Productivity change in Nigerian seaports after reform: a Malmquist productivity index decomposition approach

References

• Barros, C. P. 2012. “Productivity Assessment of African Seaports.” African Development Review 24 (1): 67–78. doi:10.1111/afdr.2012.24.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, C. P., A. Assaf, and A. Ibiwoye. 2010. “Bootstrapped Technical Efficiency of African Seaports.” In Essays on Port Economics, 237–250. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, C. P., J. A. Felício, and R. Fernandes. 2012. “Productivity Analysis of Brazilian Seaports.” Maritime Policy & Management 39 (5): 503–523. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.705033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, C. P., and N. Peypoch. 2012. “Productivity Assessment of African Seaports with Biased Technological Change.” Transportation Planning and Technology 35 (6): 663–675. doi:10.1080/03081060.2012.710033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and W. Erwin Diewert. 1982. “Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers.” The Economic Journal 92 (365): 73–86. doi:10.2307/2232257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. 2007a. Evaluating Impacts of Institutional Reforms on Port Efficiency Changes Malquimist Productivity Index for World Container Ports. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Cheon, S. 2007b. World Port Institutions and Productivity: Roles of Ownership, Corporate Structure, and Inter-port Competition, City and Regional planning. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Cheon, S., D. E. Dowall, and D.-W. Song. 2009. “Typology of Long-Term Port Efficiency Improvement Paths: Malmquist Total Factor Productivity forWorld Container Ports.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems 15 (4): 340–350. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:4(340).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheon, S., D. E. Dowall, and D.-W. Song. 2010. “Evaluating Impacts of Institutional Reforms on Port Efficiency Changes: Ownership, Corporate Structure, and Total Factor Productivity Changes of World Container Ports.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 46 (4): 546–561. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W., L. Seiford, and J. Zhu. 2011. Data Envelopment Analysis: History, Models, and Interpretations. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coto-Millán, P., M. A. Pesquera, and J. Castanedo. 2010. Essays on Port Economics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Langen, P. W., and A. A. Pallis. 2007. “Entry Barriers in Seaports.” Maritime Policy & Management 34 (5): 427–440. doi:10.1080/03088830701585134.
   Google Scholar
• De, P. 2006. “Total Factor Productivity Growth: Indian Ports in the Era of Globalisation.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 8 (4): 366–386. doi:10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100164.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz-Hernández, J. J., E. Martínez-Budría, and S. Jara-Díaz. 2008. “Productivity in Cargo Handling in Spanish Ports during a Period of Regulatory Reforms.” Networks and Spatial Economics 8 (2–3): 287–295. doi:10.1007/s11067-007-9056-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estache, A., B. T. De Lafé, and L. Trujillo. 2004. “Sources of Efficiency Gains in Port Reform: A DEA Decomposition of a Malmquist TFP Index for Mexico.” Utilities Policy 12 (4): 221–230. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2004.04.013.
   Google Scholar
• Estache, A., M. González, and L. Trujillo. 2001. Technical Efficiency Gains from Port Reform: The Potential for Yardstick Competition in Mexico. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Estache, A., M. González, and L. Trujillo. 2002. “Efficiency Gains from Port Reform and the Potential for Yardstick Competition: Lessons from Mexico.” World Development 30 (4): 545–560. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00129-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. A. Knox Lovell. 1994. Production Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang. 1994. “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries.” The American Economic Review 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, I. 1922. “The Making of Index Numbers: A Study of Their Varieties, Tests, and Reliability.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 107 (1): 312–313.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, M. K. Y., K. K. H. Wan, Y. V. Hui, and J. S. Law. 2008. “Productivity Changes in Chinese Airports 1995–2004.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 44 (3): 521–542. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, M., and L. Trujillo. 2005. Reforms and Infrastructure Efficiency in Spain’s Container Ports. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3515. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Haralambides, H. E., M. Hussain, C. P. Barros, and N. Peypoch. 2010. “A New Approach in Benchmarking Seaport Efficiency and Technological Change.” International Journal of Transport Economics= Rivista Internazionale di Economia dei Trasporti 37: 1.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B.-L., W.-L. Liu, and C.-P. Cheng. 2006. “Efficiency Analysis of Container Terminals in China: An Application of DEA Approach.” Unpublished manuscript, Taipei: Nankai University/Soochow University.
   Google Scholar
• Malmquist, S. 1953. “Index Numbers and Indifference Surfaces.” Trabajos De Estadistica 4: 209–242. doi:10.1007/BF03006863.
   Google Scholar
• Mohiuddin, A., and J. Jones 2006. “Ports Reform and Concessions in Nigeria.” Presentation at West African Trade & Transport Today’s Reality, Tomorrow’s Potential Seminar. London.
   Google Scholar
• Ocean Shipping consultants. 2008. “Beyond the Bottlenecks: Ports in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Africa Infrastructure Country Diagnostics Paper, juin. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction/The WorldBank.
   Google Scholar
• Odeck, J. 2000. “Assessing the Relative Efficiency and Productivity Growth of Vehicle Inspection Services: An Application of DEA and Malmquist Indices.” European Journal of Operational Research 126 (3): 501–514. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00305-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, R. L., and R. W. Lichty. 2002. “Identifying Subareas that Comprise a Greater Metropolitan Area: The Criterion of County Relative Efficiency.” Journal of Regional Science 42 (3): 579–594. doi:10.1111/jors.2002.42.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezitis, A. N. 2008. “Efficiency and Productivity Effects of Bank Mergers: Evidence from the Greek Banking Industry.” Economic Modelling 25 (2): 236–254. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2007.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Törnqvist, L. 1936. “The Bank of Finland’s Consumption Price Index.” Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin 10 (1936): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, L., and G. Nombela. 1999. Privatization and Regulation of the Seaport Industry. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, A. C.-L., A. Zhang, and W. Cheung. 2013. “Foreign Participation and Competition: A Way to Improve the Container Port Efficiency in China?” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 49: 220–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. 2003. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver. 51 vols. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar