Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: A survey of the last 25 years

References

• Ajiboye A B, Weir R F. A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005; 13: 280–291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins D, Heard D, Donovan W. Epidemiologic overview of individuals with upper-limb loss and their reported research priorities. J Prosthet Orthot 1996; 8: 2–11
   Google Scholar
• Ballance R, Wilson B N, Harder J A. Factors affecting myoelectric prosthetic use and wearing patterns in the juvenile unilateral below-elbow amputee. Can J Occup Ther 1989; 56: 132–137
   Google Scholar
• Berke G M, Nielsen C C. Establishing parameters affecting the use of myoelectric prostheses in children: A preliminary investigation. J Prosthet Orthot 1991; 3: 162–167
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskaranand K, Bhat A K, Acharya K N. Prosthetic rehabilitation in traumatic upper limb amputees (an Indian perspective). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003; 123: 363–366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branemark R, Branemark P-I, Rydevik B, Myers R R. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: A review. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 175–181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger H, Marincek C. Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia. Prosthet Orthot Int 1994; 18: 25–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell D G, Tsagarakis N. Biomimetic actuators in prosthetic and rehabilitation applications. Technol Health Care 2002; 10: 107–120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carpaneto J, Micera S, Zaccone F, Vecchi F, Dario P. A sensorized thumb for force closed-loop control of hand neuroprostheses. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003; 11: 346–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrozza M C, Suppo C, Sebastiani F, Massa B, Vecchi F, Lazzarini R, Cutkosky M R, Dario P. The SPRING hand: Development of a self-adaptive prosthesis for restoring natural grasping. Autonomous Robots 2004; 16: 125–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan A DC, Englehart K B (2003) Continuous classification of myoelectric signals for powered prostheses using Gaussian mixture models. Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, CancunMexico, September, 17 – 212003. IEEE, New York, 2841–2844
   Google Scholar
• Crandall R C, Tomhave W. Pediatric unilateral below-elbow amputees: Retrospective analysis of 34 patients given multiple prosthetic options. J Pediatr Orthop 2002; 22: 380–383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranny A, Cotton D PJ, Chappell P H, Beeby S P, White N M. Thick-film force and slip sensors for a prosthetic hand. Sens Actuators A Phys 2005; 123 – 124: 162–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupo M E, Sheredos S J. Clinical evaluation of a new, above-elbow, body-powered prosthetic arm: A final report. J Rehabil Res Develop 1998; 35: 431–446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalsey R, Gomez W, Seitz W H, Dick H M, Hutnick G, Akdeniz R. Myoelectric prosthetic replacement in the upper-extremity amputee. Orthop Rev 1989; 18: 697–702
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Datta D, Kingston J, Ronald J. Myoelectric prostheses for below-elbow amputees: The Trent experience. Int Disabil Stud 1989; 11: 167–170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency-acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 172–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson J. A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities. J Hand Ther 2002; 15: 62–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Laurentis K, Mavroidis C. Mechanical design of a shape memory alloy actuated prosthetic hand. Technol Health Care 2002; 10: 91–106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechev N, Cleghorn W L, Naumann S. Multiple finger, passive adaptive grasp prosthetic hand. Mech Mach Theory 2001; 36: 1157–1173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Cura V O, Cunha F L, Aguiar M L, Cliquet A. Study of the different types of actuators and mechanisms for upper limb prostheses. Artif Organs 2003; 27: 506–516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond D M, MacLachlan M. Factor structure of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 506–513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon G S, Horch K W. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005; 13: 468–472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos C ML, da Cunha F L, Dynnikov V I. The application of shape memory actuators in anthropomorphic upper limb prostheses. Artif Organs 2003; 27: 473–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 60–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durance J P, O'Shea B J. Upper limb amputees: A clinic profile. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 68–72
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fairley M. Form, function combine in new hand prosthesis. 2005, Available online at: http://www.oandp.com/edge/issues/articles/2005-11_05.asp (accessed 5 March 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez A, Isusi I, Gomez M. Factors conditioning the return to work of upper limb amputees in Asturias, Spain. Prosthet Orthot Int 2000; 24: 143–147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser C. A survey of users of upper limb prostheses. Br J Occup Ther 1993; 56: 166–168
   Google Scholar
• Fraser C M. An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1998; 22: 216–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaine W J, Smart C, Bransby-Zachary M. Upper limb traumatic amputees: Review of prosthetic use. J Hand Surg 1997; 22B: 73–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn M K, Galway H R, Hunter G, Sauter W F. Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device. Clin Orthop 1986; 209: 202–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow D J, Douglas W, Geggie C, Monteith E, Stewart D. The development of the Edinburgh modular arm system. J Eng Mech 2001; 215H: 291–298
   Google Scholar
• Hacking H GA, van den Berg J P, Dahmen K T, Post M WM. Long-term outcome of upper limb prosthetic use in the Netherlands. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 7: 179–181
   Google Scholar
• Hagberg K, Haggstrom E, Uden M, Branemark R. Socket versus bone-anchored trans-femoral prostheses: hip range of motion and sitting comfort. Prosthet Orthot Int 2005; 29: 153–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckathorne C W, Weir R F (2005) Evaluation of a prototype electric-powered partial-hand prosthesis. Proceedings of the MEC ’05 Integrating Medicine and Prosthetics, FrederictonCanada, August, 17 – 192005. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 137–138
   Google Scholar
• Herbert N, Simpson D, Spence W D, Ion W. A preliminary investigation into the development of 3-D printing of prosthetic sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 141–146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heger H, Millstein S, Hunter G A. Electrically powered prostheses for the adult with an upper limb amputation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67: 278–281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herberts P, Korner L, Caine K, Wensby L. Rehabilitation of unilateral below-elbow amputees with myoelectric prostheses. Scand J Rehabil Med 1980; 12: 123–128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hermansson L, Eliasson A C, Engstrom I. Psychosocial adjustment in Swedish children with upper-limb reduction deficiency and a myoelectric prosthetic hand. Acta Paediatr 2005; 94: 479–488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M E, Levy C E, Webster J B. Acquired limb deficiencies. 3. Prosthetic components, prescriptions, and indications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82(Suppl. 1)S17–S24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y H, Englehart K B, Hudgins B, Chan A DC. A Gaussian mixture model based classification scheme for myoelectric control of powered upper limb prostheses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005; 52: 1801–1811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard S, Kurtz I, Heim W, Montgomery G. Powered prosthetic intervention in upper extremity deficiency. The limb deficient child, J Herring, J A Birch. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Rosemont Ill 1997; 417–431
   Google Scholar
• Ivko J J. Independence through humeral rotation in the conventional transhumeral prosthetic design. J Prosthet Orthot 1999; 11: 20–22
   Google Scholar
• Kejlaa G H. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993; 17: 157–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadivi A, Nazarpou K, Zadeh H S (2005) SEMG classification for upper-limb prosthesis control using higher order statistics. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), PennsylvaniaUSA, March, 19 – 232005. IEEE, New York, V385–V388
   Google Scholar
• Kruger L M, Fishman S. Myoelectric and body-powered prostheses. J Pediatr Orthop 1993; 13: 68–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuiken T A, Dumanian G A, Lipschutz R D, Miller L A, Stubblefield K A. The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004; 28: 245–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyberd P, Davey J, Morrison J. A survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Oxfordshire. J Prosthet Orthot 1998; 10: 85–91
   Google Scholar
• Kyberd P J, Light C, Chappell P H, Nightingale J M, Whatley D, Evans M. The design of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: A study of the Southampton hand. Robotica 2001; 19: 593–600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake C, Miguelez J. Comparative analysis of microprocessors in upper limb prosthetics. J Prosthet Orthot 2003; 15: 48–63
   Google Scholar
• LeBlanc M. Use of prosthetic prehensors. Prosthet Orthot Int 1988; 12: 152–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow M E, Pho R WH, Pereira B P. Esthetic prostheses in minor and major upper limb amputations. Hand Clin 2001; 17: 489–497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light C M, Chappell P H. Development of a lightweight and adaptable multiple-axis hand prosthesis. Med Eng Phys 2000; 22: 679–684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGahey P, Mandacina S (2005) The difference a terminal device can make. Proceedings of the MEC ’05 Integrating Prosthetics and Medicine, FredrictonCanada, August, 17 – 192005. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredricton, 52–54
   Google Scholar
• Melendez D, Leblanc M. Survey of arm amputees not wearing prostheses: Implications for research and service. J Assoc Child Prosthet Orthot Clin 1988; 23: 62–69
   Google Scholar
• Mendez M A. Evaluation of a myoelectric hand prosthesis for children with a below-elbow absence. Prosthet Orthot Int 1985; 9: 137–140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld S R, Novotny M P, Schwartz M. Age-appropriateness of myoelectric prosthetic fitting. J Assoc Child Prosthet Orthot Clin 1987; 22: 60–65
   Google Scholar
• Millstein S G, Heger H, Hunter G A. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: A comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 1986; 10: 27–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa D, Yu W, Maruishi M, Watanabe I, Yokoi H, Mano Y, et al. On-line learning based electromyogram to forearm motion classifier with motor skill evaluation. JSME Int J Ser C 2000; 43: 906–915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northmore-Ball M D, Heger H, Hunter G A. The below-elbow myo-electric prosthesis: A comparison of the Otto Bock myo-electric prosthesis with the hook and functional hand. J Bone Joint Surg 1980; 62B: 363–367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet J, Didierjean-Pillet A. Aesthetic hand prosthesis: Gadget or therapy? Presentation of a new classification. J Hand Surg 2001; 26B: 523–528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzur M S, Angelats J, Light T R, Izuierdo R, Pluth T. Functional outcome following traumatic upper limb amputation and prosthetic limb fitting. J Hand Surg 1994; 19A: 836–839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plettenberg D H (2005) The Wilmer appealing prehensor. Proceedings of the MEC ’05 Integrating Prosthetics and Medicine, FrederictonCanada, August, 17 – 192005. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 139–142
   Google Scholar
• Pons J L, Rodriguez H, Luyckx I, Reynaerts D, Ceres R, Van Brussel H. High torque ultrasonic motors for hand prosthetics: Current status and trends. Technol Heath Care 2002; 10: 2
   Google Scholar
• Pons J L, Ceres R, Rocon E, Reynaerts D, Saro B, Levin S, Van Moorleghem W. Objectives and technological approach to the development of the multifunctional MANUS upper limb prosthesis. Robotica 2005; 23: 301–310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postema K, van der Donk V, van Limbeek J, Rijken R A, Poelma M J. Prosthesis rejection in children with a unilateral congenital arm defect. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 243–249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt S D, Varni J W, Seid M, Setoguchi Y. Prosthesis satisfaction outcome measurement in pediatric limb deficiency. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 750–754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylatiuk C, Kargov A, Oberle R, Klosek H, Schulz S (2005) Preliminary experience with hydraulically driven hand prostheses. Proceedings of the MEC ’05 Integrating Prosthetics and Medicine, FrederictonCanada, August, 17 – 192005. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 143–146
   Google Scholar
• Reid D, Fay A. Survey of juvenile hand amputees. J Assoc Child Prosthet Orthot Clin 1987; 22: 51–55
   Google Scholar
• Riso R R. Strategies for providing upper extremity amputees with tactile and hand position feedback – moving closer to the bionic arm. Technol Health Care 1999; 7: 401–409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Routhier F, Vincent C, Morissette M-J, Desaulniers L. Clinical results of an investigation of paediatric upper limb myoelectric prosthesis fitting at the Quebec Rehabilitation Institute. Prosthet Orthot Int 2001; 25: 119–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotland T R, Galway H R. A long-term review of children with congenital and acquired upper limb deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg 1983; 65B: 346–349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibelius F, Eriksson L, Holmberg H, Levinsson A, Lundborg G, Danielsen N, Schoenborg J, Balkenius C, Laurell T, Monteluis L. Classification of motor commands using a modified self-organising feature map. Med Eng Phys 2005a; 27: 403–413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibelius F C, Rosen B N, Lundborg G N. Refined myoelectric control in below-elbow amputees using artificial neural networks and a data glove. J Hand Surg 2005b; 30A: 780–789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaperman J, Landsberger S E, Setoguchi Y. Early upper limb prosthesis fitting: When and what do we fit?. J Prosthet Orthot 2003; 15: 11–17
   Google Scholar
• Silcox D H, Rooks M D, Vogel R R, Fleming L L. Myoelectric prostheses: Long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg 1993; 75A: 1781–1789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva J, Heim W, Chau T. A self-contained mechanomyography-driven externally powered prosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 2066–2070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sol A. Wilmer Passive Hand WHD-4 for Children 1 – 5 years. 1999, Available online at: http://mms.tudelft.nl/wilmer/whd4-1.htm (accessed 5 March 2006)
   Google Scholar
• Sol A. Wilmer Elbow Control. 1999, Available online at: http://mms.tudelft.nl/wilmer/wec.htm (accessed 2006 March 5)
   Google Scholar
• Stein R B, Walley M. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 243–247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturup J, Thyregod H C, Jensen J S, Retpen J B, Boberg G, Rasmussen E, Jensen S. Traumatic amputation of the upper limb: The use of body-powered prostheses and employment consequences. Prosthet Orthot Int 1988; 12: 50–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornby M A, Krebs D E. Bimanual skill development in pediatric below-elbow amputation: A multicenter, cross-sectional study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 697–702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost F J. A comparison of conventional and myoelectric below-elbow prosthetic use. ICIB 1983; 18(4)9–16
   Google Scholar
• Ullendahl J M (2005) Custom silicone sockets for myoelectric prostheses. Proceedings of the MEC ’05 Integrating Prosthetics and Medicine, FrederictonCanada, August, 17 – 192005. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 35–40
   Google Scholar
• van Lunteren A, van Lunteren-Gerritsen G H, Stassen H G, Zuithoff M J. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 1983; 7: 141–151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver S A, Lange L R, Vogts V M. Comparison of myoelectric and conventional prostheses for adolescent amputees. Am J Occup Ther 1988; 42: 87–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir R F, Grahn E G (2005) Powered humeral rotator for persons with shoulder disarticulation amputations. Proceedings of the MEC ’05 Integrating Medicine and Prosthetics, FrederictonCanada, August, 17 – 192005. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 15–17
   Google Scholar
• Weir R F, Troyk P R, DeMichele G, Lowery M, Kuiken T (2005) Implantable myoelectric sensors (IMES). Proceedings of the MEC ’05 Integrating Medicine and Prosthetics, FrederictonCanada, August, 17 – 192005. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, 93–97
   Google Scholar
• Williams T WI (2005) Controlling powered upper extremity prostheses now and in the future. Proceedings of the MEC ’05 Integrating Prosthetics and Medicine. August, 17 – 192005. Fredericton Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of New Brunswick, 56–61
   Google Scholar
• Wright T W, Hagen A D, Wood M B. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations. J Hand Surg 1995; 20A: 619–622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Pena Pitarch E, Abdel-Malek K, Patrick A, Lindkvist L. A multi-fingered hand prosthesis. Mech Mach Theory 2004; 39: 555–581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zecca M, Cappiello G, Sebastiani F, Roccella S, Vecchi F, Carrozza M C, Dario P. Experimental analysis of the proprioceptive and exteroceptive sensors of an underactuated prosthetic hand. Lect Notes Contr Inf 2004; 306: 233–242
   Google Scholar