical Psychology , 28 : 317 – 332 .
  • Jensen, R.E., 1984b, Comparisons of eigenvector, least squares, chi square, and logarithmic least squares methods of scaling a reciprocal matrix. Trinity University, Working Paper
  • Kacprzyk , J. 1986 . Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 18 : 105 – 118 .
  • Kacprzyk , J. and Roubens , M. 1988 . Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision-Making , Berlin : Springer .
  • Kwiesielewicz , M. 1998 . A note on the fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 95 : 161 – 172 .
  • Levrat , E. , Voisin , A. , Bombardier , S. and Bremont , J. 1997 . Subjective evaluation of car seat comfort with fuzzy techniques . International Journal of Intelligent Systems , 12 : 891 – 913 .
  • Liou , T.S. and Wang , M.J. 1992 . Ranking fuzzy numbers with integral value . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 50 : 247 – 255 .
  • Lipovetsky , S. and Michael Conklin , W. 2002 . Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP . European Journal of Operational Research , 137 : 110 – 122 .
  • Lipovetsky , S. and Tishler , A. 1999 . Interval estimation of priorities in the AHP . European Journal of Operational Research , 114 : 153 – 164 .
  • Luce , R.D. Suppes , P. 1965 . “ Preferences utility and subject probability ” . In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology , Edited by: Luce , R.D. Vol. III , 249 – 410 . New York, NY : Wiley .
  • Ma , J. , Fan , Z.P. , Jiang , Y.P. , Mao , J.Y. and Ma , L. 2006 . A method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relations . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 157 : 20 – 33 .
  • Malakooti , B. and Zhou , Y.Q. 1994 . Feedforward artificial neural networks for solving discrete multiple criteria decision making problems . Management Science , 40 : 1542 – 1561 .
  • Martínez , L. , Liu , J. , Yang , J.B. and Herrera , F. 2005 . A multigranular hierarchical linguistic model for design evaluation based on safety and cost analysis . International Journal of Intelligent Systems , 20 : 1161 – 1194 .
  • Mikhailov , L. 2002 . Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises . Omega , 30 : 393 – 401 .
  • Mikhailov , L. 2003 . Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgments . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 134 : 365 – 385 .
  • Nishizawa , K. 1997 . A method to find elements of cycles in an incomplete directed graph and its applications binary AHP and Petri nets . Computers and Mathematics with Applications , 33 ( 9 ) : 33 – 46 .
  • Nurmi , H. 1981 . Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 6 : 249 – 259 .
  • Orlovsky , S.A. 1978 . Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 1 : 155 – 167 .
  • Saaty , T.L. 1980 . The Analytic Hierarchy Process , New York, NY : McGraw-Hill .
  • Saaty , T.L. and Vargas , L.G. 1987 . Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process . European Journal of Operational Research , 32 : 107 – 117 .
  • Salo , A. and Hämäläinen , R.P. 1995 . Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons . European Journal of Operational Research , 82 : 458 – 475 .
  • Shu , K. and Liang , Z.H. 1990 . Exponential scale in AHP . Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice , 10 ( 1 ) : 6 – 8 .
  • Szmidt , E. and Kacprzyk , J. 2002 . Using intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making . Control and Cybernetics , 31 : 1037 – 1053 .
  • Tanino , T. 1984 . Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 12 : 117 – 131 .
  • Tanino , T. 1988 . “ Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making ” . In Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making , Edited by: Kacprzyk , J. and Roubens , M. 54 – 71 . Berlin : Springer-Verlag .
  • Torra , V. 1996 . Negation functions based semantics for ordered linguistic labels . International Journal of Intelligent Systems , 11 : 975 – 988 .
  • Torra , V. 2001 . Aggregation of linguistic labels when semantics is based on antonyms . International Journal of Intelligent Systems , 16 : 513 – 524 .
  • Van Laarhoven , P.J.M. and Pedrycz , W. 1983 . A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 11 : 199 – 227 .
  • Wang , Y.M. and Fu , G.W. 1992 . The chi square priority method of comparison matrix . Journal of Decision and Hierarchy Analytic Process , 2 : 19 – 27 .
  • Wang , H. and Ma , D. 1993 . Scale evaluation and new scale method . Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice , 13 ( 5 ) : 24 – 26 .
  • Wang , L.F. and Xu , S.B. 1990 . Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process , Beijing : China Renmin University Press .
  • Wang , Y.M. , Yang , J.B. and Xu , D.L. 2005 . A two-stage logarithmic goal programming method for generating weights from interval comparison matrices . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 152 : 475 – 498 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 1999 . Study on the relation between two classes of scales in AHP . Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice , 19 ( 7 ) : 97 – 101 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2000a . On consistency of the weighted geometric mean complex judgment matrix in AHP . European Journal of Operational Research , 126 : 683 – 687 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2000b . Generalized chi square method for the estimation of weights . Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications , 107 : 183 – 192 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2001a . The least variance priority method (LVM) for fuzzy complementary judgment matrix . Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice , 21 ( 10 ) : 93 – 96 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2001b . Algorithm for priority of fuzzy complementary judgment matrix . Journal of Systems Engineering , 16 : 311 – 314 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2002a . Two methods for priorities of complementary judgment matrices—weighted least-square method and eigenvector method . Systems EngineeringTheory & Practice , 22 ( 7 ) : 71 – 75 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2002c . A method for priorities of triangular fuzzy number complementary judgment matrices . Fuzzy Systems and Mathematics , 16 : 47 – 50 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2002b . A practical method for priority of interval number complementary judgment matrix . Operations Research and Management Science , 10 ( 1 ) : 16 – 19 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2004a . Uncertain Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications , Beijing : Tsinghua University Press .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2004b . Goal programming models for obtaining the priority vector of incomplete fuzzy preference relation . International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 36 : 261 – 270 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2004c . On compatibility of interval fuzzy preference matrices . Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making , 3 : 217 – 225 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2004d . A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations . Information Sciences , 166 : 19 – 30 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2004e . EOWA and EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations . International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems , 12 : 791 – 810 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2004f . Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment . Information Sciences , 168 : 171 – 184 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2005a . On method for uncertain multiple attribute decision making problems with uncertain preference information on alternatives . Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making , 4 : 131 – 139 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2005b . A procedure for decision making based on incomplete fuzzy preference relation . Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making , 4 : 175 – 189 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2005c . Interactive approach based on incomplete complementary judgement matrices to group decision making . Control and Decision , 20 : 913 – 916 .
  • Xu, Z.S., 2005d, Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations. Tsinghua University, Working Report
  • Xu , Z.S. 2005e . Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making . Omega , 33 : 249 – 254 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2005f . An approach to group decision making based on incomplete linguistic preference relations . Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making , 4 : 153 – 160 .
  • Xu, Z.S., 2005g, Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Tsinghua University, Working Report
  • Xu , Z.S. 2006a . Method for group decision making with various types of incomplete judgment matrices . Control and Decision , 21 : 28 – 33 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2006b . Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion . Information Fusion , 7 : 331 – 337 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2006c . On generalized induced linguistic aggregation operators . International Journal of General Systems , 35 : 17 – 28 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2006d . An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and the induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations . Decision Support Systems , 41 : 488 – 499 .
  • Xu , Z.S. 2006e . A C-OWA operator based approach to decision making with interval fuzzy preference relation . International Journal of Intelligent Systems , : 21
  • Xu , Z.S. and Da , Q.L. 2002 . The uncertain OWA operator . International Journal of Intelligent Systems , 17 : 569 – 575 .
  • Xu , Z.S. and Da , Q.L. 2003a . An approach to improving consistency of fuzzy preference matrix . Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making , 2 : 3 – 12 .
  • Xu , Z.S. and Da , Q.L. 2003b . An overview of operators for aggregating information . International Journal of Intelligent Systems , 18 : 953 – 969 .
  • Xu , Z.S. and Yager , R.R. 2006 . Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets . International Journal of General Systems , : 35
  • Xu , R.N. and Zhai , X.Y. 1992 . Extensions of the analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy environment . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 52 : 251 – 257 .
  • Xu , Z.S. and Wei , C.P. 1999 . A consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy process . European Journal of Operational Research , 116 : 443 – 449 .
  • Xu , Z.S. and Da , Q.L. 2005 . A least deviation method to obtain a priority vector of a fuzzy preference relation . European Journal of Operational Research , 164 : 206 – 216 .
  • Yager , R.R. 1992 . Applications and extensions of OWA aggregations . International Journal of Man-Machine Studied , 37 : 103 – 132 .
  • Yager , R.R. 1995 . An approach to ordinal decision making . International Journal of Approximate Reasoning , 12 : 237 – 261 .
  • Yager , R.R. and Xu , Z.S. 2006 . The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making . Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 157 : 1393 – 1402 .
  • Yager , R.R. 2004 . OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making . IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B , 34 : 1952 – 1963 .
  • Yoon , K. 1989 . The propagation of errors in multiple-attribute decision analysis: a practical approach . Journal of the Operational Research Society , 40 : 681 – 686 .
  • Zadeh , L.A. and Kacprzyk , J. 1999 . Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems-Part 1: Foundations: Part 2: Applications , Vol. I , Heidelberg : Physica-Verlag .
  • Zahir , S. 1991 . Incorporating the uncertainty of decision judgments in the analytic hierarchy process . European Journal of Operational Research , 53 : 206 – 216 .
  • Zhu , K.J. , Jing , Y. and Chang , D.Y. 1999 . A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP . European Journal of Operational Research , 116 : 450 – 456 .
  • Zimmermann , H.J. 1991 . Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , Dordrecht : Kluwer .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.