A numerical investigation of stress, strain, and bone density changes due to bone remodelling in the talus bone following total ankle arthroplasty

References

• Brunner S, Barg A, Knupp M, et al. The Scandinavian total ankle replacement long-term, eleven to Fifteen-Year, survivorship analysis of the prosthesis in seventy-two consecutive patients. J Bone & Joint Sur. 2013;95(8):711–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jastifer JR, Coughlin MJ. Long-term follow-up of mobile bearing total ankle arthroplasty in the United States. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(2):143–150. doi: 10.1177/1071100714550654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot JB, Gundapaneni D, Goswami T, et al. Finite element analysis of stress and wear characterization in total ankle replacements. J Mech Behv Biomed Mat. 2014;34:134–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa N, Walti M, Favre P, et al. Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high joint contact pressures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2010;92:1179–1187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gundapaneni D, Tsatalis TJ, Laughlin TR, et al. Wear characteristics of WSU total ankle replacement devices under shear and torsion loads. J Mech Behv Biomed Mat. 2015;44:202–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinelli N, Baretta1 S, Pagano J, et al. Contact stresses, pressure and area in a fixed bearing total ankle replacement: a finite element analysis. BMC Musc Dis. 2017;18:493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller CM, Smolinski P, Conti S, et al. Stresses in polyethylene lines in a semi constrained ankle prosthesis. J Biomech Engg. 2004;126(5):636–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozen M, Sayman O, Havitcioglu H, et al. Modelling and stress analyses of a normal foot-ankle and a prosthetic foot-ankle complex. Acta Bio & Biomech. 2013;15(3):19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putra AMS, Harun MN, Kadir MRA, et al. Polyethylene wear in total ankle replacement is influenced by its radial curvature: a computational wear simulation study. International Medical Device and Technology Conference 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Putra SMA, Harun NM, Ardiyanshyah S, et al. Study of wear prediction on total ankle replacement. Adv Mat Res. 2014;845:311–315.
   Google Scholar
• Reggiani B, Leardini A, Corazza F, et al. Finite element analysis of a total ankle replacement during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech. 2006;39:1435–1443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopher SR, Andrew AA, James DC, et al. Total ankle replacement design and positioning affect implant-bone micromotion and bone strains. Med Eng Phys. 2017;42:80–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrier A, Fernandes CS, Guillemin M, et al. Fixed and mobile bearing total ankle prostheses: effect on tibial bone strain. Clin Biomech. 2017;48:57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrier A, Larrea X, Guerdat J, et al. Development and experimental validation of a finite element model of total ankle replacement. J Biomech. 2014;47:742–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YLZ, Wong DWC, Cheng CK, et al. Finite element analysis of biomechanical effects of total ankle arthroplasty on the foot. J Ortho Trans. 2018;12:55–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei F, Hunley SC, Powell JW, et al. Development and validation of a computational model to study the effect of foot constraint on ankle injury due to the external rotation. Annals of Biomech Engg. 2011;39:756–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Ghosh R. The effects of implant orientations and implant–bone interfacial conditions on potential causes of failure of tibial component due to total ankle replacement. Journal of Med and Bio Engg. 2019;39:541–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Ghosh R. Effects of implant orientation and implant material on tibia bone strain, implant-bone micromotion, contact pressure, and wear depth due to total ankle replacement. Proc IMechE Part H: j Eng in Med. 2019;233(3):318–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh R, Gupta S. Bone remodelling around cementless composite acetabular components: the effects of implant geometry and implant-bone interfacial conditions. J Mech Behavior Biomed Mat. 2014;32:257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, et al. Adaptive bone-remodelling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech. 1987;20:1135–1150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter D, Orr TE, Fyhrie D. Relationships between bone loading history and femoral cancellous bone architecture. J Biomech. 1989;22(3):231–244. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90091-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart RT, Davy DT, Heiple KG. Mathematical modelling and numerical solutions for functionally dependent bone. Calc Tissue Int. 1984;36:11–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart RT, Davy DT. Theories of bone modelling and remodelling, in bone mechanics. (Ed Cowin SC) Boca Reton, FL, CRC Press 1989; 449–454.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Ghosh R. Bone remodelling around the tibia due to total ankle replacement: effects of implant material and implant–bone interfacial conditions. Comp Met in Biomech and Biomed Engg. 2019;22:1247–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouguecha A, Weigel N, Behrens BA, et al. Numerical simulation of strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the ankle joint. Biomed Engg Online. 2011;10(58):2–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rodrigues DSOS. Biomechanics of the total ankle arthroplasty: Stress analysis and bone remodelling [master of science thesis]. Tecnico Lisboa, Portugal; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Varghese B, Short D, Penmetsa R, et al. Computed-tomography-based finite-element models of long bones can accurately capture strain response to bending and torsion. J Biomech. 2011;44:1374–1379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh R, Mukharjee K, Gupta S. Bone remodelling around uncemented metallic and ceramic acetabular components. Proc IMechE Part H: J Eng in Med. 2013;227(5):490–502.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mondal S, Ghosh R. A numerical study on stress distribution across the ankle joint: effects of material distribution of bone, muscle force and ligaments. J Ortho. 2017;14:229–235.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Ghosh R. Influence of cancellous bone material and dead zone on stress-strain, bone stimulus and bone remodelling around the tibia for total ankle replacement. Proc IMechE Part H: J Eng in Med. 2021;235:185–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beumar A, Hemert WLV, Swierstra BA, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of the tibiofibular and tibiotalar ligaments of the ankle. Foot Ankle Inter. 2003;24:426–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza F, O'Connor JJ, Leardini A, et al. Ligament fibre recruitment and forces for the anterior drawer test at the human ankle joint. J Biomech. 2003;36(3):363–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekero VDMP, Raven EE. The distal fascicle of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament as a cause of tibiotalar impingement syndrome: a current concepts review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthro. 2007;15(4):465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liacouras PC, Wayne JS. Computational modelling to predict mechanical function of joints: application to the lower leg simulation of two cadaver studies. J Biomech Eng. 2007;129(6):811–817. doi:10.1115/1.2800763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Procter P, Paul JP. Ankle joint biomechanics. J Biomech. 1982;15(9):627–634. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(82)90017-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinans H, Huiskes R, van Rietbergen B, et al. Adaptive bone remodelling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: a comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation. J Orthop Res. 1993;11(4):500–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García JM, Doblaré M, Cegonino. Bone remodelling simulation: a tool for implant design. Comput Mater Sci. 2002;25:100–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talbott H, Jha S, Gulati A, et al. Clinically useful finite element models of the natural ankle – a review. Clin Biomech. 2023;106:106006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas MJ, Buechel FF. Failure modes of current total ankle replacement systems. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(2):123–143. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2012.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Ghosh R. Experimental and finite element investigation of total ankle replacement: a review of literature and recommendations. J Ortho. 2020;18:41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman SB, Gallo J. Periprosthetic osteolysis: mechanisms, prevention and treatment. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):2091. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angthong C, Chumchuen S, Khadsongkram A. A systematic review of intermediate-term outcomes and failure rates for total ankle replacements: an asian perspective. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(3):148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spirt AA, Assal M, Hansen ST.Jr Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86(6):1172–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Ghosh R, Jyoti. Biomechanical analysis of three popular tibial designs for TAR with different implant-bone interfacial conditions and bone qualities: a finite element study. Med Eng Phys. 2022;104:103812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Zhang C, Chen WM, et al. Finite-element analysis of the influence of tibial implant fixation design of total ankle replacement on bone–implant interfacial biomechanical performance. J Orthop Surg. 2020;28(3):2309499020966125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quevedo González FJ, Steineman BD, Sturnick DR, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty. Part II: influence of loading and fixation design on tibial bone-implant interaction. J Orthop Res. 2021;39(1):103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moideen ISM, Lim CT, Yeow RCH, et al. Finite element analysis of bone-prosthesis interface micromotion for cementless talar component fixation through critical loading conditions. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2020;36(3):e3310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotnis R, Pasapula C, Anwar F, et al. The management of failed ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88-B(8):1039–1047.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton-Maggs BG, Sudlow RA, Freeman MA. Total ankle arthroplasty. A long-term review of the london hospital experience. J Bone Jt Surg. 1985;67-B(5):785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd MIS, Lim CT, Yeow RCH, et al. Polka dot cementless talar component in enhancing total ankle replacement fixation: a parametric study using the finite element analysis approach. Comput Biol Med. 2022;141:105142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara BP, Taylor D, Prendergast PJ. Computer prediction of adaptive bone remodelling around noncemented femoral prostheses: the relationship between damage-based and strain-based algorithms. Med Eng Phys. 1997;19(5):454–463. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(97)00002-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrens BA, Nolte I, Wefstaedt P, et al. Numerical investigations on the strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the periprosthetic femur: influence of the boundary conditions. Biomed Eng Online. 2009;8(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1475-925X-8-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaupré GS, Orr TE, Carter DR. An approach for time-dependent bone modelling and remodelling-application: a preliminary remodelling simulation. J Orthop Res. 1990;8(5):662–670. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100080507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridez P, Terrier A, Rakotomanana L, et al. Three-|dimensional model of bone external adaptation. Comput Methd Biomech Biomed Eng. 1998;2:189–196.
   Google Scholar