310
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Acoustic emission technology can warn of impending iatrogenic femur fracture during femoral canal preparation for uncemented hip replacement. A cadaveric animal bone study

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 72-87 | Received 19 Feb 2017, Accepted 28 Nov 2017, Published online: 21 Mar 2018

References

  • Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome after total hip arthroplasty, I: general health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish national total hip arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:354–359.
  • Mallory TH, Lombardi AV, Jr., Leith JR, et al. Why a taper? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(Suppl 2):81–89.
  • Dennis D, Lynch C, Total hip arthroplasty. In: Callaghan J, Rosenberg A, Rubash H, editors. The adult hip. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
  • Rashid MS, Pullin R. The sound of orthopaedic surgery – the application of acoustic emission technology in orthopaedic surgery: a review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24: 24:1–6.
  • Kapur RA. Acoustic emission in orthopaedics: a state of the art review. J Biomech. 2016; 49:4065–4072.
  • Pollard H. Sound waves in solids. London: Pioneer Publishers; 1977. p. 269–78.
  • Leichter I, Bivas A, Margulies J, et al. Acoustic emission from trabecular bone during mechanical testing: the effect of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med. 1990;204:123–127.
  • Wright T, Vosburgh F, Burstein A. Permanent deformation of compact bone monitored by acoustic emission. J Biomech. 1981;14:405–409.
  • Dunegan H, Harris D. Acoustic emission – a new nondestructive testing tool. Ultrasonics. 1989;7:160–166.
  • James D, Carpenter S. Relationship between acoustic emission and dislocation kinetics in crystalline solids. J Appl Phys. 1971;42:4685–4697.
  • Hanagud S, Clinton R, editors. Acoustic emission techniques in the development of a diagnostic tool for osteoporosis. IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, New York, p. 41; 1975.
  • Rajachar R, Chow D, Curtis C, et al. Use of acoustic emission to characterize focal and diffuse microdamage in bone. In: Vahaviolos S, editor. Acoustic emission: standards and technology update. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1999.
  • Hanagud S, Hannon G, Clinton R, editors. Acoustic emission and diagnosis of osteoporosis. IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, New York; 1974.
  • Sugiyama H, Whiteside L, Kaiser A. Examination of rotational fixation of the femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. A mechanical study of micromovement and acoustic emission. Clin Orthrop Related Res. 1989;249:122–128.
  • Jonsson U, Eriksson K. Microcracking in dog bone under load. A biomechanical study of bone visco-elasticity. Acta Orthop Scand. 1984;55:441–445.
  • Hanagud S, Clinton R, Lopez J, editors. Acoustic emission in bone substance. Proceedings of the ASME Symposium on Biomechanics, New York; 1973.
  • Fischer R, Arms S, Pope M, et al. Analysis of the effect of using two different strain rates on the acoustic emission in bone. J Biomech. 1986;19:119–127.
  • Laine H, Lehto M, Moilanen T. Diversity of the proximal femoral medullary canal. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:86–92.
  • Massin P, Geais L, Astoin E, et al. The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems: a frontal plane radiographic study of the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:93–101.
  • Noble P, Alexander J, Lindahl L, et al. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Related Res. 1988;235:148–165.
  • Noble P, Box G, Kamaric E, et al. The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop Related Res. 1995;316:31–44.
  • Rubin P, Leyvraz P, Aubaniac J, et al. The morphology of the proximal femur: a three-dimensional radiographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:28–32.
  • Van Haaren E, Van Der Zwaard B, Van Der Veen A, et al. Effect of long-term preservation on the mechanical properties of cortical bone in goats. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:708–716.
  • Goh J, Ang E, Bose K. Effect of preservation medium on the mechanical properties of cat bones. Acta Orthop Scand 1989;60:465–467.
  • Nazarianac A, Hermannsona B, Mullera J, et al. Effects of tissue preservation on murine bone mechanical properties. J Biomech. 2009;42:82–86.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.