Multi-criteria analysis of decision-making by international commercial banks for providing shipping loans

References

• Albertijn, S., W. Bessler, and W. Drobetz. 2011. “Financing Shipping Companies and Shipping Operations: A Risk-Management Perspective.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 23 (4): 70–82. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6622.2011.00353.x.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. E., A. R. Kramadibrata, R. J. Powell, and A. K. Singh. 2013. “Modelling Tail Credit Risk Using Transition Matrices.” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 93: 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2012.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, B. 2016 Dec 12. “Rickmers Maritime to Scrap Youngest Container Ship Ever.” Journal of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Benmelech, E., and N. K. Bergman. 2011. “Bankruptcy and the Collateral Channel.” The Journal of Finance 66 (2): 337–378. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01636.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton, P., X. Freixas, L. Gambacorta, and P. E. Mistrulli. 2016. “Relationship and Transaction Lending in a Crisis.” The Review of Financial Studies 29 (10): 2643–2676. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhw041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, A. W. A. 2000. “Relationship Banking: What Do We Know?” Journal of Financial Intermediation 9 (1): 7–25. doi:10.1006/jfin.2000.0282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boot, A. W. A., and A. V. Thakor. 2000. “Can Relationship Banking Survive Competition?” The Journal of Finance 55 (2): 679–713. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozoki, S., and T. Rapcsak. 2008. “On Saaty’s and Koczkodaj’s Inconsistencies of Pairwise Comparison Matrices.” Journal of Global Optimization 42 (2): 157–175. doi:10.1007/s10898-007-9236-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, L., and S. Tenold. 2011. “The Basis for South Korea’s Ascent in the Shipbuilding Industry, 1970–1990.” Mariners Mirror 97 (3): 201–217. doi:10.1080/00253359.2011.10708948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavlazoglu, B., and C. L. Stuessy. 2017. “Identifying and Verifying Earthquake Engineering Concepts to Create A Knowledge Base in STEM Education: A Modified Delphi Study.” International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 5 (1): 40–52. doi:10.18404/ijemst.60674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choina, M., M. Stamp, and T. I. Hansen. 2016 Nov 9. Accessing Global Commercial Ship Financing – What Lenders Need. Panel Discussion at the 17th Annual Ship Finance Forum. Interviewer: Greg Chase. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson Research. 2017. “Clarkson Research Online Data Base.” https://sin.clarksons.net/Timeseries
   Google Scholar
• Denis, S. A., and D. J. Mullineaux. 2000. “Syndicated Loans.” Journal of Financial Intermediation 9 (4): 404–426. doi:10.1006/jfin.2000.0298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DNB. 2015 Mar 5. “Credit Seminar 2015: Lessons Learned & Restructuring.” Paper presented at the Joint Conference with K-SURE. Busan.
   Google Scholar
• Drobetz, W., D. Gounopoulos, A. Merikas, and H. Schröder. 2013. “Capital Structure Decisions of Globally-Listed Shipping Companies.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 52: 49–76. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2012.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drobetz, W., R. Haller, and I. Meier. 2015. Cash Flow Sensitivities in an Asset-Heavy Industry: The Case of Shipping. HFRC Working Paper Series No. 14. Hamburg Financial Research Center. http://www.hhfrc.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Website/Forschung/Working_Paper/HFRC_Working_Paper_Series_No14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Duan, J. C., and E. V. Laere. 2012. “A Public Good Approach to Credit Ratings – From Concept to Reality.” Journal of Banking & Finance 36 (12): 3239–3247. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch. 2015 Mar 9. Shipping Companies: Criteria. .
   Google Scholar
• Franek, J., and A. Kresta. 2014. “Judgment Scales and Consistency Measure in AHP.” Procedia Economics and Finance 12: 164–173. doi:10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3.
