Traders of gametes, brokers of values: Mediating commercial gamete donations in Delhi

References

• Almeling, R. (2007). Selling genes, selling gender: Egg agencies, sperm banks, and the medical market in genetic material. American Sociological Review, 72(3), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeling, R. (2011). Sex cells: The medical market for eggs and sperm. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, J. (1992). The wrestler’s body: Identity and ideology in North India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. (2015). Making feminist sense of the commercial surrogacy ‘industry' in India. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Jawaharlal Nehru University, India.
   Google Scholar
• Bärnreuther, S. (2018). Suitable substances: How biobanks (re)store biologicals. New Genetics and Society, 37(4), 319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, L., Ho, K., Tsing, A. & Yanagisako, S. (2015). Gens: A feminist manifesto for the study of capitalism. Cultural Anthropology. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/652-gens-a-feminist-manifesto-for-the-study-of-capitalism
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, S. (2014). Ausweichrouten der Reproduktion. Biomedizinische Mobilität und die Praxis der Eizellspende. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. (2009). Assisted life: The neoliberal moral economy of embryonic stem cells in India. In D. Birenbaum-Carmeli & M. C. Inhorn (Eds.), Assisting reproduction, testing genes: Global encounters with new biotechnologies (pp. 239–257). New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, E. (2012). Disquieting gifts: Humanitarianism in New Delhi. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, J. (1990). Gifts in a world of commodities: The ideology of the perfect gift in American society. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 29, 19–37.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. (2009). Islam and new kinship: Reproductive technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. (2005). Operability, bioavailibility, and exception. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 79–90). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. & Waldby, C. (2014). Clinical labor: Tissue donors and research subjects in the global bioeconomy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copeman, J. (2009). Veins of devotion: Blood donation and religious experience in North India. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Copeman, J. (2011). The gift and its forms of life in contemporary India. Modern Asian Studies, 45(5), 1051–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeman, J. (2013). South Asian tissue economies. Contemporary South Asia, 21(3), 195–213.
   Google Scholar
• Deomampo, D. (2013). Transnational surrogacy in India: Interrogating power and women’s agency. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 34(3), 167–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deomampo, D. (2016). Transnational reproduction: Race, kinship, and commercial surrogacy in India. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dussauge, I., Helgesson, C.-F. & Lee, F. (2015). Valuography. Studying the making of values. In I. Dussauge, C.-F. Helgesson & F. Lee (Eds.), Value practices in the life sciences and medicine (pp. 267–285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dussauge, I., Helgesson, C.-F., Lee, F. & Woolgar, S. (2015). On the omnipresence, diversity, and elusiveness of values in the life sciences and medicine. In I. Dussauge, C.-F. Helgesson & F. Lee (Eds.), Value practices in the life sciences and medicine (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, C. (1997). Savage money. The anthropology and politics of commodity exchange. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, C. (2007). Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit-sharing. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 729–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heim, M. (2004). Theories of the gift in South Asia: Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain reflections on Dāna. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeyer, K. (2013). Exchanging human bodily material: Rethinking bodies and markets. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman, J. (2010). The Dāngers of Dalālī, the Dāngers of Dān. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 33(3), 399–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, F. (2014). Intimate gifts and ‘bad’ deaths: Reflections on organ transplants, state and society in Gujarat. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 48(2), 165–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, B. (2015, January 22). Muslim population grows 24%, slower than previous decade. The Times of India. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Muslim-population-grows-24-slower-than-previous-decade/articleshow/45972687.cms
   Google Scholar
• John, M. E. (2017). Reflections on feminism and Marxism: The woman question. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(50), 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, M. (2005). Nameless relations: Anonymity, Melanesia and reproductive gift exchange between British ova donors and recipients. New York, NY: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Laidlaw, J. (2000). A free gift makes no friends. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(4), 617–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levien, M. (2011). Special economic zones and accumulation by dispossession in India. Journal of Agrarian Change, 11(4), 454–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levien, M. (2013). The politics of dispossession: Theorizing India’s ‘land wars’. Politics & Society, 41(3), 351–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (2000). Small-time political fixers in India’s states: ‘Towel over armpit’. Asian Survey, 40(5), 816–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauss, M. (2002 [1925]). The gift: The form and reason of exchange in archaic societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, S. (2014). Beyond motivation: On what it means to be a sperm donor in Denmark. Anthropology and Medicine, 21(2), 162–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. & Lewis, D. (Eds.). (2006). Development brokers and translators: The ethnography of aid and agencies. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muehlebach, A. (2012). The moral neoliberal: Welfare and citizenship in Italy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, A. (2010). Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35(4), 969–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, A. (2014). Wombs in labor: Transnational commercial surrogacy in India. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, B. (2018). Surrogate labour: Exceptional for whom? Economy and Society, 47(2), 214–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry, J. (1986). The gift, the Indian gift and the ‘Indian gift’. Man New Series, 21(3), 453–473.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, J. (1994). Death in Banaras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, J. (2000). The ‘crisis of corruption’ and ‘the idea of India’: A worm’s eye view. In P. Italo (Ed.), The morals of legitimacy: Between agency and system (pp. 27–56). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, J. (2013). Company and contract labour in a central Indian steel plant. Economy and Society, 42(3), 348–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raheja, G. (1988). The poison in the gift: Ritual, prestation, and the dominant caste in a North Indian village. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, D. (2007). Good gifts for the common good: Blood and bioethics in the market of genetic research. Cultural Anthropology, 22(3), 429–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, G. R. & Haragopal, G. (1985). The Pyraveekar: ‘The fixer’ in rural India. Asian Survey, 25(11), 1148–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudrappa, S. (2015). Discounted life: The price of global surrogacy in India. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. (2000). The commodification of the body and its parts. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29(1), 287–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. (2006). Strange harvest: Organ transplants, denatured bodies, and the transformed self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, S. (2004). Impossible gifts: Bodies, Buddhism and bioethics in contemporary Sri Lanka. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 10(4), 839–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spar, D. (2006). The baby business: How money, science, and politics drive the commerce of conception. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. (2010). An end and a beginning for the gift? Journal de la Société des Océanistes, 1-2(130-131), 119–128.
   Google Scholar
• Sud, N. (2014). The men in the middle: A missing dimension in global land deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(4), 593–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunder Rajan, K. (2006). Biocapital: The constitution of postgenomic life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorat, S. & Newman, K. S. (Eds.). (2010). Blocked by caste: Economic discrimination in modern India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, D. (2000). Markets and intermediaries: An enquiry about the principles of market economy in the grain market of Delhi. In V. Dupont, E. Tarlo & V. Denis (Eds.), Delhi: Urban space and human destinies (pp. 125–139). New Delhi: Manohar.
   Google Scholar
• Waldby, C. & Mitchell, R. (2006). Tissue economies: Blood, organs, and cell lines in late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. (2004). The intimate economies of Bangkok: Tomboys, tycoons, and Avon ladies in the global city. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, V. (2005). Purchase of intimacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar