ECG denoising and feature extraction techniques – a review

References

• Kasper DL, Fauci AS, Longo DL, et al. Harrison's principles of internal medicine. Vol. 2607, 16th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2005. p. 1313–1314.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi M, Aloiaastagnolo MD. Fast parallelized algorithm for ECG analysis. WSEAS Trans Biol Med. 2008;5(8):210–219.
   Google Scholar
• SarithaSukanya C, Narasingh Murty VY. ECG signal analysis using wavelet transformation. Bulg J Physics. 2008;3:68–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sörnmo L, Laguna P. 2005. Bioelectrical signal processing in cardiac and neurological applications. Vol. 8. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mallat S. 1999. A wavelet tour of signal processing. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Daqrouq K, Al-Qawasmi A-R. ECG enhancement using wavelet transform. WSEAS Trans Biol Biomed. 2010;7(2):62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Y-F, Lei D. Study on wavelet transform in the processing for ECG signals. World congress on Software Engineering, IEEE; 2009. p. 515–518.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen GM ,Jannett TC ,Jadallah MA. A comprison of the noise sensitivity of nine QRS detection algorithms, biomedical engineering. New York: AAAI Press; 2007. p. 29–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Ge L. A method for reduction of noise in the ECG. In 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering. IEEE; 2008. p. 2119–2122.
   Google Scholar
• Gualsaquí M, Vizcaíno I, Proaño V, et al. ECG signal denoising using discrete wavelet transform: a comparative analysis of threshold values and functions. MSKN. 2018;9(1):105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Haykin S. Adaptive filter theory. 5th ed. Ontario Canada: Pearson, McMaster University; 2014. p. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dixit S, Nagaria D. LMS adaptive filters for noise cancellation: a review. IJECE. 2017;7(5):2520–2529.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Huang NE. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise assisted data analysis method. Adv Adapt Data Anal. 2009;01(01):1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas SC. Introduction to adaptive filters. In Madisetti VK, Williams DB, editors. Digital signal processing handbook. CRC Press LLC; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JW, Lee GK. Design of an adaptive filter with a dynamic structure for ECG signal processing. Int J Control Autom Syst. 2005;3(1):137–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehamby R, Singh B. Noise cancellation using adaptive filtering in ECG signals: application to biotelemetry. IJBSBT. 2016;8(2):237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Lastre-Domínguez C, Shmaliy YS, Ibarra-Manzano O, et al. ECG signal denoising and features extraction using unbiased FIR smoothing. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitzky A, Golay MJ. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem. 1964;36(8):1627–1639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birle A, Malviya S, Mittal D. Noise removal in ECG signal using Savitzky-Golay filter. IJARECE. 2015;4(5):1331–1333.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai S. Savitzky-Golay least-squares polynomial filters in ECG signal processing. In Computers in cardiology. IEEE; 2005. p. 763–766.
   Google Scholar
• Samann F, Schanze T. An efficient ECG denoising method using discrete wavelet with Savitzky-Golay filter. Curr Direct Biomed Eng. 2019;5(1):385–387.
   Google Scholar
• Huang H, Hu S, Sun Y. A discrete curvature estimation based low-distortion adaptive Savitzky–Golay filter for ECG denoising. Sensors. 2019;19(7):1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc Royal Soc London Series A Math Phys Eng Sci; 1998;454(1971):903–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Wei G. An integrated EMD adaptive threshold denoising method for reduction of noise in ECG. PLOS One. 2020;15(7):e0235330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Shahnawazuddin S, Pradhan G. Significance of modified empirical mode decomposition for ECG denoising. In 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE; 2017. p. 2956–2959.
   Google Scholar
• Dragomiretskiy K, Zosso D. Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2014;62(3):531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh P, Pradhan G. Variational mode decomposition based ECG denoising using non-local means and wavelet domain filtering. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2018;41(4):891–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahmiri S. Comparative study of ECG signal denoising by wavelet thresholding in empirical and variational mode decomposition domains. Healthc Technol Lett. 2014;1(3):104–109.
   Google Scholar
• Liu W, Chen W. Recent advancements in empirical wavelet transform and its applications. IEEE Access. 2019;7:103770–103780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilles J. Empirical wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2013;61(16):3999–4010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh O, Sunkaria RK. ECG signal denoising via empirical wavelet transform. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2017;40(1):219–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Liang Y, He P, et al. Adaptive motion artifact reduction based on empirical wavelet transform and wavelet thresholding for the non-contact ECG monitoring systems. Sensors. 2019;19(13):2916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kher R. Signal processing techniques for removing noise from ECG signals. J Biomed Eng Res. 2019;3:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Buendía-Fuentes F, Arnau-Vives MA, Arnau-Vives A, et al. High-bandpass filters in electrocardiography: source of error in the interpretation of the ST segment. ISRN Cardiol. 2012;2012:706217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Dahshan ESA. Genetic algorithm and wavelet hybrid scheme for ECG signal denoising. Telecommun Syst. 2011;46(3):209–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahay S, Wadhwani AK, Wadhwani S. A survey approach on ECG feature extraction techniques. IJCA. 2015;120(11):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad GK, Sahambi JS. Classification of ECG arrhythmias using multi-resolution analysis and neural networks. Vol. 1. In TENCON 2003. Conference on Convergent Technologies for Asia-Pacific Region. IEEE; 2003. p. 227–231.
   Google Scholar
• Jen K, Hwang Y. ECG feature extraction and classification using cepstrum and neural networks. J Med Biol Eng. 2008;28(1):31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro B, Kogan D, Geva AB. ECG feature extraction using optimal mother wavelet. In 21st IEEE Convention of the Electrical and Electronic Engineers in Israel, Proceedings (Cat. No. 00EX377). IEEE; 2000. p. 346–350.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Q, Zhang L. ECG feature extraction and classification using wavelet transform and support vector machines. Vol. 2. In 2005 International Conference on Neural Networks and Brain. IEEE; 2005. p. 1089–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Shinwari MF, Ahmed N, Humayun H, et al. Classification algorithm for feature extraction using linear discriminant analysis and cross-correlation on ECG signals. Int J Adv Sci Technol. 2012;48:149–162.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez R, Mexicano A, Bila J, et al. Feature extraction of electrocardiogram signals by applying adaptive threshold and principal component analysis. J Appl Res Technol. 2015;13(2):261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Mert A. ECG feature extraction based on the bandwidth properties of variational mode decomposition. Physiol Meas. 2016;37(4):530–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra S, Sharma A, Singh GK. Feature extraction of ECG signal. J Med Eng Technol. 2018;42(4):306–316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma T, Sharma KK. A new method for QRS detection in ECG signals using QRS-preserving filtering techniques. Biomed Tech. 2018;63(2):207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar