3,971
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

In trust we share: The politics of financial intelligence sharing

&

References

  • Amicelle, A. (2011). Towards a ‘new’ political anatomy of financial surveillance. Security Dialogue, 42(2), 161–178.
  • Amicelle, A. (2017). When finance met security: Back to the war on drugs and the problem of dirty money. Finance and Society, 3(2), 106–123.
  • Amicelle, A. (2018). Policing through misunderstanding: Insights from the configuration of financial policing. Crime, Law and Social Change, 69(2), 207–222.
  • Amicelle, A. & Faravel-Garrigues, G. (2012). Financial surveillance: Who cares? Journal of Cultural Economy, 5(1), 105–214.
  • Amicelle, A. & Jacobsen, E. (2016). The cross-colonization of finance and security through lists: Banking policing in the UK and India. Environment & Planning D: Society and Space, 34(1), 89–106.
  • Amicelle, A. & Chaudieu, K. (2018). In search of transnational financial intelligence: Questioning cooperation between Financial Intelligence Units. In C. King, C. Walker & J. Gurule (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of criminal and terrorism financing law (pp. 649–675). Springer International Publishing.
  • Amoore, L. (2013). The politics of possibility. Duke University Press.
  • Amoore, L. & de Goede, M. (2008). Transactions after 9/11: The banal face of the preemptive strike. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(2), 173–185.
  • Anwar, T. (2020). Unfolding the past, proving the present: Social media evidence in terrorism finance court cases. International Political Sociology, 14(4), 382–398.
  • Aradau, C. (2017). Assembling (non)knowledge: Security, law and surveillance in a digital world. International Political Sociology, 11(4), 327–342.
  • Baird, T. (2017). Knowledge of practice: A multi-sited event ethnography of border security fairs in Europe and North America. Security Dialogue, 48(3), 187–205.
  • Balázs, B. (2020). Mediated trust: A theoretical framework to address the trustworthiness of technological trust mediators. New Media & Society, 23(9), 2668–2690.
  • Bellanova, R. (2017). Digital, politics, and algorithms: Governing digital data through the lens of data protection. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3), 329–347.
  • Bellanova, R. & de Goede, M. (2022). The algorithmic regulation of security: An infrastructural perspective. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 102–118.
  • Bonelli, L. & Ragazzi, F. (2014). Low-tech security: Files, notes, and memos as technologies of anticipation. Security Dialogue, 45(5), 476–493.
  • Bosma, E. (2019). Multi-sited ethnography of digital security technologies. In M. de Goede, E. Bosma & P. Pallister-Wilkins (Eds.), Secrecy and methods in security research: A guide to qualitative fieldwork (pp. 193–212). Routledge.
  • Boy, N. & Gabor, D. (2019). Collateral times. Economy and Society, 48(3), 295–314.
  • Boy, N., Morris, J. & Santos, M. (Eds.) (2017). Special issue: Finance and security. Finance & Society, 3(2), 102–105.
  • Bures, O. & Carrapico, H. (2018). Security privatization: How non-security-related private businesses shape security governance. Springer International Publishing.
  • Cook, K. S., Hardin, R. & Levi, M. (2005). Cooperation without trust. Russell Sage Foundation.
  • de Goede, M. (2010). Financial security. In J. P. Burgess (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of new security studies (Chapter 11) (pp. 100–109). Routledge.
  • de Goede, M. (2012). Speculative security: The politics of pursuing terrorist monies. University of Minnesota Press.
  • de Goede, M. (2018). The chain of security. Review of International Studies, 44(1), 24–42.
  • de Wilde, M. (2020). A care-infused market tale: On (not) maintaining relationships of trust in energy retrofit products. Journal of Cultural Economy, 13(5), 561–578.
  • Draku, F. (2020). The HoFIUs communi- cate on a daily basis through the Egmont Secure Web and meet once a year in the Egmont Group Annual Plenary. Monitor. Retrieved from https://www.monitor.co.ug/uganda/special-reports/elections/govt-freezes-accounts-of-4-ngos-doing-poll-work-3216360
  • Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. (2013). Principles for information exchange between FIUs. The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units.
  • Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. (2017). Operational guidance for FIU activities and the exchange of information. The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units.
  • Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. (2018). Annual report 2017/2018. The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units.
  • Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. (2019). Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units charter. The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units.
  • Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. (2021a). Annual report 2019/2020. The Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units.
  • Egmont Group. (2021b). Egmont Group chair’s statement on allegations of FIUs misusing their powers to combat ML and TF. Retrieved from https://egmontgroup.org/en/content/egmont-group-chair%E2%80%99s-statement.
  • Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. (2022a). Organisation and structure. Egmont Group. Retrieved from https://egmontgroup.org/about/organization-and-structure/.
  • Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units. (2022b). About the Egmont Group. Egmont Group. Retrieved from https://egmontgroup.org/about/.
  • Fahey, E. & Curtin, D. (2014). A transatlantic community of law: Legal perspectives on the relationship between the EU and US legal orders. Cambridge University Press.
  • FATF. (2020a). International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation. FATF.
  • FATF. (2020b). Letter to the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved from https://fatfplatform.org/assets/2020-12-18-FATF-re-UN-APML-Serb.pdf.
  • FATF. (2022). International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism & proliferation. FATF.
  • Ferrari, V. (2020). Crosshatching privacy: Financial intermediaries’ data practices between law enforcement and data economy. European Data Protection Law Review, 6(4), 522–535.
  • Gilbert, E. (2015). Money as a ‘weapons system’ and the entrepreneurial way of war. Critical Military Studies, 1(3), 202–219.
  • Gitelman, L. & Jackson, V. (2013). Introduction. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), Raw data’ is an oxymoron (pp. 1–14). MIT Press.
  • Helgesson, K. S. & Mörth, U. (2019). Instruments of securitization and resisting subjects: For-profit professionals in the finance–security nexus. Security Dialogue, 50(3), 257–274.
  • Heng, Y. & McDonagh, K. (2008). The other war on terror revealed: Global governmentality and the Financial Action Task Force’s campaign against terrorist financing. Review of International Studies, 34(3), 553–573.
  • Ho, K. (2009). Liquidated: An ethnography of Wall Street. Duke University Press.
  • Hoffman, A. M. (2002). A conceptualization of trust in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 375–401.
  • Hoijtink, M. (2019). Gender, ethics and critique in researching security and secrecy. In M. de Goede, E. Bosma & P. Pallister-Wilkins (Eds.), Secrecy and methods in security research: A guide to qualitative fieldwork (pp. 143–157). Routledge.
  • Iafolla, V. (2018). The production of suspicion in retail banking: An examination of unusual transaction reporting. In C. King, C. Walker & J. Gurule (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of criminal and terrorism financing law (pp. 81–107). Springer International Publishing.
  • Issa, H. (2021). NGOs plead with government over frozen bank accounts. URN. Retrieved from https://ugandaradionetwork.net/story/ngos-plead-with-government-over-frozen-bank-accounts.
  • Kazibwe, K. (2021). Govt unfreezes accounts of NGOs accused of terrorism funding. NilePost. Retrieved from https://nilepost.co.ug/2021/02/27/govt-unfreezes-accounts-of-ngos-accused-of-terrorism-funding/.
  • Koole, B. (2020). Trusting to learn and learning to trust: A framework for analyzing the interactions of trust and learning in arrangements dedicated to instigating social change. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 161, 120260.
  • Lababidi, E. M. R. (2020). State and institutional capacity in combating money laundering and terrorism financing in armed conflict the Central Bank of Syria. Journal of Money Laundering, 23(1), 155–172.
  • Lagerwaard, P. (2020). Flattening the international: Producing financial intelligence through a platform. Critical Studies on Security, 8(2), 160–174.
  • Lagerwaard, P. (2022). Financiële surveillance en de rol van de Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) in Nederland. Beleid en Maatschappij, 2(49), 128–153.
  • Langenohl, A. (2017). Securities markets and political securitization: The case of the sovereign debt crisis in the eurozone. Security Dialogue, 48(2), 131–148.
  • Langley, P. (2017). Finance/Security/Life. Finance and Society, 3(2), 173–179.
  • Leyshon, A. & Thrift, N. (1997). Money/space: Geographies of monetary transformation. Routledge.
  • Liss, C. & Sharman, J. (2015). Global corporate crime-fighters: Private transnational responses to piracy and money laundering. Review of International Political Economy: RIPE, 22(4), 693–718.
  • MacKenzie, D. (2001). Mechanizing proof: Computing, risk, and trust. MIT Press.
  • MENA FATF. (2018). Mutual evaluation report: 13th follow-up report for Syria. MENA FATF. Retrieved from http://www.menafatf.org/mutual-evaluations-follow/follow-up-reports.
  • Mitsilegas, V. (2014). Transatlantic counterterrorism cooperation and European values: The elusive quest for coherence. In E. Fahey & D. Curtin (Eds.), A transatlantic community of law: Legal perspectives on the relationship between the EU and US legal orders (pp. 289–315). Cambridge University Press.
  • Mouzakiti, F. (2020). Cooperation between Financial Intelligence Units in the European Union: Stuck in the middle between the General Data Protection Regulation and the Police Data Protection Directive. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 11(3), 351–374.
  • Nance, M. T. (2018). The regime that FATF built: An introduction to the Financial Action Task Force. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 69(2), 109–129.
  • Olsen, R. A. (2008). Trust as risk and the foundation of investment value. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(6), 2189–2200.
  • Overton, J. (1999). Worlds apart: Reflections on trust, colonialism and decolonization. Hume Papers on Public Policy, 7, 33–41.
  • Permanent Mission of the Republic of Serbia to the United Nations. (2020). Responses of the Republic of Serbia. Retrieved from https://spcommreports.ohchr.org/TMResultsBase/DownLoadFile?gId=35826.
  • Pryke, M. (2010). Money’s eyes: The visual preparation of financial markets. Economy and Society, 39(4), 427–459.
  • Rasha, M. (2019). Syria participates in Egmont Group for combating money laundering and terrorism funding in Hague. SANA. Retrieved from https://www.sana.sy/en/?p=169229.
  • Searle, R. H., Nienaber, A.-M. I. & Sitkin, S. B. (Eds.) (2018). The Routledge companion to trust. Routledge.
  • Sharman, J. C. (2009). The bark is the bite: International organizations and blacklisting. Review of International Political Economy: RIPE, 16(4), 573–596.
  • Sitkin, S. B. & Bijlsma-Frankema, K. M. (2018). Distrust. In R. H. Searle, A.-M. I. Nienaber & S. B. Sitkin (Eds.), The Routledge companion to trust (pp. 128–150). Routledge.
  • Siu, L. L. S. (2010). Gangs in the markets: Network-based cognition in China’s futures industry. International Journal of China Studies, 1(2), 21.
  • The Independent. (2021). EU, US envoys urge gov’t to unfreeze CSO bank accounts. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.ug/eu-us-envoys-urge-govt-to-unfreeze-cso-bank-accounts/.
  • Vedrenne, G. (2021). Exclusive: Egmont flags government abuse of financial intelligence. ACAMS moneylaundering.com. Retrieved from https://www.moneylaundering.com/news/exclusive-egmont-flags-government-abuse-of-financial-intelligence/.
  • Versloot, L. (2022). The vitality of trusting relations in multilateral diplomacy: An account of the European Union. International Affairs, 98(2), 509–528.
  • Wesseling, M. (2013). The European fight against terrorism financing: Professional fields and new governing practices. PhD dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
  • Westermeier, C. (2020). Money is data: The platformization of financial transactions. Information, Communication & Society, 23(14), 2047–2063.
  • Zelizer, V. A. (2006). Circuits in economic life. Economic Sociology, 8(1), 30–35.
  • Zelizer, V. A. (2004). Circuits of commerce. In J. C. Alexander, G. T. Marx & C. L. Williams (Eds.), Self, social structure, and beliefs (pp. 122–144). University of California Press.