Publication Cover
Maritime Policy & Management
The flagship journal of international shipping and port research
Volume 46, 2019 - Issue 5
583
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Benefit, cost, and size of an emission control area: a simulation approach for spatial relationships

ORCID Icon

References

  • AEA Technology, TNO, IVL & EMRC. 2010. Cost Benefit Analysis to Support the Impact Assessment Accompanying the Revision of Directive 1999/32/EC on the Sulphur Content of Certain Liquid Fuels (Prepared for the European Commission). Harwell: AEA Technology.
  • Antturi, J., O. Hänninen, J.-P. Jalkanen, L. Johansson, M. Prank, M. Sofiev, and M. Ollikainen. 2016. “Costs and Benefits of Low-Sulphur Fuel Standard for Baltic Sea Shipping.” Journal of Environmental Management 184: 431–440. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.064.
  • Balland, O., S. Erikstad, and K. Fagerholt. 2012. “Optimized Selection of Air Emission Controls for Vessels.” Maritime Policy & Management 39 (4): 387–400. doi:10.1080/03088839.2012.689877.
  • Balland, O., S. Erikstad, K. Fagerholt, and S. Wallace. 2013. “Planning Vessel Air Emission Regulations Compliance under Uncertainty.” Journal of Marine Science and Technology 18 (3): 349–357. doi:10.1007/s00773-013-0212-7.
  • Basham, J. 2001. “Application of COMEAP Dose–Response Coefficients within a Regulatory Health Impact Assessment Methodology.” Journal of Public Health Medicine 23 (3): 212–218. doi:10.1093/pubmed/23.3.212.
  • Brynolf, S., F. Baldi, and H. Johnson. 2016. “Energy Efficiency and Fuel Changes to Reduce Environmental Impacts, Shipping and the Environment.” Shipping and the Environment, Springer, 295–339. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-49045-7_10.
  • Buhaug, Ø., J. J. Corbett, Ø. Endresen, V. Eyring, J. Faber, S. Hanayama, D. S. Lee, et al. 2009. Second IMO GHG Study 2009. London: IMO.
  • Chang, Y.-T., Y. Roh, and H. Park. 2014. “Assessing Noxious Gases of Vessel Operations in a Potential Emission Control Area.” Transportation Research Part D 28: 91–97. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.03.003.
  • COMEAP (Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants). 1998. Quantification of the Effects of Air Pollution on Health in the United Kingdom. London: Stationary Office.
  • Corbett, J. J., J. J. Winebrake, E. H. Green, P. Kasibhatla, V. Eyring, and A. Lauer. 2007. “Mortality from Ship Emissions: A Global Assessment.” Environmental Science and Technology 41 (24): 8512–8518.
  • Cui, Q. 2017. “Environmental Efficiency Measures for Ports: An Application of RAM-Tobit-RAM with Undesirable Outputs.” Maritime Policy & Management 44 (5): 551–564. doi:10.1080/03088839.2017.1319982.
  • Delucchi, M. A. 2003. “Environmental Externalities of Motor Vehicle Use.” In Handbook of Transport and the Environment, edited by D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, 429–449. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Entec. 2009. Impact Assessment for the Revised Annex VI of MARPOL, Final Supporting Report. London: Entec.
  • Entec. 2010. Study to Review Assessments Undertaken of the Revised MARPOL Annex VI Regulations. London: Entec.
  • EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2010. Designation of North American Emission Control Area to Reduce Emissions from Ships: Regulatory Announcement. Ann Arbor: EPA. Accessed September 20 2015. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/nonroad/marine/ci/420f10015.pdf
  • Fagerholt, K., N. T. Gausel, J. G. Rakke, and H. N. Psaraftis. 2015. “Maritime Routing and Speed Optimization with Emission Control Areas.” Transportation Research Part C 52: 57–73. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.010.
  • Fagerholt, K., and H. N. Psaraftis. 2015. “On Two Speed Optimization Problems for Ships that Sail in and Out of Emission Control Areas.” Transportation Research Part D 39: 56–64. doi:10.1016/j.trc.2014.12.010.
  • Fujita, M. 1989. Urban Economic Theory: Land Use and City Size. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gard, A. S. 2015. “China Introduces 0.50 Per Cent Sulphur Cap in Major Port Regions.” Gard Alert. Accessed 2 June 2018. http://www.gard.no/web/updates/content/20904877/gard-alert-china-introduces-050-per-cent-sulphur-cap-in-major-port-regions
  • Gard AS. 2016. “China Emission Control Areas – Update.” Gard Alert. Accessed 2 June 2018. http://www.gard.no/web/updates/content/20923234/gard-alert-china-emission-control-areas-update
  • Gu, Y., and S. W. Wallace. 2017. “Scrubber: A Potentially Overestimated Compliance Method for the Emission Control Areas: The Importance of Involving A Ship’s Sailing Pattern in the Evaluation.” Transportation Research Part D 55: 51–66. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.024.
  • Henderson, J. V. 1977. “Externalities in a Spatial Context: The Case of Air Pollution.” Journal of Public Economics 7: 89–110. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(77)90038-X.
  • IGCB (Interdepartmental Group on Costs and Benefits). 2007. An Economic Analysis to Inform the Air Quality Strategy. Norwich: Stationary Office.
  • IMO (International Maritime Organization). 2015. Third IMO Greenhouse Gas Study 2014. London: IMO.
  • Jiang, L., J. Kronbaka, and L. P. Christensen. 2014. “The Costs and Benefits of Sulphur Reduction Measures: Sulphur Scrubbers versus Marine Gas Oil.” Transportation Research Part D 28: 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005.
  • Johansson, J., J.-P. Jalkanen, J. Kalli, and J. Kukkonen. 2013. “The Evolution of Shipping Emissions and the Costs of Regulation Changes in the Northern EU Area.” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 13: 11375–11389. doi:10.5194/acp-13-11375-2013.
  • Kanemoto, Y. 1987. “Externalities in Space.” In Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics 11: Urban Dynamics and Urban Externalities, edited by T. Miyao and Y. Kanemoto, 43–103. Chur: Harwood Academic Publisher GmbH.
  • Kawakami, T. 2012. Atmospheric Environmental Engineering. Tokyo: Corona Publishing. [in Japanese]
  • Kishimoto, A. 2003. “Current Situation and Issues in the Evaluation of Health Effects by Particulate Matter.” mimeo. [in Japanese]. Accessed 20 September 2015. https://unit.aist.go.jp/riss/crm/030124kishimoto.pdf
  • Lindstad, H., I. Sandaas, and A. H. Strømman. 2015. “Assessment of Cost as a Function of Abatement Options in Maritime Emission Control Areas.” Transportation Research Part D 38: 41–48. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.04.018.
  • MarineTraffic. 2018. “Live map.” Accessed 26 May 2018. https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:-120.4/centery:41.6/zoom:5
  • McCubbin, D. R., and M. A. Delucchi. 2003. “The Health Effects of Motor Vehicle-Related Air Pollution.” In Handbook of Transport and the Environment, edited by D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, 411–427. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • Miyao, T., P. Shapiro, and D. Knapp. 1980. “On the Existence, Uniqueness and Stability of Spatial Equilibrium in an Open City with Externalities.” Journal of Urban Economics 8 (2): 139–149. doi:10.1016/0094-1190(80)90041-8.
  • MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism). 2012. Development of Atmospheric Simulation Model, and Results on Reproduction of Current Situation and on Future Forecast by the Simulation, Material for Technical Committee on Emission Control Area. Tokyo: MLIT. [in Japanese].
  • Nikopoulou, Z. 2017. “Incremental Costs for Reduction of Air Pollution from Ships: A Case Study on North European Emission Control Area.” Maritime Policy & Management 44 (8): 1056–1077. doi:10.1080/03088839.2017.1342878.
  • Parker, D. C. 2007. “Revealing “Space” in Spatial Externalities: Edge-Effect: Externalities and Spatial Incentives.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54: 84–99. doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.004.
  • Pasquill, F., and F. B. Smith. 1983. Atmospheric Diffusion: The Dispersion of Windborne Material from Industrial and Other Sources. West Sussex: Ellis Horwood.
  • Qiu, X., E. Y. C. Wong, and J. S. L. Lam. 2018. “Evaluating Economic and Environmental Value of Liner Vessel Sharing along the Maritime Silk Road.” Maritime Policy & Management 45 (3): 336–350. doi:10.1080/03088839.2018.1437285.
  • Shen, C. 2016. “China’s ECA Plan: The Mix of Hopes and Uncertainties.” Lloyd’s List, January 29.
  • Shirota, H., T. Yokoi, M. Kameyama, and K. Harumi. 2013. “Preparation of Ship Emission Data on Concentrations of Air Pollutants in the Present Status and Future”. Papers of National Maritime Research Institute. 13(3):383–416. [in Japanese]. Accessed February 8 2018. http://www.nmri.go.jp/oldpages/main/publications/paper/pdf/21/13/03/PNM21130301-00.pdf
  • Simon, C. P., and L. E. Blume. 1994. Mathematics for Economists. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • Sportisse, B. 2010. Fundamentals in Air Pollution: From Processes to Modelling. Springer.
  • Stull, W. J. 1974. “Land Use and Zoning in an Urban Economy.” American Economic Review 64 (3): 337–347.
  • Sutton, O. 1947. “The Theoretical Distribution of Airborne Pollution from Factory Chimneys.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 73: 426–436. doi:10.1002/qj.49707331715.
  • Swedish Maritime Administration. 2009. Consequences of the IMO’s New Marine Sulphur Fuel Regulations. Norrköping: Swedish Maritime Administration. Accessed August 16 2016. http://www.sjofartsverket.se/pages/22117/Engelsk%20version%20-%20SOx.pdf
  • Tsukamoto, H. 2004. Practice of the Diffusion Equation by Computer. Tokyo: Environmental Research and Control Center. [in Japanese].
  • Tzannatos, E. 2010. “Costs and Benefits of Reducing SO2 Emissions from Shipping in the Greek Seas.” Maritime Economics & Logistics 12: 280–294. doi:10.1057/mel.2010.9.
  • Wainwright, K., and A. C. Chiang. 2005. Fundamental Methods of Mathematical Economics. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Wang, C., and J. J. Corbett. 2007. “The Costs and Benefits of Reducing SO2 Emissions from Ships in the US West Coastal Waters.” Transportation Research Part D 12: 577–588. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2007.08.003.
  • Wang, C., J. J. Corbett, and J. J. Winebrake. 2007. “Cost-Effectiveness of Reducing Sulfur Emissions from Ships.” Environmental Science & Technology 41 (24): 8233–8239. doi:10.1021/es070812w.
  • Zannetti, P., ed. 1990. Air Pollution Modeling: Theories, Computational Methods and Available Software. New York: Springer.
  • Zhu, S., X. Fu, A. K. Y. Ng, M. Luo, and Y.-E. Ge. 2018. “The Environmental Costs and Economic Implications of Container Shipping on the Northern Sea Route.” Maritime Policy & Management 45: 456–477. doi:10.1080/03088839.2018.1443228.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.