   Google Scholar
• Gavalas, D., and T. Syriopoulos. 2013. “Bank Loan Quality and Credit Risk Exposure: A Multi-Criteria Decision Approach to Collateral Selection in Shipping.” Economics World 1 (1): 59–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gavalas, D., and T. Syriopoulos. 2015. “An Integrated Credit Rating and Loan Quality Model: Application to Bank Shipping Finance.” Maritime Policy & Management 42 (5–6): 533. doi:10.1080/03088839.2014.904948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, S. X., H. Q. Ye, and Y. Y. Zeng. 2013. “Impacts of the Recent Financial Crisis on Ship Financing in Hong Kong: A Research Note.” Maritime Policy & Management 40 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.745202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulielmos, A. M., and M. Psifia. 2006. “Shipping Finance: Time to Follow a New Track?” Maritime Policy & Management 33 (3): 301–320. doi:10.1080/03088830600783301.
   Google Scholar
• Grammenos, C. T., and A. G. Arkoulis. 2003. “Determinants of Spreads on New High Yield Bonds of Shipping Companies.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 39 (6): 459–471. doi:10.1016/S1366-5545(03)00054-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, D., M. Gross, J. Paredes, and M. Sydow. 2013. Modeling Banking, Sovereign, and Macro Risk in a CCA Global VaR. Working Paper WP/13/218. IMF. doi:10.5089/9781484322185.001.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S. I., A. V. Thakor, and A. W. A. Boot, ed. 2016. “Spot Lending and Credit Risk.” Chap 7 In: Contemporary Financial Intermediation, 133–168. London: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-405196-6.00007-0.
   Google Scholar
• Gyory, R. 1962. “Security at Sea: A Review of the Preferred Ship Mortgage.” Fordham Law Review 31 (2): 231–276.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D., G. Newell, and A. Walker. 2005. “The Importance of Property-Specific Attributes in Assessing CBD Office Building Quality.” Journal of Property Investment & Finance 23 (5): 424–444. doi:10.1108/14635780510616025.
   Google Scholar
• Hollmann, M. 2016 Feb 25. “Shipping Bank DVB Posts All-Time High Risk Costs.” IHS Maritime. . http://fairplay.ihs.com/commerce/article/4263056/shipping-bank-dvb-posts-all-tim-high-risk-costs
   Google Scholar
• Ilker, M. A., and K. Ahmet. 2013. “Evaluating the Relative Efficiency of Commercial Banks in Turkey: An Integrated AHP/DEA Approach.” International Business Research 6 (4): 129–146. doi:10.5539/ibr.v6n4p129.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P., D. J. Maude, and W. Perraudin. 1998. Bank Capital and Value at Risk. Bank of England Working Paper No. 79. Bank of England London. doi:10.2139/ssrn.87288.
   Google Scholar
• Kavussanos, M. G., and D. A. Tsouknidis. 2016. “Default Risk Drivers in Shipping Bank Loans.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 94: 71–94. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2016.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeny, R. L., and H. Raiffa. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Khayatmoghadam, S., and S. Seraj. 2013. “Identifying and Prioritizing Effective Factors on Classifying a Private Bank Customers by Delphi Technique and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).” Journal of Soft Computing and Applications 1–12. doi:10.5899/2013/jsca-00013.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, I. H. 2017. “Legal Implications of Hanjin Shipping’s Rehabilitation Proceeding.” Hong Kong Law Journal 47 (3): 915–935.
   Google Scholar
• Koetter, M., and D. Porath. 2007. Efficient, Profitable and Safe Banking: An Oxymoron? Evidence from a Panel VaR Approach. Discussion Paper Series 2: Banking and Financial Studies No 02/2007. Deutsche Bundesbank. Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Kubicz, J., M. Hämmerling, and N. Walczak. 2015. “The Use of AHP Method for the Determination of the Most Environmentally Beneficial Variants of Barrages.” Journal of Ecological Engineering 16 (4): 36–43. doi:10.12911/22998993/59345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, V. S., B. K. Wong, and W. Cheung. 2002. “Group Decision Making in A Multiple Criteria Environment: A Case Using the AHP in the Software Selection.” European Journal of Operational Research 37 (1): 134–144. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00084-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. M., C. Y. Jung, and J. Y. Lee. 2010. “The Combat Effectiveness Analysis of Attack Helicopter Using Simulation and AHP.” [In Korean.] Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation 19 (3): 63–70.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. K., G. Mogi, and J. W. Kim. 2008. “Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Measuring Relative Efficiency of Greenhouse Gas Technologies: AHP/DEA Hybrid Model Approach.” International Association of Engineers 16 (4): 493–497.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, X., and J. B. Yang. 2001. Introduction to Multi-Criteria Decision Making and the Evidential Reasoning Approach. Working Paper No.0106. University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology. Manchester School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Lozinskaia, A., A. Merikas, A. Merica, and H. Penikas. 2017. “Determinants of the Probability of Default: The Case of the Internationally Listed Shipping Corporations.” Maritime Policy & Management 44 (7): 837–858. doi:10.1080/03088839.2017.1345018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniati, M., and E. Sambracos. 2017. “Decision-Making Process in Shipping Finance: A Stochastic Approach.” Cogent Economics & Finance 5 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/23322039.2017.1317083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh. 2011. “Charter Default Insurance (Company Brochure).” https://www.marsh.com/content/dam/marsh/Documents/PDF/US-en/Marine%20Charter%20Default%20Insurance%20brochure-01-2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitroussi, K., W. Abouarghoub, J. J. Haider, S. J. Pettit, and N. Tigka. 2016. “Performance Drivers of Shipping Loans: An Empirical Investigation.” International Journal of Production Economics 171 (3): 438–452. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.09.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montibeller, G., and A. Franco. 2010. ““Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Strategic Decision Making.” Chap 2 In: Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis (Applied Optimization), edited by Zopounidis, C., and P. M. Pardalos, 25–48. Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92828-7_2.
   Google Scholar
• Moody’s. 2010 Nov 23. Rating Methodology: Moody’s Approach to Rating Shipping Loans for Structured Finance Transactions. .
   Google Scholar
• Moody’s. 2014 Feb 24. Rating Methodology: Global Shipping Industry. .
   Google Scholar
• Nord/LB. 2016. Nord/LB Group Presentation. https://www.nordlb.de/fileadmin/redaktion_en/branchen/investorrelations/praesentationen/NORDLB_Group_Presentation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2007. Report on Ship Financing. OECD Council Working Party on Shipbuilding (WP6). http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/47128870.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Onyiriuba, L. 2016. ““Credit Analysis Memorandum Fitted for Banks in Emerging Markets.” Chap 27 In Emerging Market Bank Lending and Credit Risk Control, 471–499. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Panayides, P. M., N. Lambertides, and K. Cullinane. 2013. “Liquidity Risk Premium and Asset Pricing in US Water Transportation.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 52: 3–15. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2012.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. H. 2017. Bankrupt Hanjin Shipping’s Creditor Banks Are Well-Reserved. Moody’s. https://distressions.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/170220-Moodys-Outlook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Parker, M., P. Almeida, R. Burke, and M. McCarthy. 2017 Jan 25. The Changing Face of Shipping and Finance in the Next Decade: Lessons Learned, New Attitudes, the Role of Shipping Banks. Panel Discussion at the 8th Annual London Ship Finance Forum. Interviewer: Lindsey Keeble. London. https://www.marinemoney.com/sites/marinemoney.com/files/1645%20Panel%20Discussion_1.mp3
   Google Scholar
• Paun, C., and V. Topan. 2016. “Capital Structure in the Global Shipping Industry.” Panoeconomicus 63 (3): 359–384. doi:10.2298/PAN1603359P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera, N., and M. Sutrisna. 2010. “The Use of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the Analysis of Delay Claims in Construction Projects in the UAE.” The Built & Human Environment Review 3 (1): 29–48.
