Impacts of new routes and ports on spatial competition for containerized imports into the United States

References and notes

• TIOGA GROUP, INC., 2008, Containerized Intermodal Goods Movement Assessment. North American Logistics Chain Transportation Issues and Trends. 1st Edition Research Report. Philadelphia, PA: Tioga Group Inc
   Google Scholar
• Llacer , FJM . 2005 . The Panama Canal: Operations and traffic . Marine Policy , 29 ( 2005 ) : 223 – 234 .
   Google Scholar
• LLOYD's LIST, 2009, West Side Story: A Tale of Boom and Bust, 763rd ed. Australia, April 2, pp. 8–11
   Google Scholar
• CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS, INC., 2007, National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study. Final Report. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Systematics Inc. http://www.camsys.com/pubs/AAR_RRCapacityStudy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CARMEL, S., 2009, Trade impacts of a viable northwest passage. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Studies Association (ISA) 2009 Conference, New York City, USA, February 15–18
   Google Scholar
• Somanathan , S , Flynn , P and Szymanski , J . 2009 . The Northwest passage: A simulation . Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice , 43 ( 2 ) : 127 – 135 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 2007, America's Container Ports: Delivering the Goods (Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation)
   Google Scholar
• US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 2009, America's Container Ports: Freight Hubs That Connect Our Nation to Global Markets (Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation)
   Google Scholar
• MERCATOR TRANSPORTATION GROUP, 2005, Forecast of Container Vessel Specifications and Port Calls Within San Pedro Bay (Bellevue, WA: Mercator Transport Group)
   Google Scholar
• Maloni , M and Jackson , EC . 2005 . North American container port capacity: An exploratory analysis . Transportation Journal , 44 ( 3 ) : 1 – 22 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OCEAN SHIPPING CONSULTANTS, LTD., 2005, The Proposed Directive on Market Access to Port Services and Container Terminal Operations in Northern Europe (London, UK: InfoMARE - Forum of Shipping and Logistics). http://www.infomare.it/news/forum/2005/oscuk.asp
   Google Scholar
• Bennathan , E and Walters , AA . 1979 . Port Pricing and Investment Policy for Developing Countries , Washington , DC : Oxford University Press for the World Bank .
   Google Scholar
• BLONIGEN, B. A. and WILSON, W. W., 2006, International trade, transportation networks and port choice. Report. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon. http://www.aeaweb.org/annual_mtg_papers/2007/0105_1430_2103.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blonigen , BA and Wilson , WW . 2008 . Port efficiency and trade flows . Review of International Economics , 16 ( 1 ) : 21 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drewry Publishing . 2009 . Annual Review of Global Container Terminal Operators, 2009 , London , , England : Nigel Gardner .
   Google Scholar
• Drewry Shipping Consultants Ltd. 2005 . Panama Canal Study. Final report , London , , England : Marsh Hal .
   Google Scholar
• ACP, 2006, Proposal for the Expansion of the Panama Canal: Third Set of Locks Project (Miami, FL: Autoridad del Canal de Panamá). http://www.pancanal.com/eng/plan/documentos/propuesta/acp-expansion-proposal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACP, 2006, Plan Maestro del Canal de Panama (Miami, FL: Autoridad del Canal de Panamá). http://www.pancanal.com/esp/plan/index.html
   Google Scholar
• REUTERS, 2012, Arctic a road to promise for Russian shipping, Moscow Times, January 31, p. 2
   Google Scholar
• Specifically, the ACP [18] indicated that ‘… a route through the Arctic is highly speculative given the present uncertainty about the magnitude of the ice cover … . the route would only be partially viable for commerce during very few months of the year and would not be dependable in terms of navigability, occurrence and duration. Furthermore, it is speculated that this would only come about after the second half of this century, in 50 or 100 years, and even then, vessels would be exposed to the danger of floating ice’
   Google Scholar
• Pittman , R . 2009 . Competition issues in restructuring ports and railways, including brief consideration of these sectors in India . International Journal of Regulation and Governance , 9 ( 2 ) : 121 – 146 . (The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi)
   Google Scholar
• Talley , W . 2009 . Port Economics , London , UK : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Bonacich , E and Wislon , JB . 2008 . Getting the Goods: Ports, Labor, and the Logistics Revolution , Ithaca , , New York : Cornell University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury , M . 2007 . By the numbers: containerized ocean trade . Journal of Commerce , 8 ( 21 ) : 36
   Google Scholar
• US MARITIME ADMINISTRATION, 2009, Trade Statistics: US Waterborne Foreign Container Trades by US Custom Ports (Washington, DC: US Maritime Administration). http://www.marad.dot.gov/library_landing_page/data_and_statistics/Data_and_Statistics.htm
   Google Scholar
• US SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD, 2007, Economic Data: Waybill (Washington, DC: US Surface Transportation Board). http://www.stb.dot.gov/stb/industry/econ_waybill.html
   Google Scholar
• ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 2007. Port_DistancesTable_05_11_05.mdb. Washington, DC: US Army Corp of Engineers
   Google Scholar
• US BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS, 2008, National Transportation Atlas Database, NTAD 2006 and North American Transportation Atlas Data, NORTAD 1998 (Washington, DC: US Bureau of Transportation Statistics)
   Google Scholar
• ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, 2009, USACE Aggregate Vessel Operating Cost Model (Washington, DC: Maritime Strategies International, Ltd. and the Institute for Water Resources, US Army Corps of Engineers)
   Google Scholar
• CLARKSON RESEARCH SERVICES, 2009, Container Intelligence Quarterly, Third Quarter 2009 (London, UK: Clarkson Research Services Limited)
   Google Scholar
• Canal Water Time includes waiting time to transit and transit time [18]
   Google Scholar
• LLOYD's REGISTER-FAIRPLAY LTD., 2006, Port and Terminal Guide 2007–2008 (Redhill Surrey, UK: Lloyd's Register Fairplay Ltd.)
   Google Scholar
• AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PORTS AUTHORITIES, 2009, Canada/US Container Port Terminals (Alexandria, VA: American Association of Ports Authorities)
   Google Scholar
• Port of Prince Rupert [38] indicates that backhaul accounted for nearly 40% of all throughput
   Google Scholar
• These rail lines are almost entirely served by UP railroad (except 217 miles local rail lines). In addition, the rail capacities for import containers on the UP, which would serve Mexican port, are currently operated near/at capacity [4]
   Google Scholar
• Prince Rupert [38] The Prince Rupert Container Terminal Development—Phase 2. http://www.rupertport.com/container2.html
   Google Scholar
• Carmel [5] indicated that this 1000 nautical miles must be modelled separately from the remaining trip speeds. This is a fairly important assumption given that a ship travelling at even three knots would ‘most likely sustain significant damage by hitting multi-year ice’
   Google Scholar
• PORT OF PRINCE RUPERT, 2009, 54 North Newsletter, August 2009. Canada: Port of Prince Rupert. http://www.rupertport.com/pdf/54North/port%20of%20prince%20rupert%20newsletter%20august%202009.pdf
   Google Scholar