222
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Energy and water resource simulations for U.S. geography undergraduates

, &
Pages 40-55 | Received 11 Jun 2017, Accepted 02 Oct 2018, Published online: 05 Dec 2018

References

  • Baranowski, M. (2006). Single session simulations: The effectiveness of short congressional simulations in introductory American government classes. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1), 33–49.
  • Boot, W. R., Basak, C., Erickson, K. I., Neider, M., Simons, D. J., Fabiani, M., ... & Low, K. A. (2010). Transfer of skill engendered by complex task training under conditions of variable priority. Acta Psychologica, 135(3), 349–357.
  • Boyle, E. A., Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Gray, G., Earp, J., Ott, M., … Pereira, J. (2016). An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 94, 178–192.
  • Brown, S. W., & King, F. B. (2000). Constructivist pedagogy and how we learn: Educational psychology meets international studies. International Studies Perspectives, 1(3), 245–254.
  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • De Freitas, S., Rebolledo‐Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 69–85.
  • Delgado, M. R., Schotter, A., Ozbay, E. Y., & Phelps, E. A. (2008). Understanding overbidding: Using the neural circuitry of reward to design economic auctions. Science, 321(5897), 1849–1852.
  • Dellapenna, J. W. (2002). The law of water allocation in the southeastern states at the opening of the twenty-first century. University of Arkansaw Little Rock Law Review, 25, 9–87.
  • Engel, R. J., & Schutt, R. K. (2012). Chapter 6: Group experimental designs. In The practice of research in social work 3rd, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, pp.139-158.
  • Fliter, J. (2009). Incorporating a sophisticated supreme court simulation into an undergraduate constitutional law class. Journal of Political Science Education, 5(1), 12–26.
  • Getches, D. H. (2008). Water law in a nutshell. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
  • Gundala, R. R., & Singh, M. (2016). Role of simulations in student learning: A case study using marketing simulation. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 2(5), 1–14.
  • Hainey, T., Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., Wilson, A., & Razak, A. (2016). A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Computers & Education, 102, 202–223.
  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 99–107.
  • Horangic, A., Berry, K. A., & Wall, T. (2016). Influences on stakeholder participation in water negotiations: A case study from the Klamath Basin. Society & Natural Resources, 29(12), 1–15.
  • Howe, C. W. (2000). Protecting values in a water market setting: Improving water markets to increase economic efficiency and equity. Denver University Law Review, 3(2), 357–372.
  • Hsieh, S. W., Jang, Y. R., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, N. S. (2011). Effects of teaching and learning styles on students’ reflection levels for ubiquitous learning. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1194–1201.
  • Hung, W., Harpole, B. J., & Jonassen, D. H. (2003). Exploring the tensions of problem‐based learning: Insights from research. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 95, 13–23.
  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • King, D. L., Delfabbro, P. H., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). The role of structural characteristics in problematic video game play: An empirical study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9(3), 320–333.
  • Kirschner, F., Paas, F., Kirschner, P. A., & Janssen, J. (2011). Differential effects of problem-solving demands on individual and collaborative learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 587–599.
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-cased, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
  • Lant, C. L., Perez-Lapena, B., Xiong, W., Kraft, S. E., Kowalchuk, R., & Blair, M. (2016). Environmental systems simulations for carbon, energy, nitrogen, water, and watersheds: Design principles and pilot testing. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64, 115–124.
  • Lee, Y. H., & Malmendier, U. (2007). The bidder’s curse (No. w13699). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Lesh, R. A., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Madani, K., Pierce, T. W., & Mirchi, A. (2017). Serious games on environmental management. Sustainable Cities and Society, 29, 1–11.
  • McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
  • National Research Council. (2008). America’s energy future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 137–158.
  • Pawson, E., Fournier, E., Haigh, M., Muniz, O., Trafford, J., & Vajoczki, S. (2006). Problem-based learning in geography: Towards a critical assessment of its purposes, benefits and risks. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 30(1), 103–116.
  • Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 36–153.
  • Schnurr, M. A., De Santo, E. M., & Green, A. D. (2014). What do students learn from a role-play simulation of an international negotiation? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(3), 401–414.
  • Shellman, S., & Turan, K. (2006). Do simulations enhance student learning? An empirical evaluation of an IR simulation. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1), 19–32.
  • Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2012). Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 34(9), 1337–1370.
  • Spiro, R. J., & DeSchryver, M. T. (2009). Constructivism: When it’s the wrong idea and when it’s the only idea. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure? (pp. 106–123). 376. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Suits, B. (1990). The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Boston, MA: D.R. Godine.
  • Tietenberg, T. (2003). Environmental and natural resources economics (6th ed.), Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/
  • Ward, F. A., & Michelsen, A. (2002). The economic value of water in agriculture: Concepts and policy applications. Water Policy, 4, 423–446.
  • Yang, Y. T. C. (2012). Building virtual cities, inspiring intelligent citizens: Digital games for developing students’ problem solving and learning motivation. Computers & Education, 59(2), 365–377.
  • Yergin, D. (2011). The quest: Energy security and the remaking of the modern world. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
  • Young, R. A. (2005). Determining the economic value of water: Concepts and methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.