645
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Footprints in the sky: using student track logs from a “bird's eye view” virtual field trip to enhance learning

, &
Pages 97-110 | Received 29 Oct 2013, Accepted 18 Nov 2014, Published online: 06 Feb 2015

References

  • ArnoldK. E., & PistilliM. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 267–270). Vancouver, BC: ACM.
  • BörnerK., & PenumarthyS. (2003). Social diffusion patterns in three-dimensional virtual worlds. Information Visualization, 2, 182–198.
  • BrodlieK., DykesJ., GillingsM., HaklayM., KitchinR., & KraakM. J. (2002). Geography in VR: Context. In P.Fisher & D.Unwin (Eds.), Virtual reality in geography (pp. 7–16). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • ChittaroL., & IeronuttiL. (2004). A visual tool for tracing users' behaviour in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces (pp. 40–47). New York: ACM.
  • CoultonP., BamfordW., CheverstK., & RashidO. (2008). 3D space-time visualization of player behaviour in pervasive location-based games. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2008, Article ID 192153. 10.1155/2008/192153.
  • DalgarnoB., & LeeM. J. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments?British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 10–32.
  • DordevicM. M., & WildS. C. (2012). Avatars and multi-student interactions in Google Earth-based virtual field experiences. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 492, 315–321.
  • DykesJ. (2002). Creating information-rich virtual environments with geo-referenced digital panoramic imagery. In P.Fisher & D.Unwin (Eds.), Virtual reality in geography (pp. 68–92). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • DykesJ., MooreK., & WoodJ. (1999). Virtual environments for student fieldwork using networked components. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13, 397–416.
  • EusdenJ. D., DuvallM., & BryantM. (2012). Google Earth mashup of the geology in the Presidential Range, New Hampshire: Linking real and virtual field trips for an introductory geology class. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 492, 355–366.
  • FergusonR. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4, 304–317. doi:10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816.
  • GibbsG., SimpsonC., & MacdonaldR. (2003, August). Improving student learning through changing assessment – A conceptual and practical framework. Paper presented at the meeting of European Association for Research into Learning and Instruction conference, Padova, Italy.
  • GillingsM. (2002). Virtual archaeologies and the hyper-real: Or, what does it mean to describe something as virtually-real? In P.Fisher & D.Unwin (Eds.), Virtual reality in geography (pp. 17–34). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Google. (2014). Google Earth system requirements [web page]. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/earth/answer/20701.
  • GranshawF. D., & Duggan-HaasD. (2012). Virtual fieldwork in geoscience teacher education: Issues, techniques, and models. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 492, 285–303.
  • JohnsonN. D., LangN. P., & ZophyK. T. (2011). Overcoming assessment problems in Google Earth-based assignments. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59, 99–105.
  • KraakM. J. (2002). Visual exploration of virtual environments. In P.Fisher & D.Unwin (Eds.), Virtual reality in geography (pp. 58–67). London: Taylor and Francis.
  • LangN. P., LangK. T., & CamodecaB. M. (2012). A geology-focused virtual field trip to Tenerife, Spain. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 492, 323–334.
  • MarshS. L. (2007). Using and evaluating HCI techniques in geovisualization: Applying standard and adapted methods in research and education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). City University, London, UK.
  • MaskallJ., & StokesA. (2008). Designing effective fieldwork for the environmental and natural sciences. Plymouth, UK: Higher Education Academy Subject Centre for Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences.
  • OdaJ., ThawonmasR., & ChenK. T. (2009). Comparison of user trajectories based on coordinate data and state transitions. In Intelligent information hiding and multimedia signal processing (2009). Fifth International Conference on IIH-MSP'09 (pp. 1134–1137). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
  • PriestnallG. (2009). Landscape visualization in fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(S1), 104–112.
  • SiemensG., & LongP. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46, 30–32.
  • SookhanaphibarnK., ThawonmasR., RinaldoF., & ChenK. T. (2011, May). Spatiotemporal analysis of circulation behaviors using Path and Residing Time displaY (PARTY). In Digital Media and Digital Content Management (DMDCM), 2011 workshop (pp. 284–291). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
  • SpicerJ. I., & StratfordJ. (2001). Student perceptions of a virtual field trip to replace a real field trip. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 345–354.
  • StainfieldJ., FisherP., FordB., & SolemM. (2000). International virtual field trips: A new direction?Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24, 255–262.
  • StumpfR. J., DouglassJ., & DornR. I. (2008). Learning desert geomorphology virtually versus in the field. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32, 387–399.
  • TrevesR. (2014a). Animated path map media [web page]. Retrieved from http://is.gd/PtTiXy.
  • TrevesR. (2014b). Paint spray calculator and instructions [web page]. Retrieved from http://goo.gl/kuKfau.
  • TrevesR., & BaileyJ. E. (2012). Best practices on how to design Google Earth tours for education. Google Earth and Virtual Visualizations in Geoscience Education and Research: Geological Society of America Special Paper, 492, 383–394.
  • WentzE. A., VenderJ. C., & BrewerC. A. (1999). An evaluation of teaching introductory geomorphology using computer-based tools. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 23, 167–179.
  • WoodJ. (2002). Visualizing the structure and scale dependency of landscapes. In P.Fisher & D.Unwin (Eds.), Virtual reality in geography (pp. 163–174). London: Taylor and Francis.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.