Business-process management in high-turbulence environments: the case of the offshore service vessel industry

References

• Aas, B., Ø. Halskau, and S. W. Wallace. 2009. “The Role of Supply Vessels in Offshore Logistics.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 11 (3): 302–325. doi:10.1057/Mel.2009.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, J. A. C., and B. McKelvey. 2006. “Analysis of Extremes in Management Studies.” Research Methodology in Strategy and Management 3: 123–196. doi:10.1016/S1479–8387(06)03007–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bettis, R. A., and C. K. Prahalad. 1995. “The Dominant Logic: Retrospective and Extension.” Strategic Management Journal 16 (1): 5–14. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borch, O. J., and E. L. Madsen. 2007. “Dynamic Capabilities Facilitating Innovative Strategies in Smes.” International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship 1 (1): 109–125. doi:10.1504/IJTE.2007.014731.
   Google Scholar
• Borch, O. J., and H. E. I. Roaldsen. 2011. “Entrepreneurial Strategies of Smes in Mature Industries: The Role of R&D Alliances and Value Chain Configuration.” In Entrepreneurship and Technological Change, edited by L. Cassia, T. Minola, and S. Paleari, 51–71. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, L. J., and K. M. Eisenhardt. 1988. “Strategic Decision Processes in High Velocity Environments: Four Cases in the Microcomputer Industry.” Management Science 34 (7): 816–835. doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.7.816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocke, J, vom., and M. Rosemann. 2010. Handbook on Business Process Management 2 Strategic Alignment, Governance, People and Culture, International Handbooks on Information Systems. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Button, K. 2010. Transport Economics. 3rd ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravarthy, B. 1997. “A New Strategy Framework for Coping with Turbulence.” Sloan Management Review 38 (2): 69–82.
   Google Scholar
• Chesbrough, H. 2010. “Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers.” Long Range Planning 43 (2–3): 354–363. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., and J. E. Short. 1990. “The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign.” Sloan Management Review 31 (4): 11–27.
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., and D. W. Beard. 1984. “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (1): 52–73. doi:10.2307/2393080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad, Ø. D., and C. H. M. Ketels. 2006. “Competitive Advantage and the Value Network Configuration: Making Decisions at A Swedish Life Insurance Company.” Long Range Planning 39 (2): 109–131. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2006.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• George, G., and A. J. Bock. 2011. “The Business Model in Practice and Its Implications for Entrepreneurship Research.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 35 (1): 83–111. doi:10.1111/j.1540–6520.2010.00424.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer, R., and A. M. Weiss. 1993. “Marketing in Turbulent Environments: Decision Processes and the Time-Sensitivity of Information.” Journal of Marketing Research 30 (4): 509–521. doi:10.2307/3172694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah, S. T., M. Uhl-Bien, B. J. Avolio, and F. L. Cavarretta. 2009. “A Framework for Examining Leadership in Extreme Contexts.” The Leadership Quarterly 20 (6): 897–919. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houy, C., P. Fettke, and P. Loos. 2010. “Empirical Research in Business Process Management—Analysis of An Emerging Field of Research.” Business Process Management Journal 16 (4): 619–661. doi:10.1108/14637151011065946.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, R. D., and J. W. Webb. 2007. “Strategic Entrepreneurship: Creating Competitive Advantage through Streams of Innovation.” Business Horizons 50 (1): 49–59. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2006.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Jenssen, J. I., and T. RandØy. 2006. “The Performance Effect of Innovation in Shipping Companies.” Maritime Policy & Management 33 (4): 327–343. doi:10.1080/03088830600895485.
   Google Scholar
• Kleindorfer, P. R., and G. H. Saad. 2005. “Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains.” Production and Operations Management 14 (1): 53–68. doi:10.1111/j.1937–5956.2005.tb00009.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, S. 2005. Maritime Transport, Safety Management and Risk Analysis. Burlington: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Lazzarini, S., F. Chaddad, and M. Cook. 2001. “Integrating Supply Chain and Network Analyses: The Study of Netchains.” Journal on Chain and Network Science 1 (1): 7–22. doi:10.3920/JCNS2001.x002.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S., and D. W. Song. 2010. “Knowledge Management for Maritime Logistics Value: Discussing Conceptual Issues.” Maritime Policy & Management 37 (6): 563–583. doi:10.1080/03088839.2010.514959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorange, P. 2005. Shipping Company Strategies : Global Management under Turbulent Conditions. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., and G. G. Dess. 2001. “Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle.” Journal of Business Venturing 16 (5): 429–451. doi:10.1016/S0883–9026(00)00048–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyridis, D. V., T. Fyrvik, G. N. Kapetanis, N. Ventikos, P. Anaxagorou, E. Uthaug, and H. N. Psaraftis. 2005. “Optimizing Shipping Company Operations Using Business Process Modelling.” Maritime Policy & Management 32 (4): 403–420. doi:10.1080/03088830500300636.
   Google Scholar
• Medda, F., and L. Trujillo. 2010. “Short-Sea Shipping: An Analysis of Its Determinants.” Maritime Policy & Management 37 (3): 285–303. doi:10.1080/03088831003700678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitroussi, K. 2004. “Quality in Shipping: Imo’s Role and Problems of Implementation.” Disaster Prevention and Management 13 (1): 50–58. doi:10.1108/09653560410521698.
   Google Scholar
• Osterwalder, A., Y. Pigneur, and C. L. Tucci. 2005. “Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present and Future of the Concept.” Communications of the Association for Information Science (CAIS) 16: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M. 2006a. “Maritime Logistics and Global Supply Chains: Towards A Research Agenda.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100147.
   Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M. 2006b. “Maritime Policy, Management and Research: Role and Potential.” Maritime Policy & Management 33 (2): 95–105. doi:10.1080/03088830600678757.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinohara, M. 2005. “Quality Shipping and Incentive Schemes: from the Perspective of the Institutional Economics.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 7 (3): 281–295. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100138.
   Google Scholar
• Sidorova, A., and O. Isik. 2010. “Business Process Research: A Cross-Disciplinary Review.” Business Process Management Journal 16 (4): 566–597. doi:10.1108/14637151011065928.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., and P. Fingar. 2003. Business Process Management: The Third Wave. Tampa, FL: Meghan-Kiffer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stabell, C. B., and O. D. Fjeldstad. 1998. “Configuring Value for Competitive Advantage: on Chains, Shops, and Networks.” Strategic Management Journal 19 (5): 413–437. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097–0266(199805)19:5<Aid-Smj946>3.0.CO;2-C.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. 2009. Maritime Economics. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon, P., K. L. Kraemer, and V. Gurbaxani. 2000. “Executives’ Perceptions of the Business Value of Information Technology: A Process-Oriented Approach.” Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (4): 145–174.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. 1967. Organizations in Action : Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Zott, C., and R. Amit. 2008. “The Fit between Product Market Strategy and Business Model: Implications for Firm Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 29 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1002/Smj.642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar