Measurement latency significantly contributes to reduced heart rate measurement accuracy in wearable devices

References

• Reddy RK, Pooni R, Zaharieva DP, et al. Accuracy of Wrist-Worn Activity Monitors During Common Daily Physical Activities and Types of Structured Exercise: Evaluation Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(12):e10338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coughlin SS, Stewart J. Department of Clinical and Digital Health Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA. Use of consumer wearable devices to promote physical activity: a review of health intervention studies. JEHS. 2016;2(6):1–313.
   Google Scholar
• Wright SP, Hall Brown TS, Collier SR, et al. How consumer physical activity monitors could transform human physiology research. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 2017;312(3):R358–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engström E, Ottosson E, Wohlfart B, et al. Comparison of heart rate measured by Polar RS400 and ECG, validity and repeatability. Adv Physiother. 2012;14(3):115–122.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcellos FVA, Seabra A, Cunha FA, et al. Heart rate variability assessment with fingertip photoplethysmography and poler RS800cx as compared with electrocardiography in obese adolescents. Blood Press Monit. 2015;20(6):351–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallen MP, Gomersall SR, Keating SE, et al. Accuracy of heart rate watches: Implications for weight management. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154420–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl SE, An H-S, Dinkel DM, et al. How accurate are the wrist-based heart rate monitors during walking and running activities? Are they accurate enough?. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016;2(1):e000106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boudreaux BD, Hebert EP, Hollander DB, et al. Validity of Wearable Activity Monitors during Cycling and Resistance Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(3):624–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Støve MP, Haucke E, Nymann ML, et al. Accuracy of the wearable activity tracker Garmin Forerunner 235 for the assessment of heart rate during rest and activity. J Sports Sci. 2019;37:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillinov S, Etiwy M, Wang R, et al. Variable accuracy of wearable heart rate monitors during aerobic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49:1697–1703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzahrani A, Hu S, Azorin-Peris V, et al. A multi-channel opto-electronic sensor to accurately monitor heart rate against motion artefact during exercise. Sensors. 2015;15(10):25681–25702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallow AB, Tarumi T, Tanaka H. Influence of skin type and wavelength on light wave reflectance. J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27(3):313–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Lee J, Jung W, et al. The periodic moving average filter for removing motion artifacts from PPG signals. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2007;5:701–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley EE, Golaszewski NM, Bartholomew JB. Estimating accuracy at exercise intensities: a comparative study of self-monitoring heart rate and physical activity wearable devices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017;5(3):e34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spierer DK, Rosen Z, Litman LL, et al. Validation of photoplethysmography as a method to detect heart rate during rest and exercise. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(5):264–271.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shcherbina A, Mattsson C, Waggott D, et al. Accuracy in wrist-worn, sensor-based measurements of heart rate and energy expenditure in a diverse cohort. JPM. 2017;7(2):3.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler DT, Villajuan SO, Edkins L, et al. Wearable heart rate monitor technology accuracy in research: A comparative study between PPG and ECG technology. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc. 2017;2017;61(1):1292–1296.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JM, Kim Y, Welk GJ. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(9):1840–1848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rezende Barbosa MP, da C, Silva NT, da de Azevedo FM, et al. Comparison of Polar?? RS800G3??? heart rate monitor with Polar?? S810i??? and electrocardiogram to obtain the series of RR intervals and analysis of heart rate variability at rest. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016;36(2):112–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunan D, Gay D, Jakovljevic DG, Hodges LD, et al. Validity and reliability of short-term heart-rate variability from the Polar S810. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(1):243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilgen-Ammann R, Schweizer T, Wyss T. RR interval signal quality of a heart rate monitor and an ECG Holter at rest and during exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119(7):1525–1532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woldaregay AZ, Muzny M, Henriksen A, et al. Using fitness trackers and smartwatches to measure physical activity in research: analysis of consumer wrist-worn wearables. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apple.com. When Apple Watch measures your heart rate n.d. [cited 2019 Nov 4]. Available from: https://support.apple.com/lv-lv/HT204666.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson BW, Allen NB. Accuracy of consumer wearable heart rate measurement during an ecologically valid 24-hour period: Intraindividual validation study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mays RJ, Boér NF, Mealey LM, et al. A comparison of practical assessment methods to determine treadmill, cycle, and elliptical ergometer V̇O2peak. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24:1325–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim I, Lai P-H, Lobo R, et al. Challenges in wearable personal health monitoring systems. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5264–5267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selvaraj N, Jaryal A, Santhosh J, et al. Assessment of heart rate variability derived from finger-tip photoplethysmography as compared to electrocardiography. J Med Eng Technol. 2008;32(6):479–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dvorak J, Havlik J. Pulse Transition Time in heamodynamic measurement. Int Conf Appl Electron. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Parak J, Korhonen I. Evaluation of wearable consumer heart rate monitors based on photopletysmography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:3670–3673.
   Google Scholar
• Abt G, Bray J, Benson AC. The validity and inter-device variability of the Apple WatchTM for measuring maximal heart rate. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(13):1447–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey AM, Freedson PS. Utility of consumer physical activity trackers as an intervention tool in cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;58(6):613–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Støve MP, Larsen BT. Self-monitoring – usability evaluation of heart rate monitoring using wearable devices in patients with acquired brain injury. Eur J Physiother. 2019;0:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons EJ, Lewis ZH, Mayrsohn BG, Rowland JL. Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: a systematic content analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(8):e192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer A, Vagedes J. How accurate is pulse rate variability as an estimate of heart rate variability? A review on studies comparing photoplethysmographic technology with an electrocardiogram. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166(1):15–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen J. Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement. Physiol Meas. 2007;28(3):R1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):98–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar