Beyond the Fragment: postoperaismo, postcapitalism and Marx’s ‘Notes on machines’, 45 years on

References

• Aufheben. (2007). Keep on smiling: Questions on immaterial labour. Aufheben, 14, 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, A. (2013). Free software production as critical social practice. Economy and Society, 42(4), 597–625. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2013.791510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastani, A. (2015). We don’t need more austerity, we need luxury communism. Vice Magazine. 12 June. Retrieved from http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/luxury-communism-933
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, A. (2017). Accelerationism: How a fringe philosophy predicted the future we live in. The Guardian, 11 May. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/11/accelerationism-how-a-fringe-philosophy predicted-the-future-we-live-in
   Google Scholar
• Bellofiore, R. (2009). A ghost turning into a vampire: The concept of capital and living labour. In R. Bellofiore & R. Fineschi (Eds.), Re-reading Marx: New perspectives after the critical edition (pp. 178–194). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bellofiore, R. & Riva, T. R. (2015). The Neue Marx-Lektüre: Putting the critique of political economy back into the critique of society. Radical Philosophy, 189, 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Berardi, F. (2013). The uprising: On poetry and finance. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Beverungen, A., Murtola, A. -M. & Schwartz, G. (2013). The communism of capital? Ephemera, 13(3), 483–495.
   Google Scholar
• Bonefeld, W. (1994). Human practice and perversion: Between autonomy and structure. Common Sense, 15, 43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bonefeld, W. (2001). The politics of Europe: Monetary union and class. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bonefeld, W. (2010). Abstract labour: Against its nature and on its time. Capital and Class, 34(2), 257–276. doi: 10.1177/0309816810367769
   Google Scholar
• Bonefeld, W. (2014). Critical theory and the critique of political economy. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bonefeld, W. (2016). Bringing critical theory back in at a time of misery: Three beginnings without conclusion. Capital & Class, 40(2), 233–244. doi: 10.1177/0309816815603157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewster, B. (1972). Introduction to Marx’s ‘Notes on machines’. Economy and Society, 1(3), 235–243. doi: 10.1080/03085147200000013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffentzis, G. (2005). Immeasurable value? An essay on Marx’s legacy. The Commoner, 10, 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• Caffentzis, G. (2013). In letters of blood and fire: Work, machines, and value. Oakland: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H. (1992). The inversion of class perspective in Marxian theory: From valorisation to self-valorisation. In W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn & K. Psychopedis (Eds.), Open Marxism Vol. II: Theory and practice (pp. 107–144). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver, H. (2000). Reading Capital politically. Edinburgh: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Brunhoff, S. (1973). Marx as an a-Ricardian: Value, money and price at the beginning of Capital. Economy and Society, 2(4), 421–430. doi: 10.1080/03085147300000020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, A. (2017). Jeremy Corbyn to address challenge posed by robots. Politico, 26 September. Retrieved from http://www.politico.eu/article/jeremy-corbyn-labour-leader-post brexit-to-address-challenge-posed-by-robots/
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2001). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2004). Multitude. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2009). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, M. (2007). Invaders from Marx: On the uses of Marxian theory, and the difficulties of a contemporary reading. Left Curve 31. Retrieved from http://www.oekonomiekritik.de/205Invaders.htm
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, M. (2013). The ‘Fragment on machines’: A Marxian misconception in the Grundrisse and its overcoming in Capital. In R. Bellofiore, G. Starosta & P. Thomas (Eds.), In Marx’s laboratory: Critical interpretations of the Grundrisse (pp. 197–212). Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial labor. In P. Virno & M. Hardt (Eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics (pp. 133–150). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marazzi, C. (2008). Capital and language. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1972). Notes on machines. Economy and Society, 1(3), 244–254. doi: 10.1080/03085147200000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1973). Grundrisse. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K. (1976). Capital. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P. (2015a). The end of capitalism has begun. The Guardian, 17 July. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/jul/17/postcapitalism-end-of-capitalism-begun
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P. (2015b). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P. (2016). Corbyn: The summer of hierarchical things. Mosquito Ridge, 12 July. Retrieved from https://medium.com/mosquito-ridge/corbyn-the-summer-of-hierarchical-things ab1368959b80#.f8e5z4k82
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, B. (2015). Fully automated luxury communism. The Guardian, 18 March. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2015/mar/18/fully-automated-luxury communism-robots-employment
   Google Scholar
• Negri, A. (1992). Marx beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Negri, A. (2015). Some reflections on the #Accelerate Manifesto. In R. Mckay & A. Avanessian (Eds.), Accelerate: The accelerationist reader (pp. 363–378). Falmouth: Urbanomic.
   Google Scholar
• Noys, B. (2012). The persistence of the negative: A critique of contemporary continental theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. (2003). Against ‘creativity’: A philistine rant. Economy and Society, 32(4), 507–525. doi: 10.1080/0308514032000141684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilling, G. (1972). The law of value in Ricardo and Marx. Economy and Society, 1(3), 281–307. doi: 10.1080/03085147200000016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitts, F. H. (2015). Review of Paul Mason, Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. Marx & Philosophy Review of Books. 4 September. Retrieved from http://marxandphilosophy.org.uk/reviewofbooks/reviews/2015/2008
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, F. H. (2016a). A crisis of measurability? Critiquing post-operaismo on labour, value and the basic income. Capital and Class. doi: 10.1177/0309816816665579
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, F. H. (2016b). Beyond the Fragment: The postoperaist reception of Marx's Fragment on machines and its relevance today. School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies Working Paper Series, 2016-02. University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, F. H. (2017). Critiquing capitalism today: New ways to read Marx. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pitts, F. H. & Dinerstein, A. C. (2017). Corbynism’s conveyor belt of ideas: Postcapitalism and the politics of social reproduction. Capital and Class. doi: 10.1177/0309816817734487
   Google Scholar
• Postone, M. (2012). Thinking the global crisis. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(2), 227–249. doi: 10.1215/00382876-1548194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. (1992). Epilogue. In A. Negri (Ed.), Marx beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse (pp. 191–221). London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, T. (2013). The ‘general intellect’ in the Grundrisse and beyond. Historical Materialism, 21(4), 235–255. doi: 10.1163/1569206X-12341321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. & Williams, A. (2015). Remembering the future. BAMN #1. Retrieved from http://www.weareplanc.org/bamn/remembering-the-future/
   Google Scholar
• Srnicek, N. & Williams, A. (2016). Inventing the future: Postcapitalism and a world without work (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Thoburn, N. (2003). Deleuze, Marx and politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (2005). Foundation and Empire: A critique of Hardt and Negri. Capital and Class, 29(2), 73–98. doi: 10.1177/030981680508600105
   Google Scholar
• Tonkiss, F. (2008). Postcapitalist politics? Economy and Society, 37(2), 304–312. doi: 10.1080/03085140801933348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tribe, K. (1974). Remarks on the theoretical significance of Marx’s Grundrisse. Economy and Society, 3(2), 180–210. doi: 10.1080/03085147400000009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eekelen, B. F. (2015). Accounting for ideas: Bringing a knowledge economy into the picture. Economy and Society, 44(3), 445–479. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2015.1052681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virno, P. (1996). The ambivalence of disenchantment. In P. Virno & M. Hardt (Eds.), Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics (pp. 13–36). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. & Srnicek, N. (2015). #Accelerate: Manifesto for an accelerationist politics. In R. Mackay & A. Avanessian (Eds.), Accelerate: The accelerationist reader (pp. 347–362). Falmouth: Urbanomic.
   Google Scholar