A survey of breast cancer screening techniques: thermography and electrical impedance tomography

References

• What is Cancer? National Cancer Institute. 2015 [cited 2019 Mar 3] Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/what-is-cancer.
   Google Scholar
• Mambou S, Maresova P, Krejcar O. Breast cancer detection using infrared thermal imaging and a deep learning model. Sensors. 2018;18(9):2799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Bond EJ, Van Veen BD, et al. An overview of ultra-wideband microwave imaging via space-time beamforming for early-stage breast-cancer detection. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2005;47(1):19–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten O, Wilmoth JR. The cancer transition in japan since 1951. DemRes. 2002;7:271–306.
   Google Scholar
• Omran A. The epidemiologic transition: a theory of the epidemiology of population change. Milbank Q. 2005;83:731–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray F, Jemal A, Grey N, et al. Global cancer transitions according to the human development index (2008–2030): a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):790–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maule M, Merletti F. Cancer transition and priorities for cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):745–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• All Cancer Globocan 2018. International Agency for Research on Cancer WHO. [cited 2019 Mar 3] Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/39-All-cancers-fact-sheet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Remennick L. The challenge of early breast cancer detection among immigrant and minority women in multicultural societies. Breast J. 2006;12(s1):S103–S110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Women’s Health Insurance Coverage - Kaiser Family Foundation. 2018. [cited 2019 Mar 3] Available from: https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/fact-sheet/womens-health-insurance-coverage-fact-sheet/.
   Google Scholar
• Kandlikar SG, Perez-Raya I, Raghupathi PA, et al. Infrared imaging technology for breast cancer detection–current status, protocols and new directions. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2017;108:2303–2320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, et al. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):738–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gøtzsche PC, Jørgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1(6):CD001877.
   Google Scholar
• Løberg M, Lousdal ML, Bretthauer M, et al. Benefits and harms of mammography screening. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17(1):63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Eschenbach AC. Nci remains committed to current mammography guidelines. Oncologist. 2002;7(3):170–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schousboe JT, Kerlikowske K, Loh A, et al. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(1):10–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner E. Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(11):1025–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Lee K, Ha U, et al. A 4.9 mω-sensitivity mobile electrical impedance tomography ic for early breast-cancer detection system. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits. 2015;50(1):245–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder DS. Electrical impedance tomography: methods, history and applications. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Morimoto T, Kimura S, Konishi Y, et al. A study of the electrical bio-impedance of tumors. J Invest Surg. 1993;6(1):25–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jossinet J. Variability of impedivity in normal and pathological breast tissue. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1996;34(5):346–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye G, Lim KH, George RT Jr, et al. 3d eit for breast cancer imaging: System, measurements, and reconstruction. Microw Opt Technol Lett. 2008;50(12):3261–3271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrício M, Pereira J, Crisóstomo J, et al. Using resistin, glucose, age and bmi to predict the presence of breast cancer. BMC cancer. 2018;18(1):29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawcz Yk B, Schaefer G, Zhu SY. Breast cancer identification based on thermal analysis and a clustering and selection classification ensemble. International Conference on Brain and Health Informatics; 2013 Oct 29–31; Maebashi, Japan. Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Jones BF. A reappraisal of the use of infrared thermal image analysis in medicine. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998;17(6):1019–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautherie M. Thermobiological assessment of benign and malignant breast diseases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;147(8):861–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Prevent Biomarkers. 2006;15(6):1159–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursin G, Hovanessian-Larsen L, Parisky YR, et al. Greatly increased occurrence of breast cancers in areas of mammographically dense tissue. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(5):R605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Sun L, Miller N, et al. The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Prevent Biomarkers. 2005;14(2):343–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontos M, Wilson R, Fentiman I. Digital infrared thermal imaging (diti) of breast lesions: sensitivity and specificity of detection of primary breast cancers. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(6):536–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskowitz M, Milbrath J, Gartside P, et al. Lack of efficacy of thermography as a screening tool for minimal and stage i breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1976;295(5):249–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Threatt B, Norbeck JM, Ullman NS, et al. Thermography and breast cancer. an analysis of a blind reading. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1980;335(1):501–519.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawson R. Implications of surface temperatures in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J. 1956;75(4):309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Massopust LC, Gardner WD. The infrared phlebogram in the diagnosis of breast complaints. an analysis of 1,200 cases. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1953;97(5):619–629.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawson R. A new infrared imaging device. Can Med Assoc J. 1958;79(5):402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alt LL, Lawson RN. Diagnostic thermography method and means; 1967. US Patent 3,335,716.
   Google Scholar
• Vogler WR, Powell RW. A clinical evaluation of thermography and heptyl adehyde in breast cancer detection. Cancer Res.. 1959;19(2):207–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams KL, Williams FL, Handley R. Infra-red radiation thermometry in clinical practice. Lancet. 1960;2 (7157):958–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell WL. Apparatus for use in differential clinical thermometry; 1967. US Patent 3,339,542.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield CM, Dodd GD, Wallace JD, et al. Use of heat-sensing devices in cancer therapy: a preliminary study. Radiology. 1968;91(4):673–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swearingen AG. Thermography: Report of the radiographic and thermographic examinations of the breasts of 100 patients. Radiology. 1965;85(5):818–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes RB, Engborg NE. Thermographic scanner and recorder; 1970. US Patent 3,531,642.
