Use of the Delphi method to determine the constraints that affect the future size of large container ships

References

• Alphaliner. 2011. “Conceptual Design and Main Parameters of an Ultra-Large Twin Engine Container Ship.” Accessed July 20. http://www.alphaliner.com/liner2/research_files/Alphaliner-20Kteu-ULCS.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American President Line. 2013. “Vessel History.” Accessed July 20. http://www.apl.com/wps/wcm/connect/9ac4350041a4b2d5bb2efb62abbb971d/APL%2BHistory.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
   Google Scholar
• Ashar, A. 2002. “Revolution Now.” Containerization International 35: 56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijn, H. 2010. “Ports of the Future—The Strategy of Port of Rotterdam & the International Ambitions.” TU DELFT presentation, Delft, June.
   Google Scholar
• Byklum, E. 2010. “The Quantum Project—Thinking Outside the Box.” DNV Container Ship Update 1: 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cargotec. 2013. “Welcome to Port 2060.” Accessed July 20. http://port2060.cargotec.com/
   Google Scholar
• Climent, A. G. 1987. “Aristotle Onassis—Un Controvertido Armador Argentino.” Accessed July 20. http://www.histarmar.com.ar/BuquesMercantes/Onassis-1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cudahy, B. J. 2006. Box Boats, How Container Ships Changed the World. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dohlie, K. 2009. “The Future of the Ultra Large Container Ship.” DNV Container Ship Updated 3: 22–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dohlie, K. 2010. “Industry Questionary: Exploring Industries Needs—Environmental Footprint in Fifth Place.” DNV Container Ship Updated 1: 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Goulielmos, A. M., and M.-E. Psifia. 2011. “Forecasting Short-Term Freight Rate Cycles: Do We Have a More Appropriate Method than a Normal Distribution?” Maritime Policy & Management 38 (6): 645–672.
   Google Scholar
• Grey, M. 2011. Age of the Giants. Ship World & Shipbuilder. London: The Institute of Marine Engineering Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, J. C. 2005. “The Feasibility of Mega Container Vessels.” European Transport 25– 26: 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hamburg Port Authority. 2010. The Port of the Future. Annual Report 2010, 15–18. Hamburg: Hamburg Port Authority.
   Google Scholar
• ISL. 2011. Market Review Analytical Focus, World Container and General Cargo Shipping. Vol. 55 (5/6). Shipping Statics and Market Review, Statistical Publications. Bremen: Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics.
   Google Scholar
• Maersk Maritime Technology. 2013. “TRIPLE-E Vessels.” Accessed July 20. http://www.maersktechnology.com/Stories/Stories/Pages/Triple-Evessels.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. 1995. “Foresight in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 7 (2): 139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millennium Project. 2013. “Real-Time Delphi.” Accessed July 20. http://www.millennium-project.org/millennium/RTD-general.html
   Google Scholar
• Morato, A. 2011. El futuro en el sector transporte: una visión prospectiva, 19–40. 12º Jornada de Reflexión y Debate: El transporte: Una visión prospectiva, España, February.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. 2007. “Getting Bigger All the Time.” Container Ship Focus, Technical News and Information on Container SHIPS, no. 4, 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Penfold, A. 2008. “Trade Concentration and Large Vessels in the Container Trades.” Boxship 2008 Conference, Hamburg, October.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, R. 2008. “How are Foresight Methods Selected?” Foresight 10 (6): 62–89.
   Google Scholar
• Price Waterhouse Coopers. 2009. “How will Supply Chains Evolve in a Energy-Constrained, Low Carbon World?” Transportation & Logistics 2030, 1: 54–58.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigue, J. P., and T. Notteboom. 2009. “The Geography of Containerization: Half a Century of Revolution, Adaptation and Diffusion.” GeoJournal 74: 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Dapena, A. 2008. “El gigantismo de los buques portacontenedores.” Jornada de Puertos Salon Internacional de Logística, España, June.
   Google Scholar
• Rolt, L. T. 1989. Isambard Kingdom Brunel. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Scherrer, P., and J. P. Guellec. 2010. “Port of Le Havre Facing the Challenge of Gigantism of Container Vessels.” PIANC MMX Congress 2010, Liverpool, May.
   Google Scholar
• Significant Ships. 2006. Emma Maersk: World’s Largest Container Ship (11,500)… .for Now!, 45. Significant Ships of 2006. London: Royal Institution of Naval Architects.
   Google Scholar
• Significant Ships. 2007. Mol Creation: Special Steel for New 8110 TEU, 78. Significant Ships 2007. London: Royal Institution of Naval Architects..
   Google Scholar
• Significant Ships. 2009. CMA CGM Andromeda: A Container Ship with Special Environmental Features, 32. Significant Ships 2009. London: Royal Institution of Naval Architects.
   Google Scholar
• Significant Ships. 2010. MSC Beryl: 13000 TEU Post Panamax Containership from STX, 76. Significant Ships 2010. London: Royal Institution of Naval Architects.
   Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. 2009. “Forecasting—An Impossible Job? What will the Global Stimulus Package do for Shipping? Is It All About China? Are We Heading for Another Dry Bulk Bonanza?” Tradewinds Nor-Shipping Conference, Oslo, June.
   Google Scholar
• STX. 2008. “Development of the World’s First 22,000 TEU Class Container Ship.” STX News, Dream & Future 85, June, 1–1.
   Google Scholar
• Tomassian, G. C., and R. Sánchez. 2009. La industria del transporte y las crisis económicas. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2011. Review of Maritime Transport. Geneva: UNCTAD Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnolst, N., M. Scholtens, and F. A. J. Waals. 1999. Malacca-Max: The Ultimate Container Carrier. Delft: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2005. The Evolution of Ports in a Competitive World. Port reform toolkit module 2. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Shipping Council. 2013. History of Containerization. Accessed July 20. http://www.worldshipping.org/about-the-industry/history-of-containerization
   Google Scholar