References
- Askins, K., & Pain, R. (2011). Contact zones: Participation, materiality, and the messiness of interaction. Environment and Planning. D, Society & Space, 29(5), 803–821. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11109
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
- Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago.
- Belfiore, E. (2004). Auditing culture : The subsidized cultural sector in the New Public Management. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630042000255808
- Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2007). Rethinking the Social Impacts of The Arts. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630701342741
- Bherer, L., Dufour, P., & Montambeault, F. (2016). ‘The participatory democracy turn: An introduction’. Journal of Civil SocietyTaylor & Francis, 12(3), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1216383
- Bishop, C. (2006, February). The social turn: Collaboration and its discontents. In Artforum (pp. 178–183).
- Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.
- Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
- Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (2010). Tackling wicked problems: Through the transdisciplinary imagination. Routledge.
- Carpentier, N. (2012). The concept of participation. If they have access and interact, do they really participate? Fronteiras – Estudos Midiáticos, 14(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.4013/fem.2012.142.10
- Castoriadis, C. (1975). The imaginary institution of society. MIT Press.
- Colls, R. (2012). BodiesTouchingBodies: Jenny Saville’s over-life-sized paintings and the ‘morpho-logics’ of fat, female bodies. Gender, Place and Culture, 19(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2011.573143
- Cooke, W., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new Tyranny? (W. Cooke & U. Kothari, Edited by). Zed Books.
- Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies, 26(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005
- Crouch, D. (2010). Flirting with space: Thinking landscape relationally. Cultural Geographies, 17(1), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474009349996
- De Leeuw, S., & Hawkins, H. (2017). Critical geographies and geography’s creative re/turn: Poetics and practices for new disciplinary spaces’. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1314947
- Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems: An essay in political inquiry. H. Holt and Company.
- Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2008). The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology. Science & Public Policy, 35(7), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X329086
- Felt, U., Fochler, M., Müller, A., & Strassnig, M. (2009). Unruly ethics: On the difficulties of a bottom-up approach to ethics in the field of genomics. Public Understanding of Science, 18(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662507079902
- Fraser, M. (2009). Facts, ethics and event. In C. Bruun Jensen & K. Rodje (Eds.), Deleuzian intersections in science, technology and anthropology (pp. 57–82). Bergahn Press.
- Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the Post-Normal Age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
- Ganuza, E., Baiocchi, G., & Summers, N. (2016). Conflicts and paradoxes in the rhetoric of participation. Journal of Civil Society, 12(3), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2016.1215981
- Goddard, J., Kempton, L., & Vallance, P. (2013). The civic university: Connecting the global and the local. In R. Cappello, A. Olechnicka, & G. Gorzelak (Eds.), Universities, cities and regions, loci for knowledge and innovation creation (pp. 43–63). Routledge.
- Gordon, G. J. (2018). ‘Environmental Personhood). Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 43(1), 49–91. https://doi.org/10.7916/cjel.v43i1.3742
- Haraway, D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, chthulucene. donna haraway in conversatino with martha kenney. In H. Davis & E. Turpin (Eds.), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies (pp. 255–270). Open Humanities Press.
- Haraway, D. J. (2016a). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.
- Haraway, D. J. (2016b). ‘Tentacular Thinking: Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Chthulucene’, E-Flux, (75), 1–17.
- Hawkins, H. (2012). Geography and art. An expanding field: Site, the body and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 37(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512442865
- Hawkins, H. (2014). For Creative Geographies: Geography, Visual Arts and the Making of Worlds. Routledge.
- Hawkins, H. (2015). Creative geographic methods: Composing, representing, intervening. Cultural Geographies, 22(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474015569995
- Hess, J. J., Malilay, J. N., & Parkinson, A. J. (2008). Climate change. the importance of place. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(5), 468–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.024
- Huizinga, J. (1950). Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Roy Publishers.
- Hulme, M. (2009). why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press.
- Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge.
- Irwin, A. (2006). The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the “new” scientific governance. Social Studies of Science, 36(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706053350
- Jackson, S. (2011). Social Works: performing art, supporting publics. Routledge.
- Kerr, A., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Tutton, S. (2006). Shifting subject positions experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science, 37(3), 385–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706068492
- Kester, G. H. (2004). Conversation pieces: community and communication in modern art. University of California Press.
- Kitchin, R. (2014). Engaging publics: Writing as praxis. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474012462535
- Knez, I. (2003a) ‘Climate: A nested structure in places’, in The 5th international conference on urban climate (ICUC-5). Lodz, Poland, pp. 65–68.
- Knez, I. (2003b) ‘Memories for climate and places’, in The 5th international conference on urban climate (ICUC-5). Lodz, Poland, pp. 69–72.
- Knez, I. (2005). Attachment and identity as related to a place and its perceived climate. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.03.003
- Last, A. (2014). Experimental Geographies’. Geography Compass, 12(6), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12011
- Leighninger, M. (2006). The next form of democracy: How expert rule is giving way to shared governance— And why politics will never be the sam. Vanderbilt University Press.
- Lind, M. (2007). The collaborative turn. In J. Billing, M. Lind, & L. Nilsson (Eds.), Taking the matter into common hands: On contemporary art and collaborative practices (pp. 15–31). Black Dog.
- Lindström, K., & Ståhl, A. (2016) ‘Becoming response-able stakeholders: Participatory design in times of uncertainties’, in Bossen, C. et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 14th participatory design conference: short papers, interactive exhibitions, workshops - volume 2 (PDC ’16), Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 41–44.
- Lukes, S. (1974). Power: A radical view. Macmillan.
- Marres, N. (2007). The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706077367
- Marston, S. A., & De Leeuw, S. (2013). Creativity and geography: Towards a politicized intervention. In Geographical review (Vol. 103, pp. III—XXVI). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12001
- Massey, D. (1991, June). A global sense of place. In Martin Jacques (Ed.), Marxism today (pp. 24–29).
- Massey, D. (2004). Geographies of responsibility. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 86(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2004.00150.x
- Mayblin, L., Valentine, G., Kossak, F., & Schneider, T. (2015). ‘Experimenting with spaces of encounter: Creative interventions to develop meaningful contact’, Geoforum. Elsevier Ltd, 63, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.010
- Mayblin, L., Valentine, G., & Andersson, J. (2016). In the contact zone: Engineering meaningful encounters across difference through an interfaith project. Geographical Journal, 182(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12128
- Mellor, A. (2019) “Putting wicked problems in their place: Interrogating the global through participatory art and infrastructuring” (PhD Thesis). Newcastle University. http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/4613
- Michael, M. (2012). “What are we busy doing?”: engaging the idiot. Science, Technology & Human Values, 37(5), 528–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911428624
- Mohan, G. (2007). Participatory development: From epistemological reversals to active citizenship. Geography Compass, 1(4), 779–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00038.x
- Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso.
- Parr, H. (2007). Collaborative film-making as process, method and text in mental health research. Cultural Geographies, 14(1), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474007072822
- Pollock, V. L., & Sharp, J. (2012). Real participation or the tyranny of participatory practice? public art and community involvement in the regeneration of the raploch, scotland. Urban Studies, 49(14), 3063–3079. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012439112
- Ramaley, J. A. (2014). The changing role of higher education: Learning to deal with wicked problems. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(3), 7–22. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&volume=18&publication_year=2014&pages=7-21&issue=3&author=J.+A.+Ramaley&title=The+Changing+Role+of+Higher+Education%3A+Learning+to+Deal+with+Wicked+Problems
- Ramaley, J. A. (2016). Global learning in a new era. Higher Learning Research Communications, 6(2), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v6i2.308
- Rittel, J., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. Rinehart and Winston.
- Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to los angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell.
- Stadler, J. (1995). Development, research and participation: Towards a critique of participatory rural appraisal method. Development Southern Africa, 12(6), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768359508439858
- Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
- Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governnace-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279869
- Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2007). Fear in paradise: The affective registers of the english lake district landscape re-visited. The Senses and Society, 2(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.2752/174589307X233576
- Urry, J. (2011). Climate change and society. Polity Press.
- Usher, M. (2013). Defending and transcending local identity through environmental discourse. Environmental Politics, 22(5), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.765685