   Google Scholar
• Bowling BR. Process of diagnosis by infrared thermography; 1966. US Patent 3,245,402.
   Google Scholar
• Isard HJ, Becker W, Shilo R, et al. Breast thermography after four years and 10,000 studies. Am J Roentgenol. 1972;115(4):811–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbar M. Clinical thermal imaging today. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 1998;17(4):25–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng EK. A review of thermography as promising non-invasive detection modality for breast tumor. Int J Ther Sci. 2009;48(5):849–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng Y, Ung L, Ng F, et al. Statistical analysis of healthy and malignant breast thermography. J Med Engineer Technol. 2001;25(6):253–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ng E, Ung L, et al. Patterns and cyclic variations of thermography in female breasts. Proceedings of ICMMB-11: International Conference on Mechanics in Medicine and Biology; 2000 Apr 2–5; Maui, Hawaii, USA; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Arena F, Barone C, DiCicco T. Use of digital infrared imaging in enhanced breast cancer detection and monitoring of the clinical response to treatment. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No. 03CH37439), Vol. 2; 2003 Sept 17–21; Cancún, Mexico. IEEE; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge P, Wrobel L. An inverse geometry problem for the localisation of skin tumours by thermal analysis. Engineer Anal Boundary Elements. 2007;31(10):803–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das K, Mishra SC. Estimation of tumor characteristics in a breast tissue with known skin surface temperature. J Ther Biol. 2013;38(6):311–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy DA, Lee T, Seely D. A comparative review of thermography as a breast cancer screening technique. Integr Cancer Ther. 2009;8(1):9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya UR, Ng EYK, Tan JH, et al. Thermography based breast cancer detection using texture features and support vector machine. J Med Syst. 2012;36(3):1503–1510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques RS. automatic segmentation of thermal mammogram images, dissertation. In: Instituto de computação universidade federal fluminense; 2012. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva TE. a methodology for the diagnosis of breast diseases from dynamic thermographs. Niterói, RJ, Brasil; 2015. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer G, Závišek M, Nakashima T. Thermography based breast cancer analysis using statistical features and fuzzy classification. Patter Recogn. 2009;42(6):1133–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo MC, Lima RC, De Souza RM. Interval symbolic feature extraction for thermography breast cancer detection. Exper Sys Appl. 2014;41(15):6728–6737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva L, Saade D, Sequeiros G, et al. A new database for breast research with infrared image. J Med Imaging Hlth Inform. 2014;4(1):92–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EK, Fok S, Peh Y, et al. Computerized detection of breast cancer with artificial intelligence and thermograms. J Med Engineer Technol. 2002;26(4):152–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng E, Kee E. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography. J Med Eng Technol. 2008;32(2):103–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yassin NI, Omran S, El Houby EM, et al. Machine learning techniques for breast cancer computer aided diagnosis using different image modalities: a systematic review. Comp Method Prog Biomed. 2018;156:25–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchartt TB, Conci A, Lima RC, et al. Breast thermography from an image processing viewpoint: a survey. Signal Proc. 2013;93(10):2785–2803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoudzadeh E, Montazeri M, Zekri M, et al. Extended hidden markov model for optimized segmentation of breast thermography images. Infra Phy Technol. 2015;72:19–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathish D, Kamath S, Prasad K, et al. Role of normalization of breast thermogram images and automatic classification of breast cancer. Vis Comput. 2019;35:57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva LF, Santos AAS, Bravo RS, et al. Hybrid analysis for indicating patients with breast cancer using temperature time series. Computer Method Prog Biomed. 2016;130:142–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Recinella AN, Kandlikar SG, et al. Technology, application and potential of dynamic breast thermography for the detection of breast cancer. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2019;131:558–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joro R, Lääperi AL, Soimakallio S, et al. Dynamic infrared imaging in identification of breast cancer tissue with combined image processing and frequency analysis. J Med Eng Technol. 2008;32(4):325–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lugoda P, Hughes-Riley T, Morris R, et al. A wearable textile thermograph. Sensors. 2018;18(7):2369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogoi UR, Bhowmik MK, Bhattacharjee D, et al. Singular value based characterization and analysis of thermal patches for early breast abnormality detection. Aus Phys Eng Sci Med. 2018;41(4):861–879.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Herman C. Optimization of skin cooling by computational modeling for early thermographic detection of breast cancer. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2018;126:864–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo AAA, do Nascimento JG, Malheiros FC, et al. Breast tumor localization using skin surface temperatures from a 2d anatomic model without knowledge of the thermophysical properties. Comp Method Prog Biomed. 2019;172:65–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogoi UR, Majumdar G, Bhowmik MK, et al. Evaluating the efficiency of infrared breast thermography for early breast cancer risk prediction in asymptomatic population. Infra Phy Technol. 2019;99:201–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarigoz T, Ertan T, Topuz O, et al. Role of digital infrared thermal imaging in the diagnosis of breast mass: A pilot study: Diagnosis of breast mass by thermography. Infra Phy Technol. 2018;91:214–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennes HH. Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J Appl Physiol. 1948;1(2):93–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Q, Yang H, Xie S, et al. Detecting early breast tumour by finite element thermal analysis. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33(4):274–280.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kubicek W, Patterson R, Witsoe D. Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive method of monitoring cardiac function and other parameters of the cardiovascular system. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1970;170(2 International):724–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corredor S, Valbuena M, Zuluaga J, et al. Design and construction a measurer of total body water, fat mass and fat free mass using lab view In: 2014 III International Congress of Engineering Mechatronics and Automation (CIIMA); 2014 Oct 22–24; Cartagena, Colombia. IEEE; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brown BH. Electrical impedance tomography (eit): a review. J Med Engineer Technol. 2003;27(3):97–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Da Silva JE, De Sá JM, Jossinet J. Classification of breast tissue by electrical impedance spectroscopy. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000;38(1):26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Y, Guo Z. A review of electrical impedance techniques for breast cancer detection. Medical Engineer Phy. 2003;25(2):79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke H, Morse S. The electric capacity of tumors of the breast. J Cancer Res. 1926;10(3):340–376.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney M, Isaacson D, Newell JC, et al. Noser: an algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 1990;2(2):66–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stasiak M, Sikora J, Filipowicz SF, et al. Principal component analysis and artificial neural network approach to electrical impedance tomography problems approximated by multi-region boundary element method. Engineer Anal Boundary Elements. 2007;31(8):713–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng B, Lederman D, Sumkin JH, et al. A preliminary evaluation of multi-probe resonance-frequency electrical impedance based measurements of the breast. Acad Radiol. 2011;18(2):220–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetiye PC, Ghatol AA, Ghate VN. Neural network based breast cancer classifier using electrical impedance. 2012 Nirma University International Conference on Engineering (NUiCONE); 6–8 Dec 2012; Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, IEEE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Calle-Alonso F, Pérez C, Arias-Nicolás J, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis system: a bayesian hybrid classification method. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013;112(1):104–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarafshani A, Bach T, Chatwin CR, et al. Conditioning electrical impedance mammography system. Measurement. 2018;116:38–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojadinovic A, Nissan A, Gallimidi Z, et al. Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: preliminary results of a multicenter prospective clinical trial. JCO. 2005;23(12):2703–2715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeri Z, Shokoufi M, Jenab M, et al. Electrical impedance spectroscopy for breast cancer diagnosis: clinical study. Integr Cancer Sci Therap. 2016;3(6):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Pak D, Rozhkova N, Kireeva M, et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer using electrical impedance tomography. Biomed Eng. 2012;46(4):154–157.
   Google Scholar
• Assenheimer M, Laver-Moskovitz O, Malonek D, et al. The t-scantm technology: electrical impedance as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer detection. Physiol Meas. 2001;22(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halter RJ, Hartov A, Paulsen KD. A broadband high-frequency electrical impedance tomography system for breast imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55(2 Pt 1):650–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Wang P, Tang Y, et al. A new method to rapid identify benign and malignant breast lumps through bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. Med Phys. 2019;46(5):2522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlak HF, Gencer NG, Besikci C. Theoretical assessment of electro-thermal imaging: A new technique for medical diagnosis. Infra Phy Technol. 2016;76:227–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegaz GL, Guimarães G. Development of a new technique for breast tumor detection based on thermal impedance and a damage metric. Infra Phy Technol. 2019;97:401–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Anand S, Lall B, et al. Low-cost multifrequency electrical impedance-based system (mfeibs) for clinical imaging: design and performance evaluation. J Med Engineer Technol. 2018;42(4):274–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheney M, Isaacson D, Newell JC. Electrical impedance tomography. SIAM Rev. 1999;41(1):85–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore LE, Pfeiffer RM, Poscablo C, et al. Genomic dna hypomethylation as a biomarker for bladder cancer susceptibility in the spanish bladder cancer study: a case–control study. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(4):359–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur BK, Zhang H, Becker A, et al. Double-stranded dna in exosomes: a novel biomarker in cancer detection. Cell Res. 2014;24(6):766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofton-Day C, Model F, DeVos T, et al. DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem. 2008;54(2):414–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi Y, Absher DM, Gulzar ZG, et al. Dna methylation profiling reveals novel biomarkers and important roles for dna methyltransferases in prostate cancer. Genome Res. 2011;21(7):1017–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan K, Garcia-Closas M, Orr N, et al. Intragenic atm methylation in peripheral blood dna as a biomarker of breast cancer risk. Cancer Res. 2012;72(9):2304–2313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. J Mac Learn Res. 2011;12:2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadi M, Barham P, Chen J, et al. Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. 12th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation; 2016 Nov 2–4; Savannah, GA, USA; 2016.
   Google Scholar