Productivity analysis of Brazilian seaports

References

• Liu , Z . 1995 . The comparative performance of public and private enterprises . Journal of Transport Economics and Policy , 29 : 263 – 274 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coto Millan , P , Baños Pino , J and Rodrigues Alvarez , A . 2000 . Economic efficiency in Spanish ports: Some empirical evidence . Maritime Policy & Management , 27 : 169 – 175 .
   Google Scholar
• Estache , A , Gonzaléz , M and Trujillo , L . 2001 . Efficiency gains from port reforms and the potential for yardstick competition: Lessons from México . World Development , 30 : 545 – 560 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullinane , KPB , Song , DW and Gray , R . 2002 . A stochastic frontier model of the efficiency of major container terminals in Asia: Assessing the influence of administrative and ownership structures . Transportation Research Part A , 36 : 734 – 762 .
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane , KPB and Song , DW . 2003 . A stochastic frontier model of the productive efficiency of Korean container terminals . Applied Economics , 35 : 251 – 267 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner , H , Windle , R and Dresner , M . 2004 . North America container port productivity, 1984–1997 . Transportation Research Part E , 40 : 339 – 356 .
   Google Scholar
• Barros , CP . 2005 . Decomposing growth in Portuguese seaports: A frontier cost approach . Maritime Economics & Logistics , 7 : 297 – 315 .
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane , K , Wang , TF , Song , DW and Ji , P . 2006 . The technical efficiency of container ports: Comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis . Transportation Research Part A , 40 : 354 – 374 .
   Google Scholar
• Roll , Y and Hayuth , Y . 1993 . Port performance comparison applying data envelopment analysis (DEA) . Maritime Policy & Management , 20 : 153 – 161 .
   Google Scholar
• Martinez Budria , E , Diaz Armas , R , Navarro Ibáñez , M and Ravelo Mesa , T . 1999 . A study of the efficiency of spanish port authorities using data envelopment analysis . International Journal of Transport Economics , 26 ( 2 ) : 237 – 253 .
   Google Scholar
• Tongzon , J . 2001 . Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis . Transportation Research Part A , 35 : 107 – 122 .
   Google Scholar
• Barros , CP . 2003 . Incentive regulation and efficiency of Portuguese port authorities . Maritime Economics & Logistics , 5 : 55 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• Barros , CP . 2003 . The measurement of efficiency of Portuguese seaport authorities with DEA . International Journal of Transport Economics , 30 : 335 – 354 .
   Google Scholar
• Barros , CP and Athanassiou , M . 2004 . Efficiency in European seaports with DEA: Evidence from Greece and Portugal . Maritime Economics & Logistics , 6 : 122 – 140 .
   Google Scholar
• Cullinane , K , Song , DW and Wang , T . 2005 . The application of mathematical programming approaches to estimating container port production efficiency . Journal of Productivity Analysis , 24 : 73 – 92 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe , R and Grosskopf , S . 1996 . Inter-temporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA , Boston/London/Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Rios , LR and Maçada , ACG . 2006 . Analysing the relative efficiency of container terminals of Mercosur using DEA . Maritime Economics & Logistics , 9 : 138 – 147 .
   Google Scholar
• MANAGI, S., 2007, Maritime shipping industry and productivity in Japan. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 9, 291–301
   Google Scholar
• Barros , CP and Peypoch , N . 2007 . Comparing productivity change in Italian and Portuguese seaports using the Luenberger indicator approach . Maritime Economics & Logistics , 9 ( 2 ) : 138 – 147 .
   Google Scholar
• Talley , WK . 2006 . “ An economic theory of port ” . In Port Efficiency. Vol. 16. (Research in Transport Economics) , Edited by: Cullinane , K and Talley , WK . 43 – 66 . Oxford , UK : JAI Press .
   Google Scholar
• Carrington , R , Coelli , T and Groom , E . 2002 . International benchmarking for monopoly price regulation: The case of Australian gas distribution . Journal of Regulatory Economics , 21 ( 2 ) : 191 – 216 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANTAQ – BRAZILIAN NATIONAL MARITIME TRANSPORT AGENCY, 2008, Port performance. http://www.antaq.gov.br/Portal/DesempenhoPortuario/Index.asp [Accessed 10 November 2009]
   Google Scholar
• CAMPOS NETO, C. A. S., PÊGO FILHO, B., ROMMINGER, A. E., FERREIRA, I. M. and VASCONCELOS, L. F. S., 2009, Gargalos e demanda da infraestrutura portuária e os investimentos do PAC: Mapeamento IPEA de obras portuárias. Texto para discussão n° 1423 (London: IPEA—Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada)
   Google Scholar
• Song , DW and Cullinane , K . 2001 . The administrative and ownership structure of Asian container ports . International Journal of Maritime Economics , 3 : 175 – 197 .
   Google Scholar
• Berger , A and Berger , FR . 2009 . Portos e Terminais Marítimos do Brasil , Joinville , SC : Bela Catarina .
   Google Scholar
• Park , RK and De , P . 2004 . An alternative approach to efficiency measurement of seaports . Maritime Economics & Logistics , 6 : 53 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• Baños Pino , J , Coto Millan , P and Rodriguez Alvarez , A . 1999 . Allocative efficiency and over-capitalisation: An application . International Journal of Transport Economics , 26 ( 2 ) : 181 – 199 .
   Google Scholar
• Venus Lun , YH , Pang , KW and Panaydes , PM . 2010 . Organisational growth and firm performance in the international container shipping industry . International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics , 2 ( 2 ) : 206 – 223 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tongzon , J and Heng , W . 2005 . Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminal) . Transportation Research Part A , 39 : 405 – 424 .
   Google Scholar
• Simões , P and Marques , RC . 2010 . Influence of congestion efficiency on the European seaports performance: Does it matter? . Transport Reviews , 30 ( 4 ) : 517 – 539 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões , P and Marques , RC . 2010 . Seaport performance analysis using robust non-parametric efficiency estimators . Transportation Planning and Technology , 33 ( 5 ) : 435 – 451 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões , P , Carvalho , P , Fonseca , A and Marques , RC . 2010 . Governance and comparative performance of Iberian Peninsula seaports: An application of non-parametric techniques . International Journal of Transport Economics , 37 ( 1 ) : 32 – 51 .
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira , GF and Cariou , P . 2011 . A DEA study of the efficiency of 122 iron ore and coal ports of 15/17 countries in 2005 . Maritime Policy & Management , 38 ( 7 ) : 727 – 743 .
   Google Scholar
• BARROS, C. P., HARALAMBIDES, H., HUSSAIN, M. and NICOLAS PEYPOCH, N., 2011, Seaport efficiency and productivity growth. In: International Handbook of Maritime Economics, edited by K. Cullinane (Northampton, MA: Edward and Elgar), Chap. 17, pp. 363–383
   Google Scholar
• Bichou , K . 2011 . A two-stage supply chain DEA model for measuring container-terminal efficiency . International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics , 3 ( 1 ) : 6 – 26 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergantino , AS and Musso , E . 2011 . The role of external factors versus managerial ability in determining seaports’ relative efficiency: An input-by-input analysis through a multi-step approach on a panel of Southern European ports . Maritime Economics & Logistics , 13 ( 2 ) : 121 – 141 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros , CP . 2012 . Productivity assessment of African airports . African Development Review , 24 ( 1 ) : 1 – 13 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEDDA, F. and LIU, Q., 2012, Determinants and strategies for the development of container terminals. Journal of Productivity Analysis (forthcoming)
   Google Scholar
• PANAYIDES, P. M., MAXOULIS, C. N., WANG, T. F. and NG, K. Y. A., 2009, A critical analysis of DEA applications to seaport economic efficiency measurement. Transportation Reviews, 29(2), 183–206
   Google Scholar
• Malmquist , S . 1953 . Index numbers and difference surfaces . Trabajos de Estatistica , 4 : 209 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Varian , H . 1987 . Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach , New York : W.W. Norton & Co. .
   Google Scholar
• Shephard , RW . 1970 . Theory of Cost and Production Functions , Princeton : Princeton University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Farrell , MJ . 1957 . The measurement of productive efficiency . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, General , 120 ( 3 ) : 253 – 281 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassiloglou , M and Giokas , D . 1990 . A study of the relative efficiency of banks’ branches: An application of data envelopment analysis . The Journal of Operational Research Society , 41 ( 7 ) : 591 – 597 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson , RG , Allen , R , Camanho , AS , Podimovski , VV , Sarrico , C and Shale , S . 2001 . Pitfalls and protocols in DEA . European Journal of Operational Research , 132 ( 2 ) : 245 – 259 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney , J . 1986 . Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy . Management Science , 32 : 1231 – 1241 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece , D , Pisano , G and Shuen , A . 1997 . Dynamic capabilities and strategic management . Strategic Management Journal , 18 : 509 – 533 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall , S . 1980 . Monopolistic advantages and foreign involvement by US manufacturing industry . Oxford Economic Papers , 32 : 102 – 122 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf , B . 1977 . Industrial diversification and internationalization: Some empirical evidence . Journal of Industrial Economics , 26 : 177 – 191 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh , DS , Hickson , DJ , Hinings , CR and Turner , RC . 1969 . The context of organization structure . Administrative Science Quarterly , 14 : 91 – 114 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taymaz , E . 2005 . Are small firms really less productive? . Small Business Economics , 25 ( 10 ) : 429 – 445 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Managi , S and Karemera , D . 2004 . Input and output biased technological change in US agriculture . Applied Economics Letters , 11 ( 5 ) : 283 – 286 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe , R and Primont , D . 1995 . Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , Boston/London/Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar