Augmenting the landscape scene: students as participatory evaluators of mobile geospatial technologies

References

• Adams, A., FitzGerald, E., & Priestnall, G. (2013). Of catwalk technologies and boundary creatures. ACM Transactions of Computer-Human Interaction, 20(3), 15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastopoulou, S., Sharples, M., Wright, M., Martin, H., Ainsworth, S., Benford, S., & O’Malley, C. (2008). Learning 21st century science in context with mobile technologies. The mLearn 2008 Conference: The bridge from text to context, Wolverhampton, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ardissono, L., Goy, A., Petrone, G., Segnan, M., & Torasso, P. (2002). Tailoring the recommendation of tourist information to heterogeneous user groups, hypermedia: openness, structural awareness, and adaptivity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2266/2002, 228–231.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, P. O. S. V., Lai-Chong Law, E., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J., & Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. 2010. User experience evaluation methods: Current state and development needs. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction: Extending boundaries (NordiCHI‘10), Reykjavik, Iceland, October 16–20 (pp. 521–530). New York, NY: ACM. DOI:10.1145/1868914.1868973
   Google Scholar
• Bartie, P. J., Mills, S., & Kingham, S. (2008). An egocentric urban viewshed: A method for landmark visibility mapping for pedestrian location based services. In A. A. D. Moore, I (Ed.), Geospatial Vision: New Dimensions in Cartography (pp. 61–85). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bettini, C., Brdiczka, O., Henricksen, K., Indulska, J., Nicklas, D., Ranganathan, A., & Riboni, D. (2010). A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 6, 161–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bower, M., Howe, C., McCredie, N., Robinson, A., & Grover, D. (2014). Augmented reality in education – Cases, places and potentials. Educational Media International, 51(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & A. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry (pp. 189–194). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B. A. T., & Perry, M. (2002). Of maps and guidebooks: Designing geographical technologies. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Technique (DIS2002), London, England.
   Google Scholar
• Bursztyn, N., Walker, A., Shelton, B., & Pederson, J. (2017). Increasing undergraduate interest to learn geoscience with GPS-based augmented reality field trips on students‘ own smartphones. GSA Today : a Publication of the Geological Society of America, 27(5), 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell, C., Saorín Pérez, J. L., & De la Torre Cantero, J. (2018). Teaching with AR as a tool for relief visualization: Usability and motivation study. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(1), 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., Koenemann-Belliveau, J., Rosson, M. B., & Singley, M. K. (1993). Critical incidents and critical themes in empirical usability evaluation. The HCI-93 Conference: People and Computers VIII (British Computer Society Conference Series), Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Carswell, J. D., Gardiner, K., & Yin, J. (2010). Mobile visibility querying for LBS. Transactions in GIS, 14(6), 791–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, P., Bruciatelli, L., Domingos, F., Jones, R. R., De Donatis, M., & Wilson, R. W. (2006). Digital geological mapping with tablet PC and PDA: A comparison. Computers & Geosciences, 32, 1682–1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clini, P., Frontoni, E., Quattrini, R., & Pierdicca, R. (2014). Augmented reality experience: From high-resolution acquisition to real time augmented contents. Advances in Multimedia, 2014, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, G. (2010). Geolearners: Location-based informal learning with mobile and social technologies. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(1), 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykes, J., Moore, K., & Wood, J. (1999). Virtual environments for student fieldwork using networked components. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 13(4), 397–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstathiou, I., Kyza, E. A., & Georgiou, Y. (2018). An inquirybased augmented reality mobile learning approach to fostering primary school students’ historical reasoning in non-formal settings. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(1), 22–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facer, K., Joiner, R., Stanton, D., Reid, J., Hull, R., & Kirk, D. (2004). Savannah: Mobile gaming and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 399–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, P. F. (1993). Algorithm and implementation uncertainty in viewshed analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 7(4), 331–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannigan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, M., Taibi, D., Seta, L., Arrigo, M., Fulantelli, G., Di Giuseppe, O., & Novara, G. (2007). Social knowledge building in a mobile learning environment. In R. Meersman, Z. Tari, & P. Herrero (Eds.), On the move to meaningful internet systems 2007: OTM 2007 workshops. OTM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 4805). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grün, C., Pröll, B., Werthner, H., & Retschitzegger, W. (2008). Assisting tourists on the move - An evaluation of mobile tourist guides. The 7th International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB ‘08), Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Hato, Y., Satake, S., Kanda, T., Imai, M., & Hagita, N. (2010). Pointing to space: Modeling of deictic interaction referring to regions. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Atlanta, GA (pp. 301–308). DOI:10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005266
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, G., Shi, Y., & Chu, H. (2011). A concept map approach to developing collaborative mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 778–789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Po-Han, W., Chi-Chang, C., & Nien-Ting, T. (2016). Effects of an augmented reality-based educational game on students‘ learning achievements and attitudes in real-world observations. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(8), 1895–1906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa, T., & Kastens, K. A. (2005). Why some students have trouble with maps and other spatial representations. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(2), 184–197.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali, S. S., Shiratuddin, M. F., & Wong, K. (2014). An overview of mobile augmented reality in higher education. International Journal on Recent Trends in Engineering and Technology, 11(1), 229–238.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, C., Priestnall, G., Polmear, G., & Li., J. (2008). Geo-contextualised visualisation for teaching and learning in the field. In The 2008 geographical information science research UK (GISRUK) conference. Manchester, UK: Manchester Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Kaasinen, E. (2003). User needs for location-aware mobile services. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7, 70–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., & Dede, C. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenteris, M., Gavalas, D., & Economou, D. (2010). Electronic mobile guides: A survey. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(1), 97–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kray, C., Baus, J., & Cheverst, K. (2005). A survey of map-based mobile guides. In A. Zipf (Ed.), Map-based mobile services – Theories, methods and implementations (pp. 197–216). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., & Longley, P. (2006). A test environment for location-based services applications. Transactions in GIS, 10(1), 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., & Willis, K. (2006). Modeling context aware interaction for wayfinding using mobile devices. The 8th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2006), Espoo, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, S. J., & Liu, Y. C. (2015). Integrating augmented reality technology to enhance children’s learning in marine education. Environmental Education Research, 21(4), 525–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, D. J. (2017). Digital nature: Are fieldtrips a thing of the past? Science, 358(6361), 298–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMorrow, J. (2005). Using a web-based resource to prepare students for fieldwork: Evaluating the dark peak virtual tour. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(2), 223–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek, S., Priestnall, G., & Goulding, J. (2013). Mobile capture of remote points of interest using line of sight modeling. Computers & Geosciences, 52, 334–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller-Jensen, L., & Egler Hansen, J. (2007). Towards a mobile tourist information system: Identifying zones of information relevance. The 10th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science 2007, Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain, D., & MacFarlane, A. (2007). Geographic information retrieval in a mobile environment: Evaluating the needs of individuals. Journal of Information Science, 33(5), 515–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascoe, J., Ryan, N., & Morse, D. (2000). Using while moving: hci issues in fieldwork environments. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(3), 417–437.
   Google Scholar
• Priestnall, G. (2009). Landscape visualization in fieldwork. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 33(1), 104–112.
   Google Scholar
• Priestnall, G., & Polmear, G. (2006). Landscape visualisation: From lab to field. The First International Workshop on Mobile Geospatial Augmented Reality, Banff, Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Pyo, S. (2005). Knowledge map for tourist destinations – Needs and implications. Tourism Management, 26, 583–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randell, C., Geelhoed, E., Dix, A., & Muller, H. (2006). Exploring the effects of target location size and position system accuracy on location based applications. Pervasive, LNCS, 3968.
   Google Scholar
• Raper, J. (2007). Geographic relevance. Journal of Documentation, 63(6), 836–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbacher, T. (2009). Geographic relevance in mobile services. The 2nd International Workshop on Location and the Web (LocWeb 2009), Boston, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., Price, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Fleck, R., Harris, E., Smith, H., & Weal, M. (2004). Ambient wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. The 2004 Conference on Interaction Design and Children: building a community (IDC 2004), College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Scaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F., & Davies, M. (1997). Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments. The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘97), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, K., & Klopfer, E. (2007). Augmented reality simulations on handheld computers. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 16(3), 371–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations‘ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley‘s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenton, S. P., Hull, R., Goddi, P. M., Reid, J. E., Clayton, B. J., Melamed, T. J., & Wee, S. (2007). Mediascapes: Context-Aware multimedia experiences. IEEE Multimedia, 14(3), 98–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wither, J., Tsai, Y.-T., & Azuma, R. (2011). Indirect augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 35, 810–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar