Enhancing field research methods with mobile survey technology

References

• Cloke, P., Cook, I., Crang, P., Goodwin, M., Painter, J., & Philo, C. (2004). Practicing human geography. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deitrick, S. (1999). The post industrial revitalization of Pittsburgh: Myths and evidence. Community Development Journal, 34, 4–12. doi:10.1093/cdj/34.1.4.
   Google Scholar
• DeLyser, D., & Sui, D. (2013). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative divide II: Inventive approaches to big data, mobile methods, and rhythmanalysis. Progress in Human Geography, 37, 293–305. doi:10.1177/0309132512444063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorsey, B. (2001). Linking theories of service-learning and undergraduate geography education. Journal of Geography, 100, 124–132. doi:10.1080/00221340108978428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, G. (2012). The edge of the island: Cultural ideology and neighbourhood identity at the gentrification frontier. Urban Studies, 49, 3579–3594. doi:10.1177/0042098012448549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, S. (2004). Experiential learning, spatial practice, and critical urban geographies. Journal of Geography, 103, 55–63. doi:10.1080/00221340408978576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, K., & O'Brien, J. (2010). Cartoblography: Experiments in using and organising the spatial context of micro-blogging. Transactions in GIS, 14, 5–23. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2010.01210.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. (2002). Survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• France, D., Whalley, W., & Mauchline, A. (2013). Using mobile devices to enhance undergraduate field research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 34, 38–42.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, M., & Rose-Redwood, R. (2014). Performativity, politics, and the production of social space. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gradeck, B. (2012). Who moves to Lawrenceville and why? Pittsburgh Economic Quarterly, March, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gwiasda, V., Taluc, N., & Popkin, S. (1997). Data collection in dangerous neighborhoods: Lessons from a survey of public housing residents in chicago. Evaluation Review, 21, 77–93. doi:10.1177/0193841X9702100105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrick, C. (2010). Lost in the field: Ensuring student learning in the ‘threatened’ geography fieldtrip. Area, 42, 108–116. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00892.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, M. (2009). The importance of direct experience: A philosophical defence of fieldwork in human geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33, 169–182. doi:10.1080/03098260802276698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Inglewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lohr, S. (2010). Sampling: Design and analysis. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lubove, R. (1994). Twentieth century Pittsburgh, Volume II: The post-steel era. Pittsburgh, PA: The University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students' use of digital technologies. Computing Education, 56, 429–440. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medzini, A., Meisher-Tal, H., & Sneh, Y. (2014). Use of mobile technologies as support tools for geography field trips. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 10.1080/10382046.2014.967514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, N. P., Ramsay, L., & Chauhan, V. (2012). Can a tablet device alter undergraduate science students' study behavior and use of technology? Advances in Physiology Education, 36, 97–107. doi:10.1152/advan.00104.2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, J. (2002). Power and the digital divide. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 159–165. doi:10.1023/A:1019983909305.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, K. (2005). The problems of utilizing “direct experience” in geography education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29, 293–309. doi:10.1080/03098260500130635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrats, part 1. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21, 305–320. doi:10.1191/030913297673302122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, K. E., Mauchline, A. L., Park, J. R., Whalley, W. B., & France, D. (2013). Enhancing fieldwork learning with technology: Practitioner's perspectives. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37, 399–415. doi:10.1080/03098265.2013.792042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, B., Middleton, A., & Nortcliffe, A. (2012). Considering the smartphone learner: Developing innovation to investigate the opportunities for students and their interest. Student Engagement and Experience Journal, 1(1), 1–15. doi:10.7190/seej.v1i1.38.
   Google Scholar