   Google Scholar
• Petropoulos, T. 2015 Dec 1. “An Overview of the Global Ship Finance Industry.” Paper presented at the 28th Annual Ship Finance & Investment forum. London. Petrofin Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pittas, A., T. Wilson, P. Willems, and M. Steeman. 2017 Jan 25. The Most Important Issues Affecting Shipping and Ship Finance Today. Panel Discussion at the 8th Annual London Ship Finance Forum. Interviewer: Kevin Oates. London. https://www.marinemoney.com/speech/most-important-issues-affecting-shipping-and-ship-finance-today-panel-discussion
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, A. 2013. “Weathering the Tempest: The Impact of the Basel III Capital Accord on Asset Finance.” The Tennessee Journal of Business Law 14: 179–188.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 2008. “Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” International Journal of Services Sciences 1 (1): 83–98. doi:10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L., and M. Ozdemir. 2003. “Why the Magic Number Seven Plus or Minus Two.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 38: 233–244. doi:10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90083-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safizadeh, H., and A. Fatemi. 1991. “A Logit Methodology for Predicting the Imposition of Exchange Controls.” Journal of Economics & Business 43 (4): 389–401. doi:10.1016/0148-6195(91)90034-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambracos, E., and M. Maniati. 2013. “Financing Shipping Market: Special Characteristics and the Impact of Basel III.” Journal of Advanced Studies in Finance 4 (2): 115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Sanga, C., and I. M. Venter. 2009. “Is a Multi-Criteria Evaluation Tool Reserved for Experts?” Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 12 (2): 185–196.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, W., and K. X. Li. 2017. “Themes and Tools of Maritime Transport Research during 2000–2014.” Maritime Policy & Management 44 (2): 151–169. doi:10.1080/03088839.2016.1274833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. 2002 Oct 31. “Setting the Scene, Identifying the Objectives.” Paper presented at the Marine Investments Financing Forum. Amsterdam. http://www.clarksons.net/archive/research/freestuff/fifty_years_of_ship_finance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stopford, M. 2009. Maritime Economics. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Syriopoulos, T. 2007. “Financing Greek Shipping: Modern Instruments, Methods and Markets.” Research in Transportation Economics 21: 171–219. doi:10.1016/S0739-8859(07)21006-6.
   Google Scholar
• Syriopoulos, T. 2010. ““Shipping Finance and International Capital Markets.” Chapter 28.” In: The Handbook of Maritime Economics and Business, edited by Gremmenos C. T., 811–850. UK: Lloyd’s List.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya, O. S., and S. Kumar. 2006. “Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications.” European Journal of Operational Research 169 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedley, W. C. 1993. “Consistency Prediction for Incomplete AHP Matrices.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 17 (415): 151–161. doi:10.1016/0895-7177(93)90183-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weltman, G, ed. 2017 Feb 2. “The Week in Review: 2016 Annual Report, Full Year Update.” Marine Money (Freshly Minted) 17 (5): 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Wicklein, R., P. C. Smith, and S. J. Kim. 2009. “Essential Concepts of Engineering Design Curriculum in Secondary Technology Education.” Journal of Technology Education 20 (2): 65–80. doi:10.21061/jte.v20i2.a.5.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. P., and C. L. Hwang. 1995. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. 1st ed. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, K. F., and V. V. Thai. 2017. “Corporate Social Responsibility and Service Quality Provision in Shipping Firms: Financial Synergies or Trade-Offs?” Maritime Policy & Management 44 (1): 131–146. doi:10.1080/03088839.2016.1237782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, H., C. Miao, Z. Shen, and Y. Feng. 2014. “Comparing the Learning Effectiveness of BP, ElM, I-ElM, and SVM for Corporate Credit Ratings.” Neurocomputing 128: 285–295. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.02.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zopounidis, C., and M. Doumpos. 2013. “Multicriteria Decision Systems for Financial Problems.” Top 21 (2): 241–261. doi:10.1007/s11750-013-0279-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar